Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Privy Council Case Commentaries

Ramdutt Ramkissen Dass v. E.D. Sassoon And Co.: Establishing the Limitation Act's Applicability in Arbitration

Ramdutt Ramkissen Dass v. E.D. Sassoon And Co.: Establishing the Limitation Act's Applicability in Arbitration

Date: Jan 25, 1929
Ramdutt Ramkissen Dass v. E.D. Sassoon And Co. (1929): Establishing the Limitation Act's Applicability in Arbitration Introduction Ramdutt Ramkissen Dass v. E.D. Sassoon And Co. is a landmark case...
Kumar Gopika Raman Roy v. Atal Singh: Affirmation of Limitation Due to Unproven Tenancy Relations

Kumar Gopika Raman Roy v. Atal Singh: Affirmation of Limitation Due to Unproven Tenancy Relations

Date: Jan 23, 1929
Kumar Gopika Raman Roy v. Atal Singh: Affirmation of Limitation Due to Unproven Tenancy Relations Introduction The case of Kumar Gopika Raman Roy v. Atal Singh And Others was adjudicated by the Privy...
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Land Ownership Disputes: Rameshwar Singh v. Bajit Lal Pathak

Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Land Ownership Disputes: Rameshwar Singh v. Bajit Lal Pathak

Date: Jan 23, 1929
Affirmation of Burden of Proof in Land Ownership Disputes: Rameshwar Singh v. Bajit Lal Pathak 1. Introduction The case of Rameshwar Singh And Another v. Bajit Lal Pathak And Others adjudicated by...
Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Atmaram Bhagwant Ghadgay v. Collector Of Nagpur

Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Atmaram Bhagwant Ghadgay v. Collector Of Nagpur

Date: Jan 23, 1929
Valuation Principles in Land Acquisition: Atmaram Bhagwant Ghadgay v. Collector Of Nagpur Introduction The case of Atmaram Bhagwant Ghadgay v. Collector Of Nagpur adjudicated by the Privy Council on...
Affirmation of Rules on Imperfect Gifts and Legacy Distribution under Agarwalla Jain Custom: Hariram Serowgee v. Madan Gopal Bagla

Affirmation of Rules on Imperfect Gifts and Legacy Distribution under Agarwalla Jain Custom: Hariram Serowgee v. Madan Gopal Bagla

Date: Dec 18, 1928
Affirmation of Rules on Imperfect Gifts and Legacy Distribution under Agarwalla Jain Custom: Hariram Serowgee v. Madan Gopal Bagla Introduction Hariram Serowgee v. Madan Gopal Bagla And Another,...
Equal Share Allocation Requires Value-Based Assessment: Insights from Sennimalai Goundan v. Sellappa Goundan (1928)

Equal Share Allocation Requires Value-Based Assessment: Insights from Sennimalai Goundan v. Sellappa Goundan (1928)

Date: Dec 15, 1928
Equal Share Allocation Requires Value-Based Assessment: Insights from Sennimalai Goundan v. Sellappa Goundan (1928) Introduction The case of Sennimalai Goundan And Another v. Sellappa Goundan And...
Joint Liability in Trover Actions: Insights from Lewis Pugh Evans Pugh v. Ashutosh Sen And Others

Joint Liability in Trover Actions: Insights from Lewis Pugh Evans Pugh v. Ashutosh Sen And Others

Date: Dec 15, 1928
Joint Liability in Trover Actions: Insights from Lewis Pugh Evans Pugh v. Ashutosh Sen And Others Introduction The case of Lewis Pugh Evans Pugh v. Ashutosh Sen And Others, adjudicated by the Privy...
Mohammad Wajid Ali Khan v. Puran Singh: Establishing Comprehensive Pre-emption Rights in Village Land Disputes

Mohammad Wajid Ali Khan v. Puran Singh: Establishing Comprehensive Pre-emption Rights in Village Land Disputes

Date: Dec 7, 1928
Mohammad Wajid Ali Khan v. Puran Singh: Establishing Comprehensive Pre-emption Rights in Village Land Disputes Introduction The landmark case of Mohammad Wajid Ali Khan v. Puran Singh And Others,...
Safeguarding Testamentary Intent: The Principle of Undue Influence in Sarat Kumari Bibi v. Rai Sakhi Chand Bahadur

Safeguarding Testamentary Intent: The Principle of Undue Influence in Sarat Kumari Bibi v. Rai Sakhi Chand Bahadur

Date: Dec 1, 1928
Safeguarding Testamentary Intent: The Principle of Undue Influence in Sarat Kumari Bibi v. Rai Sakhi Chand Bahadur Introduction The case of (Srimati) Sarat Kumari Bibi v. Rai Sakhi Chand Bahadur And...
Interpretation of Conditional Land Grants and Non-Agricultural Assessments: Bomanji Ardeshir Wadia v. Secretary of State (1928)

Interpretation of Conditional Land Grants and Non-Agricultural Assessments: Bomanji Ardeshir Wadia v. Secretary of State (1928)

Date: Nov 28, 1928
Interpretation of Conditional Land Grants and Non-Agricultural Assessments: Bomanji Ardeshir Wadia v. Secretary of State (1928) Introduction The case of Bomanji Ardeshir Wadia And Others v. Secretary...
Clarifying Anticipation and Inventive Step in Patent Law: Pope v. Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd.

Clarifying Anticipation and Inventive Step in Patent Law: Pope v. Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd.

Date: Nov 24, 1928
Clarifying Anticipation and Inventive Step in Patent Law: Pope v. Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. Introduction Pope Appliance Corporation v. Spanish River Pulp and Paper Mills Ltd. is a...
Weakening Presumption of Joint Family Possession in Hindu Law: Yellappa Naik v. Tippanna

Weakening Presumption of Joint Family Possession in Hindu Law: Yellappa Naik v. Tippanna

Date: Nov 17, 1928
Weakening Presumption of Joint Family Possession in Hindu Law: Yellappa Ramappa Naik and Others v. Tippanna Introduction Yellappa Ramappa Naik and Others v. Tippanna is a landmark judgment delivered...
Recognition of Separate Property within Joint Hindu Families: Insights from Peddi Reddi Jogi Reddi v. Panem Chinnabbi Reddi And Others

Recognition of Separate Property within Joint Hindu Families: Insights from Peddi Reddi Jogi Reddi v. Panem Chinnabbi Reddi And Others

Date: Nov 16, 1928
Recognition of Separate Property within Joint Hindu Families: Insights from Peddi Reddi Jogi Reddi v. Panem Chinnabbi Reddi And Others Introduction The case of Peddi Reddi Jogi Reddi v. Panem...
Affirming the Burden of Proof in Partition Actions under Mitakshara Law: K.L.S.V.E. Annamalai Chetty v. K.L.S.V.E. Subramanian Chetty And Others

Affirming the Burden of Proof in Partition Actions under Mitakshara Law: K.L.S.V.E. Annamalai Chetty v. K.L.S.V.E. Subramanian Chetty And Others

Date: Nov 10, 1928
Affirming the Burden of Proof in Partition Actions under Mitakshara Law: K.L.S.V.E. Annamalai Chetty v. K.L.S.V.E. Subramanian Chetty And Others Introduction The case K.L.S.V.E. Annamalai Chetty v....
Presumption of Undue Influence in Property Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Inche Noriah Binte Mohamed Tahir v. Shaik Allie Bin Omar Bin Abdullah Bahashuan

Presumption of Undue Influence in Property Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Inche Noriah Binte Mohamed Tahir v. Shaik Allie Bin Omar Bin Abdullah Bahashuan

Date: Oct 16, 1928
Presumption of Undue Influence in Property Gifts: A Comprehensive Analysis of Inche Noriah Binte Mohamed Tahir v. Shaik Allie Bin Omar Bin Abdullah Bahashuan Introduction The case of Inche Noriah...
Defining "Public Charitable Institutions": Insights from Laurence Arthur Adamson And Others v. Melbourne And Metropolitan Board Of Works

Defining "Public Charitable Institutions": Insights from Laurence Arthur Adamson And Others v. Melbourne And Metropolitan Board Of Works

Date: Oct 16, 1928
Defining "Public Charitable Institutions": Insights from Laurence Arthur Adamson And Others v. Melbourne And Metropolitan Board Of Works Introduction The case of Laurence Arthur Adamson And Others v....
Recognition of Interest on Expropriation Compensation: Inglewood Pulp and Paper Co. Ltd. v. New Brunswick Electric Power Commission (1928)

Recognition of Interest on Expropriation Compensation: Inglewood Pulp and Paper Co. Ltd. v. New Brunswick Electric Power Commission (1928)

Date: Jul 21, 1928
Recognition of Interest on Expropriation Compensation: Inglewood Pulp and Paper Co. Ltd. v. New Brunswick Electric Power Commission (1928) Introduction The case of Inglewood Pulp and Paper Co. Ltd....
Survivorship Rights in Joint Widowship: Limitations on Unilateral Mortgages

Survivorship Rights in Joint Widowship: Limitations on Unilateral Mortgages

Date: Jul 6, 1928
Survivorship Rights in Joint Widowship: Limitations on Unilateral Mortgages Introduction The judgment in Gauri Nath Kakaji v. Mt. Gaya Kuar (Privy Council, 1928) serves as a pivotal authority in...
Limits on Revision Powers: Insights from Kishan Singh v. Emperor

Limits on Revision Powers: Insights from Kishan Singh v. Emperor

Date: Jul 3, 1928
Limits on Revision Powers: Insights from Kishan Singh v. Emperor Introduction Kishan Singh v. Emperor is a landmark judgment delivered by the Privy Council on July 2, 1928. This case delves into the...
Credibility and Evidentiary Standards in Documentary Disputes: Kessarbai v. Jethabhai Jivan (1928)

Credibility and Evidentiary Standards in Documentary Disputes: Kessarbai v. Jethabhai Jivan (1928)

Date: Jun 29, 1928
Credibility and Evidentiary Standards in Documentary Disputes: Kessarbai v. Jethabhai Jivan (1928) Introduction The case of Kessarbai v. Jethabhai Jivan adjudicated by the Privy Council on June 28,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert