Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

interpretation-of-judicial-review-time-limits-under-section-27a-of-the-court-of-session-act-1988:-o& Case Commentaries


        Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Bord na Móna Biomass v Gorman – High Court Reinforces the Conclusive Effect of the Land Registry and Summarily Rejects “Sovereign-Citizen” Jurisdiction Challenges Introduction In Bord na Móna Biomass...
“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902)

“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902)

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Reasonable Lines of Inquiry” Re-affirmed: The Court of Appeal Clarifies Prosecution and Defence Duties in Child-Sex Cases – A Commentary on BTC, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 902) Introduction In BTC, R. v...
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Criminal Assets Bureau v. O’Brien & Anor – Clarifying the “Serious Risk of Injustice” and Proportionality Tests under the Proceeds of Crime Act 1996 1. Introduction The High Court’s decision in...
Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights

Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Mahmud v Minister for Justice — The “Objective-Evidence” Standard for Revoking EU Residence Rights 1. Introduction In Mahmud v Minister for Justice ([2025] IEHC 356) the High Court (O’Donnell J.)...
R v WAG: Court of Appeal Clarifies the “Lead-Offence” Method and the Need for Discrete Sentences When Dealing with Multiple Sexual Offences

R v WAG: Court of Appeal Clarifies the “Lead-Offence” Method and the Need for Discrete Sentences When Dealing with Multiple Sexual Offences

Date: Jun 25, 2025
R v WAG: Court of Appeal Clarifies the “Lead-Offence” Method and the Need for Discrete Sentences When Dealing with Multiple Sexual Offences Introduction In WAG, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 968) the...
“Proportional Discovery and Alternative Sources” – The Guiding Rule from DS v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 412

“Proportional Discovery and Alternative Sources” – The Guiding Rule from DS v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 412

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Proportional Discovery and Alternative Sources” – The Guiding Rule from DS v Minister for Defence & Ors [2025] IEHC 412 1. Introduction DS v Minister for Defence & Ors centres on a serving soldier’s...
Downtul v Companies Act — Clarifying Directors’ Responsibilities within Groups and the Boundaries of Expert Evidence in Irish Restriction Applications

Downtul v Companies Act — Clarifying Directors’ Responsibilities within Groups and the Boundaries of Expert Evidence in Irish Restriction Applications

Date: Jun 25, 2025
Downtul v Companies Act — Clarifying Directors’ Responsibilities within Groups and the Boundaries of Expert Evidence in Irish Restriction Applications 1. Introduction Downtul Ltd (In Liquidation) v...
“Specific Terrorist Activity” Redefined: A Commentary on Niinemae v R [2025] EWCA Crim 984

“Specific Terrorist Activity” Redefined: A Commentary on Niinemae v R [2025] EWCA Crim 984

Date: Jun 25, 2025
“Specific Terrorist Activity” Redefined: A Commentary on Niinemae v R [2025] EWCA Crim 984 Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in Niinemae v R provides the most authoritative guidance to date...
Ibrahim v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 983): Refocusing Adverse-Inference Directions on Defence Case Statements

Ibrahim v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 983): Refocusing Adverse-Inference Directions on Defence Case Statements

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Ibrahim v Rex ([2025] EWCA Crim 983): Refocusing Adverse-Inference Directions on Defence Case Statements Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) has delivered an important decision...
Lucas v Eurocoach (NI) Ltd:  The Court of Appeal Re-states the Elevated Threshold for Overturning Employment Tribunal Findings and Clarifies Time-Limit Analysis under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Lucas v Eurocoach (NI) Ltd: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Elevated Threshold for Overturning Employment Tribunal Findings and Clarifies Time-Limit Analysis under the Disability Discrimination Act 1995

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Lucas v Eurocoach (NI) Ltd: The Court of Appeal Re-states the Elevated Threshold for Overturning Employment Tribunal Findings and Clarifies Time-Limit Analysis under the Disability Discrimination Act...
CD v R [2025] NICA 34 –  When Missing Words Do Not Miscarry Justice:  The Non-Fatal Omission of “or mainly” in Right-to-Silence Directions

CD v R [2025] NICA 34 – When Missing Words Do Not Miscarry Justice: The Non-Fatal Omission of “or mainly” in Right-to-Silence Directions

Date: Jun 23, 2025
CD v R [2025] NICA 34 – When Missing Words Do Not Miscarry Justice: The Non-Fatal Omission of “or mainly” in Right-to-Silence Directions 1. Introduction CD v R ([2025] NICA 34) is a Court of Appeal...
Supplementary Information as a Cure-All: The Scottish Confirmation that Missing “Place of Offence” Details Do Not Invalidate a Part 1 Extradition Warrant

Supplementary Information as a Cure-All: The Scottish Confirmation that Missing “Place of Offence” Details Do Not Invalidate a Part 1 Extradition Warrant

Date: Jun 23, 2025
Supplementary Information as a Cure-All: The Scottish Confirmation that Missing “Place of Offence” Details Do Not Invalidate a Part 1 Extradition Warrant Introduction In Application for Leave to...
“From Rubber-Stamp to Robust Scrutiny” – The Court of Session’s Proportionality Test for Extending Interim Regulatory Orders (NMC Extension Cases, [2025] CSOH 51)

“From Rubber-Stamp to Robust Scrutiny” – The Court of Session’s Proportionality Test for Extending Interim Regulatory Orders (NMC Extension Cases, [2025] CSOH 51)

Date: Jun 23, 2025
“From Rubber-Stamp to Robust Scrutiny” – The Court of Session’s Proportionality Test for Extending Interim Regulatory Orders (The Nursing & Midwifery Council for Extension of Time Periods of Interim...
Sentencing, Family Hardship, and Double-Counting: The Clarified Boundaries in R v Quinn [2025] NICA 40

Sentencing, Family Hardship, and Double-Counting: The Clarified Boundaries in R v Quinn [2025] NICA 40

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Sentencing, Family Hardship, and Double-Counting: The Clarified Boundaries in R v Quinn [2025] NICA 40 Introduction Court: Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland | Date: 20 June 2025 Coram: Keegan LCJ,...
Sentencing Autonomy and Elevated Benchmarks for Predatory Child-Sexual Offences in Northern Ireland – Commentary on Costar v R [2025] NICA 37

Sentencing Autonomy and Elevated Benchmarks for Predatory Child-Sexual Offences in Northern Ireland – Commentary on Costar v R [2025] NICA 37

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Sentencing Autonomy and Elevated Benchmarks for Predatory Child-Sexual Offences in Northern Ireland Commentary on Costar v R [2025] NICA 37 1. Introduction In Costar v R the Court of Appeal in...
Reaffirming the Newton Hearing Framework: The Duty to Give Reasoned Rulings on Disputed Facts at Sentencing

Reaffirming the Newton Hearing Framework: The Duty to Give Reasoned Rulings on Disputed Facts at Sentencing

Date: Jun 21, 2025
Reaffirming the Newton Hearing Framework: The Duty to Give Reasoned Rulings on Disputed Facts at Sentencing 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal in Northern Ireland, in Weir, R. v ([2025] NICA 38),...
“From ‘Open Price’ to ‘Market Price’: KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH and the Revival of Reasonable-Price Implied Terms”

“From ‘Open Price’ to ‘Market Price’: KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH and the Revival of Reasonable-Price Implied Terms”

Date: Jun 20, 2025
From “Open Price” to “Market Price”: KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH ([2025] EWCA Civ 760) Introduction The Court of Appeal’s decision in KSY Juice Blends UK Ltd v Citrosuco GmbH tackles a...
Reaffirming the Multi-Factorial Test for Extended Disclosure under PD 57AD – Comment on AmTrust Specialty Ltd v Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 755

Reaffirming the Multi-Factorial Test for Extended Disclosure under PD 57AD – Comment on AmTrust Specialty Ltd v Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd [2025] EWCA Civ 755

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Reaffirming the Multi-Factorial Test for Extended Disclosure under PD 57AD Commentary on AmTrust Specialty Ltd v Endurance Worldwide Insurance Ltd (t/a Sompo International) [2025] EWCA Civ 755 1....
Limiting Speculative Credibility Assessments in International Protection Appeals: Commentary on J.L. v. International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 347

Limiting Speculative Credibility Assessments in International Protection Appeals: Commentary on J.L. v. International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 347

Date: Jun 20, 2025
Limiting Speculative Credibility Assessments in International Protection Appeals Commentary on J.L. v. International Protection Appeals Tribunal & Minister for Justice [2025] IEHC 347 1. Introduction...
“From Intermediaries to Hearsay” – Claffey & Roach and the Re-drawing of the Bad-Character / Investigation Boundary

“From Intermediaries to Hearsay” – Claffey & Roach and the Re-drawing of the Bad-Character / Investigation Boundary

Date: Jun 20, 2025
“From Intermediaries to Hearsay” – How Claffey, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 852) Clarifies the Scope of s.98(b) CJA 2003 and the Threshold for Self-Defence Directions Introduction Claffey, R. v and Roach,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert