Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in False Arrest Claims: Tanberg v. Sholtis

Affirmation of Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in False Arrest Claims: Tanberg v. Sholtis

Date: Mar 17, 2005
Affirmation of Probable Cause and Qualified Immunity in False Arrest Claims: Tanberg v. Sholtis Introduction In the case of Deena Tanberg and Valerie Ortega v. Officer Tom Sholtis, the United States...
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Prosecution: Health Net v. Jimenez and Freeman

Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Prosecution: Health Net v. Jimenez and Freeman

Date: Mar 12, 2005
Dismissal of Appeal for Lack of Prosecution: Health Net v. Jimenez and Freeman Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America, ex rel. Teresa Jimenez and William Freeman v. Health Net, Inc.,...
Blakely v. Price: Procedural Implications on Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Blakely v. Price: Procedural Implications on Federal Sentencing Guidelines

Date: Mar 9, 2005
Blakely v. Price: Procedural Implications on Federal Sentencing Guidelines Introduction The case of United States of America v. Joshua Price, Jr. (400 F.3d 844) adjudicated by the United States Court...
Good Faith Exception Denied: Tenth Circuit Upholds Suppression of Deficient Warrant

Good Faith Exception Denied: Tenth Circuit Upholds Suppression of Deficient Warrant

Date: Mar 2, 2005
Good Faith Exception Denied: Tenth Circuit Upholds Suppression of Deficient Warrant Introduction The case UNITED STATES of America v. Roberto Gonzales (399 F.3d 1225) adjudicated by the United States...
Tenth Circuit Requires Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments Within Insurance Window in Social Security Disability Cases

Tenth Circuit Requires Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments Within Insurance Window in Social Security Disability Cases

Date: Mar 2, 2005
Tenth Circuit Requires Comprehensive Evaluation of Mental Impairments Within Insurance Window in Social Security Disability Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Alvin A. Grogan v. Jo Anne B....
Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Force: Marquez v. City of Albuquerque

Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Force: Marquez v. City of Albuquerque

Date: Feb 26, 2005
Affirmation of Objective Reasonableness in Police Use of Force: Marquez v. City of Albuquerque Introduction The case of Marlo Marquez, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. The City of Albuquerque and Officer...
Denial of Pre-Parole Conditional Supervision Placement: Limits of § 1983 and Habeas Corpus Remedies

Denial of Pre-Parole Conditional Supervision Placement: Limits of § 1983 and Habeas Corpus Remedies

Date: Feb 24, 2005
Denial of Pre-Parole Conditional Supervision Placement: Limits of § 1983 and Habeas Corpus Remedies Introduction The case of John Kenneth Boutwell v. Frank Keating et al. revolves around Mr....
Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: An Analysis of BACA v. Da

Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: An Analysis of BACA v. Da

Date: Feb 17, 2005
Reinforcing First Amendment Protections in Public Employment: An Analysis of BACA v. Da Introduction BACA v. Da, 398 F.3d 1210 (10th Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case that underscores the judiciary's...
Strict Title VII Filing Deadlines Reinforced in Duncan v. Manager, Dept. of Safety, City and County of Denver

Strict Title VII Filing Deadlines Reinforced in Duncan v. Manager, Dept. of Safety, City and County of Denver

Date: Feb 16, 2005
Strict Title VII Filing Deadlines Reinforced in Duncan v. Manager, Dept. of Safety, City and County of Denver Introduction In the case of Cynthia Duncan v. Manager, Department of Safety, City and...
Derivative Works Licensing Requirements Affirmed: Palladium Music, Inc. v. EatSleepMusic, Inc.

Derivative Works Licensing Requirements Affirmed: Palladium Music, Inc. v. EatSleepMusic, Inc.

Date: Feb 15, 2005
Derivative Works Licensing Requirements Affirmed: Palladium Music, Inc. v. EatSleepMusic, Inc. Introduction The case of Palladium Music, Inc. vs. EatSleepMusic, Inc., and Tennessee Production Center,...
Enhancing Protections Against Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Under Title VII: Insights from Dick v. Phone Directories Company, Inc.

Enhancing Protections Against Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Under Title VII: Insights from Dick v. Phone Directories Company, Inc.

Date: Feb 12, 2005
Enhancing Protections Against Same-Sex Sexual Harassment Under Title VII: Insights from Dick v. Phone Directories Company, Inc. Introduction The case of Diane D. Dick v. Phone Directories Company,...
Reaffirmation of Daubert Gatekeeping and Evidence Admissibility Standards in Products Liability: Bitler v. White Rodgers

Reaffirmation of Daubert Gatekeeping and Evidence Admissibility Standards in Products Liability: Bitler v. White Rodgers

Date: Feb 10, 2005
Reaffirmation of Daubert Gatekeeping and Evidence Admissibility Standards in Products Liability: Bitler v. White Rodgers Introduction In the case of Fred D. Bitler, Peggy A. Bitler, Colorado...
Reaffirming the Necessity of Epidemiological Evidence for General Causation in Toxic Torts: Norris v. Baxter Healthcare

Reaffirming the Necessity of Epidemiological Evidence for General Causation in Toxic Torts: Norris v. Baxter Healthcare

Date: Feb 9, 2005
Reaffirming the Necessity of Epidemiological Evidence for General Causation in Toxic Torts: Norris v. Baxter Healthcare Introduction In the landmark case of Dee Norris v. Baxter Healthcare...
Enhancing FTCA Jurisprudence: Tenth Circuit on Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Enhancing FTCA Jurisprudence: Tenth Circuit on Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Date: Feb 4, 2005
Enhancing FTCA Jurisprudence: Tenth Circuit on Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Introduction The case of Kenneth Michael Trentadue, Estate v. Carmen Aguilar et al. (397 F.3d 840, 10th...
Tenth Circuit Enhances Hostile Work Environment Standards in Sexual Harassment Cases

Tenth Circuit Enhances Hostile Work Environment Standards in Sexual Harassment Cases

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Tenth Circuit Enhances Hostile Work Environment Standards in Sexual Harassment Cases Introduction The case of Maria Consuelo Chavez et al. v. State of New Mexico et al. adjudicated by the United...
Reasonable Suspicion and Statutory Interpretation: United States v. Tibbetts

Reasonable Suspicion and Statutory Interpretation: United States v. Tibbetts

Date: Feb 3, 2005
Reasonable Suspicion and Statutory Interpretation: United States v. Tibbetts Introduction In United States v. Jesse James Tibbetts, 396 F.3d 1132 (10th Cir. 2005), the United States Court of Appeals...
Willful Age Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Termination: Insights from Miller v. Eby Realty Group LLC

Willful Age Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Termination: Insights from Miller v. Eby Realty Group LLC

Date: Jan 26, 2005
Willful Age Discrimination and Pretext in Employment Termination: Insights from Miller v. Eby Realty Group LLC Introduction Miller v. Eby Realty Group LLC, 396 F.3d 1105 (10th Cir. 2005), presents a...
Reconciliation of Vocational Expert Testimony and DOT Requirements: Hackett v. Barnhart

Reconciliation of Vocational Expert Testimony and DOT Requirements: Hackett v. Barnhart

Date: Jan 25, 2005
Reconciliation of Vocational Expert Testimony and DOT Requirements: Hackett v. Barnhart Introduction Case: Elizabeth Hackett, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social...
Reaffirming AEDPA's Deferential Standards: Parker v. Scott (394 F.3d 1302) Analysis

Reaffirming AEDPA's Deferential Standards: Parker v. Scott (394 F.3d 1302) Analysis

Date: Jan 6, 2005
Reaffirming AEDPA's Deferential Standards: Parker v. Scott (394 F.3d 1302) Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Matthew Richard Parker v. H.N. "Sonny" Scott, decided on January 5, 2005, the...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Proper Standards for Rule 60(b) Post-Judgment Motions in Jennings v. Rivers

Tenth Circuit Establishes Proper Standards for Rule 60(b) Post-Judgment Motions in Jennings v. Rivers

Date: Jan 5, 2005
Tenth Circuit Establishes Proper Standards for Rule 60(b) Post-Judgment Motions in Jennings v. Rivers Introduction The case of Alison Jennings, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marcellus Rivers; Alvin Porter,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert