Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Shahzad v. Mazher & Anor: Decree Absolute Unimpeachable Unless Procedural Irregularities Occur

Shahzad v. Mazher & Anor: Decree Absolute Unimpeachable Unless Procedural Irregularities Occur

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Shahzad v. Mazher & Anor: Decree Absolute Unimpeachable Unless Procedural Irregularities Occur Introduction Shahzad v. Mazher & Anor ([2020] EWCA Civ 1740) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Procedural Safeguards in Interim Care Orders: Insights from Z (Interim Care Order) (Rev 1) [2020] EWCA Civ 1755

Procedural Safeguards in Interim Care Orders: Insights from Z (Interim Care Order) (Rev 1) [2020] EWCA Civ 1755

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Procedural Safeguards in Interim Care Orders: Insights from Z (Interim Care Order) (Rev 1) [2020] EWCA Civ 1755 Introduction The appellate case of Z (Interim Care Order) (Rev 1) [2020] EWCA Civ 1755...
RS v. London Borough of Brent: Affirming Cost Awards in Administrative Law

RS v. London Borough of Brent: Affirming Cost Awards in Administrative Law

Date: Dec 19, 2020
RS v. London Borough of Brent: Affirming Cost Awards in Administrative Law Introduction The case RS, R (On the Application Of) v. London Borough of Brent ([2020] EWCA Civ 1711) presents a significant...
Establishing Reasonable Duty of Care for Hotels in Protecting Guests from Third-Party Criminal Acts

Establishing Reasonable Duty of Care for Hotels in Protecting Guests from Third-Party Criminal Acts

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Establishing Reasonable Duty of Care for Hotels in Protecting Guests from Third-Party Criminal Acts Introduction The case of Al-Najar & Ors v. The Cumberland Hotel (London) Ltd ([2020] EWCA Civ 1716)...
Court of Appeal Upholds HMRC's Loan Charge Scheme as Proportionate

Court of Appeal Upholds HMRC's Loan Charge Scheme as Proportionate

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Court of Appeal Upholds HMRC's Loan Charge Scheme as Proportionate Introduction The case of Cartref Care Home Ltd & Ors v. HM Revenue and Customs ([2020] EWCA Civ 1744) addresses the legality of...
Rowlett, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1748: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in the Transition from SOPO to SHPO

Rowlett, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1748: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in the Transition from SOPO to SHPO

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Rowlett, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1748: Establishing Jurisdictional Boundaries in the Transition from SOPO to SHPO Introduction The case of Rowlett, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1748 presents a significant...
M (Children) v. Wiltshire Council: Redefining Threshold Criteria in Care Proceedings

M (Children) v. Wiltshire Council: Redefining Threshold Criteria in Care Proceedings

Date: Dec 19, 2020
M (Children) v. Wiltshire Council: Redefining Threshold Criteria in Care Proceedings Introduction The case M (Children) v. Wiltshire Council & Ors ([2020] EWCA Civ 1717) represents a pivotal moment...
Unlawful Direct Discrimination on Nationality Grounds in Social Security Benefits: Fratila & Tanase v. SSWP

Unlawful Direct Discrimination on Nationality Grounds in Social Security Benefits: Fratila & Tanase v. SSWP

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Unlawful Direct Discrimination on Nationality Grounds in Social Security Benefits: Fratila & Tanase v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions Introduction The case of Fratila & Anor v. Secretary of...
Affirmation of Joint Liability in Confiscation Orders under POCA: Nawaz v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1715

Affirmation of Joint Liability in Confiscation Orders under POCA: Nawaz v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1715

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Affirmation of Joint Liability in Confiscation Orders under POCA: Nawaz v R [2020] EWCA Crim 1715 Introduction The case of Nawaz, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1715) was adjudicated by the England and Wales...
Clarifying Totality and Plea Discounts in Sentencing: Insights from Bailey & Ors, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1719

Clarifying Totality and Plea Discounts in Sentencing: Insights from Bailey & Ors, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1719

Date: Dec 19, 2020
Clarifying Totality and Plea Discounts in Sentencing: Insights from Bailey & Ors, R v [2020] EWCA Crim 1719 Introduction The case of Bailey & Ors, R v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1719) presents a critical...
Stephenson Harwood LLP v. Medien Patentverwaltung AG: Clarifying Jurisdiction in Stakeholder Claims under CPR Parts 86 and 11

Stephenson Harwood LLP v. Medien Patentverwaltung AG: Clarifying Jurisdiction in Stakeholder Claims under CPR Parts 86 and 11

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Stephenson Harwood LLP v. Medien Patentverwaltung AG: Clarifying Jurisdiction in Stakeholder Claims under CPR Parts 86 and 11 Introduction The case of Stephenson Harwood LLP v. Medien...
Boys & Maugham v Moore [2020]: Clarifying Duplicity in Contempt of Court Charges

Boys & Maugham v Moore [2020]: Clarifying Duplicity in Contempt of Court Charges

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Boys & Maugham v Moore [2020]: Clarifying Duplicity in Contempt of Court Charges Introduction Boys & Maugham (a firm) v. Moore ([2020] EWCA Civ 1860) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England and...
Proportionate Disqualification in Operator Licensing: Insights from Coach Hire Surrey Ltd v Traffic Commissioner

Proportionate Disqualification in Operator Licensing: Insights from Coach Hire Surrey Ltd v Traffic Commissioner

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Proportionate Disqualification in Operator Licensing: Insights from Coach Hire Surrey Ltd & Anor v. Traffic Commissioner Introduction The case of Coach Hire Surrey Ltd & Anor v. Traffic Commissioner...
Enhanced Sentencing Principles in Conspiracy to Burgle: Barrett & Ors v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1775)

Enhanced Sentencing Principles in Conspiracy to Burgle: Barrett & Ors v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1775)

Date: Dec 18, 2020
Enhanced Sentencing Principles in Conspiracy to Burgle: Barrett & Ors v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1775) Introduction The case of Barrett & Ors v R ([2020] EWCA Crim 1775) represents a pivotal moment in the...
Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Planning Permission' in Option Agreements: Fishbourne Developments Ltd v. Stephens

Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Planning Permission' in Option Agreements: Fishbourne Developments Ltd v. Stephens

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Comprehensive Interpretation of 'Planning Permission' in Option Agreements: Fishbourne Developments Ltd v. Stephens Introduction The case of Fishbourne Developments Ltd v. Stephens ([2020] EWCA Civ...
Sentencing Principles in McKenzie v R: Establishing Precedents for Unduly Lenient Sentences

Sentencing Principles in McKenzie v R: Establishing Precedents for Unduly Lenient Sentences

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Sentencing Principles in McKenzie v R: Establishing Precedents for Unduly Lenient Sentences Introduction In the case of McKenzie, R. v ([2020] EWCA Crim 1776), the Court of Appeal in England and...
Separate Surcharges for Offences Sentenced in Magistrates' and Crown Courts: Precedent Set by Cuthbertson v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1883

Separate Surcharges for Offences Sentenced in Magistrates' and Crown Courts: Precedent Set by Cuthbertson v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1883

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Separate Surcharges for Offences Sentenced in Magistrates' and Crown Courts: Precedent Set by Cuthbertson v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim 1883 Introduction The case of Cuthbertson v Regina [2020] EWCA Crim...
Ensuring Fair Disclosure in Insider Trading Cases: Analyzing R (FCA) v. Abdel-Malek & Anor (2020)

Ensuring Fair Disclosure in Insider Trading Cases: Analyzing R (FCA) v. Abdel-Malek & Anor (2020)

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Ensuring Fair Disclosure in Insider Trading Cases: Analyzing R (FCA) v. Abdel-Malek & Anor (2020) Introduction The case of R (The Financial Conduct Authority) v. Abdel-Malek & Anor ([2020] EWCA Crim...
R v Martin: Establishing the Crucial Role of Fresh Psychiatric Evidence in Partial Defenses

R v Martin: Establishing the Crucial Role of Fresh Psychiatric Evidence in Partial Defenses

Date: Dec 17, 2020
R v Martin: Establishing the Crucial Role of Fresh Psychiatric Evidence in Partial Defenses Introduction In the landmark case of R v Martin ([2020] EWCA Crim 1798), the appellant, Farieissia Martin,...
Bentley Motors Limited v. Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited: A Landmark in Trademark Infringement and Honest Concurrent Use

Bentley Motors Limited v. Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited: A Landmark in Trademark Infringement and Honest Concurrent Use

Date: Dec 17, 2020
Bentley Motors Limited v. Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited: A Landmark in Trademark Infringement and Honest Concurrent Use Introduction The case of Bentley Motors Limited v. Bentley 1962...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert