Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Admissibility of Sleeping Pornography Evidence and Sentencing Standards in R v Kipps-Bolton [2020] EWCA Crim 1641

Admissibility of Sleeping Pornography Evidence and Sentencing Standards in R v Kipps-Bolton [2020] EWCA Crim 1641

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Admissibility of Sleeping Pornography Evidence and Sentencing Standards in R v Kipps-Bolton [2020] EWCA Crim 1641 Introduction The case of R v Kipps-Bolton [2020] EWCA Crim 1641 presents a...
Dual Liability for Theft and Handling Stolen Goods: Insights from Bates v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1288

Dual Liability for Theft and Handling Stolen Goods: Insights from Bates v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1288

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Dual Liability for Theft and Handling Stolen Goods: Insights from Bates v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1288 Introduction Bates v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1288 is a significant case adjudicated by the England and...
Howarth v R: Extending the Limits of Appeal Timeliness in Criminal Conspiracy Cases

Howarth v R: Extending the Limits of Appeal Timeliness in Criminal Conspiracy Cases

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Howarth v R: Extending the Limits of Appeal Timeliness in Criminal Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of Howarth, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1286) represents a significant development in the realm of...
Court of Appeal Affirms Dual Convictions Under the Theft Act 1968 in Bates v [2020] EWCA Crim 1288

Court of Appeal Affirms Dual Convictions Under the Theft Act 1968 in Bates v [2020] EWCA Crim 1288

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Court of Appeal Affirms Dual Convictions Under the Theft Act 1968 in Bates v [2020] EWCA Crim 1288 Introduction The case of Bates, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1288) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Waite v. R: Implications for Confiscation Orders and Appeal Timelines

Waite v. R: Implications for Confiscation Orders and Appeal Timelines

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Waite v. R: Implications for Confiscation Orders and Appeal Timelines Introduction The case of Waite v. R ([2020] EWCA Crim 768) adjudicated by the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Establishing Temporal Extensions in Criminal Appeals: Commentary on Howarth v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1286)

Establishing Temporal Extensions in Criminal Appeals: Commentary on Howarth v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1286)

Date: Jun 18, 2020
Establishing Temporal Extensions in Criminal Appeals: Commentary on Howarth v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1286) 1. Introduction The case of Howarth v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1286) serves as a pivotal reference...
Mandating Intermediaries in Hybrid Hearings for Vulnerable Parties

Mandating Intermediaries in Hybrid Hearings for Vulnerable Parties

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Mandating Intermediaries in Hybrid Hearings for Vulnerable Parties Introduction The case of S (Vulnerable Parent: Intermediary) ([2020] EWCA Civ 763) represents a pivotal moment in the jurisprudence...
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence Under Section 116(2)(d)-(e): Insights from Barnes v R [2020] EWCA Crim 959

Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence Under Section 116(2)(d)-(e): Insights from Barnes v R [2020] EWCA Crim 959

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence Under Section 116(2)(d)-(e): Insights from Barnes v R [2020] EWCA Crim 959 Introduction Barnes v R [2020] EWCA Crim 959 is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England...
Crowther v. Crowther & Ors: Refining the Application of Freezing Orders in Matrimonial Financial Remedies

Crowther v. Crowther & Ors: Refining the Application of Freezing Orders in Matrimonial Financial Remedies

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Crowther v. Crowther & Ors: Refining the Application of Freezing Orders in Matrimonial Financial Remedies Introduction Crowther v. Crowther & Ors ([2020] EWCA Civ 762) is a pivotal case heard by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on 89 Holland Park Management Ltd v. Hicks ([2020] EWCA Civ 758)

Comprehensive Commentary on 89 Holland Park Management Ltd v. Hicks ([2020] EWCA Civ 758)

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Comprehensive Commentary on 89 Holland Park Management Ltd v. Hicks ([2020] EWCA Civ 758) 1. Introduction 89 Holland Park Management Ltd v. Hicks is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England and...
Arbitration Encompasses Statutory Relief Claims: Bridgehouse Ltd v BAE Systems Plc [2020] EWCA Civ 759

Arbitration Encompasses Statutory Relief Claims: Bridgehouse Ltd v BAE Systems Plc [2020] EWCA Civ 759

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Arbitration Encompasses Statutory Relief Claims: Bridgehouse Ltd v BAE Systems Plc [2020] EWCA Civ 759 Introduction Bridgehouse (Bradford No. 2) Limited (BB2) entered into a contract with BAE Systems...
Family Court Discretion Over Asylum Risk Assessments in FGM Protection Orders: Re A (A Child) (2020) EWCA Civ 731

Family Court Discretion Over Asylum Risk Assessments in FGM Protection Orders: Re A (A Child) (2020) EWCA Civ 731

Date: Jun 16, 2020
Family Court Discretion Over Asylum Risk Assessments in FGM Protection Orders: Re A (A Child) (2020) EWCA Civ 731 Introduction The case of Re A (A Child) (Rev 1) ([2020] EWCA Civ 731) presents a...
Reaffirming Time-Bar Principles and Evidence Handling in Consumer Protection Cases: Malik, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 957

Reaffirming Time-Bar Principles and Evidence Handling in Consumer Protection Cases: Malik, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 957

Date: Jun 13, 2020
Reaffirming Time-Bar Principles and Evidence Handling in Consumer Protection Cases: Malik, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 957 Introduction The case of Malik, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 957 represents a significant...
Establishing Standards for DNA Evidence Sufficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis of R v Killick [2020] EWCA Crim 785

Establishing Standards for DNA Evidence Sufficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis of R v Killick [2020] EWCA Crim 785

Date: Jun 12, 2020
Establishing Standards for DNA Evidence Sufficiency: A Comprehensive Analysis of R v Killick [2020] EWCA Crim 785 Introduction The case of R v Killick [2020] EWCA Crim 785 presents a pivotal...
Comprehensive Commentary on Tabidi v. British Broadcasting Corporation ([2020] EWCA Civ 733): Establishing the Threshold for Prima Facie Sex Discrimination Claims

Comprehensive Commentary on Tabidi v. British Broadcasting Corporation ([2020] EWCA Civ 733): Establishing the Threshold for Prima Facie Sex Discrimination Claims

Date: Jun 12, 2020
Comprehensive Commentary on Tabidi v. British Broadcasting Corporation ([2020] EWCA Civ 733): Establishing the Threshold for Prima Facie Sex Discrimination Claims Introduction The case of Tabidi v....
Mutual Consent as Essential for Capacity to Decide Sexual Relations: A Local Authority v. JB [2020] EWCA Civ 735

Mutual Consent as Essential for Capacity to Decide Sexual Relations: A Local Authority v. JB [2020] EWCA Civ 735

Date: Jun 12, 2020
Mutual Consent as Essential for Capacity to Decide Sexual Relations: A Local Authority v. JB [2020] EWCA Civ 735 Introduction A Local Authority v. JB ([2020] EWCA Civ 735) is a landmark decision by...
Defining the Scope of Article 2 ECHR's Procedural Duties in Inquests: Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde & Ors

Defining the Scope of Article 2 ECHR's Procedural Duties in Inquests: Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde & Ors

Date: Jun 11, 2020
Defining the Scope of Article 2 ECHR's Procedural Duties in Inquests: Maguire v HM Senior Coroner for Blackpool & Fylde & Ors Introduction The case of Maguire, R (on the application of) v. HM Senior...
Balancing Article 6 Fair Hearing Rights in Hybrid Care Proceedings Amid Covid-19

Balancing Article 6 Fair Hearing Rights in Hybrid Care Proceedings Amid Covid-19

Date: Jun 11, 2020
Balancing Article 6 Fair Hearing Rights in Hybrid Care Proceedings Amid Covid-19 Introduction The case C (Children: Covid-19: Representation) ([2020] EWCA Civ 734) presented before the England and...
R v Wabelua & Ors: Defining Necessity and Proportionality Standards for Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Orders Under the Modern Slavery Act 2015

R v Wabelua & Ors: Defining Necessity and Proportionality Standards for Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Orders Under the Modern Slavery Act 2015

Date: Jun 10, 2020
R v Wabelua & Ors: Defining Necessity and Proportionality Standards for Slavery and Trafficking Prevention Orders Under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 Introduction The case of Wabelua & Ors, R v ([2020]...
Garrity v [2020] EWCA Crim 788: Clarification on Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

Garrity v [2020] EWCA Crim 788: Clarification on Sexual Harm Prevention Orders

Date: Jun 10, 2020
Garrity v [2020] EWCA Crim 788: Clarification on Sexual Harm Prevention Orders Introduction The case of Garrity, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 788 concerns David Michael Garrity, who faced multiple...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert