Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Officers in Filing Complaints Under Section 476 IPC: Analysis of Nand Kumar Sinha v. Emperor

Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Officers in Filing Complaints Under Section 476 IPC: Analysis of Nand Kumar Sinha v. Emperor

Date: Dec 9, 1936
Jurisdiction of Sub-Divisional Officers in Filing Complaints Under Section 476 IPC: Analysis of Nand Kumar Sinha v. Emperor Introduction The case of Nand Kumar Sinha v. Emperor ([1936] Patna High...
Preservation of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Joti Lal Sah v. Sheodhayan Prashad Sah

Preservation of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Joti Lal Sah v. Sheodhayan Prashad Sah

Date: Mar 24, 1936
Preservation of Equity of Redemption in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Joti Lal Sah v. Sheodhayan Prashad Sah Introduction Joti Lal Sah and Others v. Sheodhayan Prashad Sah and Others,...
Assignment of Leases and Forfeiture: Insights from Kuchwar Lime v. Secretary of State

Assignment of Leases and Forfeiture: Insights from Kuchwar Lime v. Secretary of State

Date: Feb 8, 1936
Assignment of Leases and Forfeiture: Insights from Kuchwar Lime v. Secretary of State Introduction Kuchwar Lime v. Secretary of State, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on February 7, 1936, deals...
Res Judicata and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Janki Das v. Kalu Ram

Res Judicata and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Janki Das v. Kalu Ram

Date: Jan 21, 1936
Res Judicata and Judicial Discretion: Insights from Janki Das v. Kalu Ram Introduction Janki Das v. Kalu Ram is a seminal case adjudicated by the Patna High Court on January 20, 1936. This civil...
Apurba Krishna Mitra v. Ram Bahadur: Clarifying Interest Pendente Lite and Appeal Abatement upon Defendant’s Demise

Apurba Krishna Mitra v. Ram Bahadur: Clarifying Interest Pendente Lite and Appeal Abatement upon Defendant’s Demise

Date: Jan 10, 1936
Apurba Krishna Mitra v. Ram Bahadur: Clarifying Interest Pendente Lite and Appeal Abatement upon Defendant’s Demise Introduction Apurba Krishna Mitra v. Ram Bahadur is a significant judgment...
Secy. Of State v. Lodna Colliery Co. Ltd. [1935] Patna High Court: Expanding Compensation Obligations Under the Mines Acquisition Act

Secy. Of State v. Lodna Colliery Co. Ltd. [1935] Patna High Court: Expanding Compensation Obligations Under the Mines Acquisition Act

Date: Dec 6, 1935
Secy. Of State v. Lodna Colliery Co. Ltd. [1935] Patna High Court: Expanding Compensation Obligations Under the Mines Acquisition Act Introduction The case of Secy. Of State v. Lodna Colliery Co....
Non-Abatement of Appeals Upon Death in Joint Families: Sankru Mahto v. Bhoju Mahato

Non-Abatement of Appeals Upon Death in Joint Families: Sankru Mahto v. Bhoju Mahato

Date: Nov 13, 1935
Non-Abatement of Appeals Upon Death in Joint Families: Sankru Mahto v. Bhoju Mahato Introduction Sankru Mahto v. Bhoju Mahato is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on November 12,...
Revival of Execution Proceedings in Cases of Null Sales: Surendra Kumar Singh v. Srichand Mahata And Others

Revival of Execution Proceedings in Cases of Null Sales: Surendra Kumar Singh v. Srichand Mahata And Others

Date: Oct 18, 1935
Revival of Execution Proceedings in Cases of Null Sales: Surendra Kumar Singh v. Srichand Mahata And Others Introduction The case of Surendra Kumar Singh v. Srichand Mahata And Others adjudicated by...
Clarification on Prosecution Initiation under Section 195 of Cr PC: Patna High Court in Jugeshwar Singh v. Emperor

Clarification on Prosecution Initiation under Section 195 of Cr PC: Patna High Court in Jugeshwar Singh v. Emperor

Date: May 3, 1935
Clarification on Prosecution Initiation under Section 195 of Cr PC: Patna High Court in Jugeshwar Singh v. Emperor Introduction The case of Jugeshwar Singh And Others v. Emperor Opposite Party was...
Liability of Sons for Pre-Partition Ancestral Debts under Section 53: Atul Krishna Roy v. Lala Nandanji

Liability of Sons for Pre-Partition Ancestral Debts under Section 53: Atul Krishna Roy v. Lala Nandanji

Date: Apr 11, 1935
Liability of Sons for Pre-Partition Ancestral Debts under Section 53: Atul Krishna Roy v. Lala Nandanji Introduction The case of Atul Krishna Roy v. Lala Nandanji adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Defendant's Right to Independent Valuation on Appeal Memorandum under Section 7(iv)(f) of the Court-fees Act

Defendant's Right to Independent Valuation on Appeal Memorandum under Section 7(iv)(f) of the Court-fees Act

Date: Apr 11, 1935
Defendant's Right to Independent Valuation on Appeal Memorandum under Section 7(iv)(f) of the Court-fees Act Introduction The case of Deoji Goa v. Tricumji Jivan Das adjudicated by the Patna High...
Patna High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Mortgage Suit Revisions under CPC Orders 21 and 23: Harihar Prasad Narain Singh v. Gopal Saran Narain Singh

Patna High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Mortgage Suit Revisions under CPC Orders 21 and 23: Harihar Prasad Narain Singh v. Gopal Saran Narain Singh

Date: Feb 13, 1935
Patna High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Mortgage Suit Revisions under CPC Orders 21 and 23 Introduction The case of Harihar Prasad Narain Singh v. Gopal Saran Narain Singh adjudicated by the Patna...
Boundary Statements in Third-Party Documents: Admissibility under Section 32(3) - Soney Lal Jha v. Darabdeo Narain Singh

Boundary Statements in Third-Party Documents: Admissibility under Section 32(3) - Soney Lal Jha v. Darabdeo Narain Singh

Date: Feb 8, 1935
Boundary Statements in Third-Party Documents: Admissibility under Section 32(3) - Soney Lal Jha v. Darabdeo Narain Singh Introduction The case of Soney Lal Jha v. Darabdeo Narain Singh revolves...
Sundarji Shivji v. Secretary Of State For India: Establishing Strict Compliance with Statutory Procedures in Conversion Claims

Sundarji Shivji v. Secretary Of State For India: Establishing Strict Compliance with Statutory Procedures in Conversion Claims

Date: Jul 5, 1934
Sundarji Shivji v. Secretary Of State For India: Establishing Strict Compliance with Statutory Procedures in Conversion Claims Introduction The case of Sundarji Shivji v. Secretary Of State For India...
Protection of Religious Endowments: Susil Chandra Sen v. Gobind Chandra Das

Protection of Religious Endowments: Susil Chandra Sen v. Gobind Chandra Das

Date: Feb 24, 1934
Protection of Religious Endowments: Susil Chandra Sen v. Gobind Chandra Das Introduction Susil Chandra Sen and Another v. Gobind Chandra Das and Another is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Patna...
Pathak Bhaunath Singh v. Thakur Kedar Nath Singh: Clarifying Limitation Periods for Restitution Applications under CPC Section 144

Pathak Bhaunath Singh v. Thakur Kedar Nath Singh: Clarifying Limitation Periods for Restitution Applications under CPC Section 144

Date: Feb 9, 1934
Pathak Bhaunath Singh v. Thakur Kedar Nath Singh: Clarifying Limitation Periods for Restitution Applications under CPC Section 144 Introduction The case of Pathak Bhaunath Singh v. Thakur Kedar Nath...
Dispossession and Limitation under the Bengal Tenancy Act: Jurawan Singh v. Ramsarekh Singh

Dispossession and Limitation under the Bengal Tenancy Act: Jurawan Singh v. Ramsarekh Singh

Date: Jan 20, 1933
Dispossession and Limitation under the Bengal Tenancy Act: Jurawan Singh v. Ramsarekh Singh Introduction The case of Jurawan Singh And Others v. Ramsarekh Singh And Others adjudicated by the Patna...
Clarification on section 24 of the Evidence Act: Santokhi Beldar v. King-Emperor

Clarification on section 24 of the Evidence Act: Santokhi Beldar v. King-Emperor

Date: Dec 24, 1932
Clarification on section 24 of the Evidence Act: Santokhi Beldar v. King-Emperor Introduction The case of Santokhi Beldar v. King-Emperor adjudicated by the Patna High Court on December 23, 1932,...
Uma Singh v. King Emperor: Upholding Magistrate’s Authority to Reopen Cases Under Sections 173 and 190 of the CrPC

Uma Singh v. King Emperor: Upholding Magistrate’s Authority to Reopen Cases Under Sections 173 and 190 of the CrPC

Date: Dec 16, 1932
Uma Singh v. King Emperor: Upholding Magistrate’s Authority to Reopen Cases Under Sections 173 and 190 of the CrPC Introduction Uma Singh v. King Emperor is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Patna...
Jnanendra Prasad Bose v. Gopal Prasad Sen: Upholding Judicial Authority and Contempt of Court

Jnanendra Prasad Bose v. Gopal Prasad Sen: Upholding Judicial Authority and Contempt of Court

Date: Nov 11, 1932
Jnanendra Prasad Bose v. Gopal Prasad Sen: Upholding Judicial Authority and Contempt of Court Introduction Jnanendra Prasad Bose v. Gopal Prasad Sen is a landmark case adjudicated by the Patna High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert