Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Affirming Partnership Validity within Excise Business under Section 26-A: Md. Warasat Hussain v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Affirming Partnership Validity within Excise Business under Section 26-A: Md. Warasat Hussain v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Feb 25, 1971
Affirming Partnership Validity within Excise Business under Section 26-A: Md. Warasat Hussain v. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of Md. Warasat Hussain v. The Commissioner Of Income...
Right of Pre-emption under Bihar Land Reforms Act: Ram Chandra Srivastava v. Parsidh Narain Singh

Right of Pre-emption under Bihar Land Reforms Act: Ram Chandra Srivastava v. Parsidh Narain Singh

Date: Sep 24, 1970
Right of Pre-emption under Bihar Land Reforms Act: Ram Chandra Srivastava v. Parsidh Narain Singh Introduction The case of Ram Chandra Srivastava And Others v. Parsidh Narain Singh And Others...
Establishing Informal Partition Through Conduct: Insights from Arjun Mahto & Others v. Monda Mahatain & Others

Establishing Informal Partition Through Conduct: Insights from Arjun Mahto & Others v. Monda Mahatain & Others

Date: Jul 15, 1970
Establishing Informal Partition Through Conduct: Insights from Arjun Mahto & Others v. Monda Mahatain & Others Introduction The case of Arjun Mahto And Others v. Monda Mahatain And Others adjudicated...
Exhaustion of Election Petitions Before Writ Jurisdiction in Gram Panchayat Elections

Exhaustion of Election Petitions Before Writ Jurisdiction in Gram Panchayat Elections

Date: May 6, 1970
Exhaustion of Election Petitions Before Writ Jurisdiction in Gram Panchayat Elections Introduction The case of Dilip Kumar Singh And Another v. State Of Bihar And Others addressed crucial issues...
Reinforcing the Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Against the State

Reinforcing the Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Against the State

Date: Apr 8, 1970
Reinforcing the Mandatory Compliance with Section 80 of the CPC in Suits Against the State Introduction The judicial landscape of India is continuously shaped by pivotal judgments that interpret and...
Subhlal Gope v. State of Bihar: Clarifying the Reviewability of Discharge Orders under Section 369 CrPC

Subhlal Gope v. State of Bihar: Clarifying the Reviewability of Discharge Orders under Section 369 CrPC

Date: Mar 21, 1970
Subhlal Gope v. State of Bihar: Clarifying the Reviewability of Discharge Orders under Section 369 CrPC Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute...
Reaffirmation of Seniority Rights for Promoted IAS Officers: S.A.F Abbas & Others v. State of Bihar

Reaffirmation of Seniority Rights for Promoted IAS Officers: S.A.F Abbas & Others v. State of Bihar

Date: Nov 8, 1969
Reaffirmation of Seniority Rights for Promoted IAS Officers: S.A.F Abbas & Others v. State of Bihar Introduction The case titled S.A.F Abbas and Others v. State of Bihar and Others Opposite Party,...
Determination of Tenancy through Partial Notice Service in Tenants-in-Common: Insights from Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Abdul Ahad and Others

Determination of Tenancy through Partial Notice Service in Tenants-in-Common: Insights from Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Abdul Ahad and Others

Date: Oct 10, 1969
Determination of Tenancy through Partial Notice Service in Tenants-in-Common: Insights from Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd. v. Abdul Ahad and Others Introduction The case of The Tata Iron & Steel Co. Ltd....
Jurisdictional Boundaries Under the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961: Insights from Amarnath Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bihar

Jurisdictional Boundaries Under the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961: Insights from Amarnath Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bihar

Date: Sep 7, 1969
Jurisdictional Boundaries Under the Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961: Insights from Amarnath Singh v. Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal, Bihar Introduction The case of Amarnath Singh v....
Sumeshwar Mishra v. Swami Nath Tiwari: Affirming Full Ownership Rights of Hindu Widows Under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Sumeshwar Mishra v. Swami Nath Tiwari: Affirming Full Ownership Rights of Hindu Widows Under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Date: Sep 6, 1969
Sumeshwar Mishra v. Swami Nath Tiwari: Affirming Full Ownership Rights of Hindu Widows Under Section 14(1) of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Introduction The case of Sumeshwar Mishra And Others v....
Patna High Court Establishes Clear Definition of Agricultural Land for Wealth Tax Exemption

Patna High Court Establishes Clear Definition of Agricultural Land for Wealth Tax Exemption

Date: Aug 17, 1969
Patna High Court Establishes Clear Definition of Agricultural Land for Wealth Tax Exemption Introduction In the landmark case of Syed Rafiqur Rahman v. Commissioner Of Wealth Tax, Patna Opposite...
Non-Acknowledgment of Dishonored Cheques and Its Implications on Limitation Periods: Arjunlal Dhanji Rathod v. Dayaram Premji Padhiar

Non-Acknowledgment of Dishonored Cheques and Its Implications on Limitation Periods: Arjunlal Dhanji Rathod v. Dayaram Premji Padhiar

Date: Aug 7, 1969
Non-Acknowledgment of Dishonored Cheques and Its Implications on Limitation Periods: Arjunlal Dhanji Rathod v. Dayaram Premji Padhiar Introduction The case of Arjunlal Dhanji Rathod v. Dayaram Premji...
Recognition of Indian Railways as an Industry under Industrial Disputes Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Somu Kumar Chatterjee v. District Signal Tele-Communication Engineer

Recognition of Indian Railways as an Industry under Industrial Disputes Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Somu Kumar Chatterjee v. District Signal Tele-Communication Engineer

Date: May 24, 1969
Recognition of Indian Railways as an Industry under Industrial Disputes Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Somu Kumar Chatterjee v. District Signal Tele-Communication Engineer Introduction The case of...
Bihar High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Clarity for Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals

Bihar High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Clarity for Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals

Date: May 17, 1969
Bihar High Court Establishes Jurisdictional Clarity for Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals Introduction The case of Bihar Co-Operative Motor Vehicles Ins. Society Ltd. v. Rameshwar Raut And Others...
Joint Family Representation in Land Acquisition Compensation: Insights from Bhadar Munda v. Dhuchua Oraon

Joint Family Representation in Land Acquisition Compensation: Insights from Bhadar Munda v. Dhuchua Oraon

Date: Apr 19, 1969
Joint Family Representation in Land Acquisition Compensation: Insights from Bhadar Munda v. Dhuchua Oraon Introduction The case of Bhadar Munda and Another v. Dhuchua Oraon, adjudicated by the Patna...
Rodio Foundation Engineering Ltd. v. State of Bihar: Defining 'Industry' and 'Workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Rodio Foundation Engineering Ltd. v. State of Bihar: Defining 'Industry' and 'Workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947

Date: Apr 16, 1969
Rodio Foundation Engineering Ltd. v. State of Bihar: Defining 'Industry' and 'Workmen' under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Introduction The case of Management Of Rodio Foundation Engineering Ltd....
Non-Applicability of Article 311 Protections to Employees of Registered Societies: K.C Thomas v. R.L Gadeock And Another

Non-Applicability of Article 311 Protections to Employees of Registered Societies: K.C Thomas v. R.L Gadeock And Another

Date: Apr 8, 1969
Non-Applicability of Article 311 Protections to Employees of Registered Societies: K.C Thomas v. R.L Gadeock And Another Introduction The case of K.C Thomas v. R.L Gadeock And Another, adjudicated by...
Valid Basis for Income-Tax Officer’s Belief Under Section 147: Insights from Elphinstone Picture Palace v. Union of India

Valid Basis for Income-Tax Officer’s Belief Under Section 147: Insights from Elphinstone Picture Palace v. Union of India

Date: Feb 27, 1969
Valid Basis for Income-Tax Officer’s Belief Under Section 147: Insights from Elphinstone Picture Palace v. Union of India Introduction The case of Elphinstone Picture Palace v. Union Of India And...
Prosecution of Railway Officers Without Sanction: Insights from D.S Bhoria & Another v. N. Singh

Prosecution of Railway Officers Without Sanction: Insights from D.S Bhoria & Another v. N. Singh

Date: Feb 13, 1969
Prosecution of Railway Officers Without Sanction: Insights from D.S Bhoria & Another v. N. Singh Introduction The legal landscape governing the prosecution of public servants, particularly those in...
Patna High Court Clearly Delineates Jurisdiction and Damages in Contract Breach Case: M/S. Matanhella Brothers v. M/S. Shri Mahabir Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Patna High Court Clearly Delineates Jurisdiction and Damages in Contract Breach Case: M/S. Matanhella Brothers v. M/S. Shri Mahabir Industries Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Feb 12, 1969
Patna High Court Clearly Delineates Jurisdiction and Damages in Contract Breach Case: M/S. Matanhella Brothers v. M/S. Shri Mahabir Industries Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The case of M/S. Matanhella...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert