Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

vesting-of-trusts-at-death:-insights-from-waters& Case Commentaries

Judicial Finality and the Limits of Inherent Jurisdiction: Reaffirming the Principle of Finality in High Court Judgments

Judicial Finality and the Limits of Inherent Jurisdiction: Reaffirming the Principle of Finality in High Court Judgments

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Judicial Finality and the Limits of Inherent Jurisdiction: Reaffirming the Principle of Finality in High Court Judgments Introduction The case of Pepper Finance Corporation [Ireland] Designated...
Clarifying the Identification of Specific Reasons in Multi-Site Zoning Decisions: Insights from Ballindooley Developments v Minister for Housing

Clarifying the Identification of Specific Reasons in Multi-Site Zoning Decisions: Insights from Ballindooley Developments v Minister for Housing

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Clarifying the Identification of Specific Reasons in Multi-Site Zoning Decisions: Insights from Ballindooley Developments v Minister for Housing Introduction The case of Ballindooley Developments Ltd...
Clarifying Tribunal Findings in Discovery: A Precedent on Judicial Correction and Balancing Public Interests

Clarifying Tribunal Findings in Discovery: A Precedent on Judicial Correction and Balancing Public Interests

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Clarifying Tribunal Findings in Discovery: A Precedent on Judicial Correction and Balancing Public Interests Introduction The High Court of Ireland, in the case of Persona Digital Telephony Ltd &...
R v Hayes & Mack – Clarifying “Grave Injury” and Foreseeable Harm in Section 20 Sentencing

R v Hayes & Mack – Clarifying “Grave Injury” and Foreseeable Harm in Section 20 Sentencing

Date: Feb 21, 2025
R v Hayes & Mack – Clarifying “Grave Injury” and Foreseeable Harm in Section 20 Sentencing 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) in R v Hayes & Anor ([2025] EWCA Crim 750) revisited...
Balancing Child Welfare and Sentencing Severity: The New Test for Suspending High-Culpability Child-Cruelty Sentences – Commentary on BJR & AFW [2025] EWCA Crim 217

Balancing Child Welfare and Sentencing Severity: The New Test for Suspending High-Culpability Child-Cruelty Sentences – Commentary on BJR & AFW [2025] EWCA Crim 217

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Balancing Child Welfare and Sentencing Severity: The New Test for Suspending High-Culpability Child-Cruelty Sentences – Commentary on BJR & AFW [2025] EWCA Crim 217 1. Introduction The Court of...
Smith, R. v. [2025] EWCA Crim 221: Establishing Proportionality and Discretion in Sentencing for Persistent Offending

Smith, R. v. [2025] EWCA Crim 221: Establishing Proportionality and Discretion in Sentencing for Persistent Offending

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Smith, R. v. [2025] EWCA Crim 221: Establishing Proportionality and Discretion in Sentencing for Persistent Offending Introduction The case of Smith, R. v. [2025] EWCA Crim 221 involves an appeal by...
“From Caution to Defamation: When Professional-Negligence Advice Is NOT Defamatory” – Analysis of O'Connor v. Legal Aid Board & Ors. [2025] IECA 39

“From Caution to Defamation: When Professional-Negligence Advice Is NOT Defamatory” – Analysis of O'Connor v. Legal Aid Board & Ors. [2025] IECA 39

Date: Feb 21, 2025
“From Caution to Defamation: When Professional-Negligence Advice Is NOT Defamatory” Commentary on O'Connor v. Legal Aid Board & Ors. [2025] IECA 39 1. Introduction O'Connor v. Legal Aid Board & Ors....
The Rump Funds Conundrum: Lodgment of Unapplied or Undistributable Balances under s.623 of the Companies Act 2014

The Rump Funds Conundrum: Lodgment of Unapplied or Undistributable Balances under s.623 of the Companies Act 2014

Date: Feb 21, 2025
The Rump Funds Conundrum: Lodgment of Unapplied or Undistributable Balances under s.623 of the Companies Act 2014 Introduction This commentary examines the landmark judgment delivered by Mr. Justice...
Balancing Deference and Proportionality in Regulatory Sanctions: RS v Health and Social Care Professionals Council

Balancing Deference and Proportionality in Regulatory Sanctions: RS v Health and Social Care Professionals Council

Date: Feb 21, 2025
Balancing Deference and Proportionality in Regulatory Sanctions: RS v Health and Social Care Professionals Council Introduction RS v Health and Social Care Professionals Council [2025] IEHC 267 is a...
“Deliberate Absence from Trial” Clarified: New Guidance on Extradition under Section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003

“Deliberate Absence from Trial” Clarified: New Guidance on Extradition under Section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Deliberate Absence from Trial Clarified: New Guidance on Extradition under Section 20 of the Extradition Act 2003 Introduction This case, Karczewski v The Lord Advocate (representing the Republic of...
Clarified Fiduciary Standards in Quasi-Partnerships: Davidson & Others v Pinz Bowling Ltd & Others ([2025] CSIH 6)

Clarified Fiduciary Standards in Quasi-Partnerships: Davidson & Others v Pinz Bowling Ltd & Others ([2025] CSIH 6)

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Clarified Fiduciary Standards in Quasi-Partnerships: Davidson & Others v Pinz Bowling Ltd & Others ([2025] CSIH 6) 1. Introduction The reclaimer proceedings in Davidson & Others v Pinz Bowling Ltd &...
Affirming the Parole Board’s Discretion to Disregard Withheld Damaging Information

Affirming the Parole Board’s Discretion to Disregard Withheld Damaging Information

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Affirming the Parole Board’s Discretion to Disregard Withheld Damaging Information 1. Introduction In Petition of Luke Mitchell for Judicial Review (Court of Session) ([2025] CSOH 19), the Scottish...
Clarifying the Limits of Article 4 Obligations in School Exclusions

Clarifying the Limits of Article 4 Obligations in School Exclusions

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Article 4 Obligations in School Exclusions 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in RWU, R (on the application of) v The Governing Body of A...
When “Wholly Enforceable” Means Waiver of Immunity: A New Principle in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Against States

When “Wholly Enforceable” Means Waiver of Immunity: A New Principle in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Against States

Date: Feb 20, 2025
When “Wholly Enforceable” Means Waiver of Immunity: A New Principle in Enforcing Arbitration Awards Against States 1. Introduction The case of General Dynamics United Kingdom Ltd v The State of Libya...
Excluding Declaratory Judgments from the Doctrine of Merger: Nasir v Zavarco Plc ([2025] UKSC 5)

Excluding Declaratory Judgments from the Doctrine of Merger: Nasir v Zavarco Plc ([2025] UKSC 5)

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Excluding Declaratory Judgments from the Doctrine of Merger: Nasir v Zavarco Plc ([2025] UKSC 5) 1. Introduction In Nasir v Zavarco Plc ([2025] UKSC 5), the United Kingdom Supreme Court confronted...
Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Section 423 IA 1986: Debtor Need Not Directly Own the Transferred Asset

Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Section 423 IA 1986: Debtor Need Not Directly Own the Transferred Asset

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Supreme Court Broadens Scope of Section 423 IA 1986: Debtor Need Not Directly Own the Transferred Asset Introduction In El-Husseiny & Anor v Invest Bank PSC ([2025] UKSC 4), the United Kingdom...
Ensuring Rigorous Standards in Sexual Offence Trials: Juror Competence and Evidentiary Precision in Rycroft’s Appeal

Ensuring Rigorous Standards in Sexual Offence Trials: Juror Competence and Evidentiary Precision in Rycroft’s Appeal

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Ensuring Rigorous Standards in Sexual Offence Trials: Juror Competence and Evidentiary Precision in Rycroft’s Appeal Introduction The case of Rycroft, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 231) brought forth in the...
A New Precedent on Protecting the Rights of Vulnerable Patients in Transfer Applications

A New Precedent on Protecting the Rights of Vulnerable Patients in Transfer Applications

Date: Feb 20, 2025
A New Precedent on Protecting the Rights of Vulnerable Patients in Transfer Applications Introduction The judgment in In the Matter of [A], and In the Matter of the Inherent Jurisdiction of the High...
Defining the Moment of Criminality: The Dawn of a New Precedent in Fraud-Related Money Laundering

Defining the Moment of Criminality: The Dawn of a New Precedent in Fraud-Related Money Laundering

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Defining the Moment of Criminality: The Dawn of a New Precedent in Fraud-Related Money Laundering Introduction The Judgment in Kamran, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 247) represents an important evolution in...
Mushtaq v Minister for Justice: Clarifying Fair Procedures and Evidentiary Requirements in Visa Decisions

Mushtaq v Minister for Justice: Clarifying Fair Procedures and Evidentiary Requirements in Visa Decisions

Date: Feb 20, 2025
Mushtaq v Minister for Justice: Clarifying Fair Procedures and Evidentiary Requirements in Visa Decisions Introduction The judgment in Mushtaq v Minister for Justice ([2025] IEHC 102) represents a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert