Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Privy Council Case Commentaries

Establishing Manufacturer's Duty of Care: Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd. (1935)

Establishing Manufacturer's Duty of Care: Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd. (1935)

Date: Oct 22, 1935
Establishing Manufacturer's Duty of Care: Grant v Australian Knitting Mills Ltd. (1935) Introduction The case of Richard Thorold Grant v. Australian Knitting Mills Ltd. And Others decided by the...
Establishing Absolute Estate of Inheritance: Commentary on Singh v. Kuar (1935)

Establishing Absolute Estate of Inheritance: Commentary on Singh v. Kuar (1935)

Date: Jul 24, 1935
Establishing Absolute Estate of Inheritance: Commentary on Singh v. Kuar (1935) Introduction The case of (Kunwar) Rameshwar Bakhsh Singh And Others v. (Thakurain) Balraj Kuar And Others, adjudicated...
Validation of Adoption Without Genuine Consent Under Madras Hindu Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Krishnayya Rao v. Venkata Kumara Mahipathi Surya Rao

Validation of Adoption Without Genuine Consent Under Madras Hindu Law: A Comprehensive Commentary on Krishnayya Rao v. Venkata Kumara Mahipathi Surya Rao

Date: Jun 29, 1935
Validation of Adoption Without Genuine Consent Under Madras Hindu Law Krishnayya Rao and Another v. Venkata Kumara Mahipathi Surya Rao Privy Council Decision, June 28, 1935 Introduction The case of...
Privy Council Upholds Canadian Legislative Supremacy in Appeal Prohibition

Privy Council Upholds Canadian Legislative Supremacy in Appeal Prohibition

Date: Jun 7, 1935
Privy Council Upholds Canadian Legislative Supremacy in Appeal Prohibition Introduction The case of British Coal Corporation And Others v. The King decided by the Privy Council on June 6, 1935,...
Res Judicata Principles in Mutt Property Execution: Kedar Nath Goenka v. Munshi Ram Narain Lal And Others (1935)

Res Judicata Principles in Mutt Property Execution: Kedar Nath Goenka v. Munshi Ram Narain Lal And Others (1935)

Date: Jun 5, 1935
Res Judicata Principles in Mutt Property Execution: Kedar Nath Goenka v. Munshi Ram Narain Lal And Others (1935) Introduction The case of Kedar Nath Goenka v. Munshi Ram Narain Lal And Others...
Life Annuities Classified as Taxable Income under 'Other Sources' – Analysis of Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar And Orissa

Life Annuities Classified as Taxable Income under 'Other Sources' – Analysis of Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar And Orissa

Date: May 29, 1935
Life Annuities Classified as Taxable Income under 'Other Sources' – Analysis of Gopal Saran Narain Singh v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bihar And Orissa Introduction The landmark case of Gopal Saran...
Limits of Counsel’s Authority in Compromise Agreements: Sheonandan Prasad Singh v. Reza

Limits of Counsel’s Authority in Compromise Agreements: Sheonandan Prasad Singh v. Reza

Date: May 22, 1935
Limits of Counsel’s Authority in Compromise Agreements: Sheonandan Prasad Singh v. Reza Introduction The case of Sheonandan Prasad Singh And Others v. Hakim Abdul Fateh Mohammad Reza And Another is a...
Presumption of Will Authenticity and Adoption Validity under Customary Jat Law: Basant Singh v. Brij Raj Saran Singh

Presumption of Will Authenticity and Adoption Validity under Customary Jat Law: Basant Singh v. Brij Raj Saran Singh

Date: May 18, 1935
Presumption of Will Authenticity and Adoption Validity under Customary Jat Law: Basant Singh v. Brij Raj Saran Singh Introduction Basant Singh And Others v. Brij Raj Saran Singh And Others is a...
Transfer of Jurisdiction in Criminal Appeals: The Landmark Judgment in Hari v. Emperor

Transfer of Jurisdiction in Criminal Appeals: The Landmark Judgment in Hari v. Emperor

Date: Apr 13, 1935
Transfer of Jurisdiction in Criminal Appeals: The Landmark Judgment in Hari v. Emperor Introduction Hari v. Emperor is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Privy Council on April 12, 1935. This case...
Maritime National Fish Ltd. v. Ocean Trawlers Ltd. (1935) - Self-Induced Frustration Cannot Excuse Contractual Obligations

Maritime National Fish Ltd. v. Ocean Trawlers Ltd. (1935) - Self-Induced Frustration Cannot Excuse Contractual Obligations

Date: Apr 13, 1935
Maritime National Fish Ltd. v. Ocean Trawlers Ltd. (1935) Self-Induced Frustration Cannot Excuse Contractual Obligations Introduction Maritime National Fish Ltd. v. Ocean Trawlers Ltd. is a seminal...
Defining the Legal Nature of Religious Trusts: Patel Chhotabhai v. Basak – A Landmark Privy Council Decision

Defining the Legal Nature of Religious Trusts: Patel Chhotabhai v. Basak – A Landmark Privy Council Decision

Date: Mar 6, 1935
Defining the Legal Nature of Religious Trusts: Patel Chhotabhai v. Jnan Chandra Basak – A Landmark Privy Council Decision Introduction The case of Patel Chhotabhai And Others v. Jnan Chandra Basak...
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Appellate Proceedings: King-Emperor v. Dahu Raut (1935)

Jurisdictional Boundaries in Appellate Proceedings: King-Emperor v. Dahu Raut (1935)

Date: Mar 2, 1935
Jurisdictional Boundaries in Appellate Proceedings: King-Emperor v. Dahu Raut (1935) Introduction The case of King-Emperor v. Dahu Raut (1935) was adjudicated by the Privy Council, serving as a...
Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish: Clarifying Estoppel and Security Rights in Commercial Transactions

Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish: Clarifying Estoppel and Security Rights in Commercial Transactions

Date: Feb 22, 1935
Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish: Clarifying Estoppel and Security Rights in Commercial Transactions Introduction The case of Dawsons Bank Ltd. v. Nippon Menkwa Kabushihi Kaish...
Enforcement of Delivery Obligations and Rescission for Wrongful Repudiation under the Contract Act: Nune Sivayya v. Maddu Ranganayakulu

Enforcement of Delivery Obligations and Rescission for Wrongful Repudiation under the Contract Act: Nune Sivayya v. Maddu Ranganayakulu

Date: Feb 13, 1935
Enforcement of Delivery Obligations and Rescission for Wrongful Repudiation under the Contract Act: Nune Sivayya v. Maddu Ranganayakulu Introduction The case of Nune Sivayya and Another v. Maddu...
Non-Exclusion of Execution Periods from Limitation Computation: Maqbul Ahmad v. Onkar Pratap Narain Singh

Non-Exclusion of Execution Periods from Limitation Computation: Maqbul Ahmad v. Onkar Pratap Narain Singh

Date: Feb 8, 1935
Non-Exclusion of Execution Periods from Limitation Computation: Maqbul Ahmad v. Onkar Pratap Narain Singh Introduction The case of Maqbul Ahmad and Others v. Onkar Pratap Narain Singh and Others is a...
Valuation Principles and Statutory Limitations in Employment-Based Land Leases: Chandrika Prasada v. BB&CIR Co. (1935)

Valuation Principles and Statutory Limitations in Employment-Based Land Leases: Chandrika Prasada v. BB&CIR Co. (1935)

Date: Jan 19, 1935
Valuation Principles and Statutory Limitations in Employment-Based Land Leases: Chandrika Prasada v. Bombay Baroda And Central India Ry. Co. (1935) 1. Introduction The case of Chandrika Prasada v....
Affirmation of Primogeniture in Succession under the Oudh Estates Act: A Comprehensive Commentary on Ejas Ali Qidwai And Others v. Special Manager, Court Of Wards, Balrampur Estate And Others

Affirmation of Primogeniture in Succession under the Oudh Estates Act: A Comprehensive Commentary on Ejas Ali Qidwai And Others v. Special Manager, Court Of Wards, Balrampur Estate And Others

Date: Dec 19, 1934
Affirmation of Primogeniture in Succession under the Oudh Estates Act Ejas Ali Qidwai And Others v. Special Manager, Court Of Wards, Balrampur Estate And Others (1934) 1. Introduction The case of...
Maharaja Srischandra Nandy v. Baijnath Jugal Kishore: Establishing Principles of Adverse Possession in Coal Mining Rights

Maharaja Srischandra Nandy v. Baijnath Jugal Kishore: Establishing Principles of Adverse Possession in Coal Mining Rights

Date: Dec 15, 1934
Maharaja Srischandra Nandy v. Baijnath Jugal Kishore: Establishing Principles of Adverse Possession in Coal Mining Rights Introduction The case of Maharaja Srischandra Nandy And Others v. Baijnath...
Seth Pratapsingh Moholalbhai v. Keshavlal Harilal Setahvad: Discharge of Sureties Without Consent

Seth Pratapsingh Moholalbhai v. Keshavlal Harilal Setahvad: Discharge of Sureties Without Consent

Date: Nov 28, 1934
Discharge of Sureties Without Consent: The Landmark Decision in Seth Pratapsingh Moholalbhai v. Keshavlal Harilal Setahvad Introduction The case of Seth Pratapsingh Moholalbhai and Another v....
Valid Pledge of Goods via Documentary Titles under Section 178, Contract Act, 1872

Valid Pledge of Goods via Documentary Titles under Section 178, Contract Act, 1872

Date: Oct 16, 1934
Valid Pledge of Goods via Documentary Titles under Section 178, Contract Act, 1872 Introduction The case of Official Assignee, Madras v. Mercantile Bank Of India Ltd. adjudicated by the Privy Council...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert