Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Expanding Defenses for Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance: Insights from M.M.S Investments v. V. Veerappan

Expanding Defenses for Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance: Insights from M.M.S Investments v. V. Veerappan

Date: Jan 26, 2000
Expanding Defenses for Subsequent Purchasers in Specific Performance: Insights from M.M.S Investments v. V. Veerappan Introduction The case of M.M.S Investments Through Its Managing Director And 4...
Protection of Special Pay under Fundamental Rules: F. Abdul Lateef v. State of Tamil Nadu

Protection of Special Pay under Fundamental Rules: F. Abdul Lateef v. State of Tamil Nadu

Date: Jan 25, 2000
Protection of Special Pay under Fundamental Rules: F. Abdul Lateef v. State of Tamil Nadu Introduction The case of F. Abdul Lateef, Manager, Office of the Government Pleader, High Court, Madras v....
Liability of Insurance Companies under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act

Liability of Insurance Companies under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act

Date: Jan 15, 2000
Liability of Insurance Companies under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. A. Sharifa Bivi And Others Introduction The case of New India Assurance Co....
Clarifying Limitation Period Under Section 138 NI Act: Vinayagam v. Dr. Subash Chandran

Clarifying Limitation Period Under Section 138 NI Act: Vinayagam v. Dr. Subash Chandran

Date: Jan 11, 2000
Clarifying Limitation Period Under Section 138 NI Act: Vinayagam v. Dr. Subash Chandran Introduction The case of A. Vinayagam And 3 Others Petitioners v. Dr. Subash Chandran And Another S,...
Wilful Default in Rent Payment: Comprehensive Analysis of T. Gopalsamy v. R. Renganathan Judgment

Wilful Default in Rent Payment: Comprehensive Analysis of T. Gopalsamy v. R. Renganathan Judgment

Date: Jan 4, 2000
Wilful Default in Rent Payment: Comprehensive Analysis of T. Gopalsamy v. R. Renganathan Judgment Introduction The case of T. Gopalsamy, T. Radhakrishnan Petitioners v. R. Renganathan, R. Narayanan,...
Establishing Compensation Calculation Standards in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from Annai Sathya Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Janardhanam & Others

Establishing Compensation Calculation Standards in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from Annai Sathya Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Janardhanam & Others

Date: Jan 4, 2000
Establishing Compensation Calculation Standards in Motor Accident Claims: Insights from Annai Sathya Transport Corporation Ltd. v. Janardhanam & Others Introduction The case of Annai Sathya Transport...
Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Eviction under Section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Eviction under Section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960

Date: Dec 25, 1999
Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Eviction under Section 14(1)(b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 Introduction The case of S.M Ispahani And Another Petitioners v....
Madras High Court Upholds Block Assessment Under Chapter XIV-B: C.A Abraham v. ACI-T

Madras High Court Upholds Block Assessment Under Chapter XIV-B: C.A Abraham v. ACI-T

Date: Dec 22, 1999
Madras High Court Upholds Block Assessment Under Chapter XIV-B: C.A Abraham v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction In the landmark case of C.A Abraham And Others v. Assistant...
Guarding Corporate Democracy and Ensuring Bona Fides in Shareholder Oppression Claims: An Insight into Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. v. K.R.S Mani And Others

Guarding Corporate Democracy and Ensuring Bona Fides in Shareholder Oppression Claims: An Insight into Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. v. K.R.S Mani And Others

Date: Dec 18, 1999
Guarding Corporate Democracy and Ensuring Bona Fides in Shareholder Oppression Claims: An Insight into Anugraha Jewellers Ltd. v. K.R.S Mani And Others Introduction The case of Anugraha Jewellers...
Accrual of Royalties in Tax Assessments: Insights from Lakshminarayana Films v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Accrual of Royalties in Tax Assessments: Insights from Lakshminarayana Films v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Dec 1, 1999
Accrual of Royalties in Tax Assessments: Insights from Lakshminarayana Films v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Lakshminarayana Films v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by...
Transfer of Accumulated Income to Charitable Trusts Under Section 11(3)(c): Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Ct. Muthiah Chettiar Family Trust

Transfer of Accumulated Income to Charitable Trusts Under Section 11(3)(c): Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Ct. Muthiah Chettiar Family Trust

Date: Dec 1, 1999
Transfer of Accumulated Income to Charitable Trusts Under Section 11(3)(c): Analysis of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Ct. Muthiah Chettiar Family Trust 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of...
Ensuring Proper Service of Notice in Land Acquisition: Ramiah Moopanar v. State of Tamil Nadu

Ensuring Proper Service of Notice in Land Acquisition: Ramiah Moopanar v. State of Tamil Nadu

Date: Nov 20, 1999
Ensuring Proper Service of Notice in Land Acquisition: Ramiah Moopanar v. State of Tamil Nadu Introduction The case of Ramiah Moopanar v. State of Tamil Nadu (Madras High Court, dated November 19,...
Unilateral Alteration of Service Conditions Requires Compliance with S.9A: Madras High Court in Voltas Volkart v. Voltes Ltd.

Unilateral Alteration of Service Conditions Requires Compliance with S.9A: Madras High Court in Voltas Volkart v. Voltes Ltd.

Date: Nov 17, 1999
Unilateral Alteration of Service Conditions Requires Compliance with S.9A: Madras High Court in Voltas Volkart v. Voltes Ltd. Introduction The case of Voltas Volkart Employees Union v. Voltes Ltd....
Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Appointing Advocate Commissioners for Property Disputes – Pillaiyar Petitioner v. Ganesan

Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Appointing Advocate Commissioners for Property Disputes – Pillaiyar Petitioner v. Ganesan

Date: Nov 11, 1999
Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Appointing Advocate Commissioners for Property Disputes – Pillaiyar Petitioner v. Ganesan Introduction Pillaiyar Petitioner v. Ganesan and Another is a...
Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Demolition-Based Eviction: Insights from Akbar Ali And 4 Others v. Donian Rodrigo And Another S

Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Demolition-Based Eviction: Insights from Akbar Ali And 4 Others v. Donian Rodrigo And Another S

Date: Oct 21, 1999
Establishing Bona Fide Requirements for Demolition-Based Eviction: Insights from Akbar Ali And 4 Others v. Donian Rodrigo And Another S Introduction The case of Akbar Ali And 4 Others v. Donian...
Comprehensive Commentary on V. Vanamamalai v. Management Of Sundaram Textiles Ltd.

Comprehensive Commentary on V. Vanamamalai v. Management Of Sundaram Textiles Ltd.

Date: Oct 16, 1999
Dismissal of Employee for Grave Misconduct: Analyzing V. Vanamamalai v. Management Of Sundaram Textiles Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of V. Vanamamalai v. Management Of Sundaram Textiles Ltd....
Redefining 'Royalty' Under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.

Redefining 'Royalty' Under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd.

Date: Oct 8, 1999
Redefining 'Royalty' Under Section 9(1)(vi) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Neyveli Lignite Corporation Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v....
Estoppel and Government Quota Policy Upheld: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Medical Specialty Course Admissions

Estoppel and Government Quota Policy Upheld: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Medical Specialty Course Admissions

Date: Oct 2, 1999
Estoppel and Government Quota Policy Upheld: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Medical Specialty Course Admissions Introduction The case of Dr. R. Murali v. Dr. R. Kamalakkannan And Three...
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Insights from B. Rajagopalan v. Indian Telephone Industries Ltd.

Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Insights from B. Rajagopalan v. Indian Telephone Industries Ltd.

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Enforcement of Arbitration Clauses under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act: Insights from B. Rajagopalan v. Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. Introduction The case of B. Rajagopalan v. Indian...
Completion of Gift of Immovable Property Requires Registration: Insights from Thulasimani Ammal v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Completion of Gift of Immovable Property Requires Registration: Insights from Thulasimani Ammal v. Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Oct 1, 1999
Completion of Gift of Immovable Property Requires Registration: Insights from Thulasimani Ammal v. Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction The case of Thulasimani Ammal v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert