Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

proportionality-in-deportation-cases-under-article-8-echr:-upper-tribunal& Case Commentaries

K4S Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014: Upholding Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Transactions

K4S Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014: Upholding Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Transactions

Date: Apr 26, 2023
K4S Real Estate Ltd v Companies Act 2014: Upholding Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Transactions Introduction The case of K4S Real Estate Ltd (In Liquidation) v Companies Act 2014 (Approved) ([2023]...
Exclusion of Non-Party Claims from Arbitration: Bogside Investments Ltd v Christopher Linford Shute and Graeme Paterson [2023]

Exclusion of Non-Party Claims from Arbitration: Bogside Investments Ltd v Christopher Linford Shute and Graeme Paterson [2023]

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Exclusion of Non-Party Claims from Arbitration: Bogside Investments Ltd v Christopher Linford Shute and Graeme Paterson [2023] Introduction In Bogside Investments Ltd v Christopher Linford Shute and...
Clarification on Extended Sentencing Criteria and Restraining Order Specifications in McMahon v R [2023] EWCA Crim 598

Clarification on Extended Sentencing Criteria and Restraining Order Specifications in McMahon v R [2023] EWCA Crim 598

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Clarification on Extended Sentencing Criteria and Restraining Order Specifications in McMahon v R [2023] EWCA Crim 598 Introduction The case of McMahon, R. v ([2023] EWCA Crim 598) presents a pivotal...
Determining Administrators' Remuneration: Scottish Court of Session Clarifies Process and Locus

Determining Administrators' Remuneration: Scottish Court of Session Clarifies Process and Locus

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Determining Administrators' Remuneration: Scottish Court of Session Clarifies Process and Locus Introduction The case of Blair Carnegie Nimmo and Alistair McAlinden ([2023] CSOH 27) before the...
Strict Enforcement of Costs Orders to Prevent Abuse of Process: Commentary on Browne & Ors v An Taoiseach & Ors [2023] IEHC 205

Strict Enforcement of Costs Orders to Prevent Abuse of Process: Commentary on Browne & Ors v An Taoiseach & Ors [2023] IEHC 205

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Strict Enforcement of Costs Orders to Prevent Abuse of Process: Commentary on Browne & Ors v An Taoiseach & Ors [2023] IEHC 205 Introduction The High Court of Ireland delivered a significant judgment...
Reaffirmation of Proper Juror Conduct and Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeframes in Rotaru v [2023] EWCA Crim 496

Reaffirmation of Proper Juror Conduct and Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeframes in Rotaru v [2023] EWCA Crim 496

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Reaffirmation of Proper Juror Conduct and Strict Adherence to Appeal Timeframes in Rotaru v [2023] EWCA Crim 496 Introduction The case of Rotaru, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 496 before the England and...
R v Monk [2023] EWCA Crim 518: Upholding Custodial Sentences in Cases of Unremorseful Aggression and Public Safety Risks

R v Monk [2023] EWCA Crim 518: Upholding Custodial Sentences in Cases of Unremorseful Aggression and Public Safety Risks

Date: Apr 26, 2023
R v Monk [2023] EWCA Crim 518: Upholding Custodial Sentences in Cases of Unremorseful Aggression and Public Safety Risks Introduction The case of R v Monk [2023] EWCA Crim 518 presents a significant...
Enhancing Sentencing Consistency in Drug Offenses: Nazir v ([2023] EWCA Crim 524)

Enhancing Sentencing Consistency in Drug Offenses: Nazir v ([2023] EWCA Crim 524)

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Enhancing Sentencing Consistency in Drug Offenses: Nazir v ([2023] EWCA Crim 524) Introduction The case of Subhaan Nazir v [2023] EWCA Crim 524 represents a pivotal moment in the jurisprudence...
Comprehensive Commentary on Minister for Justice & Equality v TD (Aka TO'R) [2023] IEHC 397

Comprehensive Commentary on Minister for Justice & Equality v TD (Aka TO'R) [2023] IEHC 397

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Minister for Justice & Equality v TD (Aka TO'R) [2023] IEHC 397: Establishing Surrender Protocols under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement Introduction The case of Minister for Justice & Equality v...
Crumlish v Health Service Executive: Upholding the 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Medical Negligence Claims

Crumlish v Health Service Executive: Upholding the 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Medical Negligence Claims

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Crumlish v Health Service Executive: Upholding the 'Costs Follow the Event' Principle in Medical Negligence Claims Introduction Crumlish v Health Service Executive ([2023] IEHC 202) is a pivotal...
Defining 'Constructive Custody' for Habeas Corpus: Insights from C3 & Anor v Secretary of State [2023] EWCA Civ 444

Defining 'Constructive Custody' for Habeas Corpus: Insights from C3 & Anor v Secretary of State [2023] EWCA Civ 444

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Defining 'Constructive Custody' for Habeas Corpus: Insights from C3 & Anor v The Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Affairs [2023] EWCA Civ 444 Introduction The case C3 & Anor...
Clarifying Standards for Dishonesty and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Floreat Investment Management Ltd v Churchill & Ors

Clarifying Standards for Dishonesty and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Floreat Investment Management Ltd v Churchill & Ors

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Clarifying Standards for Dishonesty and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Floreat Investment Management Ltd v Churchill & Ors Introduction In the landmark case of Floreat Investment Management Ltd v...
Sufficiency of Fraud Claims and Arbitration Clause Application in Commercial Litigation: Leandor Advisors v Bogside Investments

Sufficiency of Fraud Claims and Arbitration Clause Application in Commercial Litigation: Leandor Advisors v Bogside Investments

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Sufficiency of Fraud Claims and Arbitration Clause Application in Commercial Litigation: Leandor Advisors v Bogside Investments Introduction The case of Leander CB Consultants Ltd t/a Leandor...
Kodaolu & Anor v R: Affirming Judicial Discretion in Applying Sentencing Guidelines for Conspirators in Robbery

Kodaolu & Anor v R: Affirming Judicial Discretion in Applying Sentencing Guidelines for Conspirators in Robbery

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Kodaolu & Anor v R: Affirming Judicial Discretion in Applying Sentencing Guidelines for Conspirators in Robbery Introduction The case of Kodaolu & Anor v R ([2023] EWCA Crim 525) presents a pivotal...
Objective Justification for Differential Treatment in Domestic Violence Concession Applications Based on Immigration Status

Objective Justification for Differential Treatment in Domestic Violence Concession Applications Based on Immigration Status

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Objective Justification for Differential Treatment in Domestic Violence Concession Applications Based on Immigration Status Introduction The case of SWP, R (On the Application Of) v Secretary of...
Recognition of Neurodevelopmental Disorders as Mitigating Factors in Sentencing: Gulzar, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 630

Recognition of Neurodevelopmental Disorders as Mitigating Factors in Sentencing: Gulzar, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 630

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Recognition of Neurodevelopmental Disorders as Mitigating Factors in Sentencing: Gulzar, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 630 Introduction The case of Gulzar, R. v ([2023] EWCA Crim 630) adjudicated by the...
Optis Cellular Technology LLC v Apple Retail UK Ltd: Establishing the Non-Obviousness of Specific RNG Implementations in Patent Claims

Optis Cellular Technology LLC v Apple Retail UK Ltd: Establishing the Non-Obviousness of Specific RNG Implementations in Patent Claims

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Optis Cellular Technology LLC v Apple Retail UK Ltd: Establishing the Non-Obviousness of Specific RNG Implementations in Patent Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Optis Cellular Technology...
Harris v Moore: High Court Prioritizes Judicial Efficiency in Defamation Proceedings

Harris v Moore: High Court Prioritizes Judicial Efficiency in Defamation Proceedings

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Harris v Moore: High Court Prioritizes Judicial Efficiency in Defamation Proceedings Introduction Harris v Moore ([2023] IEHC 213) is a significant case adjudicated by the High Court of Ireland on...
Dunn & Anor, R. v: Establishing Precedents in Modern Slavery and Control of Prostitution

Dunn & Anor, R. v: Establishing Precedents in Modern Slavery and Control of Prostitution

Date: Apr 26, 2023
Dunn & Anor, R. v: Establishing Precedents in Modern Slavery and Control of Prostitution Introduction The case of Dunn & Anor, R. v ([2023] EWCA Crim 527) adjudicated by the England and Wales Court...
Exclusive Jurisdiction under Article 5(1) of the Lugano Convention: Insights from Von Geitz v De Rothschild (Suisse) S.A. [2023] IEHC 224

Exclusive Jurisdiction under Article 5(1) of the Lugano Convention: Insights from Von Geitz v De Rothschild (Suisse) S.A. [2023] IEHC 224

Date: Apr 25, 2023
Exclusive Jurisdiction under Article 5(1) of the Lugano Convention: Insights from Von Geitz v De Rothschild (Suisse) S.A. [2023] IEHC 224 Introduction The case of Von Geitz v De Rothschild (Suisse)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert