Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Establishing Maintenance Claims as a Valid Interest for Caveat Under Section 69: Insights from Jamni Hanumantha Rao v. Aratala Latchamma

Establishing Maintenance Claims as a Valid Interest for Caveat Under Section 69: Insights from Jamni Hanumantha Rao v. Aratala Latchamma

Date: Mar 24, 1926
Establishing Maintenance Claims as a Valid Interest for Caveat Under Section 69: Insights from Jamni Hanumantha Rao v. Aratala Latchamma Introduction The case of Jamni Hanumantha Rao v. Aratala...
Interpretation of "Step-in-aid of Execution" under the Limitation Act: Insights from M. Krishna Pattar v. K. Seetharama Pattar

Interpretation of "Step-in-aid of Execution" under the Limitation Act: Insights from M. Krishna Pattar v. K. Seetharama Pattar

Date: Mar 12, 1926
Interpretation of "Step-in-aid of Execution" under the Limitation Act: Insights from M. Krishna Pattar v. K. Seetharama Pattar Introduction The case of M. Krishna Pattar v. K. Seetharama Pattar...
Joinder of Parties in Statutory Challenge: Vaithilinga Pandara Sannidhi Audhina Karthar Tiruvaduthurai Adhinam v. Sadasiva Iyer

Joinder of Parties in Statutory Challenge: Vaithilinga Pandara Sannidhi Audhina Karthar Tiruvaduthurai Adhinam v. Sadasiva Iyer

Date: Mar 9, 1926
Joinder of Parties in Statutory Challenge: Vaithilinga Pandara Sannidhi Audhina Karthar Tiruvaduthurai Adhinam v. Sadasiva Iyer Introduction The case of Vaithilinga Pandara Sannidhi Audhina Karthar...
Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Joinder of Government Parties in Ultra Vires Actions

Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Joinder of Government Parties in Ultra Vires Actions

Date: Mar 9, 1926
Madras High Court Establishes Limitations on Joinder of Government Parties in Ultra Vires Actions Introduction The case of Mahant Prayaga Doss Jee Varu v. Board Of Commissioners adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Role of Police Reports in Non-Cognizable Offenses: Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty Accused (1926)

Clarifying the Role of Police Reports in Non-Cognizable Offenses: Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty Accused (1926)

Date: Feb 25, 1926
Clarifying the Role of Police Reports in Non-Cognizable Offenses: Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty Accused (1926) Introduction Public Prosecutor v. Ratnavelu Chetty Accused is a landmark...
Exhaustiveness of Section 499 IPC Exceptions: Insights from Tiruvengada Mudali v. Tripurasundari Ammal

Exhaustiveness of Section 499 IPC Exceptions: Insights from Tiruvengada Mudali v. Tripurasundari Ammal

Date: Feb 16, 1926
Exhaustiveness of Section 499 IPC Exceptions: Insights from Tiruvengada Mudali v. Tripurasundari Ammal Introduction The case of Tiruvengada Mudali (Accused) v. Tripurasundari Ammal (Complainant),...
Kandaswami Udayan v. Velayutha Udayan: Redefining Alienation and Partition in Joint Hindu Family Law

Kandaswami Udayan v. Velayutha Udayan: Redefining Alienation and Partition in Joint Hindu Family Law

Date: Feb 6, 1926
Kandaswami Udayan v. Velayutha Udayan: Redefining Alienation and Partition in Joint Hindu Family Law Introduction The case of Kandaswami Udayan v. Velayutha Udayan, adjudicated by the Madras High...
Expanding the Scope of Heritable Bandhus in Hindu Succession: Kesar Singh v. Secretary of State for India (1926)

Expanding the Scope of Heritable Bandhus in Hindu Succession: Kesar Singh v. Secretary of State for India (1926)

Date: Jan 7, 1926
Expanding the Scope of Heritable Bandhus in Hindu Succession: Kesar Singh v. Secretary of State for India (1926) Introduction The Kesar Singh v. Secretary Of State For India In Council case,...
Onus of Proof in Resumption of Service-Burdened Land Grants

Onus of Proof in Resumption of Service-Burdened Land Grants

Date: Nov 4, 1925
Onus of Proof in Resumption of Service-Burdened Land Grants Introduction The case of Kandala Thiruvenkatacharlu v. Shaik Altoo Sahib adjudicated by the Madras High Court on November 3, 1925, presents...
Appellate Limitations on Orders Refusing Legal Representation: Venkatakrishna Reddi v. Krishna Reddi

Appellate Limitations on Orders Refusing Legal Representation: Venkatakrishna Reddi v. Krishna Reddi

Date: Oct 30, 1925
Appellate Limitations on Orders Refusing Legal Representation: Venkatakrishna Reddi v. Krishna Reddi Introduction The case of Venkatakrishna Reddi v. Krishna Reddi adjudicated by the Madras High...
Kama Reddy v. Ranga Dasan: Limitation Periods in Recovery of Religious Trust Property

Kama Reddy v. Ranga Dasan: Limitation Periods in Recovery of Religious Trust Property

Date: Oct 29, 1925
Kama Reddy v. Ranga Dasan: Limitation Periods in Recovery of Religious Trust Property Introduction Kama Reddy v. Ranga Dasan is a seminal judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on October 28,...
Establishing Prescriptive Easements: Insights from Subba Rao v. Lakshmana Rao

Establishing Prescriptive Easements: Insights from Subba Rao v. Lakshmana Rao

Date: Oct 28, 1925
Establishing Prescriptive Easements: Insights from Subba Rao v. Lakshmana Rao Introduction The case of Subba Rao v. Lakshmana Rao decided by the Madras High Court on October 27, 1925, marks a...
Extension of Pious Obligations to Commercial Debts: Insights from Achutaramayya v. Ratnajee Bhootaji

Extension of Pious Obligations to Commercial Debts: Insights from Achutaramayya v. Ratnajee Bhootaji

Date: Oct 23, 1925
Extension of Pious Obligations to Commercial Debts: Insights from Achutaramayya v. Ratnajee Bhootaji Introduction The landmark case of Achutaramayya v. Ratnajee Bhootaji, adjudicated by the Madras...
Limitation Periods in Execution Applications: Insights from Pattannayya v. Pattayya Alias Krishnayya

Limitation Periods in Execution Applications: Insights from Pattannayya v. Pattayya Alias Krishnayya

Date: Oct 10, 1925
Limitation Periods in Execution Applications: Insights from Pattannayya v. Pattayya Alias Krishnayya Introduction Pattannayya v. Pattayya Alias Krishnayya is a seminal judgment delivered by the...
Premature Redemption Suit in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Mylavakapu Rangayya Naidu v. Basana Simon

Premature Redemption Suit in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Mylavakapu Rangayya Naidu v. Basana Simon

Date: Oct 8, 1925
Premature Redemption Suit in Usufructuary Mortgages: Insights from Mylavakapu Rangayya Naidu v. Basana Simon 1. Introduction The case of Mylavakapu Rangayya Naidu v. Basana Simon adjudicated by the...
Absolute Privilege in Preventive Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of P. Sanjivi Reddy v. K. Koneri Reddi

Absolute Privilege in Preventive Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of P. Sanjivi Reddy v. K. Koneri Reddi

Date: Oct 7, 1925
Absolute Privilege in Preventive Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of P. Sanjivi Reddy v. K. Koneri Reddi Introduction P. Sanjivi Reddy v. K. Koneri Reddi, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Enforcement of Registration Obligations under Section 77 of the Registration Act: Analysis of K. Satyanarayana v. Y. Chinna Venkatarao

Enforcement of Registration Obligations under Section 77 of the Registration Act: Analysis of K. Satyanarayana v. Y. Chinna Venkatarao

Date: Sep 17, 1925
Enforcement of Registration Obligations under Section 77 of the Registration Act: Analysis of K. Satyanarayana v. Y. Chinna Venkatarao Introduction The case of K. Satyanarayana v. Y. Chinna...
Rajagopala Pandaratthiar v. Tirupathia Pillai: Establishing Jurisdictional Principles in Execution Proceedings

Rajagopala Pandaratthiar v. Tirupathia Pillai: Establishing Jurisdictional Principles in Execution Proceedings

Date: Aug 29, 1925
Rajagopala Pandaratthiar v. Tirupathia Pillai: Establishing Jurisdictional Principles in Execution Proceedings Introduction The case of Rajagopala Pandaratthiar v. Tirupathia Pillai is a landmark...
Revitalizing Landlord's Rights: The Landmark Judgment in Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali

Revitalizing Landlord's Rights: The Landmark Judgment in Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali

Date: Aug 19, 1925
Revitalizing Landlord's Rights: The Landmark Judgment in Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali Introduction The case of Veeraswami Mudali v. P.R. Venkatachala Mudali adjudicated by the Madras...
Limitation on Executing Co-conditional Decrees under Section 48 CPC

Limitation on Executing Co-conditional Decrees under Section 48 CPC

Date: Apr 30, 1925
Limitation on Executing Co-conditional Decrees under Section 48 CPC Introduction The case of Nawab Shuja-Ul-Mulk Bahadur v. Umir-Ul-Umra Bahadur, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on April 29,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert