Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Assessment of Sentencing Discretion in Eken & Anor, R. v: Establishing the Limits of Judicial Leniency

Assessment of Sentencing Discretion in Eken & Anor, R. v: Establishing the Limits of Judicial Leniency

Date: Jul 17, 2021
Assessment of Sentencing Discretion in Eken & Anor, R. v: Establishing the Limits of Judicial Leniency Introduction The case of Eken & Anor, R. v ([2021] EWCA Crim 1160) was heard in the England and...
Non-Binding Nature of Arbitration Awards on Third Parties in Rescission and Proprietary Claims: Vale S.A. & Ors v. Steinmetz & Ors (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 1087

Non-Binding Nature of Arbitration Awards on Third Parties in Rescission and Proprietary Claims: Vale S.A. & Ors v. Steinmetz & Ors (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 1087

Date: Jul 17, 2021
Non-Binding Nature of Arbitration Awards on Third Parties in Rescission and Proprietary Claims: Vale S.A. & Ors v. Steinmetz & Ors (Rev 1) [2021] EWCA Civ 1087 Introduction The case of Vale S.A. &...
Kandore Ltd & Ors v. HMRC: Limiting Inter Partes Hearings and Upholding Private Proceedings under Schedule 36, Finance Act 2008

Kandore Ltd & Ors v. HMRC: Limiting Inter Partes Hearings and Upholding Private Proceedings under Schedule 36, Finance Act 2008

Date: Jul 17, 2021
Kandore Ltd & Ors v. HMRC: Limiting Inter Partes Hearings and Upholding Private Proceedings under Schedule 36, Finance Act 2008 Introduction The case of Kandore Ltd & Ors v. Commissioners for Her...
Requirement of Security for Permission to Appeal in Cross-Jurisdictional Cases: Insights from Helios Oryx Ltd v Trustco Group Holdings Ltd

Requirement of Security for Permission to Appeal in Cross-Jurisdictional Cases: Insights from Helios Oryx Ltd v Trustco Group Holdings Ltd

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Requirement of Security for Permission to Appeal in Cross-Jurisdictional Cases: Insights from Helios Oryx Ltd v Trustco Group Holdings Ltd Introduction The case of Helios Oryx Ltd v Trustco Group...
Mungur v Home Department: Establishing Reasonable Expectation for Continuous Residence in ILR Applications

Mungur v Home Department: Establishing Reasonable Expectation for Continuous Residence in ILR Applications

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Mungur v Home Department: Establishing Reasonable Expectation for Continuous Residence in ILR Applications Introduction In the landmark case of Mungur, R (On the Application Of) v. Secretary of State...
Enhancing Sentencing Consistency: Insights from Malik v R [2021] EWCA Crim 1162

Enhancing Sentencing Consistency: Insights from Malik v R [2021] EWCA Crim 1162

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Enhancing Sentencing Consistency: Insights from Malik v R [2021] EWCA Crim 1162 1. Introduction The case of Malik v R [2021] EWCA Crim 1162 presents a pivotal moment in the interpretation and...
Strict Standards for Forensic Footwear Mark Evidence Affirmed: Plummer v. R [2021] EWCA Crim 1392

Strict Standards for Forensic Footwear Mark Evidence Affirmed: Plummer v. R [2021] EWCA Crim 1392

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Strict Standards for Forensic Footwear Mark Evidence Affirmed: Plummer v. R [2021] EWCA Crim 1392 Introduction Plummer, R. v ([2021] EWCA Crim 1392) is a significant judgment delivered by the England...
Proportional Sentencing in Conspiracy to Supply Class A Drugs: Insights from Eslick v. [2021] EWCA Crim 1073

Proportional Sentencing in Conspiracy to Supply Class A Drugs: Insights from Eslick v. [2021] EWCA Crim 1073

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Proportional Sentencing in Conspiracy to Supply Class A Drugs: Insights from Eslick v. [2021] EWCA Crim 1073 Introduction The case of Eslick v. [2021] EWCA Crim 1073 deals with an appeal against...
Clarification on Step-wise Sentencing for Drug Purity: Insights from Bailey & Anor, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1161

Clarification on Step-wise Sentencing for Drug Purity: Insights from Bailey & Anor, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1161

Date: Jul 16, 2021
Clarification on Step-wise Sentencing for Drug Purity: Insights from Bailey & Anor, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1161 Introduction The case of Bailey & Anor, R. v ([2021] EWCA Crim 1161) adjudicated by the...
Stanton v. R.: Establishing Boundaries for Bad Character Evidence Admissibility

Stanton v. R.: Establishing Boundaries for Bad Character Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jul 15, 2021
Stanton v. R.: Establishing Boundaries for Bad Character Evidence Admissibility Introduction Stanton v. R. ([2021] EWCA Crim 1075) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England and Wales Court of...
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Criminal Attempts: R v Aurangzab [2021] EWCA Crim 1132

Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Criminal Attempts: R v Aurangzab [2021] EWCA Crim 1132

Date: Jul 14, 2021
Enhanced Sentencing Guidelines for Criminal Attempts: R v Aurangzab [2021] EWCA Crim 1132 Introduction The case of R v Aurangzab [2021] EWCA Crim 1132 serves as a pivotal reference in the realm of...
Personal Liability of Directors in Insolvent Companies: Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalet Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v. Aytacli

Personal Liability of Directors in Insolvent Companies: Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalet Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v. Aytacli

Date: Jul 14, 2021
Personal Liability of Directors in Insolvent Companies: Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji Imalet Ithalat Ihracat Ticaret Ve Sanayi AS v. Aytacli Introduction The case of Goknur Gida Maddeleri Enerji...
Counter-Redemption and Change of Position in Unjust Enrichment: New Precedent in SFM Ltd v. Governing Body of Christ The King College

Counter-Redemption and Change of Position in Unjust Enrichment: New Precedent in SFM Ltd v. Governing Body of Christ The King College

Date: Jul 13, 2021
Counter-Redemption and Change of Position in Unjust Enrichment: New Precedent in School Facility Management Ltd & Ors v. Governing Body of Christ The King College Introduction The case of School...
VAT Exemption for Financial Services: Insights from Target Group Ltd v. HMRC ([2021] EWCA Civ 1043)

VAT Exemption for Financial Services: Insights from Target Group Ltd v. HMRC ([2021] EWCA Civ 1043)

Date: Jul 13, 2021
VAT Exemption for Financial Services: Insights from Target Group Ltd v. HMRC ([2021] EWCA Civ 1043) Introduction The case of Target Group Ltd v. Her Majesty's Revenue And Customs (HMRC) ([2021] EWCA...
Holistic Welfare Evaluation in Care Proceedings: Insights from R (A Child) Re [2021] EWCA Civ 1019

Holistic Welfare Evaluation in Care Proceedings: Insights from R (A Child) Re [2021] EWCA Civ 1019

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Holistic Welfare Evaluation in Care Proceedings: Insights from R (A Child) Re [2021] EWCA Civ 1019 Introduction The case of R (A Child) Re ([2021] EWCA Civ 1019) before the England and Wales Court of...
Clarifying 'Actual Occupation' in Land Registration: Pennistone Holdings Ltd v Rock Ferry Waterfront Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 1029

Clarifying 'Actual Occupation' in Land Registration: Pennistone Holdings Ltd v Rock Ferry Waterfront Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 1029

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Clarifying 'Actual Occupation' in Land Registration: Pennistone Holdings Ltd v Rock Ferry Waterfront Trust [2021] EWCA Civ 1029 Introduction The case of Pennistone Holdings Ltd v. Rock Ferry...
Upper Tribunal's Authority to Consider Late Acknowledgments of Service Under Rule 29(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008

Upper Tribunal's Authority to Consider Late Acknowledgments of Service Under Rule 29(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Upper Tribunal's Authority to Consider Late Acknowledgments of Service Under Rule 29(3) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 Introduction The case of KA, R (on the application of) v....
Molloy v BPHA Limited: Clarifying the Boundaries of Anti-Social Behaviour Injunctions under the ASBCPA 2014

Molloy v BPHA Limited: Clarifying the Boundaries of Anti-Social Behaviour Injunctions under the ASBCPA 2014

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Molloy v BPHA Limited: Clarifying the Boundaries of Anti-Social Behaviour Injunctions under the ASBCPA 2014 Introduction Molloy v BPHA Limited ([2021] EWCA Civ 1035) is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Establishing the Justification for Long-Duration Sexual Harm Prevention Orders: Insights from Hanson v [2021] EWCA Crim 1008

Establishing the Justification for Long-Duration Sexual Harm Prevention Orders: Insights from Hanson v [2021] EWCA Crim 1008

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Establishing the Justification for Long-Duration Sexual Harm Prevention Orders: Insights from Hanson v [2021] EWCA Crim 1008 Introduction In the case of Hanson, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 1008, the...
Strict Adherence to Judicial Review Time Limits in Immigration Cases: AK & Ors v. Entry Clearance Office

Strict Adherence to Judicial Review Time Limits in Immigration Cases: AK & Ors v. Entry Clearance Office

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Strict Adherence to Judicial Review Time Limits in Immigration Cases: AK & Ors v. Entry Clearance Office Introduction The case of AK & Ors, R (on the application of) v. The Entry Clearance Office...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert