Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Judicial Jurisdiction Post Final Order: Clarification on Section 148 CPC in D. Raju v. N. Ramalingam

Judicial Jurisdiction Post Final Order: Clarification on Section 148 CPC in D. Raju v. N. Ramalingam

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Judicial Jurisdiction Post Final Order: Clarification on Section 148 CPC in D. Raju v. N. Ramalingam Introduction The case of D. Raju v. N. Ramalingam adjudicated by the Madras High Court on February...
Madras High Court's Interpretation of 'Technical Services' in Income Tax Law

Madras High Court's Interpretation of 'Technical Services' in Income Tax Law

Date: Feb 24, 2001
Madras High Court's Interpretation of 'Technical Services' in Income Tax Law Introduction The case of Skycell Communications Ltd. and Another v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax and Others...
Clarifying Revenue Expenditure in Machinery Replacement: Insights from Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Joint CIT

Clarifying Revenue Expenditure in Machinery Replacement: Insights from Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Joint CIT

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Clarifying Revenue Expenditure in Machinery Replacement: Insights from Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Joint CIT Introduction The case of Ambika Cotton Mills Ltd. v. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax...
Limitation of Pendente Lite Interest in Mortgage Suits: Madras High Court's Ruling in A.S Ramakrishnan v. Bank of Baroda

Limitation of Pendente Lite Interest in Mortgage Suits: Madras High Court's Ruling in A.S Ramakrishnan v. Bank of Baroda

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Limitation of Pendente Lite Interest in Mortgage Suits: Madras High Court's Ruling in A.S Ramakrishnan v. Bank of Baroda Introduction The case of A.S Ramakrishnan v. Bank Of Baroda, Madurai...
Madras High Court Upholds Guarantor Liability in D. Pandi v. The Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited

Madras High Court Upholds Guarantor Liability in D. Pandi v. The Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Madras High Court Upholds Guarantor Liability in D. Pandi v. The Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited 1. Introduction The case of D. Pandi v. The Dhanalakshmi Bank Limited centers around the enforcement of a...
Non-Competition Fees as Capital Receipts: Insights from P.L. Chemical Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

Non-Competition Fees as Capital Receipts: Insights from P.L. Chemical Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT

Date: Feb 3, 2001
Non-Competition Fees as Capital Receipts: Insights from P.L. Chemical Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT Introduction The case of P.L. Chemical Ltd. v. Asstt. CIT adjudicated by the Madras High Court on February 2,...
Guardianship in Partition Suits of Hindu Joint Families: Insights from K. Jagannathan v. A.M Vasudevan Chettiar

Guardianship in Partition Suits of Hindu Joint Families: Insights from K. Jagannathan v. A.M Vasudevan Chettiar

Date: Jan 26, 2001
Guardianship in Partition Suits of Hindu Joint Families: Insights from K. Jagannathan v. A.M Vasudevan Chettiar Introduction The case of K. Jagannathan v. A.M Vasudevan Chettiar And 12 Others S...
Reliance on Eyewitness Testimony in Absence of Police Reports: Pallavan Transport Corporation v. Saroj Goyal

Reliance on Eyewitness Testimony in Absence of Police Reports: Pallavan Transport Corporation v. Saroj Goyal

Date: Jan 13, 2001
Reliance on Eyewitness Testimony in Absence of Police Reports: Pallavan Transport Corporation v. Saroj Goyal Introduction The case of Pallavan Transport Corporation v. Saroj Goyal was adjudicated by...
Enforcement of Tenant Notice Requirements Under the Madras City Tenants Protection Act: A Commentary on Valliammal v. S. Arumugha Gounder

Enforcement of Tenant Notice Requirements Under the Madras City Tenants Protection Act: A Commentary on Valliammal v. S. Arumugha Gounder

Date: Jan 4, 2001
Enforcement of Tenant Notice Requirements Under the Madras City Tenants Protection Act: A Commentary on Valliammal v. S. Arumugha Gounder Introduction The case of Valliammal v. S. Arumugha Gounder...
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Director Liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Director Liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act

Date: Dec 16, 2000
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Director Liability under the Negotiable Instruments Act Introduction In the case of Ashok Muthanna v. Wipro Finance Ltd., adjudicated by the Madras...
Judicial Scrutiny of Land Acquisition Authority: S.K. Thirugnanasambandam v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Judicial Scrutiny of Land Acquisition Authority: S.K. Thirugnanasambandam v. Government of Tamil Nadu

Date: Dec 14, 2000
Judicial Scrutiny of Land Acquisition Authority: S.K. Thirugnanasambandam v. Government of Tamil Nadu Introduction The case of S.K. Thirugnanasambandam and Others v. The Government Of Tamil Nadu and...
Madras High Court Clarifies Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Suits under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC

Madras High Court Clarifies Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Suits under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC

Date: Dec 14, 2000
Madras High Court Clarifies Impleading of Subsequent Purchasers in Partition Suits under Order 1, Rule 10 CPC Introduction The case of Bakthavatsalam Petitioner v. Anjapuli And 5 Others S adjudicated...
Limitation on Lease Renewals Under Burma Shell Acquisition of Undertakings in India Act: Madras High Court Decision

Limitation on Lease Renewals Under Burma Shell Acquisition of Undertakings in India Act: Madras High Court Decision

Date: Dec 3, 2000
Limitation on Lease Renewals Under Burma Shell Acquisition of Undertakings in India Act: Madras High Court Decision Introduction The case of G. Mohamed Thajf And Another Petitioners v. The Bharath...
Madras High Court Affirms Bona Fide Requirement for Eviction under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Madras High Court Affirms Bona Fide Requirement for Eviction under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act

Date: Nov 24, 2000
Madras High Court Affirms Bona Fide Requirement for Eviction under Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act Introduction The case of The South Indian Bank Ltd. v. Saroja Govindarajan deals...
Admissibility of Unregistered Family Arrangement Documents: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.C Lakshmipathy v. A.M Chakrapani Reddiar

Admissibility of Unregistered Family Arrangement Documents: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.C Lakshmipathy v. A.M Chakrapani Reddiar

Date: Nov 15, 2000
Admissibility of Unregistered Family Arrangement Documents: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.C Lakshmipathy v. A.M Chakrapani Reddiar Introduction The case of A.C Lakshmipathy and Another v. A.M...
Limitation Period for Revising Wealth-Tax Reassessment Orders Established: Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax v. A.K Thanga Pillai

Limitation Period for Revising Wealth-Tax Reassessment Orders Established: Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax v. A.K Thanga Pillai

Date: Nov 14, 2000
Limitation Period for Revising Wealth-Tax Reassessment Orders Established: Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax v. A.K Thanga Pillai Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax v. A.K Thanga Pillai...
Reaffirmation of Section 118 Presumption in the Negotiable Instruments Act: Mohammed Ali v. Abdul Sinab

Reaffirmation of Section 118 Presumption in the Negotiable Instruments Act: Mohammed Ali v. Abdul Sinab

Date: Nov 4, 2000
Reaffirmation of Section 118 Presumption in the Negotiable Instruments Act: Mohammed Ali v. Abdul Sinab Introduction The case of Mohammed Ali v. Abdul Sinab serves as a pivotal judicial examination...
Establishing Vicarious Liability of Directors under Section 141(2) – R. Kannan v. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd.

Establishing Vicarious Liability of Directors under Section 141(2) – R. Kannan v. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd.

Date: Nov 4, 2000
Establishing Vicarious Liability of Directors under Section 141(2) – R. Kannan v. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. Introduction The case of R. Kannan v. Kotak Mahindra Finance Ltd. adjudicated by the...
N.R. Vairamani v. Union Of India: Establishing the Right to Vacant Possession under the Burmah Shell Act

N.R. Vairamani v. Union Of India: Establishing the Right to Vacant Possession under the Burmah Shell Act

Date: Oct 21, 2000
N.R. Vairamani v. Union Of India: Establishing the Right to Vacant Possession under the Burmah Shell Act Introduction The case of N.R. Vairamani v. Union Of India adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Valuation Criteria in Property Exchange Under Income-Tax Act

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Valuation Criteria in Property Exchange Under Income-Tax Act

Date: Oct 21, 2000
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Valuation Criteria in Property Exchange Under Income-Tax Act Introduction In the landmark case of Hindustan Motors Ltd. And Another v. Members, Appropriate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert