Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

Scotland Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Feu-duty and Prohibition of Subinfeudation: Insights from Church of Scotland v. Watson and Others [1904] SLR 42_299

Enforcement of Feu-duty and Prohibition of Subinfeudation: Insights from Church of Scotland v. Watson and Others [1904] SLR 42_299

Date: Dec 25, 1904
Enforcement of Feu-duty and Prohibition of Subinfeudation: Insights from Church of Scotland v. Watson and Others [1904] SLR 42_299 Introduction The case of Church of Scotland v. Watson and Others...
Defining Dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Turners Ltd v. Whitefield [1904]

Defining Dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Turners Ltd v. Whitefield [1904]

Date: Jun 18, 1904
Defining Dependency under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Turners Ltd v. Whitefield [1904] Introduction The case of Turners Ltd v. Whitefield ([1904] SLR 41_631) adjudicated by the Scottish...
Expansion of Public Authorities Protection: Spittal v. The Corporation of Glasgow (1904)

Expansion of Public Authorities Protection: Spittal v. The Corporation of Glasgow (1904)

Date: Jun 18, 1904
Expansion of Public Authorities Protection: Spittal v. The Corporation of Glasgow (1904) Introduction The case of Spittal v. The Corporation of Glasgow ([1904] SLR 41_629) stands as a pivotal moment...
Strannigan v. William Baird & Co., Ltd (1904): Arbitration Accessibility After Employer-Provided Medical Examination in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Strannigan v. William Baird & Co., Ltd (1904): Arbitration Accessibility After Employer-Provided Medical Examination in Workmen's Compensation Cases

Date: Jun 8, 1904
Strannigan v. William Baird & Co., Ltd (1904): Arbitration Accessibility After Employer-Provided Medical Examination in Workmen's Compensation Cases Introduction The case of Strannigan v. William...
Hutchinson's Trustees v. Young & Others: Enforcing Testator’s Intent through Government Annuities

Hutchinson's Trustees v. Young & Others: Enforcing Testator’s Intent through Government Annuities

Date: Oct 30, 1903
Hutchinson's Trustees v. Young & Others: Enforcing Testator’s Intent through Government Annuities Introduction Hutchinson's Trustees v. Young & Others ([1903] SLR 41_14) is a seminal case adjudicated...
Niddrie and Benhar Coal Co., Ltd v. M'Kay: Reinforcing Workers' Rights under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897

Niddrie and Benhar Coal Co., Ltd v. M'Kay: Reinforcing Workers' Rights under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897

Date: Jul 15, 1903
Niddrie and Benhar Coal Co., Ltd v. M'Kay: Reinforcing Workers' Rights under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 Introduction The case of Niddrie and Benhar Coal Co., Ltd v. M'Kay ([1903] SLR 40_798)...
Taylor's Trustee v. Christal: Establishing Vested Rights a Morte Testatoris in Scottish Succession Law

Taylor's Trustee v. Christal: Establishing Vested Rights a Morte Testatoris in Scottish Succession Law

Date: Jun 25, 1903
Taylor's Trustee v. Christal: Establishing Vested Rights a Morte Testatoris in Scottish Succession Law Introduction Taylor's Trustee v. Christal ([1903] SLR 40_738) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Refusal of Medical Treatment and Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act: Sweeney v. Pumpherston Oil Co., Ltd ([1903] SLR 40_721)

Refusal of Medical Treatment and Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act: Sweeney v. Pumpherston Oil Co., Ltd ([1903] SLR 40_721)

Date: Jun 24, 1903
Refusal of Medical Treatment and Compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Act: Sweeney v. Pumpherston Oil Co., Ltd ([1903] SLR 40_721) Introduction Sweeney v. Pumpherston Oil Co., Ltd is a...
Exclusion of Supervening Factors in Workers’ Compensation Arbitration – Jamieson v. Fife Coal Co., Ltd.

Exclusion of Supervening Factors in Workers’ Compensation Arbitration – Jamieson v. Fife Coal Co., Ltd.

Date: Jun 21, 1903
Exclusion of Supervening Factors in Workers’ Compensation Arbitration – Jamieson v. Fife Coal Co., Ltd. Introduction The case of Jamieson v. Fife Coal Co., Ltd. ([1903] SLR 40_704) is a seminal...
Negligence in Medical Treatment and Termination of Workmen's Compensation: Dowds v. Bennie & Son (1902)

Negligence in Medical Treatment and Termination of Workmen's Compensation: Dowds v. Bennie & Son (1902)

Date: Dec 20, 1902
Negligence in Medical Treatment and Termination of Workmen's Compensation: Dowds v. Bennie & Son (1902) Introduction Dowds v. Bennie & Son ([1902] SLR 40_239) is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Steel v. Oakbank Oil Co., Ltd: Jurisdiction Over Retroactive Review of Workmen's Compensation

Steel v. Oakbank Oil Co., Ltd: Jurisdiction Over Retroactive Review of Workmen's Compensation

Date: Dec 17, 1902
Steel v. Oakbank Oil Co., Ltd: Jurisdiction Over Retroactive Review of Workmen's Compensation Introduction Steel v. Oakbank Oil Co., Ltd ([1902] SLR 40_205) is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Liability of Property Owners for Dangerous Conditions: Insights from Devlin v. Jeffray's Trustees

Liability of Property Owners for Dangerous Conditions: Insights from Devlin v. Jeffray's Trustees

Date: Nov 19, 1902
Liability of Property Owners for Dangerous Conditions: Insights from Devlin v. Jeffray's Trustees Introduction Devlin v. Jeffray's Trustees ([1902] SLR 4092) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Acceleration of Death through Employer-Induced Injury: Golder v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902)

Acceleration of Death through Employer-Induced Injury: Golder v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902)

Date: Nov 15, 1902
Acceleration of Death through Employer-Induced Injury: Golder v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902) Introduction Golder v. Caledonian Railway Co. ([1902] SLR 40_89) is a landmark decision by the Scottish...
Employment Boundaries under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Insights from Caton v. The Summerlee and Mossend Iron and Steel Co., Ltd (1902)

Employment Boundaries under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Insights from Caton v. The Summerlee and Mossend Iron and Steel Co., Ltd (1902)

Date: Jul 12, 1902
Employment Boundaries under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897: Insights from Caton v. The Summerlee and Mossend Iron and Steel Co., Ltd (1902) Introduction The case of Caton v. The Summerlee and...
Cunningham v. Skinner (1902): Res Judicata, Mora, and the Requirement of Malice in Slander Claims

Cunningham v. Skinner (1902): Res Judicata, Mora, and the Requirement of Malice in Slander Claims

Date: Jun 20, 1902
Cunningham v. Skinner (1902): Res Judicata, Mora, and the Requirement of Malice in Slander Claims Introduction Cunningham v. Skinner ([1902] SLR 39_727) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Scottish...
Reinterpreting 'Average Weekly Earnings' in Workmen's Compensation: Grewar v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902)

Reinterpreting 'Average Weekly Earnings' in Workmen's Compensation: Grewar v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902)

Date: Jun 20, 1902
Reinterpreting 'Average Weekly Earnings' in Workmen's Compensation: Grewar v. Caledonian Railway Co. (1902) Introduction The case of Grewar v. Caledonian Railway Co. ([1902] SLR 39_687) stands as a...
Postponement of Vesting in Trust Estates: Parlane's Trustees v. Parlane (1902)

Postponement of Vesting in Trust Estates: Parlane's Trustees v. Parlane (1902)

Date: May 18, 1902
Postponement of Vesting in Trust Estates: Parlane's Trustees v. Parlane (1902) Introduction Parlane's Trustees v. Parlane ([1902] SLR 39_632) is a seminal case adjudicated by the Scottish Court of...
Validity of Liferent Restrictions in Trust Appointments: Neill's Trustees v. Neill [1902]

Validity of Liferent Restrictions in Trust Appointments: Neill's Trustees v. Neill [1902]

Date: Mar 8, 1902
Validity of Liferent Restrictions in Trust Appointments: Neill's Trustees v. Neill [1902] Introduction Neill's Trustees v. Neill ([1902] SLR 39_426) is a seminal case decided by the Scottish Court of...
Entitlement to Legal Expenses in Successive Trials: M'Quilkin v. The Glasgow District Subway Co.

Entitlement to Legal Expenses in Successive Trials: M'Quilkin v. The Glasgow District Subway Co.

Date: Jan 25, 1902
Entitlement to Legal Expenses in Successive Trials: M'Quilkin v. The Glasgow District Subway Co. ([1902] SLR 39_328) Introduction Parties Involved: Mrs. Sarah M'Corkindale or M'Quilkin (Pursuer) vs....
Dunlop v. Rankin & Blackmore (1901): Establishing the Binding Nature of Compensation Agreements under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897

Dunlop v. Rankin & Blackmore (1901): Establishing the Binding Nature of Compensation Agreements under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897

Date: Nov 28, 1901
Dunlop v. Rankin & Blackmore (1901): Establishing the Binding Nature of Compensation Agreements under the Workmen's Compensation Act 1897 Introduction Dunlop v. Rankin & Blackmore ([1901] SLR 39_146)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert