Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Partial Grant of Back Wages in 'The Union Of India And Others v. Balram': A Landmark Judgment

Partial Grant of Back Wages in 'The Union Of India And Others v. Balram': A Landmark Judgment

Date: Jan 10, 2009
Partial Grant of Back Wages in 'The Union Of India And Others v. Balram': A Landmark Judgment Introduction The case of The Union Of India And Others v. Balram adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Clarifying Extension Fee Calculations: Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab

Clarifying Extension Fee Calculations: Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: Jan 9, 2009
Clarifying Extension Fee Calculations: Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab 1. Introduction The case of Harpreet Singh v. State of Punjab adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High Court on January 8,...
Application of Current Rate of Interest Under the Interest Act in Ram Gopal v. HUDA

Application of Current Rate of Interest Under the Interest Act in Ram Gopal v. HUDA

Date: Jan 7, 2009
Application of Current Rate of Interest Under the Interest Act in Ram Gopal v. Haryana Urban Development Authority Introduction Ram Gopal v. Haryana Urban Development Authority And Another is a...
Coca Cola India Inc. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Establishing Transfer Pricing Principles under Chapter X

Coca Cola India Inc. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Establishing Transfer Pricing Principles under Chapter X

Date: Dec 18, 2008
Reaffirmation of Transfer Pricing Provisions under Chapter X of the Income Tax Act in Coca Cola India Inc. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Coca Cola India Inc. v....
Gippy Arora v. State Of Punjab And Others: Establishing Jurisdiction in Custody Disputes Through Habeas Corpus

Gippy Arora v. State Of Punjab And Others: Establishing Jurisdiction in Custody Disputes Through Habeas Corpus

Date: Nov 26, 2008
Gippy Arora v. State Of Punjab And Others: Establishing Jurisdiction in Custody Disputes Through Habeas Corpus Introduction Gippy Arora v. State Of Punjab And Others is a landmark judgment delivered...
Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes 'Manufacture' Definition for Tax Deductions under Section 80-IB

Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes 'Manufacture' Definition for Tax Deductions under Section 80-IB

Date: Nov 1, 2008
Punjab & Haryana High Court Establishes 'Manufacture' Definition for Tax Deductions under Section 80-IB Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Shri Mahesh Chandra Sharma adjudicated...
Recognition of Minor Siblings as Dependents under the Railway Act for Compensation Claims

Recognition of Minor Siblings as Dependents under the Railway Act for Compensation Claims

Date: Oct 18, 2008
Recognition of Minor Siblings as Dependents under the Railway Act for Compensation Claims Introduction The case of Dhyan Singh And Another v. Union Of India And Others adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Establishing the Adequate Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Initiation under Section 271(1)(c)

Establishing the Adequate Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Initiation under Section 271(1)(c)

Date: Sep 26, 2008
Establishing the Adequate Recording of Satisfaction for Penalty Initiation under Section 271(1)(c) Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Pearey Lal And Sons (Ep) Ltd., adjudicated by...
Market Value-Based Stamp Duty Over Sale Consideration: Analysis of Sukhjit Singh Cheema v. Punjab Urban Development Authority

Market Value-Based Stamp Duty Over Sale Consideration: Analysis of Sukhjit Singh Cheema v. Punjab Urban Development Authority

Date: Sep 19, 2008
Market Value-Based Stamp Duty Over Sale Consideration: Analysis of Sukhjit Singh Cheema v. Punjab Urban Development Authority Introduction The case of Sukhjit Singh Cheema, Advocate v. Punjab Urban...
Suspended Police Officer's Absence Constitutes Misconduct: Ex. Constable Jagan Singh v. DGP Haryana

Suspended Police Officer's Absence Constitutes Misconduct: Ex. Constable Jagan Singh v. DGP Haryana

Date: Sep 17, 2008
Suspended Police Officer's Absence Constitutes Misconduct: Ex. Constable Jagan Singh v. DGP Haryana Introduction The case of Ex. Constable Jagan Singh v. Director General Of Police, Haryana is a...
Defining Injunction Grounds Among Co-Owners: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jai Karan Sharma v. Ram Kumar

Defining Injunction Grounds Among Co-Owners: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jai Karan Sharma v. Ram Kumar

Date: Sep 10, 2008
Defining Injunction Grounds Among Co-Owners: A Comprehensive Analysis of Jai Karan Sharma v. Ram Kumar Introduction The case of Jai Karan Sharma v. Ram Kumar adjudicated by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Inclusion of Gram Panchayat Areas within Municipal Limits: Insights from Gram Panchayat Bassi Sekhan v. State Of Punjab

Inclusion of Gram Panchayat Areas within Municipal Limits: Insights from Gram Panchayat Bassi Sekhan v. State Of Punjab

Date: Sep 5, 2008
Inclusion of Gram Panchayat Areas within Municipal Limits: Insights from Gram Panchayat Bassi Sekhan v. State Of Punjab Introduction The case of Gram Panchayat Bassi Sekhan v. State Of Punjab &...
Application of Section 28 Proviso for Forgery in Customs Duty Appeals: Munjal Showa Ltd. Case

Application of Section 28 Proviso for Forgery in Customs Duty Appeals: Munjal Showa Ltd. Case

Date: Sep 2, 2008
Application of Section 28 Proviso for Forgery in Customs Duty Appeals: Munjal Showa Ltd. Case Introduction The case of Munjal Showa Ltd. v. Commissioner of Customs & Central Excise (Delhi-IV),...
Joint Ownership Compensation under Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Smt. Parwati And Anr. v. The State Of Haryana And Anr.

Joint Ownership Compensation under Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Smt. Parwati And Anr. v. The State Of Haryana And Anr.

Date: Aug 28, 2008
Joint Ownership Compensation under Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Smt. Parwati And Anr. v. The State Of Haryana And Anr. Introduction The case of Smt. Parwati And Anr. v. The State Of Haryana...
Election Control Mechanisms for Sarpanch Elections: Insights from Baljit Singh v. State of Punjab

Election Control Mechanisms for Sarpanch Elections: Insights from Baljit Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: Aug 23, 2008
Election Control Mechanisms for Sarpanch Elections: Insights from Baljit Singh v. State of Punjab And Others Introduction The case of Baljit Singh v. State Of Punjab And Others adjudicated by the...
Liability of State Electricity Boards for Negligence Leading to Accidental Death: Paramjit Kaur v. State of Punjab

Liability of State Electricity Boards for Negligence Leading to Accidental Death: Paramjit Kaur v. State of Punjab

Date: Aug 21, 2008
Liability of State Electricity Boards for Negligence Leading to Accidental Death: Paramjit Kaur v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Paramjit Kaur and Ors. v. State of Punjab and Ors....
Paramvir Happy Petitioner v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Decision on the Application of Section 319 Cr.P.C

Paramvir Happy Petitioner v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Decision on the Application of Section 319 Cr.P.C

Date: Aug 14, 2008
Paramvir Happy Petitioner v. State Of Haryana: A Landmark Decision on the Application of Section 319 Cr.P.C 1. Introduction Paramvir Happy Petitioner v. State Of Haryana is a pivotal judgment...
Mandate of Procedural Safeguards in NDPS Act Enforcement: Analysis of Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab

Mandate of Procedural Safeguards in NDPS Act Enforcement: Analysis of Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab

Date: Aug 1, 2008
Mandate of Procedural Safeguards in NDPS Act Enforcement: Analysis of Malkiat Singh v. State of Punjab Introduction The case of Malkiat Singh Alias Kala v. The State Of Punjab adjudicated by the...
High Court Affirms Quashing of Defamation Complaints as Misuse of Court Process: Kamlesh Kaur v. Lakhwinder Singh

High Court Affirms Quashing of Defamation Complaints as Misuse of Court Process: Kamlesh Kaur v. Lakhwinder Singh

Date: Aug 1, 2008
High Court Affirms Quashing of Defamation Complaints as Misuse of Court Process: Kamlesh Kaur v. Lakhwinder Singh Introduction The case of Kamlesh Kaur Petitioner v. Lakhwinder Singh And Another S...
Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab: Reinforcing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases

Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab: Reinforcing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases

Date: Jul 31, 2008
Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab: Reinforcing the Necessity of Corroborative Evidence in Corruption Cases 1. Introduction The case of Karnail Singh v. State of Punjab, adjudicated by the Punjab &...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert