Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Punjab & Haryana High Court Case Commentaries

Clarifying Medical Fitness Standards in Police Recruitment: Minor Scoliosis Not a Disqualifier – Ranbir v. State of Haryana

Clarifying Medical Fitness Standards in Police Recruitment: Minor Scoliosis Not a Disqualifier – Ranbir v. State of Haryana

Date: Mar 19, 2025
Clarifying Medical Fitness Standards in Police Recruitment: Minor Scoliosis Not a Disqualifier – Ranbir v. State of Haryana Introduction Ranbir v. State of Haryana and Others (LPA No. 128 of 2020)...
Restoration of Possession Over Title: Clarifying Dispossession Requirements Under Section 6, Specific Relief Act

Restoration of Possession Over Title: Clarifying Dispossession Requirements Under Section 6, Specific Relief Act

Date: Mar 11, 2025
Restoration of Possession Over Title: Clarifying Dispossession Requirements Under Section 6, Specific Relief Act Introduction This case arises from a family dispute over a portion of a residential...
Comprehensive Compensation Assessment in Fatal MV Claims: Inclusion of Unborn Child and Conventional Heads

Comprehensive Compensation Assessment in Fatal MV Claims: Inclusion of Unborn Child and Conventional Heads

Date: Mar 7, 2025
Comprehensive Compensation Assessment in Fatal MV Claims: Inclusion of Unborn Child and Conventional Heads Introduction In the case of Krishna & Anr v. Rameshwar & Anr (2025: PHHC:031708), the Punjab...
Clarifying Judicial Criticism and the Opportunity to Be Heard: New Parameters Under Article 311(2) and High Court Rules

Clarifying Judicial Criticism and the Opportunity to Be Heard: New Parameters Under Article 311(2) and High Court Rules

Date: Mar 6, 2025
Clarifying Judicial Criticism and the Opportunity to Be Heard: New Parameters Under Article 311(2) and High Court Rules Introduction The case of ASI Naresh Kumar v. State of Haryana and Another...
Ensuring Fair Evaluation in Public Service Examinations: The HEENA SHEHRAWAT Precedent

Ensuring Fair Evaluation in Public Service Examinations: The HEENA SHEHRAWAT Precedent

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Ensuring Fair Evaluation in Public Service Examinations: The HEENA SHEHRAWAT Precedent Introduction The case of HEENA SHEHRAWAT v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS marks a significant intervention by the...
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in “Recognized Resident” Determinations: Insights from MOHAN LAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

Ensuring Procedural Fairness in “Recognized Resident” Determinations: Insights from MOHAN LAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS.

Date: Feb 6, 2025
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in “Recognized Resident” Determinations: Insights from MOHAN LAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS. Introduction The case of MOHAN LAL v. UT OF CHANDIGARH AND ORS. concerns a...
Upholding Disciplinary Autonomy in Judicial Service: No Immunity from Departmental Inquiry

Upholding Disciplinary Autonomy in Judicial Service: No Immunity from Departmental Inquiry

Date: Feb 5, 2025
Upholding Disciplinary Autonomy in Judicial Service: No Immunity from Departmental Inquiry Introduction The case of Sudhir Jiwan v. High Court of Punjab and Haryana and Anr. examines the tension...
Mandatory Formation of "Reason to Believe" as a Prerequisite for Disciplinary Proceedings Under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961

Mandatory Formation of "Reason to Believe" as a Prerequisite for Disciplinary Proceedings Under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961

Date: Jan 30, 2025
Mandatory Formation of "Reason to Believe" as a Prerequisite for Disciplinary Proceedings Under Section 35 of the Advocates Act, 1961 Introduction The judgment in the case of NARESH DILAWARI v. BAR...
Finality of Exoneration in Recruitment Processes: Restricting Reopening of Settled Departmental Inquiries

Finality of Exoneration in Recruitment Processes: Restricting Reopening of Settled Departmental Inquiries

Date: Jan 30, 2025
Finality of Exoneration in Recruitment Processes: Restricting Reopening of Settled Departmental Inquiries Introduction The case of Jaiveer Yadav and Others v. State of Haryana before the Punjab &...
Reaffirming the Authenticity Protocol in Judicial Orders: Insights from Bikram Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Reaffirming the Authenticity Protocol in Judicial Orders: Insights from Bikram Singh v. State of Punjab and Others

Date: Jan 30, 2025
Reaffirming the Authenticity Protocol in Judicial Orders: Insights from Bikram Singh v. State of Punjab and Others Introduction The judgment of Bikram Singh v. State of Punjab and Others, delivered...
Judicial Restraint in Administrative Infrastructure Decisions: Upholding Policy Parameters in Public Sports Facilities

Judicial Restraint in Administrative Infrastructure Decisions: Upholding Policy Parameters in Public Sports Facilities

Date: Jan 30, 2025
Judicial Restraint in Administrative Infrastructure Decisions: Upholding Policy Parameters in Public Sports Facilities Introduction The judgment in the case of Lakshay Attri v. Chandigarh...
Clarifying Interim Order Compliance and Contempt Jurisdiction: A Paradigm Shift in Enforcement

Clarifying Interim Order Compliance and Contempt Jurisdiction: A Paradigm Shift in Enforcement

Date: Jan 29, 2025
Clarifying Interim Order Compliance and Contempt Jurisdiction: A Paradigm Shift in Enforcement Introduction The judgment in PRITAP SINGH GREWAL & ORS v. S. GURLAL SINGH GREWAL delivered by the Punjab...
Excessive Bail Surety and the Right to Personal Liberty: Establishing Reasonable Bail Conditions

Excessive Bail Surety and the Right to Personal Liberty: Establishing Reasonable Bail Conditions

Date: Jan 29, 2025
Excessive Bail Surety and the Right to Personal Liberty: Establishing Reasonable Bail Conditions Introduction The case of SARASWATI DEVI v. HARVINDER SINGH SODHI, decided by the Punjab & Haryana High...
Mandating Administrative Swift Action: The Precedent on Timely Relief in Regulatory Actions

Mandating Administrative Swift Action: The Precedent on Timely Relief in Regulatory Actions

Date: Jan 28, 2025
Mandating Administrative Swift Action: The Precedent on Timely Relief in Regulatory Actions Introduction In the case of SINGLA ICE FACTORY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS, the Punjab &...
Establishing the Reimbursement Principle for Chronic Illness OPD Treatment in Unapproved Hospitals

Establishing the Reimbursement Principle for Chronic Illness OPD Treatment in Unapproved Hospitals

Date: Jan 28, 2025
Establishing the Reimbursement Principle for Chronic Illness OPD Treatment in Unapproved Hospitals Introduction In the case of STATE OF HARYANA & ANOTHER v. MANOJ JAIN & ORS, the Punjab & Haryana...
Upholding the Sanctity of the Admission Prospectus: Binding Reservation Criteria and Non-Arbitrariness in Educational Administration

Upholding the Sanctity of the Admission Prospectus: Binding Reservation Criteria and Non-Arbitrariness in Educational Administration

Date: Jan 28, 2025
Upholding the Sanctity of the Admission Prospectus: Binding Reservation Criteria and Non-Arbitrariness in Educational Administration Introduction The judgment in Samarveer Singh v. State of Punjab...
Reaffirming Judicial Discipline: Limiting Misuse of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Protecting the Dignity of the Judiciary

Reaffirming Judicial Discipline: Limiting Misuse of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Protecting the Dignity of the Judiciary

Date: Jan 28, 2025
Reaffirming Judicial Discipline: Limiting Misuse of Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Protecting the Dignity of the Judiciary Introduction The case of Suresh Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others before the...
Establishing the Digital Attestation Principle in Judicial Orders

Establishing the Digital Attestation Principle in Judicial Orders

Date: Jan 24, 2025
Establishing the Digital Attestation Principle in Judicial Orders Introduction The case of BHAGRATHI v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS comes before the Punjab & Haryana High Court on January 23, 2025....
Judicial Mandate on Retrospective Regularization: Balancing Statutory Policies and Administrative Finality

Judicial Mandate on Retrospective Regularization: Balancing Statutory Policies and Administrative Finality

Date: Jan 23, 2025
Judicial Mandate on Retrospective Regularization: Balancing Statutory Policies and Administrative Finality Introduction The judgment in Sanjeev Kumar v. State of Haryana and Others (Punjab & Haryana...
Judicial Boundaries in Regulating Religious Practices: Upholding Legislative Supremacy in the Karwa Chauth Debate

Judicial Boundaries in Regulating Religious Practices: Upholding Legislative Supremacy in the Karwa Chauth Debate

Date: Jan 23, 2025
Judicial Boundaries in Regulating Religious Practices: Upholding Legislative Supremacy in the Karwa Chauth Debate Introduction The case of Nareender Kumar Malhotra v. Union of India and Another...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert