Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Simultaneous Benefits under Section 10(10C) and Section 89(1): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.V Venugopal

Simultaneous Benefits under Section 10(10C) and Section 89(1): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.V Venugopal

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Simultaneous Benefits under Section 10(10C) and Section 89(1): Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.V Venugopal Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.V Venugopal...
Judicial Restraint in Public Order Cases: Rama Muthuramalingam v. D.S.P. Mannargudi

Judicial Restraint in Public Order Cases: Rama Muthuramalingam v. D.S.P. Mannargudi

Date: Dec 4, 2004
Judicial Restraint in Public Order Cases: Rama Muthuramalingam v. Deputy Superintendent of Police, Mannargudi Introduction The case of Rama Muthuramalingam v. The Deputy Superintendent of Police...
Madras High Court Clarifies Application of Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Disputes Over Execution

Madras High Court Clarifies Application of Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Disputes Over Execution

Date: Nov 30, 2004
Madras High Court Clarifies Application of Section 118 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in Disputes Over Execution Introduction The case of Ayyakannu Gounder v. Virudhambal Ammal adjudicated by the...
CLB Lacks Jurisdiction to Grant Anti-Suit Injunction in Ppn Power Generating Co. Ltd. v. Ppn (Mauritius) Co.

CLB Lacks Jurisdiction to Grant Anti-Suit Injunction in Ppn Power Generating Co. Ltd. v. Ppn (Mauritius) Co.

Date: Oct 9, 2004
CLB Lacks Jurisdiction to Grant Anti-Suit Injunction in Ppn Power Generating Co. Ltd. v. Ppn (Mauritius) Co. 1. Introduction The case of Ppn Power Generating Co. Ltd. v. Ppn (Mauritius) Co. revolves...
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Reliance of Seized Documents for Undisclosed Income Assessments

Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Reliance of Seized Documents for Undisclosed Income Assessments

Date: Oct 7, 2004
Madras High Court Sets Precedent on Reliance of Seized Documents for Undisclosed Income Assessments Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kences Foundation P. Ltd. (And...
Recognition of Independent Depreciable Assets and Non-Taxable Security Deposits: Madras High Court Decision

Recognition of Independent Depreciable Assets and Non-Taxable Security Deposits: Madras High Court Decision

Date: Oct 7, 2004
Recognition of Independent Depreciable Assets and Non-Taxable Security Deposits: Madras High Court Decision Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Madurai Soft Drinks Pvt. Ltd....
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Limits on Reopening Assessments in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Annamalai Finance Ltd.

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Limits on Reopening Assessments in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Annamalai Finance Ltd.

Date: Oct 6, 2004
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Limits on Reopening Assessments in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Annamalai Finance Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Annamalai Finance...
Exclusion of Excise Duty and Sales Tax from Total Turnover for Section 80HHC: Wheels India Ltd. Judgment

Exclusion of Excise Duty and Sales Tax from Total Turnover for Section 80HHC: Wheels India Ltd. Judgment

Date: Sep 22, 2004
Exclusion of Excise Duty and Sales Tax from Total Turnover for Section 80HHC: Wheels India Ltd. Judgment Introduction The legal landscape governing the computation of deductions under section 80HHC...
Advance Tax Payments Constitute Income Disclosure: Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling in The Assistant Commissioner Of v. Ms.A.R.Enterprises

Advance Tax Payments Constitute Income Disclosure: Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling in The Assistant Commissioner Of v. Ms.A.R.Enterprises

Date: Sep 9, 2004
Advance Tax Payments Constitute Income Disclosure: Madras High Court's Landmark Ruling in The Assistant Commissioner Of v. Ms.A.R.Enterprises Introduction In the landmark case of The Assistant...
Advance Tax Payment and Undisclosed Income: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S. A.R. Enterprises

Advance Tax Payment and Undisclosed Income: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S. A.R. Enterprises

Date: Sep 9, 2004
Advance Tax Payment and Undisclosed Income: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S. A.R. Enterprises Introduction The case of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, City Circle...
Madras High Court Establishes Precedent on Bona Fide Purchasers and Time in Specific Performance

Madras High Court Establishes Precedent on Bona Fide Purchasers and Time in Specific Performance

Date: Aug 21, 2004
Bona Fide Purchasers and Time Constraints in Specific Performance: Insights from Ranganatha Gounder v. Sahadeva Gounder And Others Introduction The case of Ranganatha Gounder v. Sahadeva Gounder And...
Madras High Court Upholds Gender Equality in Scheduled Caste Certificate Issuance

Madras High Court Upholds Gender Equality in Scheduled Caste Certificate Issuance

Date: Aug 17, 2004
Madras High Court Upholds Gender Equality in Scheduled Caste Certificate Issuance Introduction In the landmark case of P. Jeya v. Union Of India And Others, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Madras High Court Upholds DNA Testing in Paternity Disputes

Madras High Court Upholds DNA Testing in Paternity Disputes

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Madras High Court Upholds DNA Testing in Paternity Disputes Introduction The case of Bommi v. Minor Sonia Minor Rep. By Mother And Natural Guardian, Bommi filed in the Madras High Court on July 28,...
Suguna Poultry Farm Ltd. v. Arul Mariamman Textiles Ltd.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 227

Suguna Poultry Farm Ltd. v. Arul Mariamman Textiles Ltd.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 227

Date: Jul 29, 2004
Suguna Poultry Farm Ltd. v. Arul Mariamman Textiles Ltd.: Clarifying Jurisdictional Boundaries under Article 227 Introduction The case of Suguna Poultry Farm Ltd. v. Arul Mariamman Textiles Ltd....
Madras High Court Upholds the Necessity of Proper Stamping and Registration for Athakshi to Sever Property Rights

Madras High Court Upholds the Necessity of Proper Stamping and Registration for Athakshi to Sever Property Rights

Date: Jul 14, 2004
Madras High Court Upholds the Necessity of Proper Stamping and Registration for Athakshi to Sever Property Rights Introduction The case of R. Deivanai Ammal (Died) And Another v. G. Meenakshi Ammal...
Valid Adoption and Testamentary Succession under Hindu Law: Senthilkumar v. Dhandapani

Valid Adoption and Testamentary Succession under Hindu Law: Senthilkumar v. Dhandapani

Date: Jun 26, 2004
Valid Adoption and Testamentary Succession under Hindu Law: Senthilkumar v. Dhandapani Introduction Senthilkumar v. Dhandapani is a landmark judgment delivered by Justice P. Sathasivam of the Madras...
State Government's Exclusive Authority to Regulate Sand Quarrying Affirmed: State Of Tamil Nadu v. P. Krishnamoorthy

State Government's Exclusive Authority to Regulate Sand Quarrying Affirmed: State Of Tamil Nadu v. P. Krishnamoorthy

Date: May 12, 2004
State Government's Exclusive Authority to Regulate Sand Quarrying Affirmed Introduction The case of State Of Tamil Nadu v. P. Krishnamoorthy adjudicated by the Madras High Court on May 11, 2004,...
Private Companies and Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Insights from P. Pitchumani v. Management Of Sri Chakra Tyres, Ltd.

Private Companies and Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Insights from P. Pitchumani v. Management Of Sri Chakra Tyres, Ltd.

Date: May 6, 2004
Private Companies and Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226: Insights from P. Pitchumani v. Management Of Sri Chakra Tyres, Ltd. Introduction The case of P. Pitchumani v. Management Of Sri Chakra...
Madras High Court Upholds Strict Limitation on Review Petitions Under Order 47, Rule 1, CPC: Clarifying the Scope of Judicial Review

Madras High Court Upholds Strict Limitation on Review Petitions Under Order 47, Rule 1, CPC: Clarifying the Scope of Judicial Review

Date: Apr 30, 2004
Madras High Court Upholds Strict Limitation on Review Petitions Under Order 47, Rule 1, CPC: Clarifying the Scope of Judicial Review Introduction The landmark case of B. Dhanalakshmi v. M. Shajahan...
Presumption of Proper Service and Strict Limitation in Ex Parte Decree Challenges: Rathinathammal v. Muthusamy

Presumption of Proper Service and Strict Limitation in Ex Parte Decree Challenges: Rathinathammal v. Muthusamy

Date: Apr 27, 2004
Presumption of Proper Service and Strict Limitation in Ex Parte Decree Challenges: Rathinathammal v. Muthusamy Introduction Rathinathammal v. Muthusamy is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert