Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Uttarakhand High Court Case Commentaries

Uttarakhand High Court Validates Retrospective Imposition of Market Fee on Agricultural Produce for Manufacturing

Uttarakhand High Court Validates Retrospective Imposition of Market Fee on Agricultural Produce for Manufacturing

Date: Jul 11, 2014
Uttarakhand High Court Validates Retrospective Imposition of Market Fee and Development Cess on Agricultural Produce for Manufacturing Introduction The case of M/S Bansal Industries v. State of...
Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendments to Agricultural Produce Marketing Act

Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendments to Agricultural Produce Marketing Act

Date: Jul 11, 2014
Uttarakhand High Court Upholds Retrospective Amendments to Agricultural Produce Marketing Act Introduction In a pivotal judgment delivered on July 10, 2014, the Uttarakhand High Court addressed a...
Uttarakhand High Court Establishes Clarity on Forest Produce Classification in Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Tehri Hydro Development

Uttarakhand High Court Establishes Clarity on Forest Produce Classification in Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Tehri Hydro Development

Date: May 30, 2014
Uttarakhand High Court Establishes Clarity on Forest Produce Classification in Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Tehri Hydro Development Introduction The case of M/S. Jaiprakash Associates Ltd. v. Tehri...
Reaffirmation of Revisional Jurisdiction Over Inherent Powers: Harsh Kapoor v. State Of Uttarakhand

Reaffirmation of Revisional Jurisdiction Over Inherent Powers: Harsh Kapoor v. State Of Uttarakhand

Date: Aug 22, 2013
Reaffirmation of Revisional Jurisdiction Over Inherent Powers: Harsh Kapoor v. State Of Uttarakhand Introduction The case of Harsh Kapoor And Others v. State Of Uttarakhand And Another adjudicated by...
Reena v. State of Uttarakhand: Enhanced Standards for Bail in Non-Arrest Cases

Reena v. State of Uttarakhand: Enhanced Standards for Bail in Non-Arrest Cases

Date: Aug 13, 2013
Reena v. State of Uttarakhand: Enhanced Standards for Bail in Non-Arrest Cases Introduction Reena v. State of Uttarakhand is a landmark judgment delivered by the Uttarakhand High Court on August 12,...
Discretionary Powers in Arrests and Bail: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hari Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand

Discretionary Powers in Arrests and Bail: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hari Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand

Date: Jun 27, 2013
Discretionary Powers in Arrests and Bail: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hari Gupta v. State of Uttarakhand Introduction The case of Hari Gupta And Another Petitioners v. State Of Uttarakhand And Others...
Uttarakhand High Court Reinforces Jurisdiction Under U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 on Nazul Land

Uttarakhand High Court Reinforces Jurisdiction Under U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 on Nazul Land

Date: May 14, 2013
Uttarakhand High Court Reinforces Jurisdiction Under U.P. Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 on Nazul Land Introduction The case of Intezar Hussain v. State of Uttarakhand...
Establishing Limits on Easement Claims: Uttarakhand High Court in Asha Devi v. Govind Singh

Establishing Limits on Easement Claims: Uttarakhand High Court in Asha Devi v. Govind Singh

Date: May 7, 2013
Establishing Limits on Easement Claims: Uttarakhand High Court in Asha Devi v. Govind Singh Introduction The case of Asha Devi v. Govind Singh adjudicated by the Uttarakhand High Court on May 6,...
Permanent Establishment Determined by Project Duration: Uttarakhand High Court in Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun v. M/S BKI/HAM

Permanent Establishment Determined by Project Duration: Uttarakhand High Court in Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun v. M/S BKI/HAM

Date: Oct 15, 2011
Permanent Establishment Determined by Project Duration: Uttarakhand High Court in Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun v. M/S BKI/HAM Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Dehradun...
Change of Opinion Does Not Constitute 'Reasons to Believe' Under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act

Change of Opinion Does Not Constitute 'Reasons to Believe' Under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Aug 21, 2011
Change of Opinion Does Not Constitute 'Reasons to Believe' Under Sections 147 and 148 of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of B.J Services Company Middle East Ltd. v. Deputy Director Of Income...
Enhancing Due Process in Municipal Governance: State Of Uttarakhand v. Dinesh Randhawa & Others

Enhancing Due Process in Municipal Governance: State Of Uttarakhand v. Dinesh Randhawa & Others

Date: Jun 24, 2011
Enhancing Due Process in Municipal Governance: State Of Uttarakhand v. Dinesh Randhawa & Others Introduction The case of State Of Uttarakhand & Another v. Dinesh Randhawa & Others adjudicated by the...
Jurisdiction of Consumer Commission in Complex Bank Service Deficiency Cases: Bhagwanji D. Patel v. Indian Bank

Jurisdiction of Consumer Commission in Complex Bank Service Deficiency Cases: Bhagwanji D. Patel v. Indian Bank

Date: May 7, 2011
Jurisdiction of Consumer Commission in Complex Bank Service Deficiency Cases: Bhagwanji D. Patel v. Indian Bank Introduction The case of Bhagwanji D. Patel v. Chairman & Managing Director Indian Bank...
High Court Acquits Accused in Abdul Wahid v. State Of Uttarakhand: Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Circumstantial Cases

High Court Acquits Accused in Abdul Wahid v. State Of Uttarakhand: Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Circumstantial Cases

Date: Apr 30, 2011
High Court Acquits Accused in Abdul Wahid v. State Of Uttarakhand: Strengthening the Burden of Proof in Circumstantial Cases Introduction The case of Abdul Wahid v. State Of Uttarakhand is a...
Maersk Co. Ltd. v. Director Of Income Tax: Clarifying Liability under Section 234B for Non-Deduction of TDS on Salaries

Maersk Co. Ltd. v. Director Of Income Tax: Clarifying Liability under Section 234B for Non-Deduction of TDS on Salaries

Date: Apr 8, 2011
Maersk Co. Ltd. v. Director Of Income Tax: Clarifying Liability under Section 234B for Non-Deduction of TDS on Salaries Introduction The case of Director Of Income Tax International Taxation,...
Unified Domicile Principle for Caste Certificate Issuance in India: Insights from Smt. Dr. Madhu Arya v. State Of Uttarakhand

Unified Domicile Principle for Caste Certificate Issuance in India: Insights from Smt. Dr. Madhu Arya v. State Of Uttarakhand

Date: Apr 7, 2011
Unified Domicile Principle for Caste Certificate Issuance in India: Insights from Smt. Dr. Madhu Arya v. State Of Uttarakhand Introduction The case of Smt. Dr. Madhu Arya v. State Of Uttarakhand...
Revisiting Surveyor Expertise and Depreciation in Property Insurance Claims: Insights from Oriental Insurance Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar

Revisiting Surveyor Expertise and Depreciation in Property Insurance Claims: Insights from Oriental Insurance Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar

Date: Jul 6, 2010
Revisiting Surveyor Expertise and Depreciation in Property Insurance Claims: Insights from Oriental Insurance Ltd. v. Ashok Kumar Introduction The case of Oriental Insurance Company Limited v. Ashok...
Reevaluating Insurance Claim Settlements: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Polycap Industries

Reevaluating Insurance Claim Settlements: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Polycap Industries

Date: Jul 6, 2010
Reevaluating Insurance Claim Settlements: Insights from New India Assurance Company Limited v. Polycap Industries Introduction The case of New India Assurance Company Limited v. Polycap Industries...
Establishing Common Intention under Section 34 IPC: Insights from Smt. Angoori Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Establishing Common Intention under Section 34 IPC: Insights from Smt. Angoori Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh

Date: Jun 9, 2010
Establishing Common Intention under Section 34 IPC: Insights from Smt. Angoori Devi v. State of Uttar Pradesh Introduction The case of Smt. Angoori Devi and Others v. State of Uttar Pradesh...
Establishing Unified Domicile in India: Ensuring OBC Rights Amid Inter-State Marriages – Neha Saini v. State Of Uttarakhand

Establishing Unified Domicile in India: Ensuring OBC Rights Amid Inter-State Marriages – Neha Saini v. State Of Uttarakhand

Date: Oct 31, 2009
Establishing Unified Domicile in India: Ensuring OBC Rights Amid Inter-State Marriages – Neha Saini v. State Of Uttarakhand Introduction In the landmark case of Neha Saini Petitioner v. State Of...
Non-Residential Companies and Set-off Claims under Section 71: Precedent of Commissioner of Income-Tax And Another v. Foramer France

Non-Residential Companies and Set-off Claims under Section 71: Precedent of Commissioner of Income-Tax And Another v. Foramer France

Date: Jun 13, 2009
Non-Residential Companies and Set-off Claims under Section 71: Precedent of Commissioner of Income-Tax And Another v. Foramer France Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert