Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Rajasthan High Court Case Commentaries

Sohan Lal v. Gulab Chand: Clarification on Limitation Periods and Admissibility of Co-defendant Admissions

Sohan Lal v. Gulab Chand: Clarification on Limitation Periods and Admissibility of Co-defendant Admissions

Date: May 8, 1965
Sohan Lal v. Gulab Chand: Clarification on Limitation Periods and Admissibility of Co-defendant Admissions Introduction The case of Sohan Lal v. Gulab Chand adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Liability of Common Carriers Without Privity of Contract: Insights from Vidya Ratan v. Kota Transport Company, Ltd.

Liability of Common Carriers Without Privity of Contract: Insights from Vidya Ratan v. Kota Transport Company, Ltd.

Date: May 4, 1965
Liability of Common Carriers Without Privity of Contract: Insights from Vidya Ratan v. Kota Transport Company, Ltd. Introduction The case of Vidya Ratan v. Kota Transport Company, Ltd. adjudicated by...
Affidavit Admissibility in Section 145 CrPC: Hemdan v. State of Rajasthan

Affidavit Admissibility in Section 145 CrPC: Hemdan v. State of Rajasthan

Date: May 1, 1965
Affidavit Admissibility in Section 145 CrPC: Hemdán v. State of Rajasthan Introduction Case: Hemdan v. State of Rajasthan Court: Rajasthan High Court Date: April 30, 1965 The case of Hemdán v. State...
Authority to Dismiss Service Members Despite Judicial Acquittal: Shyam Singh v. D.I.G Of Police, Ajmer (1964)

Authority to Dismiss Service Members Despite Judicial Acquittal: Shyam Singh v. D.I.G Of Police, Ajmer (1964)

Date: Sep 23, 1964
Authority to Dismiss Service Members Despite Judicial Acquittal: Shyam Singh v. D.I.G Of Police, Ajmer (1964) Introduction Shyam Singh v. D.I.G Of Police, Ajmer is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Rajasthan High Court Affirms Constitutionality of Income Tax Act's Penal Provisions and Continuity of Notices

Rajasthan High Court Affirms Constitutionality of Income Tax Act's Penal Provisions and Continuity of Notices

Date: Sep 15, 1964
Rajasthan High Court Affirms Constitutionality of Income Tax Act's Penal Provisions and Continuity of Notices Introduction The case of Indra & Co. v. Union Of India, And Another was adjudicated by...
Seth Pushalal Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Transfer of Property in Goods for Taxation Purposes

Seth Pushalal Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Transfer of Property in Goods for Taxation Purposes

Date: Apr 30, 1964
Seth Pushalal Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Transfer of Property in Goods for Taxation Purposes Introduction The case of Seth Pushalal Mansinghka Pvt. Ltd.,...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Divorce Proceedings: Insights from Mst. Tulsi Bai v. Chunilal

Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Divorce Proceedings: Insights from Mst. Tulsi Bai v. Chunilal

Date: Apr 9, 1964
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Divorce Proceedings: Insights from Mst. Tulsi Bai v. Chunilal Introduction Mst. Tulsi Bai v. Chunilal is a landmark case adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Protection of Vested Rights of Students Against Retrospective Educational Regulations: Insights from Virendra Kapur v. The University Of Jodhpur

Protection of Vested Rights of Students Against Retrospective Educational Regulations: Insights from Virendra Kapur v. The University Of Jodhpur

Date: Feb 14, 1964
Protection of Vested Rights of Students Against Retrospective Educational Regulations: Insights from Virendra Kapur v. The University Of Jodhpur Introduction The case of Virendra Kapur v. The...
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Land Acquisition — Gopal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Land Acquisition — Gopal Singh v. State of Rajasthan

Date: Jan 21, 1964
Strict Enforcement of Procedural Requirements in Land Acquisition — Gopal Singh v. State of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Gopal Singh v. State of Rajasthan adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Clarifying the Applicability of Order XVII Rules 2 and 3 in Double Default Cases: Gopi Kishan v. Ramu

Clarifying the Applicability of Order XVII Rules 2 and 3 in Double Default Cases: Gopi Kishan v. Ramu

Date: Jan 18, 1964
Clarifying the Applicability of Order XVII Rules 2 and 3 in Double Default Cases: Gopi Kishan v. Ramu Introduction Gopi Kishan v. Ramu is a seminal judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court on...
Thakar Lal v. Nathu Lal: Affirming the Right of Auction-Purchasers to Recover Purchase Money in Absence of Judgment-Debtor's Title

Thakar Lal v. Nathu Lal: Affirming the Right of Auction-Purchasers to Recover Purchase Money in Absence of Judgment-Debtor's Title

Date: Dec 17, 1963
Thakar Lal v. Nathu Lal: Affirming the Right of Auction-Purchasers to Recover Purchase Money in Absence of Judgment-Debtor's Title 1. Introduction The case of Thakar Lal v. Nathu Lal was adjudicated...
Capital vs Revenue Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan v. Goton Lime Syndicate

Capital vs Revenue Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan v. Goton Lime Syndicate

Date: Oct 10, 1963
Capital vs Revenue Expenditure: Insights from Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan v. Goton Lime Syndicate Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan, New Delhi v....
Reaffirmation of Age Qualification Standards in Legislative Elections: Shiv Ram v. Shiv Charan Singh

Reaffirmation of Age Qualification Standards in Legislative Elections: Shiv Ram v. Shiv Charan Singh

Date: Sep 24, 1963
Reaffirmation of Age Qualification Standards in Legislative Elections: Shiv Ram v. Shiv Charan Singh Introduction The case of Shiv Ram v. Shiv Charan Singh was adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court...
Interpretation of Article 62 of the Limitation Act: Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Judgment in Jain Brothers & Co., Bundi v. State Of Rajasthan

Interpretation of Article 62 of the Limitation Act: Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Judgment in Jain Brothers & Co., Bundi v. State Of Rajasthan

Date: Aug 20, 1963
Interpretation of Article 62 of the Limitation Act: Rajasthan High Court's Landmark Judgment in Jain Brothers & Co., Bundi v. State Of Rajasthan Introduction The case of Jain Brothers & Co., Bundi v....
Maintainability of Ejectment Suits by Individual Co-Owners in Tenancy-at-Will: Ramnarain v. Kishorelal

Maintainability of Ejectment Suits by Individual Co-Owners in Tenancy-at-Will: Ramnarain v. Kishorelal

Date: May 9, 1963
Maintainability of Ejectment Suits by Individual Co-Owners in Tenancy-at-Will: Ramnarain v. Kishorelal Introduction Ramnarain v. Kishorelal is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High Court...
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Consideration in Contracts of Guarantee

Rajasthan High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Consideration in Contracts of Guarantee

Date: May 1, 1963
Rajasthan High Court Establishes Strict Requirements for Consideration in Contracts of Guarantee Introduction In the landmark case of Ram Narain v. Lt. Col. Hari Singh, decided by the Rajasthan High...
Establishing Bona Fide Necessity and Ownership through Circumstantial Evidence: Govind Ram v. Abdul Wahab

Establishing Bona Fide Necessity and Ownership through Circumstantial Evidence: Govind Ram v. Abdul Wahab

Date: Apr 19, 1963
Establishing Bona Fide Necessity and Ownership through Circumstantial Evidence: Govind Ram v. Abdul Wahab Introduction Govind Ram v. Abdul Wahab is a landmark judgment delivered by the Rajasthan High...
Defining "Removal" under Article 311: Insights from State of Rajasthan v. Kashiram

Defining "Removal" under Article 311: Insights from State of Rajasthan v. Kashiram

Date: Mar 9, 1963
Defining "Removal" under Article 311: Insights from State of Rajasthan v. Kashiram Introduction The case of State of Rajasthan v. Kashiram, adjudicated by the Rajasthan High Court on March 8, 1963,...
Locus Standi of Individual Employees in Recovering Overpayments Under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act

Locus Standi of Individual Employees in Recovering Overpayments Under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act

Date: Jan 30, 1963
Locus Standi of Individual Employees in Recovering Overpayments Under Section 72 of the Indian Contract Act Introduction The case of Dhan Singh Yadav v. Badri Prasad adjudicated by the Rajasthan High...
Rajasthan High Court Judgment on Trust Assessment and Tribunal Competence: Educational & Civil List Reserve Fund v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan

Rajasthan High Court Judgment on Trust Assessment and Tribunal Competence: Educational & Civil List Reserve Fund v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan

Date: Jan 4, 1963
Rajasthan High Court Judgment on Trust Assessment and Tribunal Competence Educational & Civil List Reserve Fund v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Delhi & Rajasthan (1963) Introduction The case of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert