Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Mandatory Signature Protocols for Company Tax Returns under Section 140(c) Income-tax Act: Hind Samachar Ltd v. Union Of India

Reaffirmation of Mandatory Signature Protocols for Company Tax Returns under Section 140(c) Income-tax Act: Hind Samachar Ltd v. Union Of India

Date: Mar 12, 2008
Reaffirmation of Mandatory Signature Protocols for Company Tax Returns under Section 140(c) Income-tax Act Hind Samachar Limited Through Kultar Krishan v. Union Of India And Others Introduction The...
Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Insights from Risala Petitioner v. State Of Haryana

Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Insights from Risala Petitioner v. State Of Haryana

Date: Mar 6, 2008
Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21: Insights from Risala Petitioner v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Risala Petitioner v. State Of Haryana adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
High Court Upholds TDS Deduction Obligations under Section 194C for Cable Operators

High Court Upholds TDS Deduction Obligations under Section 194C for Cable Operators

Date: Mar 4, 2008
High Court Upholds TDS Deduction Obligations under Section 194C for Cable Operators Introduction The case of Kurukshetra Darpans (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax dealt with pivotal issues...
Exemption of Income from Banking Activities with Nominal Members under Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

Exemption of Income from Banking Activities with Nominal Members under Section 80P(2)(a)(i)

Date: Mar 4, 2008
Exemption of Income from Banking Activities with Nominal Members under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Punjab State Co-Operative Bank Ltd. adjudicated by...
Resolving Conflicts between Hindu Succession Act and Customary Law: Mihan v. Inder Decision

Resolving Conflicts between Hindu Succession Act and Customary Law: Mihan v. Inder Decision

Date: Feb 28, 2008
Resolving Conflicts between Hindu Succession Act and Customary Law: Mihan v. Inder Decision Introduction The case of Mihan And Another v. Inder And Another adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Pawan Goel v. KMG Milk Food Ltd.: Exclusion of Time for Appeals under Limitation Act

Pawan Goel v. KMG Milk Food Ltd.: Exclusion of Time for Appeals under Limitation Act

Date: Feb 23, 2008
Pawan Goel v. KMG Milk Food Ltd.: Exclusion of Time for Appeals under Limitation Act Introduction The case of Pawan Goel v. KMG Milk Food Ltd., Kurukshetra And Others adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Establishment of Eligibility Criteria for Allotment of Chemist Shops: Anil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

Establishment of Eligibility Criteria for Allotment of Chemist Shops: Anil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others

Date: Feb 21, 2008
Establishment of Eligibility Criteria for Allotment of Chemist Shops Introduction The case of Anil Kumar v. State Of Haryana And Others was adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on February...
Extended Limitation Period under Section 11-A: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Delhi-Iv, Faridabad v. Escorts Limited

Extended Limitation Period under Section 11-A: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Delhi-Iv, Faridabad v. Escorts Limited

Date: Feb 16, 2008
Extended Limitation Period under Section 11-A: Insights from Commissioner of Central Excise Commissionerate, Delhi-Iv, Faridabad v. Escorts Limited Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Central...
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Maintenance Contracts: Insights from Regent Automobiles v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Maintenance Contracts: Insights from Regent Automobiles v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited

Date: Feb 13, 2008
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses in Maintenance Contracts: Insights from Regent Automobiles v. Indian Oil Corporation Limited Introduction The case of Regent Automobiles v. Indian Oil Corporation...
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Property Specific Performance: Shiv Charan v. Siri Ram

Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Property Specific Performance: Shiv Charan v. Siri Ram

Date: Feb 12, 2008
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Property Specific Performance: Shiv Charan v. Siri Ram Introduction The case of Shiv Charan v. Siri Ram And Another adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court...
Necessity of Guilty Intent for Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ssp P. Ltd.

Necessity of Guilty Intent for Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ssp P. Ltd.

Date: Feb 8, 2008
Necessity of Guilty Intent for Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c): Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Ssp P. Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Ssp P. Ltd. [Punjab & Haryana High...
Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Justified in Bona Fide Belief Amidst Legal Ambiguity

Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Justified in Bona Fide Belief Amidst Legal Ambiguity

Date: Feb 6, 2008
Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Justified in Bona Fide Belief Amidst Legal Ambiguity Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sohan Pal, Hue ([2008] Punjab & Haryana High Court,...
Allowability of Damages for Breach of Contract under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act

Allowability of Damages for Breach of Contract under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Jan 31, 2008
Allowability of Damages for Breach of Contract under Section 37(1) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Jamna Auto Industries, Yamunanagar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax Haryana, Rohtak,...
Vesting of Surplus Land and Prescribed Authority’s Jurisdiction under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act

Vesting of Surplus Land and Prescribed Authority’s Jurisdiction under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act

Date: Jan 29, 2008
Vesting of Surplus Land and Prescribed Authority’s Jurisdiction under the Haryana Ceiling on Land Holdings Act Introduction The case Megh Raj and Ors. v. Manphool and Ors. adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Establishing the Necessity of Proving Negligence in Sterilization Failures: State Of Haryana And Others v. Smt. Amrawati

Establishing the Necessity of Proving Negligence in Sterilization Failures: State Of Haryana And Others v. Smt. Amrawati

Date: Jan 24, 2008
Establishing the Necessity of Proving Negligence in Sterilization Failures: State Of Haryana And Others v. Smt. Amrawati Introduction The case of State Of Haryana And Others v. Smt. Amrawati...
Legal Precedent on Land Acquisition: High Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation in Eros City Developers v. State of Haryana

Legal Precedent on Land Acquisition: High Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation in Eros City Developers v. State of Haryana

Date: Jan 22, 2008
Legal Precedent on Land Acquisition: High Court Upholds Promissory Estoppel and Legitimate Expectation in Eros City Developers Private Ltd. v. State Of Haryana & Others Introduction The case of Eros...
Strengthening Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases: Anand Parkash v. State Of Haryana

Strengthening Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases: Anand Parkash v. State Of Haryana

Date: Jan 11, 2008
Strengthening Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases: Anand Parkash v. State Of Haryana Introduction The case of Anand Parkash v. State Of Haryana adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court...
Enhanced Scrutiny of Procedural Compliance in Narcotic Offences: The Jit Singh Case

Enhanced Scrutiny of Procedural Compliance in Narcotic Offences: The Jit Singh Case

Date: Jan 11, 2008
Enhanced Scrutiny of Procedural Compliance in Narcotic Offences: The Jit Singh Case Introduction The case of Jit Singh v. The State of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on January...
Right to Rebuttal Evidence Under Order 18 CPC: Ranjit Singh v. Mehfil Restaurant

Right to Rebuttal Evidence Under Order 18 CPC: Ranjit Singh v. Mehfil Restaurant

Date: Dec 20, 2007
Right to Rebuttal Evidence Under Order 18 CPC: Ranjit Singh Petitioner v. Mehfil Restaurant Introduction The case of Ranjit Singh Petitioner v. Mehfil Restaurant adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana...
INC's Mandatory Approval for B.Sc Nursing Admissions: Establishing Central Authority over University Affiliations

INC's Mandatory Approval for B.Sc Nursing Admissions: Establishing Central Authority over University Affiliations

Date: Dec 20, 2007
INC's Mandatory Approval for B.Sc Nursing Admissions: Establishing Central Authority over University Affiliations Introduction The case of Shiv Shakti Educational Society (Regd.) v. State Of Punjab...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert