Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Scotland Case Commentaries

Palmer v. Wick and Pulteney: Establishing Principles of Co-Debtor Contribution in Scots Law

Palmer v. Wick and Pulteney: Establishing Principles of Co-Debtor Contribution in Scots Law

Date: Jun 6, 1894
Palmer v. Wick and Pulteney - Town Steam Shipping Co. ([1894] SLR 31_937) Introduction Palmer v. Wick and Pulteney - Town Steam Shipping Co., adjudicated by the Scottish Court of Session on June 5,...
Validation of Discretionary Bequests to Charitable Institutions in Scottish Law: Cobb v. Robertson (1894)

Validation of Discretionary Bequests to Charitable Institutions in Scottish Law: Cobb v. Robertson (1894)

Date: Mar 10, 1894
Validation of Discretionary Bequests to Charitable Institutions in Scottish Law: Cobb v. Robertson (1894) Introduction Cobb v. Robertson and Others (Cobb's Trustees) ([1894] SLR 31_506) is a landmark...
Establishing Limits to Trade Custom and Lien Rights: Analysis of Mitchell v. Heys & Sons [1894]

Establishing Limits to Trade Custom and Lien Rights: Analysis of Mitchell v. Heys & Sons [1894]

Date: Feb 28, 1894
Establishing Limits to Trade Custom and Lien Rights: Analysis of Mitchell v. Heys & Sons [1894] Introduction Mitchell v. Heys & Sons ([1894] SLR 31-485) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Scottish...
Turner v. Gaw [1894]: Clarifying Vesting Subject to Defeasance in Heritable Estates

Turner v. Gaw [1894]: Clarifying Vesting Subject to Defeasance in Heritable Estates

Date: Feb 21, 1894
Turner v. Gaw [1894]: Clarifying Vesting Subject to Defeasance in Heritable Estates Introduction Turner v. Gaw ([1894] SLR 31_447) is a landmark case decided by the Scottish Court of Session on...
Symington v. Campbell (1894): Establishing Limitations on Title to Sue for Pre-Purchase Damages

Symington v. Campbell (1894): Establishing Limitations on Title to Sue for Pre-Purchase Damages

Date: Feb 1, 1894
Symington v. Campbell (1894): Establishing Limitations on Title to Sue for Pre-Purchase Damages Introduction Symington v. Campbell ([1894] SLR 31_372) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Scottish...
Limitations on Societal Discretion in Distribution of Intestate Funds: Symington's Executors v. Galashiels Co-operative Store Co., Ltd ([1894] SLR 31_253)

Limitations on Societal Discretion in Distribution of Intestate Funds: Symington's Executors v. Galashiels Co-operative Store Co., Ltd ([1894] SLR 31_253)

Date: Jan 14, 1894
Limitations on Societal Discretion in Distribution of Intestate Funds 1. Introduction Symington's Executors v. Galashiels Co-operative Store Co., Ltd ([1894] SLR 31_253) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Wilkie's Trustees v. Wight's Trustees: Establishing Beneficiary Rights in Trust Settlements

Wilkie's Trustees v. Wight's Trustees: Establishing Beneficiary Rights in Trust Settlements

Date: Nov 30, 1893
Wilkie's Trustees v. Wight's Trustees: Establishing Beneficiary Rights in Trust Settlements 1. Introduction Wilkie's Trustees v. Wight's Trustees is a landmark case decided by the Scottish Court of...
Recognition of a Married Woman's Right to Sue for the Death of her Son: Analysis of Whitehead v. Blaik (1893)

Recognition of a Married Woman's Right to Sue for the Death of her Son: Analysis of Whitehead v. Blaik (1893)

Date: Jul 21, 1893
Recognition of a Married Woman's Right to Sue for the Death of her Son: Analysis of Whitehead v. Blaik (1893) Introduction Whitehead v. Blaik and Others ([1893] SLR 30_916) is a landmark case...
G Mackay & Son v. Police Commissioners of Leven (1893): Limitation of Arbitration Clauses in Contractual Damages Claims

G Mackay & Son v. Police Commissioners of Leven (1893): Limitation of Arbitration Clauses in Contractual Damages Claims

Date: Jul 21, 1893
G Mackay & Son v. Police Commissioners of Leven (1893): Limitation of Arbitration Clauses in Contractual Damages Claims Introduction The case of G Mackay & Son v. Police Commissioners of Leven...
Executor's Right to Sue for Patrimonial Loss: Insights from Bern v. Montrose Lunatic Asylum (1893)

Executor's Right to Sue for Patrimonial Loss: Insights from Bern v. Montrose Lunatic Asylum (1893)

Date: Jun 23, 1893
Executor's Right to Sue for Patrimonial Loss: Insights from Bern v. Montrose Lunatic Asylum (1893) Introduction The case of Bern v. Montrose Lunatic Asylum ([1893] SLR 30_748) was adjudicated by the...
Kelly v. Glebe Sugar Refining Co. (1893): Establishing Prima Facie Liability for Unfenced Machinery

Kelly v. Glebe Sugar Refining Co. (1893): Establishing Prima Facie Liability for Unfenced Machinery

Date: Jun 18, 1893
Kelly v. Glebe Sugar Refining Co. (1893): Establishing Prima Facie Liability for Unfenced Machinery Introduction Kelly v. Glebe Sugar Refining Co. ([1893] SLR 30_758_1) is a landmark case adjudicated...
Establishing Malice in Slander: Douglas v. Main [1893]

Establishing Malice in Slander: Douglas v. Main [1893]

Date: Jun 14, 1893
Establishing Malice in Slander: Douglas v. Main [1893] Introduction Douglas v. Main [1893] is a landmark case adjudicated by the Scottish Court of Session on June 13, 1893. The case revolves around...
Ingram v. Russell (1893): Establishing the Burden of Malice in Slander Cases within Banking Privileges

Ingram v. Russell (1893): Establishing the Burden of Malice in Slander Cases within Banking Privileges

Date: Jun 9, 1893
Ingram v. Russell (1893): Establishing the Burden of Malice in Slander Cases within Banking Privileges 1. Introduction Ingram v. Russell ([1893] SLR 30_699) is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Paterson v. Welch [1893]: Establishing Liability for False Attribution of Defamatory Statements

Paterson v. Welch [1893]: Establishing Liability for False Attribution of Defamatory Statements

Date: Jun 1, 1893
Paterson v. Welch [1893]: Establishing Liability for False Attribution of Defamatory Statements Introduction Paterson v. Welch ([1893] SLR 30_668) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Scottish Court...
Duty of Public Authorities to Fence Dangerous Areas to Protect Children: Gibson v. Glasgow Police Commissioners

Duty of Public Authorities to Fence Dangerous Areas to Protect Children: Gibson v. Glasgow Police Commissioners

Date: Mar 4, 1893
Duty of Public Authorities to Fence Dangerous Areas to Protect Children: Gibson v. Glasgow Police Commissioners Introduction Gibson v. Glasgow Police Commissioners and Others ([1893] SLR 30_469) is a...
Vesting of Residuary Estate in Liferent Trusts: Insights from White v. White [1893]

Vesting of Residuary Estate in Liferent Trusts: Insights from White v. White [1893]

Date: Mar 3, 1893
Vesting of Residuary Estate in Liferent Trusts: Insights from White v. White [1893] Introduction White and Another (Cumming's Trustees) v. White and Others ([1893] SLR 30_459) is a pivotal case...
Grant v. Morren: Clarifying the Scope of 'Estate' in Testamentary Dispositions

Grant v. Morren: Clarifying the Scope of 'Estate' in Testamentary Dispositions

Date: Feb 22, 1893
Grant v. Morren: Clarifying the Scope of 'Estate' in Testamentary Dispositions Introduction Grant v. Morren and Another (Grant's Executors) ([1893] SLR 30_442) is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Sleigh v. Sleigh (1893): Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Custody Disputes

Sleigh v. Sleigh (1893): Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Custody Disputes

Date: Jan 21, 1893
Sleigh v. Sleigh (1893): Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Custody Disputes Introduction Sleigh v. Sleigh is a landmark case adjudicated by the Scottish Court of Session on January 20, 1893. The...
Employer Non-Liability for Third-Party Equipment Defects: Robinson v. John Watson, Ltd ([1892] SLR 30_144)

Employer Non-Liability for Third-Party Equipment Defects: Robinson v. John Watson, Ltd ([1892] SLR 30_144)

Date: Dec 1, 1892
Employer Non-Liability for Third-Party Equipment Defects: Robinson v. John Watson, Ltd ([1892] SLR 30_144) Introduction Robinson v. John Watson, Ltd ([1892] SLR 30_144) is a seminal case adjudicated...
Establishing Duty of Care for Railway Companies in Protecting Vulnerable Pedestrians: Haughton v. North British Railway Co. ([1892] SLR 30_111)

Establishing Duty of Care for Railway Companies in Protecting Vulnerable Pedestrians: Haughton v. North British Railway Co. ([1892] SLR 30_111)

Date: Nov 30, 1892
Establishing Duty of Care for Railway Companies in Protecting Vulnerable Pedestrians: Haughton v. North British Railway Co. ([1892] SLR 30_111) Introduction Haughton v. North British Railway Co....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert