Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

High-Profile Sentencing in Turner & Anor v R: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines for Major Drug Conspiracies

High-Profile Sentencing in Turner & Anor v R: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines for Major Drug Conspiracies

Date: Oct 22, 2020
High-Profile Sentencing in Turner & Anor v R: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines for Major Drug Conspiracies Introduction The case of Turner & Anor v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1429) represents a significant...
Abuse of Process in Reopening Interlocutory Orders: The Precedent Set in JSC VTB Bank v. Skurikhin & Ors

Abuse of Process in Reopening Interlocutory Orders: The Precedent Set in JSC VTB Bank v. Skurikhin & Ors

Date: Oct 22, 2020
Abuse of Process in Reopening Interlocutory Orders: The Precedent Set in JSC VTB Bank v. Skurikhin & Ors Introduction The case of JSC VTB Bank v. Skurikhin & Ors ([2020] EWCA Civ 1337) before the...
Singh v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1366: Establishing Robust Standards for Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence

Singh v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1366: Establishing Robust Standards for Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence

Date: Oct 21, 2020
Singh v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1366: Establishing Robust Standards for Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence Introduction The case of Singh, R. v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1366) presented before the England...
Legality Upheld for Mandatory Disclosure of Spent Youth Reprimands in Police Recruitment: An Analysis of RD v. Secretary of State for Justice

Legality Upheld for Mandatory Disclosure of Spent Youth Reprimands in Police Recruitment: An Analysis of RD v. Secretary of State for Justice

Date: Oct 21, 2020
Legality Upheld for Mandatory Disclosure of Spent Youth Reprimands in Police Recruitment: An Analysis of RD v. Secretary of State for Justice Introduction The case of RD, R (On the Application Of) v....
Child Welfare and Credibility: Establishing Standards for Adverse Inferences in Care Proceedings – T and J (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 1344

Child Welfare and Credibility: Establishing Standards for Adverse Inferences in Care Proceedings – T and J (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 1344

Date: Oct 21, 2020
Child Welfare and Credibility: Establishing Standards for Adverse Inferences in Care Proceedings – T and J (Children) [2020] EWCA Civ 1344 1. Introduction The case of T and J (Children) ([2020] EWCA...
Enhanced Reliability of Hearsay Evidence in Sexual Offence Cases: Townsend & Anor, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1343)

Enhanced Reliability of Hearsay Evidence in Sexual Offence Cases: Townsend & Anor, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1343)

Date: Oct 20, 2020
Enhanced Reliability of Hearsay Evidence in Sexual Offence Cases: Townsend & Anor, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1343) Introduction The case of Townsend & Anor, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1343) adjudicated by the...
Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence in Perverting the Course of Justice: Cleere v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1360

Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence in Perverting the Course of Justice: Cleere v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1360

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Admissibility of Bad Character Evidence in Perverting the Course of Justice: Cleere v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1360 Introduction The case of Cleere, R. v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1360 addresses the...
Judicial Commentary: Scarrott v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1435 – Upholding Sentencing Principles in Multiple Sexual Offences

Judicial Commentary: Scarrott v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1435 – Upholding Sentencing Principles in Multiple Sexual Offences

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Judicial Commentary: Scarrott v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1435 – Upholding Sentencing Principles in Multiple Sexual Offences Introduction The case of Scarrott v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1435 stands as a...
Limiting Planning Conditions: Prohibition of Uncompensated Highway Dedication

Limiting Planning Conditions: Prohibition of Uncompensated Highway Dedication

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Limiting Planning Conditions: Prohibition of Uncompensated Highway Dedication Introduction The case of DB Symmetry Ltd v. Swindon Borough Council & Anor ([2020] EWCA Civ 1331) addresses a pivotal...
Admissibility of Co-Defendant's Bad Character Evidence in Gregson v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1829)

Admissibility of Co-Defendant's Bad Character Evidence in Gregson v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1829)

Date: Oct 17, 2020
Admissibility of Co-Defendant's Bad Character Evidence in Gregson v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1829) Introduction The case of Gregson v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1829) is a significant judicial decision from the...
Clarifying Service via Signed For 1st Class Post and Strict Enforcement of Unless Orders: Analysis of Diriye v. Bojaj & Anor

Clarifying Service via Signed For 1st Class Post and Strict Enforcement of Unless Orders: Analysis of Diriye v. Bojaj & Anor

Date: Oct 16, 2020
Clarifying Service via Signed For 1st Class Post and Strict Enforcement of Unless Orders: Analysis of Diriye v. Bojaj & Anor Introduction The case of Diriye v. Bojaj & Anor ([2020] EWCA Civ 1400) was...
Affirming Robust Sentencing Guidelines in Industrial-Scale Heroin Conspiracies: Harrison & Ors, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 1502

Affirming Robust Sentencing Guidelines in Industrial-Scale Heroin Conspiracies: Harrison & Ors, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 1502

Date: Oct 16, 2020
Affirming Robust Sentencing Guidelines in Industrial-Scale Heroin Conspiracies: Harrison & Ors, R. v [2020] EWCA Crim 1502 Introduction The case of Harrison & Ors, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1502)...
Defining Beneficial Interests in Confiscation Orders: The Bevan Case under Section 10A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Defining Beneficial Interests in Confiscation Orders: The Bevan Case under Section 10A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

Date: Oct 15, 2020
Defining Beneficial Interests in Confiscation Orders: The Bevan Case under Section 10A of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 Introduction The case of Bevan, R v. (3rd Party Application re Confiscation...
R v Wangige [2020]: Judicial Confirmation of Limits on Subsequent Prosecution Based on Prior Convictions

R v Wangige [2020]: Judicial Confirmation of Limits on Subsequent Prosecution Based on Prior Convictions

Date: Oct 15, 2020
R v Wangige [2020] EWCA Crim 1319: Judicial Confirmation of Limits on Subsequent Prosecution Based on Prior Convictions Introduction R v Wangige is a landmark decision by the England and Wales Court...
Clarifying the Framework for Rehearings in Family Care Proceedings: CTD (A Child: Rehearing) ([2020] EWCA Civ 1316)

Clarifying the Framework for Rehearings in Family Care Proceedings: CTD (A Child: Rehearing) ([2020] EWCA Civ 1316)

Date: Oct 15, 2020
Clarifying the Framework for Rehearings in Family Care Proceedings: CTD (A Child: Rehearing) ([2020] EWCA Civ 1316) Introduction The case CTD (A Child: Rehearing) ([2020] EWCA Civ 1316) addresses the...
Legal Commentary on R v Brownlee [2020] EWCA Crim 1442: Enhanced Sanctions for Firearms Offences Involving Dark Web Activities

Legal Commentary on R v Brownlee [2020] EWCA Crim 1442: Enhanced Sanctions for Firearms Offences Involving Dark Web Activities

Date: Oct 15, 2020
Enhanced Sanctions for Firearms Offences Involving Dark Web Activities Introduction The case of R v Brownlee [2020] EWCA Crim 1442 represents a significant judicial decision by the England and Wales...
Reclassification of Grievous Bodily Harm: R v Smith [2020] EWCA Crim 1427

Reclassification of Grievous Bodily Harm: R v Smith [2020] EWCA Crim 1427

Date: Oct 15, 2020
Reclassification of Grievous Bodily Harm: R v Smith [2020] EWCA Crim 1427 Introduction The case of R v Smith [2020] EWCA Crim 1427 serves as a pivotal precedent in the classification and sentencing...
Grainger v EWCA Crim: Enhanced Credit for Guilty Plea Under Section 111

Grainger v EWCA Crim: Enhanced Credit for Guilty Plea Under Section 111

Date: Oct 15, 2020
Grainger v EWCA Crim: Enhanced Credit for Guilty Plea Under Section 111 Introduction Grainger v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1430) is a significant decision by the England and Wales Court of Appeal (Criminal...
Admissibility of Recognition Evidence in CCTV-Based Identifications: Yaryare & Ors v. R.

Admissibility of Recognition Evidence in CCTV-Based Identifications: Yaryare & Ors v. R.

Date: Oct 14, 2020
Admissibility of Recognition Evidence in CCTV-Based Identifications: Yaryare & Ors v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 1314) Introduction The case Yaryare & Ors v. R. ([2020] EWCA Crim 1314) involves the appeals...
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v. Celgard, LLC: Defining Serious Issues in Trade Secrets Misuse under the Trade Secrets Directive and Rome II Regulation

Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v. Celgard, LLC: Defining Serious Issues in Trade Secrets Misuse under the Trade Secrets Directive and Rome II Regulation

Date: Oct 10, 2020
Shenzhen Senior Technology Material Co Ltd v. Celgard, LLC: Defining Serious Issues in Trade Secrets Misuse under the Trade Secrets Directive and Rome II Regulation Introduction In the landmark case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert