Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Privy Council Case Commentaries

Affirming State Immunity: The Secretary of State for India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859)

Affirming State Immunity: The Secretary of State for India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859)

Date: Jul 10, 1859
Affirming State Immunity: The Secretary of State for India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859) Introduction The case of The Secretary of State for India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859) is a landmark...
Privy Council Confirmed Limitations of Municipal Courts on State Acts: Secretary of State in Council of India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859)

Privy Council Confirmed Limitations of Municipal Courts on State Acts: Secretary of State in Council of India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859)

Date: Jul 10, 1859
Privy Council Confirmed Limitations of Municipal Courts on State Acts: Secretary of State in Council of India v. Kamachee Boye Sahaba (1859) Introduction The case of The Secretary of State in Council...
Sing v. Bengal Government (1859): Affirming Procedural Integrity in Land Resumption Cases

Sing v. Bengal Government (1859): Affirming Procedural Integrity in Land Resumption Cases

Date: Feb 5, 1859
Sing v. Bengal Government (1859): Affirming Procedural Integrity in Land Resumption Cases Introduction Sing v. Bengal Government (India) is a landmark judgment delivered by the Privy Council on...
Bamundoss Mookerjea and Mussamut Raj Lukhee v. Mussamut Tarinee: Establishing Widow's Rights in Hindu Succession

Bamundoss Mookerjea and Mussamut Raj Lukhee v. Mussamut Tarinee: Establishing Widow's Rights in Hindu Succession

Date: Feb 24, 1858
Bamundoss Mookerjea and Mussamut Raj Lukhee v. Mussamut Tarinee: Establishing Widow's Rights in Hindu Succession Introduction The case of Bamundoss Mookerjea and Mussamut Raj Lukhee v. Mussamut...
Limitation of Colonial Legislative Authority in Judicial Functions: The Precedent Set by Fenton v. Hampton (1858)

Limitation of Colonial Legislative Authority in Judicial Functions: The Precedent Set by Fenton v. Hampton (1858)

Date: Feb 5, 1858
Limitation of Colonial Legislative Authority in Judicial Functions: The Precedent Set by Fenton v. Hampton (1858) Introduction Fenton v. Hampton is a landmark judicial decision rendered by the Privy...
Partition and Accumulation of Joint Hindu Family Estates under Testamentary Dispositions

Partition and Accumulation of Joint Hindu Family Estates under Testamentary Dispositions

Date: Jul 21, 1857
Partition and Accumulation of Joint Hindu Family Estates under Testamentary Dispositions Introduction The case of Sreemutty Soorjeemoney Dossee v. Denobundoo Mullick and Others was adjudicated by the...
Panday v. Koonweree: Establishing Judicial Standards in Matrimonial Jurisdiction

Panday v. Koonweree: Establishing Judicial Standards in Matrimonial Jurisdiction

Date: Jul 9, 1856
Panday v. Koonweree: Establishing Judicial Standards in Matrimonial Jurisdiction Introduction Hunoomanpersaud Panday versus Mussumat Babooee Munraj Koonweree is a seminal case decided by the Privy...
Adoption and Testamentary Intent: Insights from Nagalutchmee Ummal v. Gopoo Nadaraja Chetty

Adoption and Testamentary Intent: Insights from Nagalutchmee Ummal v. Gopoo Nadaraja Chetty

Date: Feb 8, 1856
Adoption and Testamentary Intent: Insights from Nagalutchmee Ummal v. Gopoo Nadaraja Chetty Introduction Nagalutchmee Ummal v. Gopoo Nadaraja Chetty and Others is a landmark 1856 Privy Council case...
Strict Compliance with Arbitration Regulations: Insights from Nusserwanjee Pestonjee v. Meer Mynoodeen Khan Wullud Meer Sudroodeen Khan Bahadoor

Strict Compliance with Arbitration Regulations: Insights from Nusserwanjee Pestonjee v. Meer Mynoodeen Khan Wullud Meer Sudroodeen Khan Bahadoor

Date: Jun 21, 1855
Strict Compliance with Arbitration Regulations: Insights from Nusserwanjee Pestonjee v. Meer Mynoodeen Khan Wullud Meer Sudroodeen Khan Bahadoor Introduction The case of Nusserwanjee Pestonjee and...
Establishment of Land Revenue Rights in Raja Lelanund Sing Bahadoor v. The Government of Bengal

Establishment of Land Revenue Rights in Raja Lelanund Sing Bahadoor v. The Government of Bengal

Date: Jun 16, 1855
Establishment of Land Revenue Rights in Raja Lelanund Sing Bahadoor v. The Government of Bengal Introduction Raja Lelanund Sing Bahadoor v. The Government of Bengal was adjudicated by the Privy...
Jurisdiction and Service on Agents: New Precedent in Carron Iron Co. v. Maclaren

Jurisdiction and Service on Agents: New Precedent in Carron Iron Co. v. Maclaren

Date: Jan 2, 1855
Jurisdiction and Service on Agents: New Precedent in Carron Iron Co. v. Maclaren Introduction The case of Carron Iron Co. Proprietors v. Maclaren (1855) presented a significant examination of...
Anderson v. Fitzgerald: Establishing Strict Liability for False Statements in Insurance Contracts

Anderson v. Fitzgerald: Establishing Strict Liability for False Statements in Insurance Contracts

Date: Jul 15, 1853
Anderson v. Fitzgerald: Establishing Strict Liability for False Statements in Insurance Contracts Introduction The case of Anderson v. Fitzgerald (United Kingdom, Privy Council, 1853) marks a...
Accrual of Cause of Action and Statute of Limitations in Contract Breach: East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul (1849)

Accrual of Cause of Action and Statute of Limitations in Contract Breach: East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul (1849)

Date: Dec 7, 1849
Accrual of Cause of Action and Statute of Limitations in Contract Breach: East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul (1849) Introduction Case: The East India Company v. Oditchurn Paul (India) Court: Privy...
Crawford v. Spooner (1846): Extending British Ship Registry within Company’s Charter

Crawford v. Spooner (1846): Extending British Ship Registry within Company’s Charter

Date: Dec 16, 1846
Extending British Ship Registry within Company’s Charter: Crawford v. Spooner (1846) Introduction Robert Wigram Crawford v. Richard Spooner was adjudicated by the Privy Council on December 15, 1846....
Clarification on Undivided Property and Widow's Rights under Hindoo Law: Rewun Persad v. Mussumat Radha Beeby

Clarification on Undivided Property and Widow's Rights under Hindoo Law: Rewun Persad v. Mussumat Radha Beeby

Date: Dec 5, 1846
Clarification on Undivided Property and Widow's Rights under Hindoo Law: Rewun Persad v. Mussumat Radha Beeby Introduction The case of Rewun Persad v. Mussumat Radha Beeby (India) decided by the...
Right of Appeal in Criminal Cases under the Bombay Charter: The Queen v. Eduljee Byramjee and Seventeen Others (1846)

Right of Appeal in Criminal Cases under the Bombay Charter: The Queen v. Eduljee Byramjee and Seventeen Others (1846)

Date: Apr 9, 1846
Right of Appeal in Criminal Cases under the Bombay Charter The Queen v. Eduljee Byramjee and Seventeen Others (1846) Introduction The case of The Queen, on the Prosecution of the Bombay Government v....
Affirmation of Joint Family Property Rights and Widow's Entitlement under Hindoo Law: Dhurm Das Pandey v. Mussumat Shama Soondri Dibiah

Affirmation of Joint Family Property Rights and Widow's Entitlement under Hindoo Law: Dhurm Das Pandey v. Mussumat Shama Soondri Dibiah

Date: Dec 9, 1843
Affirmation of Joint Family Property Rights and Widow's Entitlement under Hindoo Law Introduction The case of Dhurm Das Pandey and Others v. Mussumat Shama Soondri Dibiah was adjudicated by the Privy...
Inalienability of Wukf Endowed Property Confirmed: Jewun Doss Sahoo v. Shah Kubeer-Ood-Deen (India)

Inalienability of Wukf Endowed Property Confirmed: Jewun Doss Sahoo v. Shah Kubeer-Ood-Deen (India)

Date: Dec 10, 1840
Inalienability of Wukf Endowed Property Confirmed: Jewun Doss Sahoo v. Shah Kubeer-Ood-Deen (India) Introduction The case of Jewun Doss Sahoo v. Shah Kubeer-Ood-Deen was adjudicated by the Privy...
Rajunder Narain Rae v. Bijai Govind Sing (1839): Affirming the Validity of Compromise Agreements in the Absence of Proven Fraud

Rajunder Narain Rae v. Bijai Govind Sing (1839): Affirming the Validity of Compromise Agreements in the Absence of Proven Fraud

Date: Dec 21, 1839
Rajunder Narain Rae v. Bijai Govind Sing (1839): Affirming the Validity of Compromise Agreements in the Absence of Proven Fraud Introduction Rajunder Narain Rae and Coower Mohauinder Narain Rae, the...
Proper Procedure in Ecclesiastical Sentencing Affirmed: Bowerbank v. Bishop of Jamaica

Proper Procedure in Ecclesiastical Sentencing Affirmed: Bowerbank v. Bishop of Jamaica

Date: Feb 23, 1839
Proper Procedure in Ecclesiastical Sentencing Affirmed: Bowerbank v. Bishop of Jamaica Introduction Bowerbank v. The Right Reverend Christopher, Lord Bishop of Jamaica, decided by the Privy Council...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert