Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Narayan v. The King: Redefining the Burden of Proof in Private Defence under Section 105, Evidence Act

Narayan v. The King: Redefining the Burden of Proof in Private Defence under Section 105, Evidence Act

Date: Dec 12, 1947
Narayan v. The King: Redefining the Burden of Proof in Private Defence under Section 105, Evidence Act Introduction Narayan v. The King is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on...
Mandatory Compliance with Detention Grounds: Insights from Muratpatwa v. Province Of Bihar

Mandatory Compliance with Detention Grounds: Insights from Muratpatwa v. Province Of Bihar

Date: Sep 23, 1947
Mandatory Compliance with Detention Grounds: Insights from Muratpatwa v. Province Of Bihar Introduction Muratpatwa v. Province Of Bihar, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on September 22, 1947, is...
Lachhmi Prasad v. Gobardhan Das: Establishing Procedural Clarity for Filing Arbitration Awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940

Lachhmi Prasad v. Gobardhan Das: Establishing Procedural Clarity for Filing Arbitration Awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940

Date: Aug 27, 1947
Lachhmi Prasad v. Gobardhan Das: Establishing Procedural Clarity for Filing Arbitration Awards under the Arbitration Act, 1940 Introduction The case of Lachhmi Prasad v. Gobardhan Das and Others...
Hiba-bil-Ewaz Classified as Sale: Establishing a Legal Precedent in Mohammad Usman Khan v. Amir Main

Hiba-bil-Ewaz Classified as Sale: Establishing a Legal Precedent in Mohammad Usman Khan v. Amir Main

Date: Aug 27, 1947
Hiba-bil-Ewaz Classified as Sale: Establishing a Legal Precedent in Mohammad Usman Khan v. Amir Main Introduction The case of Mohammad Usman Khan v. Amir Main, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Inam Land Tenure and Adverse Possession: Markanda v. V.K.R Naidu (1947)

Inam Land Tenure and Adverse Possession: Markanda v. V.K.R Naidu (1947)

Date: Aug 9, 1947
Inam Land Tenure and Adverse Possession: Markanda v. V.K.R Naidu (1947) Introduction Markanda v. V.K.R Naidu is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on August 8, 1947. The case...
Rai Kumar Singh v. Abhai Kumar Singh and Others: Upholding Family Settlements under Section 6(a) of the Transfer of Property Act

Rai Kumar Singh v. Abhai Kumar Singh and Others: Upholding Family Settlements under Section 6(a) of the Transfer of Property Act

Date: May 9, 1947
Rai Kumar Singh v. Abhai Kumar Singh and Others: Upholding Family Settlements under Section 6(a) of the Transfer of Property Act Introduction The case of Rai Kumar Singh and Another v. Abhai Kumar...
Establishing Third-Party Rights in Railway Consignments: Governor-General In Council v. Joynarain Ritolia

Establishing Third-Party Rights in Railway Consignments: Governor-General In Council v. Joynarain Ritolia

Date: May 1, 1947
Establishing Third-Party Rights in Railway Consignments: Governor-General In Council v. Joynarain Ritolia Introduction The case of Governor-General In Council v. Joynarain Ritolia adjudicated by the...
Liability Limitation Under Risk Notes A and Z: Governor-General In Council v. Thakursi Dass

Liability Limitation Under Risk Notes A and Z: Governor-General In Council v. Thakursi Dass

Date: Apr 22, 1947
Liability Limitation Under Risk Notes A and Z: Governor-General In Council v. Thakursi Dass Introduction The case of Governor-General In Council v. Thakursi Dass adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Effects of Irregular Notice Service under Order XXI, Rule 22 CPC: Ramlalsahu v. Mt. Ramia

Effects of Irregular Notice Service under Order XXI, Rule 22 CPC: Ramlalsahu v. Mt. Ramia

Date: Mar 29, 1947
Effects of Irregular Notice Service under Order XXI, Rule 22 CPC: Ramlalsahu v. Mt. Ramia 1. Introduction Ramlalsahu v. Mt. Ramia is a seminal judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on March 28,...
Bhubaneshwar Prasad Narain Sinha v. Rajeshwar Prasad Narain Sinha And Others: Establishing Criteria for Receiver Appointment in Joint Family Partition Suits

Bhubaneshwar Prasad Narain Sinha v. Rajeshwar Prasad Narain Sinha And Others: Establishing Criteria for Receiver Appointment in Joint Family Partition Suits

Date: Mar 18, 1947
Bhubaneshwar Prasad Narain Sinha v. Rajeshwar Prasad Narain Sinha And Others: Establishing Criteria for Receiver Appointment in Joint Family Partition Suits Introduction The case of Bhubaneshwar...
Recognition of Jointly Executed Documents as Wills: Rajeshwar Misser v. Sukhdeo Missir

Recognition of Jointly Executed Documents as Wills: Rajeshwar Misser v. Sukhdeo Missir

Date: Mar 13, 1947
Recognition of Jointly Executed Documents as Wills: Rajeshwar Misser v. Sukhdeo Missir Introduction The case of Rajeshwar Misser And Others v. Sukhdeo Missir adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
Establishing the Nature of Equitable Mortgages and Document Registration: Insights from Rachpalmahraj v. Bhagwandas

Establishing the Nature of Equitable Mortgages and Document Registration: Insights from Rachpalmahraj v. Bhagwandas

Date: Mar 12, 1947
Establishing the Nature of Equitable Mortgages and Document Registration: Insights from Rachpalmahraj v. Bhagwandas Introduction The case of Rachpalmahraj v. Bhagwandas, adjudicated by the Patna High...
Sadei Sahu v. Chandramani Dei: Reinforcing the Retroactive Effect of Registered Instruments in Property Transfers

Sadei Sahu v. Chandramani Dei: Reinforcing the Retroactive Effect of Registered Instruments in Property Transfers

Date: Feb 18, 1947
Sadei Sahu v. Chandramani Dei: Reinforcing the Retroactive Effect of Registered Instruments in Property Transfers Introduction The case of Sadei Sahu v. Chandramani Dei adjudicated by the Patna High...
Res Judicata and Execution Proceedings in Mortgage Decrees: Sheonarainsah v. Mt. Deolochankuer

Res Judicata and Execution Proceedings in Mortgage Decrees: Sheonarainsah v. Mt. Deolochankuer

Date: Nov 28, 1946
Res Judicata and Execution Proceedings in Mortgage Decrees: Sheonarainsah v. Mt. Deolochankuer Introduction Sheonarainsah v. Mt. Deolochankuer is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court...
Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Ram Chander Prasad v. Sital Prasad

Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Ram Chander Prasad v. Sital Prasad

Date: Oct 31, 1946
Res Judicata in Property Disputes: Ram Chander Prasad v. Sital Prasad Introduction Ram Chander Prasad And Others v. Sital Prasad And Others is a landmark judgment delivered by the Patna High Court on...
Revocation of Letters of Administration: Insights from Mt. Sheopati v. Ramakant

Revocation of Letters of Administration: Insights from Mt. Sheopati v. Ramakant

Date: Sep 21, 1946
Revocation of Letters of Administration: Insights from Mt. Sheopati v. Ramakant Introduction Mt. Sheopati v. Ramakant is a landmark case adjudicated by the Patna High Court on September 20, 1946. The...
Res Judicata and Binding Execution Petitions: Insights from Ramnarain v. Basudeo

Res Judicata and Binding Execution Petitions: Insights from Ramnarain v. Basudeo

Date: Aug 3, 1946
Res Judicata and Binding Execution Petitions: Insights from Ramnarain v. Basudeo Introduction The case of Ramnarain v. Basudeo, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on August 2, 1946, serves as a...
Procedural Integrity and Evidence Admissibility under Defence of India Rules: Province of Bihar v. Bhim

Procedural Integrity and Evidence Admissibility under Defence of India Rules: Province of Bihar v. Bhim

Date: Apr 25, 1946
Procedural Integrity and Evidence Admissibility under Defence of India Rules: Province of Bihar v. Bhim Introduction The case of Province of Bihar v. Bhim, adjudicated by the Patna High Court on...
A.B. & Co. Ltd. v. District Board: Jurisdiction in Contract Breach Suits Under CPC Section 20

A.B. & Co. Ltd. v. District Board: Jurisdiction in Contract Breach Suits Under CPC Section 20

Date: Feb 12, 1946
A.B. & Co. Ltd. v. District Board: Jurisdiction in Contract Breach Suits Under CPC Section 20 Introduction The judgment in A.B. & Co. Ltd. v. District Board delivered by the Patna High Court on...
Hazara Singh v. King-Emperor: Reinforcing Procedural Rights and Correct Application of Penal Code Sections

Hazara Singh v. King-Emperor: Reinforcing Procedural Rights and Correct Application of Penal Code Sections

Date: Jan 26, 1946
Hazara Singh v. King-Emperor: Reinforcing Procedural Rights and Correct Application of Penal Code Sections Introduction The case of Hazara Singh v. King-Emperor, adjudicated by the Patna High Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert