Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Determining Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Suit Valuation: Insights from Solaiammal v. Rajarathinam

Determining Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Suit Valuation: Insights from Solaiammal v. Rajarathinam

Date: Oct 11, 2003
Determining Pecuniary Jurisdiction and Suit Valuation: Insights from Solaiammal v. Rajarathinam Introduction Solaiammal v. Rajarathinam is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on...
Madras High Court Upholds Res Judicata in Re-litigation under Section 44 of Indian Evidence Act: Swaminathan v. Srinivasagam

Madras High Court Upholds Res Judicata in Re-litigation under Section 44 of Indian Evidence Act: Swaminathan v. Srinivasagam

Date: Oct 11, 2003
Madras High Court Upholds Res Judicata in Re-litigation under Section 44 of Indian Evidence Act: Swaminathan v. Srinivasagam Introduction The case of K.K Swaminathan Petitioner v. Srinivasagam...
Strict Adherence to Official Gazette Publication under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act Affirmed

Strict Adherence to Official Gazette Publication under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act Affirmed

Date: Sep 30, 2003
Strict Adherence to Official Gazette Publication under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act Affirmed Introduction The case of A.S Periasamy Petitioner v. State Of Tamil Nadu deliberated by the...
Ace Investments Ltd. v. Settlement Commission: Jurisdictional Clarity in Income Disclosure

Ace Investments Ltd. v. Settlement Commission: Jurisdictional Clarity in Income Disclosure

Date: Sep 27, 2003
Ace Investments Ltd. v. Settlement Commission: Jurisdictional Clarity in Income Disclosure Introduction The case of Ace Investments Ltd. v. Settlement Commission, Income Tax And Wealth Tax...
Withdrawal of Suit under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC: Madras High Court Decision in Duraikannu v. Malayammal

Withdrawal of Suit under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC: Madras High Court Decision in Duraikannu v. Malayammal

Date: Sep 12, 2003
Withdrawal of Suit under Order 23 Rule 1(3) CPC: Madras High Court Decision in Duraikannu v. Malayammal Introduction The case of Duraikannu, Meenakshi Ammal, Sellammal, and Seeniammal vs. Malayammal...
Limitation Act 1963's Section 5 Inapplicable for Condoning Delays in Execution Proceedings under Order XXI Rule 105 C.P.C

Limitation Act 1963's Section 5 Inapplicable for Condoning Delays in Execution Proceedings under Order XXI Rule 105 C.P.C

Date: Sep 4, 2003
Limitation Act 1963's Section 5 Inapplicable for Condoning Delays in Execution Proceedings under Order XXI Rule 105 C.P.C Introduction The case of M. Ponnupandian v. Selvabakiyam, adjudicated by the...
Insurer's Liability to Third Parties Despite Breach of Policy Conditions: Velammal & Others v. P. Kanagu & Others

Insurer's Liability to Third Parties Despite Breach of Policy Conditions: Velammal & Others v. P. Kanagu & Others

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Insurer's Liability to Third Parties Despite Breach of Policy Conditions: Velammal & Others v. P. Kanagu & Others Introduction The case of Velammal & Others v. P. Kanagu & Others, adjudicated by the...
Madras High Court Upholds Court Jurisdiction Over Ambiguous Arbitration Clause in Sankar Sealing Systems P. Ltd. v. Jain Motor Trading Co.

Madras High Court Upholds Court Jurisdiction Over Ambiguous Arbitration Clause in Sankar Sealing Systems P. Ltd. v. Jain Motor Trading Co.

Date: Aug 29, 2003
Madras High Court Upholds Court Jurisdiction Over Ambiguous Arbitration Clause in Sankar Sealing Systems P. Ltd. v. Jain Motor Trading Co. Introduction In the case of Sankar Sealing Systems P. Ltd....
Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Disciplinary Proceedings

Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Aug 27, 2003
Madras High Court Reinforces Natural Justice in Disciplinary Proceedings 1. Introduction The case titled M. Nagarajan Petitioner In 10588/96 v. R. Muthuswamy Petitioner In 10589/96 was adjudicated by...
Madras High Court Reaffirms Importance of Evidentiary Scrutiny in Maintenance Appeals: Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder

Madras High Court Reaffirms Importance of Evidentiary Scrutiny in Maintenance Appeals: Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder

Date: Aug 27, 2003
Madras High Court Reaffirms Importance of Evidentiary Scrutiny in Maintenance Appeals: Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder Introduction The case of Deb Narayan Halder v. Anushree Halder adjudicated...
Service Tax Applicability on Contract Carriage Operators: Insights from Sri Pandyan Travels v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Service Tax Applicability on Contract Carriage Operators: Insights from Sri Pandyan Travels v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

Date: Aug 23, 2003
Service Tax Applicability on Contract Carriage Operators: Insights from Sri Pandyan Travels v. Commissioner Of Central Excise Introduction Sri Pandyan Travels v. Commissioner Of Central Excise is a...
Recognition of Occupational Heart Disease in Workmen's Compensation: P. Kalyani v. Southern Railway

Recognition of Occupational Heart Disease in Workmen's Compensation: P. Kalyani v. Southern Railway

Date: Aug 1, 2003
Recognition of Occupational Heart Disease in Workmen's Compensation: P. Kalyani v. Southern Railway Introduction The case of P. Kalyani v. Divisional Manager, Southern Railway is a landmark decision...
Reaffirming the Test for Settlement vs. Will: Insights from Arthur Mary Ammai v. Aruldoss Pillai

Reaffirming the Test for Settlement vs. Will: Insights from Arthur Mary Ammai v. Aruldoss Pillai

Date: Jul 24, 2003
Reaffirming the Test for Settlement vs. Will: Insights from Arthur Mary Ammai v. Aruldoss Pillai Introduction The case of Arthur Mary Ammai v. Aruldoss Pillai (Deceased) adjudicated by the Madras...
Judicial Discretion under Section 149 C.P.C: Insights from K. Natarajan v. P.K Rajasekaran

Judicial Discretion under Section 149 C.P.C: Insights from K. Natarajan v. P.K Rajasekaran

Date: May 1, 2003
Judicial Discretion under Section 149 C.P.C: Insights from K. Natarajan v. P.K Rajasekaran Introduction The case of K. Natarajan v. P.K Rajasekaran, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on April 30,...
Sardar Zackria Hussain v. United India Insurance: Establishing Enhanced Compensation Framework in Road Accident Claims

Sardar Zackria Hussain v. United India Insurance: Establishing Enhanced Compensation Framework in Road Accident Claims

Date: May 1, 2003
Sardar Zackria Hussain v. United India Insurance: Establishing Enhanced Compensation Framework in Road Accident Claims Introduction The case of S. Achuthan and Another v. M. Gopal and Another S...
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Timely Completion of Enquiries Under Cooperative Societies Act

Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Timely Completion of Enquiries Under Cooperative Societies Act

Date: Apr 30, 2003
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Timely Completion of Enquiries Under Cooperative Societies Act Introduction The case of Gabriel Petitioner v. The Deputy Registrar (Housing), Cuddalore And Another...
Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Recovery Officers' Authority to Evict Tenants Post-Auction under Recovery of Debts Act

Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Recovery Officers' Authority to Evict Tenants Post-Auction under Recovery of Debts Act

Date: Apr 29, 2003
Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Recovery Officers' Authority to Evict Tenants Post-Auction under Recovery of Debts Act Introduction A. Stephen Samuel v. Union Of India is a pivotal case...
Assessing Loss of Earning Capacity Under Section 4(1)(c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Ponnammal

Assessing Loss of Earning Capacity Under Section 4(1)(c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Ponnammal

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Assessing Loss of Earning Capacity Under Section 4(1)(c) of the Workmen's Compensation Act: Insights from New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Smt. Ponnammal Introduction The case of New India Assurance...
Interpretation of Money Circulation Schemes under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978: Insights from Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd v. State of Tamil Nadu

Interpretation of Money Circulation Schemes under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978: Insights from Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd v. State of Tamil Nadu

Date: Apr 10, 2003
Interpretation of Money Circulation Schemes under the Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act, 1978: Insights from Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd v. State of Tamil Nadu...
Clarifying Counter-Claims Post-Written Statement: Insights from Southern Ancillaries Pvt Ltd vs Southern Alloy Foundaries Pvt Ltd

Clarifying Counter-Claims Post-Written Statement: Insights from Southern Ancillaries Pvt Ltd vs Southern Alloy Foundaries Pvt Ltd

Date: Mar 29, 2003
Clarifying Counter-Claims Post-Written Statement: Insights from Southern Ancillaries Pvt Ltd vs Southern Alloy Foundaries Pvt Ltd Introduction The legal dispute between Southern Ancillaries Private...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert