Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Ramalinga Adaviar v. Meenakshisundaram Pillai: Penal Provisions in Chit Fund Agreements

Ramalinga Adaviar v. Meenakshisundaram Pillai: Penal Provisions in Chit Fund Agreements

Date: Aug 27, 1924
Ramalinga Adaviar v. Meenakshisundaram Pillai: Penal Provisions in Chit Fund Agreements 1. Introduction Ramalinga Adaviar v. Meenakshisundaram Pillai is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras...
Maintenance Obligations Survive Death: Raja Lakshmi Devi Amma Garu v. Raja B. Naganna Naidu Bahadur Zamindar Garu

Maintenance Obligations Survive Death: Raja Lakshmi Devi Amma Garu v. Raja B. Naganna Naidu Bahadur Zamindar Garu

Date: Aug 19, 1924
Maintenance Obligations Survive Death: Raja Lakshmi Devi Amma Garu v. Raja B. Naganna Naidu Bahadur Zamindar Garu Introduction The case of Raja Bommadevara Raja Lakshmi Devi Amma Garu v. Raja B....
Establishing the Distinction Between Sham and Benami Transactions: Insights from Rangappa Nayakar v. Rangasami Nayakar And Others

Establishing the Distinction Between Sham and Benami Transactions: Insights from Rangappa Nayakar v. Rangasami Nayakar And Others

Date: Aug 16, 1924
Establishing the Distinction Between Sham and Benami Transactions: Insights from Rangappa Nayakar v. Rangasami Nayakar And Others Introduction The case of Rangappa Nayakar v. Rangasami Nayakar And...
Reinforcing Specific Denials in Libel Suits: L.A. Subbarama Iyer v. R.H. Hitchcock

Reinforcing Specific Denials in Libel Suits: L.A. Subbarama Iyer v. R.H. Hitchcock

Date: Aug 5, 1924
Reinforcing Specific Denials in Libel Suits: L.A. Subbarama Iyer v. R.H. Hitchcock Introduction L.A. Subbarama Iyer v. R.H. Hitchcock is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on...
Clarification of Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Gollapudi Seshayya v. Nadendla Subbayya

Clarification of Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Gollapudi Seshayya v. Nadendla Subbayya

Date: Apr 24, 1924
Clarification of Order 23 of the Civil Procedure Code: Insights from Gollapudi Seshayya v. Nadendla Subbayya Introduction The case of Gollapudi Seshayya v. Nadendla Subbayya adjudicated by the Madras...
Madras High Court Upholds Quashing of Proceedings Powers under CrPC - Ramanathan Chettiyar v. K. Sivarama Subrahmanya Ayyar

Madras High Court Upholds Quashing of Proceedings Powers under CrPC - Ramanathan Chettiyar v. K. Sivarama Subrahmanya Ayyar

Date: Mar 28, 1924
Madras High Court Upholds Quashing of Proceedings Powers under CrPC Ramanathan Chettiyar (Accused) v. K. Sivarama Subrahmanya Ayyar (Complainant), Madras High Court, 1924 Introduction The case of...
Res Judicata and Title in Lease Disputes: Nimmagadda Venkateswaralu v. Bodapati Lingayya

Res Judicata and Title in Lease Disputes: Nimmagadda Venkateswaralu v. Bodapati Lingayya

Date: Feb 14, 1924
Res Judicata and Title in Lease Disputes: Nimmagadda Venkateswaralu v. Bodapati Lingayya Introduction The case of Nimmagadda Venkateswaralu v. Bodapati Lingayya adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Liability of Sons for Father's Debts After Partition: Taduri Ramachandra Rao v. Vadrevu Visvesam

Liability of Sons for Father's Debts After Partition: Taduri Ramachandra Rao v. Vadrevu Visvesam

Date: Feb 12, 1924
Liability of Sons for Father's Debts After Partition: Taduri Ramachandra Rao v. Vadrevu Visvesam Introduction The case of Taduri Ramachandra Jagannatha Rao v. Vadrevu Visvesam adjudicated by the...
Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts Post-Partition: Analysis of Jagannatha Rao And Four Ors. v. Viswesam

Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts Post-Partition: Analysis of Jagannatha Rao And Four Ors. v. Viswesam

Date: Feb 12, 1924
Liability of Sons for Paternal Debts Post-Partition: Analysis of Jagannatha Rao And Four Ors. v. Viswesam Introduction Jagannatha Rao And Four Ors. v. Viswesam is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
A Comprehensive Analysis of Maharaja Of Kolhapur v. S. Sundaram Ayyar: Adoption, Caste, and Succession in Hindu Law

A Comprehensive Analysis of Maharaja Of Kolhapur v. S. Sundaram Ayyar: Adoption, Caste, and Succession in Hindu Law

Date: Jan 22, 1924
A Comprehensive Analysis of Maharaja Of Kolhapur v. S. Sundaram Ayyar: Adoption, Caste, and Succession in Hindu Law Introduction The case of Maharaja Of Kolhapur v. S. Sundaram Ayyar, adjudicated by...
Waiver of Territorial Jurisdiction under Section 21 CPC: Insights from Chokkalinga Pillay v. Velayudha Mudaliar

Waiver of Territorial Jurisdiction under Section 21 CPC: Insights from Chokkalinga Pillay v. Velayudha Mudaliar

Date: Jan 17, 1924
Waiver of Territorial Jurisdiction under Section 21 CPC: Insights from Chokkalinga Pillay v. Velayudha Mudaliar Introduction The case of Chokkalinga Pillay v. Velayudha Mudaliar (Madras High Court,...
Revisional Jurisdiction and Due Process: Madras High Court's Decision in In Re, Tadi Somu Naidu

Revisional Jurisdiction and Due Process: Madras High Court's Decision in In Re, Tadi Somu Naidu

Date: Dec 18, 1923
Revisional Jurisdiction and Due Process: Madras High Court's Decision in In Re, Tadi Somu Naidu (1923) Introduction The case of In Re, Tadi Somu Naidu adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December...
Madras High Court Clarifies the Application of Order 21, Rule 57 to Pre-Judgment Attachments

Madras High Court Clarifies the Application of Order 21, Rule 57 to Pre-Judgment Attachments

Date: Dec 18, 1923
Madras High Court Clarifies the Application of Order 21, Rule 57 to Pre-Judgment Attachments Introduction In the landmark case of Meyyappa Chettiar (Counter-Petitioner) v. Chidambaram Chettiar...
Authority of Official Receiver to Dispose of Minor's Shares in Insolvent Estates: Sankaranarayana Pillai v. Rajamani

Authority of Official Receiver to Dispose of Minor's Shares in Insolvent Estates: Sankaranarayana Pillai v. Rajamani

Date: Nov 22, 1923
Authority of Official Receiver to Dispose of Minor's Shares in Insolvent Estates: Sankaranarayana Pillai v. Rajamani Introduction The case of Sankaranarayana Pillai and Ors. v. Rajamani and Ors....
Revisionary Jurisdiction Affirmed for District Judges in Election Petitions Under Madras Local Boards Act, 1920

Revisionary Jurisdiction Affirmed for District Judges in Election Petitions Under Madras Local Boards Act, 1920

Date: Nov 13, 1923
Revisionary Jurisdiction Affirmed for District Judges in Election Petitions Under Madras Local Boards Act, 1920 Introduction The case of Kokku Parthasahadhi Naidu Garu (First) v. Chintlachervu...
High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Local Board Election Decisions: K. Parthasarathi Naidu Garu v. C. Koteswara Rao Garu

High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Local Board Election Decisions: K. Parthasarathi Naidu Garu v. C. Koteswara Rao Garu

Date: Nov 13, 1923
High Court's Revisional Jurisdiction Over Local Board Election Decisions: K. Parthasarathi Naidu Garu v. C. Koteswara Rao Garu Introduction The case of K. Parthasarathi Naidu Garu v. C. Koteswara Rao...
Non-Compliance with Order 21, Rule 22 Renders Execution Sale Void: Rajagopala Aiyar v. Ramanujachariar And Anr. [1923]

Non-Compliance with Order 21, Rule 22 Renders Execution Sale Void: Rajagopala Aiyar v. Ramanujachariar And Anr. [1923]

Date: Nov 7, 1923
Non-Compliance with Order 21, Rule 22 Renders Execution Sale Void: Rajagopala Aiyar, Minor, By Guardian Ramachandra Aiyar v. Ramanujachariar And Anr. [1923] Introduction The case of Rajagopala Aiyar,...
Madras High Court Establishes Void Sale Without Proper Notice in Execution Proceedings

Madras High Court Establishes Void Sale Without Proper Notice in Execution Proceedings

Date: Nov 7, 1923
Madras High Court Establishes Void Sale Without Proper Notice in Execution Proceedings Introduction The case of Rajagopala Ayyar v. Ramanujachariar adjudicated by the Madras High Court on November 6,...
Madras High Court Establishes Broad Jurisdiction for Appellate Courts to Admit Additional Defence Evidence under Section 428 CPC

Madras High Court Establishes Broad Jurisdiction for Appellate Courts to Admit Additional Defence Evidence under Section 428 CPC

Date: Oct 6, 1923
Madras High Court Establishes Broad Jurisdiction for Appellate Courts to Admit Additional Defence Evidence under Section 428 CPC Introduction The case of M.P. Narayana Menon, In Re, adjudicated by...
Ramakka v. Negasam: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Mesne Profits Litigation

Ramakka v. Negasam: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Mesne Profits Litigation

Date: Sep 8, 1923
Ramakka v. Negasam: Reaffirming the Burden of Proof in Mesne Profits Litigation Introduction The case of Ramakka v. Negasam, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on September 7, 1923, addresses...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert