Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Interpretation of "From" in Legal Notifications: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision

Interpretation of "From" in Legal Notifications: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision

Date: May 6, 1922
Interpretation of "From" in Legal Notifications: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision Introduction The In Re: Court Fees case adjudicated by the Madras High Court on May 5, 1922, addresses a pivotal...
Limited Revisory Jurisdiction in Acquittal Cases and Restrictions on Cost Grants in Private Revision Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.T Sankaralinga Mudaliar Petitioner v. Narayana Mudaliar And Others

Limited Revisory Jurisdiction in Acquittal Cases and Restrictions on Cost Grants in Private Revision Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.T Sankaralinga Mudaliar Petitioner v. Narayana Mudaliar And Others

Date: Apr 26, 1922
Limited Revisory Jurisdiction in Acquittal Cases and Restrictions on Cost Grants in Private Revision Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of A.T Sankaralinga Mudaliar Petitioner v. Narayana Mudaliar...
Adverse Possession and Res Judicata in Singaravelu Mudaliar v. Chokkalinga Mudaliar

Adverse Possession and Res Judicata in Singaravelu Mudaliar v. Chokkalinga Mudaliar

Date: Apr 25, 1922
Adverse Possession and Res Judicata in Singaravelu Mudaliar v. Chokkalinga Mudaliar: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Singaravelu Mudaliar v. Chokkalinga Mudaliar is a landmark judgment...
Remand Power Clarified: Insights from Malayath Veetil Raman Nayar v. Krishnan Nambudripad

Remand Power Clarified: Insights from Malayath Veetil Raman Nayar v. Krishnan Nambudripad

Date: Apr 19, 1922
Remand Power Clarified: Insights from Malayath Veetil Raman Nayar v. Krishnan Nambudripad Introduction The case Malayath Veetil Raman Nayar v. Krishnan Nambudripad adjudicated by the Madras High...
Madras High Court Establishes Executor de Son Tort Liability and Limitation Period for Legacies

Madras High Court Establishes Executor de Son Tort Liability and Limitation Period for Legacies

Date: Apr 5, 1922
Madras High Court Establishes Executor de Son Tort Liability and Limitation Period for Legacies Introduction The case of Rajah Parthasarathy Appa Rao Bahadur Varu v. Rajah Venkatadri Appa Rao...
Dispensing with the Merits in Default: Principles from Musaliarakath Muhammad v. M.R. Ry. Manavikraman

Dispensing with the Merits in Default: Principles from Musaliarakath Muhammad v. M.R. Ry. Manavikraman

Date: Mar 24, 1922
Dispensing with the Merits in Default: Principles from Musaliarakath Muhammad v. M.R. Ry. Manavikraman Introduction The case of Musaliarakath Muhammad v. M.R. Ry. Manavikraman was adjudicated by the...
Madras High Court Clarifies the Absolute Nature of Section 48 CPC: Minor Subbarayan v. Minor Natarajan

Madras High Court Clarifies the Absolute Nature of Section 48 CPC: Minor Subbarayan v. Minor Natarajan

Date: Mar 21, 1922
Madras High Court Clarifies the Absolute Nature of Section 48 CPC: Minor Subbarayan v. Minor Natarajan Introduction The case of Minor Subbarayan v. Minor Natarajan rendered by the Madras High Court...
Madras High Court Establishes Liability of Trust Funds for Debts Incurred by Trustees for Trust Purposes

Madras High Court Establishes Liability of Trust Funds for Debts Incurred by Trustees for Trust Purposes

Date: Mar 15, 1922
Madras High Court Establishes Liability of Trust Funds for Debts Incurred by Trustees for Trust Purposes Introduction The case of Sundaresan Chettiar v. Viswanada Pandara Sannadhi adjudicated by the...
Priority of Court Auction Purchasers in Share Transfers under the Indian Companies Act: Nagabhushanam v. Ramachandra Rao

Priority of Court Auction Purchasers in Share Transfers under the Indian Companies Act: Nagabhushanam v. Ramachandra Rao

Date: Jan 25, 1922
Priority of Court Auction Purchasers in Share Transfers under the Indian Companies Act: Nagabhushanam v. Ramachandra Rao Introduction The case Nagabhushanam v. Ramachandra Rao, adjudicated by the...
Defining Landholder Status in Inam Grants: Insights from Jarugumilli Brahmayya v. Challaghali Achiraju

Defining Landholder Status in Inam Grants: Insights from Jarugumilli Brahmayya v. Challaghali Achiraju

Date: Jan 20, 1922
Defining Landholder Status in Inam Grants: Insights from Jarugumilli Brahmayya v. Challaghali Achiraju Introduction The landmark case of Jarugumilli Brahmayya, Minor By Mother And Next Friend...
Madras High Court Establishes Article 120 as Governing Provision in Partition Suits Involving Tenancy-in-Common under the Limitation Act, 1908

Madras High Court Establishes Article 120 as Governing Provision in Partition Suits Involving Tenancy-in-Common under the Limitation Act, 1908

Date: Jan 13, 1922
Madras High Court Establishes Article 120 as Governing Provision in Partition Suits Involving Tenancy-in-Common under the Limitation Act, 1908 Introduction The case of Yerukola v. Yerukola...
Enforcement Restrictions on Inam Grants: The Neti Anjaneyalu v. Sri Venugopala Rice Mill Decision

Enforcement Restrictions on Inam Grants: The Neti Anjaneyalu v. Sri Venugopala Rice Mill Decision

Date: Jan 12, 1922
Enforcement Restrictions on Inam Grants: The Neti Anjaneyalu v. Sri Venugopala Rice Mill Decision Introduction The case of Neti Anjaneyalu v. Sri Venugopala Rice Mill, Limited adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Expansion under Section 150: Commentary on J.V. Ranganatha Rao v. Hanumantha Rao

Jurisdictional Expansion under Section 150: Commentary on J.V. Ranganatha Rao v. Hanumantha Rao

Date: Jan 12, 1922
Jurisdictional Expansion under Section 150: Commentary on J.V. Ranganatha Rao v. Hanumantha Rao Introduction The case of J.V. Ranganatha Rao v. Hanumantha Rao, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Admissibility of Non-Interpartes Judgments under Section 35 of the Evidence Act: Seethapati Rao Dora v. Venkanna Dora

Admissibility of Non-Interpartes Judgments under Section 35 of the Evidence Act: Seethapati Rao Dora v. Venkanna Dora

Date: Jan 6, 1922
Admissibility of Non-Interpartes Judgments under Section 35 of the Evidence Act: Seethapati Rao Dora v. Venkanna Dora Introduction The case of Seethapati Rao Dora v. Venkanna Dora was adjudicated by...
Continuous Adverse Possession and Limitation: Insights from Vennam Ramiah v. Kusru Kotamma

Continuous Adverse Possession and Limitation: Insights from Vennam Ramiah v. Kusru Kotamma

Date: Dec 23, 1921
Continuous Adverse Possession and Limitation: Insights from Vennam Ramiah v. Kusru Kotamma Introduction Vennam Ramiah v. Kusru Kotamma, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December 22, 1921, is a...
Adverse Possession and Legal Disabilities: Insights from Seetaramaraju v. Subbaraju

Adverse Possession and Legal Disabilities: Insights from Seetaramaraju v. Subbaraju

Date: Dec 17, 1921
Adverse Possession and Legal Disabilities: Insights from Seetaramaraju v. Subbaraju Introduction The case of Seetaramaraju v. Subbaraju adjudicated by the Madras High Court in 1921 serves as a...
Madras High Court Clarifies Binding Effect of Property Sale and Mesne Profits in Joint Family Cases: Subbe Goundan v. Krishnamachari

Madras High Court Clarifies Binding Effect of Property Sale and Mesne Profits in Joint Family Cases: Subbe Goundan v. Krishnamachari

Date: Dec 15, 1921
Madras High Court Clarifies Binding Effect of Property Sale and Mesne Profits in Joint Family Cases: Subbe Goundan v. Krishnamachari Introduction The case of Subbe Goundan v. Krishnamachari (Madras...
Notice of Claims to Authorized Agents under the Railways Act: A. Mahadeva Ayyar v. South Indian Railway Co. (1921)

Notice of Claims to Authorized Agents under the Railways Act: A. Mahadeva Ayyar v. South Indian Railway Co. (1921)

Date: Sep 18, 1921
Notice of Claims to Authorized Agents under the Railways Act: A. Mahadeva Ayyar v. South Indian Railway Co. (1921) Introduction The case A. Mahadeva Ayyar v. South Indian Railway Co. was adjudicated...
Appanna Poricha v. Narasinga Poricha: Clarifying Trustee Rights Under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code

Appanna Poricha v. Narasinga Poricha: Clarifying Trustee Rights Under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code

Date: Sep 14, 1921
Appanna Poricha v. Narasinga Poricha: Clarifying Trustee Rights Under Section 92 of the Civil Procedure Code Introduction Appanna Poricha v. Narasinga Poricha is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Subrogation and Priority in Mortgage Suits: Insights from Pingali Venkataramana Reddi v. Kotigari Rangiah Chetti

Subrogation and Priority in Mortgage Suits: Insights from Pingali Venkataramana Reddi v. Kotigari Rangiah Chetti

Date: May 4, 1921
Subrogation and Priority in Mortgage Suits: Insights from Pingali Venkataramana Reddi v. Kotigari Rangiah Chetti Introduction The case of Pingali Venkataramana Reddi v. Kotigari Rangiah Chetti...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert