Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Independent 25% Attorney Fee Limits for Agency and Court Representation under 42 U.S.C. §406

Independent 25% Attorney Fee Limits for Agency and Court Representation under 42 U.S.C. §406

Date: May 8, 2008
Independent 25% Attorney Fee Limits for Agency and Court Representation under 42 U.S.C. §406 Introduction The case of Leola Wrenn, on behalf of Patricia Wrenn, deceased, v. Michael J. Astrue,...
Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in Federal Drug Cases: United States v. Muñoz-Nava

Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in Federal Drug Cases: United States v. Muñoz-Nava

Date: May 7, 2008
Affirmation of Sentencing Discretion in Federal Drug Cases: United States v. Muñoz-Nava Introduction United States of America v. Gonzalo Muñoz-Nava, 524 F.3d 1137 (10th Cir. 2008), presents a pivotal...
Strict Interpretation of Clearly Established Federal Law under AEDPA Limits Habeas Protection: Commentary on House v. Hatch

Strict Interpretation of Clearly Established Federal Law under AEDPA Limits Habeas Protection: Commentary on House v. Hatch

Date: May 7, 2008
Strict Interpretation of Clearly Established Federal Law under AEDPA Limits Habeas Protection: Commentary on House v. Hatch Introduction In the case of Gordon House v. Tim Hatch, the United States...
Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Claims: Price-Cornelison v. Brooks

Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Claims: Price-Cornelison v. Brooks

Date: May 3, 2008
Qualified Immunity in Equal Protection and Fourth Amendment Claims: Price-Cornelison v. Brooks Introduction In the landmark case of Dana L. Price-Cornelison v. Steve Brooks, adjudicated by the United...
10th Circuit Clarifies Standards for Strip Searches and Qualified Immunity

10th Circuit Clarifies Standards for Strip Searches and Qualified Immunity

Date: Apr 30, 2008
10th Circuit Clarifies Standards for Strip Searches and Qualified Immunity Introduction The case of Mercedes Archuleta v. Michelle Wagner (523 F.3d 1278, 10th Cir. 2008) addresses significant issues...
Defining Custodial Interrogation: Tenth Circuit's Guidance on Miranda Applicability in Police Encounters - United States v. Tamara Y. Jones

Defining Custodial Interrogation: Tenth Circuit's Guidance on Miranda Applicability in Police Encounters - United States v. Tamara Y. Jones

Date: Apr 24, 2008
Defining Custodial Interrogation: Tenth Circuit's Guidance on Miranda Applicability in Police Encounters - United States v. Tamara Y. Jones Introduction In United States v. Tamara Yvonne Jones, the...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Violation Claims: York v. City of Las Cruces

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Violation Claims: York v. City of Las Cruces

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force and First Amendment Violation Claims: York v. City of Las Cruces Introduction In James York; Jodie York, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. The City of Las...
Summary Judgment Affirmed in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Suit: Key Legal Standards Clarified in Hinds v. Sprint

Summary Judgment Affirmed in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Suit: Key Legal Standards Clarified in Hinds v. Sprint

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Summary Judgment Affirmed in Age Discrimination and Retaliation Suit: Key Legal Standards Clarified in Hinds v. Sprint Introduction The case of Albert Hinds v. Sprint/United Management Company and...
Clarifying Final Policymaker Authority and Qualified Immunity in Sexual Orientation Discrimination Claims: Milligan-Hitt v. Sheridan County School District

Clarifying Final Policymaker Authority and Qualified Immunity in Sexual Orientation Discrimination Claims: Milligan-Hitt v. Sheridan County School District

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Clarifying Final Policymaker Authority and Qualified Immunity in Sexual Orientation Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Kathleen Milligan-Hitt and Kathryn R. Roberts v. Board...
Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG

Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Equitable Tolling and Language Barriers in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Analysis of Ste v. YANG Introduction The case of Steve Yang v. Lou Archuleta addresses the critical issue of whether...
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases

Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases

Date: Apr 23, 2008
Discretionary Function Exception Upholds Sovereign Immunity in Federal Employment Termination Cases Introduction In the case of Brian Sydnes and Tom LaBrecque v. United States of America (523 F.3d...
Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act

Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Comprehensive Commentary on Stokes v. Astrue: Evaluating Disability Claims under the Social Security Act Introduction The case of Mary D. Stokes v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security...
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis

Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Qualified Immunity and Supervisory Liability in Fogarty v. Gallegos: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of John D. Fogarty v. Gilbert Gallegos et al. (523 F.3d 1147) presents significant...
Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim

Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim

Date: Apr 19, 2008
Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery: Upholding Summary Judgment in Title VII Race Discrimination Claim Introduction In the case of Donald A. Sydney v. ConMed Electrical Surgery, the United States...
Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon

Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon

Date: Apr 17, 2008
Equitable Tolling in Federal Prison Litigation: Insights from United States v. Frank Gabaldon 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Frank Gabaldon, adjudicated by the United States...
Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue

Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue

Date: Apr 15, 2008
Obligation to Supplement Evidence in Disability Claims: Maes v. Astrue Introduction In Martha A. Maes v. Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner, Social Security Administration, 522 F.3d 1093 (10th Cir....
SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch

SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch

Date: Apr 8, 2008
SLUSA Preemption in State Law Securities Class Actions: Insights from Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch Introduction The case of Anderson et al. v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith, Inc. (No....
Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency

Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency

Date: Apr 5, 2008
Establishing Article III Standing in Civil Forfeiture: Insights from United States v. $148,840.00 in U.S. Currency Introduction The case of United States of America v. $148,840.00 in United States...
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board

Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board

Date: Apr 2, 2008
Affirmation of Absolute Immunity for Disciplinary Officials in Stein v. Disciplinary Board Introduction Stuart L. Stein and The Stein Law Firm (collectively referred to as the Plaintiffs-Appellants)...
Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation

Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation

Date: Apr 2, 2008
Establishing the Scope of Statute of Limitations for Hostile Work Environment Claims under Title VII and §1981: Insights from Ranee Tademy v. Union Pacific Corporation Introduction The case of Ranee...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert