Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Reconceptualizing "Provision of Plant": Expanding Capital Allowances in Offshore Windfarm Expenditure

Reconceptualizing "Provision of Plant": Expanding Capital Allowances in Offshore Windfarm Expenditure

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Reconceptualizing "Provision of Plant": Expanding Capital Allowances in Offshore Windfarm Expenditure Introduction The landmark judgment in Orsted West of Duddon Sands (UK) Ltd & Ors v Revenue And...
Reaffirming the Limits of the Modern Slavery Defense in Criminal Exploitation Cases

Reaffirming the Limits of the Modern Slavery Defense in Criminal Exploitation Cases

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Reaffirming the Limits of the Modern Slavery Defense in Criminal Exploitation Cases Introduction The case of BZP, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 267) presents a complex interplay between allegations of...
New Precedent: Establishing the Retrospectivity of Conditional Fee Agreements in Insolvency Litigation

New Precedent: Establishing the Retrospectivity of Conditional Fee Agreements in Insolvency Litigation

Date: Mar 18, 2025
New Precedent: Establishing the Retrospectivity of Conditional Fee Agreements in Insolvency Litigation Introduction The case of Singh & Ors v Ingram ([2025] EWCA Civ 264) presents a critical judicial...
Purkiss v Kennedy & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 268): Redefining the Limitations on Tax Mitigation under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Purkiss v Kennedy & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 268): Redefining the Limitations on Tax Mitigation under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Purkiss v Kennedy & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 268): Redefining the Limitations on Tax Mitigation under Section 423 of the Insolvency Act 1986 Introduction In the landmark case of Purkiss v Kennedy & Ors...
Clarifying Trademark Infringement and Sub-licensing Rights Under Settlement Agreements: Lessons from Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd v Nanthakumar & Ors

Clarifying Trademark Infringement and Sub-licensing Rights Under Settlement Agreements: Lessons from Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd v Nanthakumar & Ors

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Clarifying Trademark Infringement and Sub-licensing Rights Under Settlement Agreements: Lessons from Morley's (Fast Foods) Ltd v Nanthakumar & Ors Introduction The recent judgment in Morley's (Fast...
Balancing Timely Action and Informed Inquiry: New Precedents in Assessing Vulnerability in Immigration Detention

Balancing Timely Action and Informed Inquiry: New Precedents in Assessing Vulnerability in Immigration Detention

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Balancing Timely Action and Informed Inquiry: New Precedents in Assessing Vulnerability in Immigration Detention Introduction The case of Medical Justice v Secretary of State for the Home Department...
Clarifying the “No‐Touch” Gap: Dismissal Fairness and the Duty to Provide Explicit Disciplinary Guidance

Clarifying the “No‐Touch” Gap: Dismissal Fairness and the Duty to Provide Explicit Disciplinary Guidance

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Clarifying the “No‐Touch” Gap: Dismissal Fairness and the Duty to Provide Explicit Disciplinary Guidance Introduction The judgment in Hewston v Ofsted ([2025] EWCA Civ 250) addresses a complex...
Clarifying "Dealing" with Assets Under Freezing Orders: A Detailed Examination of Barclays Bank PLC v Dylan & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 265)

Clarifying "Dealing" with Assets Under Freezing Orders: A Detailed Examination of Barclays Bank PLC v Dylan & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 265)

Date: Mar 18, 2025
Clarifying "Dealing" with Assets Under Freezing Orders: A Detailed Examination of Barclays Bank PLC v Dylan & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 265) Introduction The case of Barclays Bank PLC v Dylan & Ors...
Clarifying the Material Consideration of EMF Impacts on Medical Implants in Planning Decisions

Clarifying the Material Consideration of EMF Impacts on Medical Implants in Planning Decisions

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Clarifying the Material Consideration of EMF Impacts on Medical Implants in Planning Decisions Introduction In the case of Thomas v Cheltenham Borough Council ([2025] EWCA Civ 259), the Court of...
Ensuring Accurate Age Determination in Child Sexual Offence Cases: A New Precedent from BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257

Ensuring Accurate Age Determination in Child Sexual Offence Cases: A New Precedent from BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Ensuring Accurate Age Determination in Child Sexual Offence Cases: A New Precedent from BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257 Introduction In the recent decision of BLV, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 257, the...
Refining Youth Culpability: The Enhanced Application of the Ahmed Framework in Sentencing Sexual Offences Committed by Young Offenders

Refining Youth Culpability: The Enhanced Application of the Ahmed Framework in Sentencing Sexual Offences Committed by Young Offenders

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Refining Youth Culpability: The Enhanced Application of the Ahmed Framework in Sentencing Sexual Offences Committed by Young Offenders Introduction The case of AIZ, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 349)...
Recalibrating Extremity in Sentencing: Balancing Aggravation and Mitigation in Extreme Child Abuse Cases

Recalibrating Extremity in Sentencing: Balancing Aggravation and Mitigation in Extreme Child Abuse Cases

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Recalibrating Extremity in Sentencing: Balancing Aggravation and Mitigation in Extreme Child Abuse Cases Introduction The case of Urfan & Ors, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 372) represents one of the most...
R v AKH: Defining “Police Privileges” and “Benefit” under Section 26 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015

R v AKH: Defining “Police Privileges” and “Benefit” under Section 26 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015

Date: Mar 14, 2025
R v AKH: Defining “Police Privileges” and “Benefit” under Section 26 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015 Introduction This commentary examines the Court of Appeal’s partial judgment in R v...
Clarifying Child-Vulnerability and Multi-Victim Sentencing:
            Commentary on R v M, [2025] EWCA Crim 872

Clarifying Child-Vulnerability and Multi-Victim Sentencing: Commentary on R v M, [2025] EWCA Crim 872

Date: Mar 14, 2025
Clarifying Child-Vulnerability and Multi-Victim Sentencing: Commentary on R v M ([2025] EWCA Crim 872) 1. Introduction In R v M the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) was asked by the...
Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis

Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarifying the Limits of Rule 18.24 & 18.28: Administrator Remuneration and the Time‐Cost Basis Introduction The case of Frost & Anor v The Good Box Co Labs Ltd & Ors ([2025] EWCA Civ 252) presents...
Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Clarifying the Threshold of Awareness: Determining a "Significant Role" in Drug Conspiracy Cases Introduction In Dobre, R. v ([2025] EWCA Crim 370), the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363)

Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363)

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Judicial Authority to Address Inaccurate Agreed Facts in Summing-Up – Arachchige v R ([2025] EWCA Crim 363) Introduction Arachchige v R is a 2025 decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
“One Bite of the Cherry”: The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting When Applying
            Sentencing Guidelines for “Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child”

“One Bite of the Cherry”: The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting When Applying Sentencing Guidelines for “Causing or Allowing the Death of a Child”

Date: Mar 13, 2025
“One Bite of the Cherry” – The Court of Appeal Clarifies How to Avoid Double-Counting in Step-Based Sentencing for Child-Death Offences (Commentary on Gleason-Mitchell, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 874) 1....
Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals

Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals

Date: Mar 13, 2025
Strict Compliance with Appeal Deadlines and Fresh Evidence Thresholds in Criminal Appeals Introduction R. v Woroniecki [2025] EWCA Crim 364 is a decision of the England and Wales Court of Appeal...
Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220)

Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220)

Date: Mar 12, 2025
Enhanced Accountability for Public Safety in Hotel Operations: LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220) Introduction The case of LFH Moonfleet Manor Ltd v R. ([2025] EWCA Crim 220) before...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert