Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

sienkiewicz-v-greif-(uk)-ltd:-upholding-the-fairchild-barker-exception-and-rejecting-the-& Case Commentaries

“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule: Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364

“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule: Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364

Date: Jun 27, 2025
“The Everyday Mishap” Doctrine & the Precision-in-Pleadings Rule Commentary on Lawless v Keatley [2025] IEHC 364 1. Introduction Lawless v Keatley is a High Court appeal from the Circuit Court in...
High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377

High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377

Date: Jun 27, 2025
High Court Discretion to Admit Fresh Evidence on Section 37 Appeals – Comment on S v E [2025] IEHC 377 1. Introduction Parties: The wife (S) as applicant/respondent in the Circuit Court and appellant...

    Immediate Custody Without Explicit Reference to the Imposition Guideline:
    Commentary on R v Saleh & Hussain [2025] EWCA Crim 1025

Immediate Custody Without Explicit Reference to the Imposition Guideline: Commentary on R v Saleh & Hussain [2025] EWCA Crim 1025

Date: Jun 27, 2025
Immediate Custody Without Explicit Reference to the Imposition Guideline: Commentary on R v Saleh & Hussain [2025] EWCA Crim 1025 Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), in R v Saleh &...
“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v DPP and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated

“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v DPP and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated

Date: Jun 26, 2025
“Frivolity Re-Defined” – Ward v Director of Public Prosecutions [2025] IEHC 355 and the New Low Threshold for Mandamus to Compel a Case Stated 1. Introduction Ward v DPP is the latest High Court...
Cowie v Vitality: A Scottish Blueprint for the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012

Cowie v Vitality: A Scottish Blueprint for the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Cowie v Vitality: A Scottish Blueprint for the Consumer Insurance (Disclosure and Representations) Act 2012 1. Introduction The decision of Lord Sandison in Gillian Cowie (as Executrix-Dative of the...
The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement

The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement

Date: Jun 26, 2025
The Engagement-Duty Costs Rule: P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor and the Proportional Reduction of Costs for Inadequate Pre-Litigation Engagement 1. Introduction P.K. v V.O.S. & Anor ([2025] IEHC 354) is a High...
Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions –  Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345)

Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions – Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345)

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Section 160 Injunctions Cannot Be Used to Collaterally Attack Planning Permissions – Malone v Laois County Council & Ors ([2025] IEHC 345) 1. Introduction In Malone & McEvoy v Laois County Council,...
Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992

Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992

Date: Jun 26, 2025
Keane v. Clerk of the Dáil – Clarifying Who May Inspect “Sealed” Election Materials under ss.129-130 of the Electoral Act 1992 High Court of Ireland – Ms. Justice Emily Egan – 19 June 2025 – [2025]...
No Automatic Stay of Civil Contempt for Parallel Criminal Charges – The Turner v Coates Doctrine

No Automatic Stay of Civil Contempt for Parallel Criminal Charges – The Turner v Coates Doctrine

Date: Jun 26, 2025
No Automatic Stay of Civil Contempt for Parallel Criminal Charges – The Turner v Coates Doctrine 1. Introduction Case: Turner & Anor v Coates [2025] EWCA Civ 782 Court: England and Wales Court of...
The “Huisman Principle” – Humanitarian UK Nationals with an Automatic Right of Abode Are Not “Excepted Students” for Scottish Tuition-Fee Purposes

The “Huisman Principle” – Humanitarian UK Nationals with an Automatic Right of Abode Are Not “Excepted Students” for Scottish Tuition-Fee Purposes

Date: Jun 26, 2025
The “Huisman Principle” – Humanitarian UK Nationals with an Automatic Right of Abode Are Not “Excepted Students” for Scottish Tuition-Fee Purposes 1. Introduction In Petition of Leo Huisman for...
Extending Statutory Minimum Sentences to Firearm-Related Conspiracies: Commentary on R v Singh & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 785

Extending Statutory Minimum Sentences to Firearm-Related Conspiracies: Commentary on R v Singh & Ors [2025] EWCA Crim 785

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Extending Statutory Minimum Sentences to Firearm-Related Conspiracies: A Detailed Commentary on R v Singh & Others [2025] EWCA Crim 785 Introduction In R v Singh & Ors, the Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Early Termination Rights and the Modern Meaning of “Financial Institution” in Aircraft JOLCO Structures – Commentary on VietJet Aviation Joint Stock Company v FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 783

Early Termination Rights and the Modern Meaning of “Financial Institution” in Aircraft JOLCO Structures – Commentary on VietJet Aviation Joint Stock Company v FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 783

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Early Termination Rights and the Modern Meaning of “Financial Institution” in Aircraft JOLCO Structures – Commentary on VietJet Aviation JSC v FW Aviation (Holdings) 1 Ltd ([2025] EWCA Civ 783) 1....
From Portal to Courtroom: The Court of Appeal Confirms Case-Management Jurisdiction over Pre-Action Protocol Compliance once Protective Part 8 Proceedings are Issued – Commentary on MH Site Maintenance Services Ltd & Anor v Watson [2025] EWCA Civ 775

From Portal to Courtroom: The Court of Appeal Confirms Case-Management Jurisdiction over Pre-Action Protocol Compliance once Protective Part 8 Proceedings are Issued – Commentary on MH Site Maintenance Services Ltd & Anor v Watson [2025] EWCA Civ 775

Date: Jun 25, 2025
From Portal to Courtroom: The Court of Appeal Confirms Case-Management Jurisdiction over Pre-Action Protocol Compliance once Protective Part 8 Proceedings are Issued – Commentary on MH Site...
Clark v Elbanna: Clarifying the Overlap of Recklessness and Negligence in Contact-Sport Injuries

Clark v Elbanna: Clarifying the Overlap of Recklessness and Negligence in Contact-Sport Injuries

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Clark v Elbanna: Clarifying the Overlap of Recklessness and Negligence in Contact-Sport Injuries 1. Introduction In Clark v Elbanna ([2025] EWCA Civ 776) the Court of Appeal was asked to revisit the...
The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 356LA(3) CTA 2010 in Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd

The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Supreme Court Clarifies Section 356LA(3) CTA 2010 in Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd

Date: Jun 25, 2025
The “Arising-From” Test for Incidental Use: Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd ([2025] UKSC 24) Introduction In Revenue and Customs v Dolphin Drilling Ltd the United Kingdom Supreme Court...
“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion – Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc & Anor [2025] UKSC 25

“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion – Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc & Anor [2025] UKSC 25

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Looking Beyond the Checkout”: The Supreme Court Affirms Post-Sale Context as a Stand-Alone Source of Trade-Mark Confusion Commentary on Iconix Luxembourg Holdings SARL v Dream Pairs Europe Inc &...

        Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges Introduction In Bord na Móna Biomass...
“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902)

“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: The Court of Appeal Clarifies Prosecution and Defence Duties in Child-Sex Cases – A Commentary on BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902) Introduction In BTC, R. v...
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 1. Introduction The High Court’s decision in...
Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights

Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights 1. Introduction In Mahmud v Minister for Justice ([2025] IEHC 356) the High Court (O’Donnell J.)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert