Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

R v Alsaadoun ([2025] EWCA Crim 800):  “Showing-Off” Motive Held to be a Distinct Aggravating Factor in Category A Death-by-Dangerous-Driving Sentencing

R v Alsaadoun ([2025] EWCA Crim 800): “Showing-Off” Motive Held to be a Distinct Aggravating Factor in Category A Death-by-Dangerous-Driving Sentencing

Date: May 3, 2025
R v Alsaadoun ([2025] EWCA Crim 800): “Showing-Off” Motive Held to be a Distinct Aggravating Factor in Category A Death-by-Dangerous-Driving Sentencing 1. Introduction The Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Bratt v Jones: The Bracket Principle and Bolam Duty in Valuation Negligence

Bratt v Jones: The Bracket Principle and Bolam Duty in Valuation Negligence

Date: May 3, 2025
Bratt v Jones: The Bracket Principle and Bolam Duty in Valuation Negligence Introduction Bratt v Jones [2025] EWCA Civ 562 is a landmark decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal that...
Ensuring Precision and Proportionality in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Al Magloub v. R [2025] EWCA Crim 640

Ensuring Precision and Proportionality in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Al Magloub v. R [2025] EWCA Crim 640

Date: May 2, 2025
Ensuring Precision and Proportionality in Criminal Behaviour Orders: Al Magloub v. R [2025] EWCA Crim 640 Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Al Magloub v. R,...
Establishing a FRAND Floor for Parallel Foreign Judgments: Optis v Apple

Establishing a FRAND Floor for Parallel Foreign Judgments: Optis v Apple

Date: May 2, 2025
Establishing a FRAND Floor for Parallel Foreign Judgments: Optis v Apple Introduction Optis Cellular Technology LLC, Optis Wireless Technology LLC and Unwired Planet International Ltd (“Optis”)...
“The Owen Extension”: When Persistent, High-Value Theft Justifies Departure from the Sentencing Guidelines

“The Owen Extension”: When Persistent, High-Value Theft Justifies Departure from the Sentencing Guidelines

Date: May 2, 2025
“The Owen Extension”: When Persistent, High-Value Theft Justifies Departure from the Sentencing Guidelines Introduction Owen, R. v  ([2025] EWCA Crim 780) delivers a significant clarification on the...
R v Farebrother ([2025] EWCA Crim 672): A New Emphasis on Pregnant Offenders’ Mitigation and the Threshold for Suspending Class-A Drug Sentences

R v Farebrother ([2025] EWCA Crim 672): A New Emphasis on Pregnant Offenders’ Mitigation and the Threshold for Suspending Class-A Drug Sentences

Date: May 2, 2025
R v Farebrother ([2025] EWCA Crim 672): A New Emphasis on Pregnant Offenders’ Mitigation and the Threshold for Suspending Class-A Drug Sentences 1. Introduction R v Farebrother is a Court of Appeal...
Emmerson & Extended Determinate Sentences: A New Benchmark for Serial Sexual Assaults and Exposure Offences

Emmerson & Extended Determinate Sentences: A New Benchmark for Serial Sexual Assaults and Exposure Offences

Date: May 2, 2025
Emmerson & Extended Determinate Sentences: A New Benchmark for Serial Sexual Assaults and Exposure Offences 1. Introduction R v Emmerson ([2025] EWCA Crim 756) is an Attorney-General’s Reference in...
R v Mulhern: Clarifying the Threshold for “Unduly Lenient” Findings in Multi-Count Sexual Offending and the Primacy of Judicial Discretion

R v Mulhern: Clarifying the Threshold for “Unduly Lenient” Findings in Multi-Count Sexual Offending and the Primacy of Judicial Discretion

Date: May 2, 2025
R v Mulhern: Clarifying the Threshold for “Unduly Lenient” Findings in Multi-Count Sexual Offending and the Primacy of Judicial Discretion 1. Introduction R v Mulhern ([2025] EWCA Crim 757) is a...
Clarifying Sequential Risk Assessment in Asylum Claims: EI v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Clarifying Sequential Risk Assessment in Asylum Claims: EI v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Date: May 1, 2025
Clarifying Sequential Risk Assessment in Asylum Claims: EI v Secretary of State for the Home Department Introduction EI v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2025] EWCA Civ 556) is a...
Extending Sentencing Guidelines to Consensual GBH: Gustavson & Ors v R

Extending Sentencing Guidelines to Consensual GBH: Gustavson & Ors v R

Date: May 1, 2025
Extending Sentencing Guidelines to Consensual GBH: Gustavson & Ors v R Introduction Gustavson & Ors v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 493) was decided by the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)...
Exception 1 of Section 117C(4): “Very Significant Obstacles to Integration” – Adequacy of Reasons for Deportation of EU Nationals to EU States

Exception 1 of Section 117C(4): “Very Significant Obstacles to Integration” – Adequacy of Reasons for Deportation of EU Nationals to EU States

Date: May 1, 2025
Exception 1 of Section 117C(4): “Very Significant Obstacles to Integration” – Adequacy of Reasons for Deportation of EU Nationals to EU States Introduction This case, Ackom v Secretary of State for...
ECHR Article 5 and Children in Care: Necessity of DOLs Orders – State Consent Insufficient

ECHR Article 5 and Children in Care: Necessity of DOLs Orders – State Consent Insufficient

Date: Apr 30, 2025
ECHR Article 5 and Children in Care: Necessity of DOLs Orders – State Consent Insufficient Introduction J v Bath and North East Somerset Council & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 478) is a Court of Appeal...
R v BNA: Rationality and Abuse of Process in Modern Slavery Victims’ Prosecutions under CPS Guidance

R v BNA: Rationality and Abuse of Process in Modern Slavery Victims’ Prosecutions under CPS Guidance

Date: Apr 26, 2025
R v BNA: Rationality and Abuse of Process in Modern Slavery Victims’ Prosecutions under CPS Guidance Introduction In R v BNA [2025] EWCA Crim 496 the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) considered...
Enforceability of Post-Termination Commission Clauses: Restraint of Trade Limits in Agency Contracts

Enforceability of Post-Termination Commission Clauses: Restraint of Trade Limits in Agency Contracts

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Enforceability of Post-Termination Commission Clauses: Restraint of Trade Limits in Agency Contracts Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in X-R Touring LLP v Javor &...
Intention Suffices for Unidentified Property in Design-Infringement Conspiracy

Intention Suffices for Unidentified Property in Design-Infringement Conspiracy

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Intention Suffices for Unidentified Property in Design-Infringement Conspiracy Introduction Iqbal & Anor v City of Wolverhampton Council ([2025] EWCA Crim 498) is a Court of Appeal criminal decision...
Clarifying Party Autonomy in Asymmetric Jurisdiction Clauses: Exclusive English Jurisdiction and Limited US Carve-Outs in Hipgnosis SFH 1 Ltd v Manilow

Clarifying Party Autonomy in Asymmetric Jurisdiction Clauses: Exclusive English Jurisdiction and Limited US Carve-Outs in Hipgnosis SFH 1 Ltd v Manilow

Date: Apr 18, 2025
Clarifying Party Autonomy in Asymmetric Jurisdiction Clauses: Exclusive English Jurisdiction and Limited US Carve-Outs in Hipgnosis SFH 1 Ltd v Manilow Introduction Hipgnosis SFH 1 Ltd v Manilow &...
Invalidity of Planning Permissions for Failure to Publish Section 106 Agreements: Greenfields (IOW) Ltd v Isle of Wight Council

Invalidity of Planning Permissions for Failure to Publish Section 106 Agreements: Greenfields (IOW) Ltd v Isle of Wight Council

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Invalidity of Planning Permissions for Failure to Publish Section 106 Agreements Introduction In Greenfields (IOW) Ltd, R (On the Application Of) v Isle of Wight Council & Anor [2025] EWCA Civ 488,...
Dispositive Section Controls: Operative Orders vs. Narrative Reasoning in Arbitral Awards

Dispositive Section Controls: Operative Orders vs. Narrative Reasoning in Arbitral Awards

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Dispositive Section Controls: Operative Orders vs. Narrative Reasoning in Arbitral Awards 1. Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s decision in Nigeria LNG Ltd v Taleveras...
Phase-Limited Planning Assessment in Hydrocarbon Exploration: Excluding Speculative Production Impacts

Phase-Limited Planning Assessment in Hydrocarbon Exploration: Excluding Speculative Production Impacts

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Phase-Limited Planning Assessment in Hydrocarbon Exploration: Excluding Speculative Production Impacts Introduction Frack Free Balcombe Residents' Association v Secretary of State for Housing,...
Litigation Funding Priority in Collective Proceedings: Jurisdiction Under Section 47C(3)(b) of the Competition Act 1998

Litigation Funding Priority in Collective Proceedings: Jurisdiction Under Section 47C(3)(b) of the Competition Act 1998

Date: Apr 17, 2025
Litigation Funding Priority in Collective Proceedings: Jurisdiction Under Section 47C(3)(b) of the Competition Act 1998 Introduction Gutmann v Apple Inc & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 459) is an appeal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert