Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Individual Assessment over Hindu Undivided Family Status in Income Tax: Insights from Sardar Indra Singh v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Individual Assessment over Hindu Undivided Family Status in Income Tax: Insights from Sardar Indra Singh v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Sep 19, 1942
Individual Assessment over Hindu Undivided Family Status in Income Tax: Insights from Sardar Indra Singh v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Sardar Bahadur Sardar Indra Singh v....
Limits on Amendments to Execution Petitions: Patna High Court in Gajanand Sha v. Dayanand Thakur

Limits on Amendments to Execution Petitions: Patna High Court in Gajanand Sha v. Dayanand Thakur

Date: Aug 28, 1942
Limits on Amendments to Execution Petitions: Patna High Court in Gajanand Sha v. Dayanand Thakur Introduction The case of Gajanand Sha v. Dayanand Thakur adjudicated by the Patna High Court on August...
Establishing the Onus of Proof in Charitable Trust Disputes: Insights from Mahanth Ramsaran Das v. Jai Ram Das

Establishing the Onus of Proof in Charitable Trust Disputes: Insights from Mahanth Ramsaran Das v. Jai Ram Das

Date: Aug 20, 1942
Establishing the Onus of Proof in Charitable Trust Disputes: Insights from Mahanth Ramsaran Das v. Jai Ram Das Introduction Mahanth Ramsaran Das v. Jai Ram Das is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Magistrate’s Authority Under Section 145 CrPC: Insights from Nandkishore Prasad Singh v. Radhakishun

Magistrate’s Authority Under Section 145 CrPC: Insights from Nandkishore Prasad Singh v. Radhakishun

Date: Jul 14, 1942
Magistrate’s Authority Under Section 145 CrPC: Insights from Nandkishore Prasad Singh v. Radhakishun Introduction The case of Nandkishore Prasad Singh v. Radhakishun adjudicated by the Patna High...
Patna High Court's Interpretation of Section 145 CrPC: Jurisdiction in Anticipated Breach of Peace Cases

Patna High Court's Interpretation of Section 145 CrPC: Jurisdiction in Anticipated Breach of Peace Cases

Date: Jul 7, 1942
Patna High Court's Interpretation of Section 145 CrPC: Jurisdiction in Anticipated Breach of Peace Cases Introduction The case of Shibnarayan Das And Others v. Satyadeo Prasad And Another was...
Patna High Court Sets Precedent on Arbitration Clause Impeachment and Fraud Allegations

Patna High Court Sets Precedent on Arbitration Clause Impeachment and Fraud Allegations

Date: Mar 24, 1942
Patna High Court Sets Precedent on Arbitration Clause Impeachment and Fraud Allegations Introduction The case of Narsingh Prasad Boobna v. Dhanraj Mills adjudicated by the Patna High Court on March...
Limits on the Exercise of Section 144 Cr PC: Ram Narain Sah v. Parmeshar Prasad Sah

Limits on the Exercise of Section 144 Cr PC: Ram Narain Sah v. Parmeshar Prasad Sah

Date: Mar 14, 1942
Limits on the Exercise of Section 144 Cr PC: Ram Narain Sah v. Parmeshar Prasad Sah Introduction The case of Ram Narain Sah and Another v. Parmeshar Prasad Sah And Others, adjudicated by the Patna...
Date of Decree for Limitation Purposes Under Article 182: Judgment Date Prevails

Date of Decree for Limitation Purposes Under Article 182: Judgment Date Prevails

Date: Feb 4, 1942
Date of Decree for Limitation Purposes Under Article 182: Judgment Date Prevails Introduction The case of Mohammad Sadique Mian v. Mahabir Sao adjudicated by the Patna High Court on February 3, 1942,...
Reforming Tenancy Rights: Patna High Court's Landmark Decision in Deen Mohammad Mian v. Hulas Narain Singh

Reforming Tenancy Rights: Patna High Court's Landmark Decision in Deen Mohammad Mian v. Hulas Narain Singh

Date: Jan 24, 1942
Reforming Tenancy Rights: Patna High Court's Landmark Decision in Deen Mohammad Mian v. Hulas Narain Singh 1. Introduction The case of Deen Mohammad Mian v. Hulas Narain Singh adjudicated by the...
Patna High Court's Jurisdiction in Orissa Tenancy Act: Arjun Rautara v. Maharaja Krishna Chandra Gajapati Narayan Deo

Patna High Court's Jurisdiction in Orissa Tenancy Act: Arjun Rautara v. Maharaja Krishna Chandra Gajapati Narayan Deo

Date: Sep 20, 1941
Patna High Court's Jurisdiction in Orissa Tenancy Act: Arjun Rautara v. Maharaja Krishna Chandra Gajapati Narayan Deo Introduction The case of Arjun Rautara v. Maharaja Krishna Chandra Gajapati...
Reaffirmation of Lease Transfer and Res Judicata Principles in Bhudeb Chandra Roy v. Bhikshakar Pattanaik

Reaffirmation of Lease Transfer and Res Judicata Principles in Bhudeb Chandra Roy v. Bhikshakar Pattanaik

Date: Aug 28, 1941
Reaffirmation of Lease Transfer and Res Judicata Principles in Bhudeb Chandra Roy v. Bhikshakar Pattanaik Introduction The case of Bhudeb Chandra Roy v. Bhikshakar Pattanaik adjudicated by the Patna...
Strict Compliance with Section 12A in Joint Family Property Mortgages: Insights from Shyam Behari Singh v. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu

Strict Compliance with Section 12A in Joint Family Property Mortgages: Insights from Shyam Behari Singh v. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu

Date: Aug 27, 1941
Strict Compliance with Section 12A in Joint Family Property Mortgages: Insights from Shyam Behari Singh v. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu Introduction The case of Shyam Behari Singh v. Rameshwar Prasad Sahu...
Clarifying Agricultural Income and Cess under the Bihar Agricultural Income-Tax Act: Province Of Bihar v. Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo

Clarifying Agricultural Income and Cess under the Bihar Agricultural Income-Tax Act: Province Of Bihar v. Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo

Date: Apr 18, 1941
Clarifying Agricultural Income and Cess under the Bihar Agricultural Income-Tax Act: Province Of Bihar v. Maharaja Pratap Udai Nath Sahi Deo Introduction The case of Province Of Bihar v. Maharaja...
Limitation Bar Applied to Unsecured Overdraft Claims: Uma Shanker Prasad v. Bank of Bihar Ltd.

Limitation Bar Applied to Unsecured Overdraft Claims: Uma Shanker Prasad v. Bank of Bihar Ltd.

Date: Apr 5, 1941
Limitation Bar Applied to Unsecured Overdraft Claims: Uma Shanker Prasad v. Bank of Bihar Ltd. Introduction The case of Uma Shanker Prasad v. Bank of Bihar Ltd. adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Establishing the Validity of Testamentary Documents: Insights from Kashi Nath Singh v. Dulhin Gulzari Kuer

Establishing the Validity of Testamentary Documents: Insights from Kashi Nath Singh v. Dulhin Gulzari Kuer

Date: Mar 19, 1941
Establishing the Validity of Testamentary Documents: Insights from Kashi Nath Singh v. Dulhin Gulzari Kuer Introduction The case of Kashi Nath Singh v. Dulhin Gulzari Kuer adjudicated by the Patna...
Clarification on Court Fees in Partition Suits: Ramautar Sao v. Ram Gobind Sao

Clarification on Court Fees in Partition Suits: Ramautar Sao v. Ram Gobind Sao

Date: Mar 7, 1941
Clarification on Court Fees in Partition Suits: Ramautar Sao v. Ram Gobind Sao Introduction The case of Ramautar Sao v. Ram Gobind Sao ([Patna High Court, March 6, 1941](#)) addresses significant...
Establishing Right of Appeal in Raja Brajasunder Deb v. Raja Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo

Establishing Right of Appeal in Raja Brajasunder Deb v. Raja Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo

Date: Mar 6, 1941
Establishing Right of Appeal in Raja Brajasunder Deb v. Raja Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo Introduction The case of Raja Brajasunder Deb v. Raja Rajendra Narayan Bhanj Deo, adjudicated by the Patna High...
Estoppel in Land Transfer Under the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act: Analysis of Dhanna Munda v. Mt. Kosila Bania

Estoppel in Land Transfer Under the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act: Analysis of Dhanna Munda v. Mt. Kosila Bania

Date: Jan 25, 1941
Estoppel in Land Transfer Under the Chota Nagpur Tenancy Act: Analysis of Dhanna Munda v. Mt. Kosila Bania Introduction The case of Dhanna Munda and Another v. Mt. Kosila Bania adjudicated by the...
Corroborative Requirements for Dying Declarations in Murder Convictions: Mohamad Arif v. Emperor

Corroborative Requirements for Dying Declarations in Murder Convictions: Mohamad Arif v. Emperor

Date: Jan 4, 1941
Corroborative Requirements for Dying Declarations in Murder Convictions: Mohamad Arif v. Emperor Introduction Mohamad Arif v. Emperor is a landmark case adjudicated by the Patna High Court on January...
Nandkumar Sinha v. Rai Bahadur Pashupati Ghosh: Upholding Statutory Bar on Suits Against Crown Servants

Nandkumar Sinha v. Rai Bahadur Pashupati Ghosh: Upholding Statutory Bar on Suits Against Crown Servants

Date: Nov 23, 1940
Nandkumar Sinha v. Rai Bahadur Pashupati Ghosh: Upholding Statutory Bar on Suits Against Crown Servants Introduction The case of Nandkumar Sinha v. Rai Bahadur Pashupati Ghosh, adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert