Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries

England and Wales Case Commentaries

Procedural Record-Keeping in Sentencing: Insights from R v Scarlett [2022] EWCA Crim 534

Procedural Record-Keeping in Sentencing: Insights from R v Scarlett [2022] EWCA Crim 534

Date: Apr 7, 2022
Procedural Record-Keeping in Sentencing: Insights from R v Scarlett [2022] EWCA Crim 534 Introduction The case of R v Scarlett ([2022] EWCA Crim 534) serves as a pivotal example of how procedural...
Legal Commentary on R v Paterson [2022] EWCA Crim 456: Extension of Time in Criminal Appeals

Legal Commentary on R v Paterson [2022] EWCA Crim 456: Extension of Time in Criminal Appeals

Date: Apr 7, 2022
Legal Commentary on R v Paterson [2022] EWCA Crim 456: Extension of Time in Criminal Appeals Introduction The case of R v Paterson [2022] EWCA Crim 456 presents a critical examination of the judicial...
Chelfat v Hutchinson 3G UK Ltd: Clarifying Procedural Compliance and Limitation Periods

Chelfat v Hutchinson 3G UK Ltd: Clarifying Procedural Compliance and Limitation Periods

Date: Apr 7, 2022
Chelfat v Hutchinson 3G UK Ltd: Clarifying Procedural Compliance and Limitation Periods Introduction Chelfat v Hutchinson 3G UK Ltd ([2022] EWCA Civ 455) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England...
Volpi & Anor v Volpi [2022]: Clarifying Standards for Fact-based Appeals in Family Loan and Gift Disputes

Volpi & Anor v Volpi [2022]: Clarifying Standards for Fact-based Appeals in Family Loan and Gift Disputes

Date: Apr 6, 2022
Volpi & Anor v Volpi [2022]: Clarifying Standards for Fact-based Appeals in Family Loan and Gift Disputes Introduction The case of Volpi & Anor v Volpi ([2022] EWCA Civ 464) adjudicated by the...
Contempt of Court in Private Family Proceedings: Griffiths v Tickle & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 465

Contempt of Court in Private Family Proceedings: Griffiths v Tickle & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 465

Date: Apr 6, 2022
Contempt of Court in Private Family Proceedings: Griffiths v Tickle & Ors [2022] EWCA Civ 465 Introduction The case of Griffiths v Tickle & Ors ([2022] EWCA Civ 465) addresses critical issues...
Extended Sentencing for Organized Familial Revenge: McDonagh v. R [2022]

Extended Sentencing for Organized Familial Revenge: McDonagh v. R [2022]

Date: Apr 6, 2022
Extended Sentencing for Organized Familial Revenge: McDonagh v. R [2022] Introduction The case of McDonagh, R. v (2022) EWCA Crim 452 presents a complex scenario involving a familial revenge attack...
Sheakh v Lambeth Council: Standard for Discharging Public Sector Equality Duty in Experimental Traffic Orders

Sheakh v Lambeth Council: Standard for Discharging Public Sector Equality Duty in Experimental Traffic Orders

Date: Apr 6, 2022
Sheakh v Lambeth Council: Standard for Discharging Public Sector Equality Duty in Experimental Traffic Orders Introduction The case of Sheakh, R (On the Application Of) v London Borough of Lambeth...
Clarifying Sexual Assault Touching Under Section 78(a): R v Abdulahi [2022] EWCA Crim 412

Clarifying Sexual Assault Touching Under Section 78(a): R v Abdulahi [2022] EWCA Crim 412

Date: Apr 5, 2022
Clarifying Sexual Assault Touching Under Section 78(a): R v Abdulahi [2022] EWCA Crim 412 Introduction R v Abdulahi [2022] EWCA Crim 412 is a pivotal case adjudicated by the England and Wales Court...
Soteria Insurance Ltd v IBM: Distinguishing Wasted Expenditure from Excluded Losses in Contractual Exclusion Clauses

Soteria Insurance Ltd v IBM: Distinguishing Wasted Expenditure from Excluded Losses in Contractual Exclusion Clauses

Date: Apr 5, 2022
Soteria Insurance Ltd v IBM: Distinguishing Wasted Expenditure from Excluded Losses in Contractual Exclusion Clauses 1. Introduction Soteria Insurance Ltd v IBM United Kingdom Ltd ([2022] EWCA Civ...
Proper Application of Sentencing Reductions for Guilty Pleas: Clarifications from R v Richards [2022] EWCA Crim 247

Proper Application of Sentencing Reductions for Guilty Pleas: Clarifications from R v Richards [2022] EWCA Crim 247

Date: Apr 5, 2022
Proper Application of Sentencing Reductions for Guilty Pleas: Clarifications from R v Richards [2022] EWCA Crim 247 Introduction The case of R v Richards [2022] EWCA Crim 247 was adjudicated in the...
Ensuring Accommodation Suitability for Homeless Applicants with Protected Characteristics: Biden v Waverley Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 442

Ensuring Accommodation Suitability for Homeless Applicants with Protected Characteristics: Biden v Waverley Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 442

Date: Apr 2, 2022
Ensuring Accommodation Suitability for Homeless Applicants with Protected Characteristics: Biden v Waverley Borough Council [2022] EWCA Civ 442 Introduction The case of Biden v Waverley Borough...
Impact of New Evidence on Credibility in Criminal Appeals: The Jackson v R Case

Impact of New Evidence on Credibility in Criminal Appeals: The Jackson v R Case

Date: Apr 2, 2022
Impact of New Evidence on Credibility in Criminal Appeals: The Jackson v R Case Introduction The case of Jackson, R. v ([2022] EWCA Crim 467) is a pivotal decision by the England and Wales Court of...
Forum Appropriateness in Contribution Claims: Insights from Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors v LG Display Co Ltd & Anor

Forum Appropriateness in Contribution Claims: Insights from Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors v LG Display Co Ltd & Anor

Date: Apr 2, 2022
Forum Appropriateness in Contribution Claims: Insights from Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd & Ors v LG Display Co Ltd & Anor ([2022] EWCA Civ 423) Introduction The case of Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd &...
QH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State: Setting Precedent for HRA Article 8 and Francovich Damages in Unlawful Removal Cases

QH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State: Setting Precedent for HRA Article 8 and Francovich Damages in Unlawful Removal Cases

Date: Apr 2, 2022
QH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State: Setting Precedent for HRA Article 8 and Francovich Damages in Unlawful Removal Cases Introduction The case QH (Afghanistan) v Secretary of State for the Home...
Reaffirming Equitable Ownership: Lam v R. ([2022] WLR(D) 163)

Reaffirming Equitable Ownership: Lam v R. ([2022] WLR(D) 163)

Date: Apr 2, 2022
Reaffirming Equitable Ownership: Lam v R. ([2022] WLR(D) 163) Introduction In the landmark case of Lam v R. ([2022] WLR(D) 163), the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) addressed significant...
Amin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022]: Defining 'Good Character' in Naturalisation Applications

Amin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022]: Defining 'Good Character' in Naturalisation Applications

Date: Apr 1, 2022
Amin v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2022]: Defining 'Good Character' in Naturalisation Applications Introduction The case of Amin, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for...
Establishing the Essential Role of Computerised Accounting Systems in Criminal Convictions: White & Anor v Post Office Ltd ([2022] EWCA Crim 435)

Establishing the Essential Role of Computerised Accounting Systems in Criminal Convictions: White & Anor v Post Office Ltd ([2022] EWCA Crim 435)

Date: Apr 1, 2022
Establishing the Essential Role of Computerised Accounting Systems in Criminal Convictions: White & Anor v Post Office Ltd ([2022] EWCA Crim 435) Introduction The case of White & Anor v Post Office...
Chalk & Anor v R: Clarifying Judicial Powers and Sentence Lawfulness under Section 66 Courts Act 2003

Chalk & Anor v R: Clarifying Judicial Powers and Sentence Lawfulness under Section 66 Courts Act 2003

Date: Apr 1, 2022
Chalk & Anor v R: Clarifying Judicial Powers and Sentence Lawfulness under Section 66 Courts Act 2003 Introduction The case of Chalk & Anor v R ([2022] 4 WLR 55) adjudicated by the England and Wales...
Phillips v R: Advancing Section 3A Powers to Correct Indictment Defects in Firearms-Related Cases

Phillips v R: Advancing Section 3A Powers to Correct Indictment Defects in Firearms-Related Cases

Date: Mar 31, 2022
Phillips v R: Advancing Section 3A Powers to Correct Indictment Defects in Firearms-Related Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Phillips v R ([2022] EWCA Crim 477), the England and Wales Court...
Strict Adherence to Time Limits in Civil Procedure: Qatar Investment v Phoenix Ancient Art

Strict Adherence to Time Limits in Civil Procedure: Qatar Investment v Phoenix Ancient Art

Date: Mar 31, 2022
Strict Adherence to Time Limits in Civil Procedure: Qatar Investment v Phoenix Ancient Art Introduction In the landmark case Qatar Investment and Project Development Holding Company & Anor v Phoenix...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert