Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Patna High Court Case Commentaries

Patna High Court Establishes Precedence on Seniority-Cum-Merit in Promotions

Patna High Court Establishes Precedence on Seniority-Cum-Merit in Promotions

Date: Nov 5, 1999
Patna High Court Establishes Precedence on Seniority-Cum-Merit in Promotions Introduction The case of Ranchi Kshetriya Gramin Bank & Ors. (In 208) v. Lal Oraon & Ors. (In 209), adjudicated by the...
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Departmental Enquiries: Insights from S.K Verma v. The State Of Bihar

Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Departmental Enquiries: Insights from S.K Verma v. The State Of Bihar

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Ensuring Procedural Fairness in Departmental Enquiries: Insights from S.K Verma v. The State Of Bihar Introduction The case of S.K Verma v. The State Of Bihar & Ors. adjudicated by the Patna High...
Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' for Reassessment Notices under Section 148: Insights from Usha Beltron Ltd. v. J.C.I.T.

Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' for Reassessment Notices under Section 148: Insights from Usha Beltron Ltd. v. J.C.I.T.

Date: Aug 27, 1999
Clarifying 'Reason to Believe' for Reassessment Notices under Section 148: Insights from Usha Beltron Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax And Others Introduction The case of Usha Beltron Ltd....
Lalita Devi v. Shakuntala Devi: Upholding Family Pension Rights for Government Servants' Widows

Lalita Devi v. Shakuntala Devi: Upholding Family Pension Rights for Government Servants' Widows

Date: Aug 17, 1999
Lalita Devi v. Shakuntala Devi: Upholding Family Pension Rights for Government Servants' Widows 1. Introduction The case of Lalita Devi (In 11049) v. Shakuntala Devi (In 5476) was adjudicated by the...
Enforcement of Prescribed Selection Procedures for Public Appointments: Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Enforcement of Prescribed Selection Procedures for Public Appointments: Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar

Date: Aug 4, 1999
Enforcement of Prescribed Selection Procedures for Public Appointments: Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar Introduction The case of Sudhir Kumar v. The State of Bihar & Ors. adjudicated by the Patna...
State's Inability to Impose Sales Tax on Indivisible Works Contracts: Patna High Court Ruling

State's Inability to Impose Sales Tax on Indivisible Works Contracts: Patna High Court Ruling

Date: Jul 20, 1999
State's Inability to Impose Sales Tax on Indivisible Works Contracts: Patna High Court Ruling 1. Introduction The case of M/S. Larsen And Toubro Ltd. v. M/S. U.B Engineering Ltd. was adjudicated in...
Patna High Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property in Barhu Ram & Ors. v. Butai Ram & Anr.

Patna High Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property in Barhu Ram & Ors. v. Butai Ram & Anr.

Date: Jun 25, 1999
Patna High Court Upholds Self-Acquired Property in Barhu Ram & Ors. v. Butai Ram & Anr. Introduction The case of Barhu Ram & Ors. v. Butai Ram & Anr. adjudicated by the Patna High Court on June 24,...
Limitations on Presumptive Assessments of Undisclosed Income in Property Transactions under Chapter XIV-B

Limitations on Presumptive Assessments of Undisclosed Income in Property Transactions under Chapter XIV-B

Date: May 7, 1999
Limitations on Presumptive Assessments of Undisclosed Income in Property Transactions under Chapter XIV-B Introduction The case D. N. Kamani (Huf) v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax adjudicated by...
Investment Allowance Eligibility Under Section 43A: Insights from M/S. Usha Beltron Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Investment Allowance Eligibility Under Section 43A: Insights from M/S. Usha Beltron Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Apr 24, 1999
Investment Allowance Eligibility Under Section 43A: Insights from M/S. Usha Beltron Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of M/S. Usha Beltron Ltd., Ranchi v. Commissioner Of...
Mandating Proper Disciplinary Authority in Employee Dismissal: The Rama Kant Sharma Case

Mandating Proper Disciplinary Authority in Employee Dismissal: The Rama Kant Sharma Case

Date: Apr 16, 1999
Mandating Proper Disciplinary Authority in Employee Dismissal: The Rama Kant Sharma Case Introduction The case of Rama Kant Sharma v. The Patliputra Central Co-Operative Bank & Ors. was adjudicated...
Limitation Period as a Barrier to Winding Up Petitions: Insights from Ferro Alloys Corp. Ltd. v. Rajhans Steel Ltd.

Limitation Period as a Barrier to Winding Up Petitions: Insights from Ferro Alloys Corp. Ltd. v. Rajhans Steel Ltd.

Date: Apr 2, 1999
Limitation Period as a Barrier to Winding Up Petitions: Insights from Ferro Alloys Corp. Ltd. v. Rajhans Steel Ltd. Introduction The case of Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. v. Rajhans Steel Ltd. heard...
Jurisdictional Authority in Transfer and Posting of Gazetted Officers: Insights from Asit Kumar Mukherjee v. Gorakh Nath Yadav

Jurisdictional Authority in Transfer and Posting of Gazetted Officers: Insights from Asit Kumar Mukherjee v. Gorakh Nath Yadav

Date: Mar 16, 1999
Jurisdictional Authority in Transfer and Posting of Gazetted Officers: Insights from Asit Kumar Mukherjee v. Gorakh Nath Yadav Introduction The case of Asit Kumar Mukherjee (In 1720) v. Gorakh Nath...
Ensuring Audi Alteram Partem: Kumar Arun Chandra Singh v. State Of Bihar & Others

Ensuring Audi Alteram Partem: Kumar Arun Chandra Singh v. State Of Bihar & Others

Date: Mar 14, 1999
Ensuring Audi Alteram Partem: Kumar Arun Chandra Singh v. State Of Bihar & Others Introduction The case of Kumar Arun Chandra Singh v. State Of Bihar And Others was adjudicated by the Patna High...
Judicial Commentary: Authority and Control in Private Sanskrit Education Institutions

Judicial Commentary: Authority and Control in Private Sanskrit Education Institutions

Date: Jan 30, 1999
Judicial Commentary: Authority and Control in Private Sanskrit Education Institutions Introduction The case of Chandra Nath Thakur And Others v. The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board And Others...
Affirmation of Murder Conviction Based on Corroborated Testimony and Medical Evidence in Laxmi Singh v. State Of Bihar

Affirmation of Murder Conviction Based on Corroborated Testimony and Medical Evidence in Laxmi Singh v. State Of Bihar

Date: Jan 13, 1999
Affirmation of Murder Conviction Based on Corroborated Testimony and Medical Evidence in Laxmi Singh v. State Of Bihar Introduction The case of Laxmi Singh v. State Of Bihar adjudicated by the Patna...
Registrar, Trade Unions' Limited Jurisdiction in Adjudicating Internal Union Disputes: Insights from Bokaro Steel Workers' Union v. State of Bihar

Registrar, Trade Unions' Limited Jurisdiction in Adjudicating Internal Union Disputes: Insights from Bokaro Steel Workers' Union v. State of Bihar

Date: Jan 11, 1999
Registrar, Trade Unions' Limited Jurisdiction in Adjudicating Internal Union Disputes: Insights from Bokaro Steel Workers' Union & Another v. The State Of Bihar & Ors. Introduction The case of Bokaro...
Comprehensive Commentary on Ranchi Handloom Emporium v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another

Comprehensive Commentary on Ranchi Handloom Emporium v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another

Date: Aug 19, 1998
Reaffirming the Boundaries of Reassessment: Insights from Ranchi Handloom Emporium v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another 1. Introduction The case of Ranchi Handloom Emporium v. Commissioner Of...
Section 131(1)(d) Notices Require Pending Proceedings: Patna High Court Sets Precedent

Section 131(1)(d) Notices Require Pending Proceedings: Patna High Court Sets Precedent

Date: Aug 19, 1998
Section 131(1)(d) Notices Require Pending Proceedings: Patna High Court Sets Precedent Introduction The case of Smt. Rina Sen v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, South Chotanagpur & Others was...
Clarification on Penalty Cancellation under Section 271(1)(c) Post-1976 Amendment: Patna High Court's Ruling

Clarification on Penalty Cancellation under Section 271(1)(c) Post-1976 Amendment: Patna High Court's Ruling

Date: Aug 18, 1998
Clarification on Penalty Cancellation under Section 271(1)(c) Post-1976 Amendment: Patna High Court's Ruling Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bihar, Ranchi v. M/S. Kailash...
Patna HC Upholds Right to Challenge Public Employment Selection Procedures Despite Participation

Patna HC Upholds Right to Challenge Public Employment Selection Procedures Despite Participation

Date: Aug 14, 1998
Patna High Court Upholds Right to Challenge Public Employment Selection Procedures Despite Participation Introduction In the case of Dilip Kumar Jha & Anr. (In 11897) v. Arun Kumar Yadav & Ors. (In...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert