Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Taxation of Government Securities Interest in Co-operative Banks: Madras Provincial Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Taxation of Government Securities Interest in Co-operative Banks: Madras Provincial Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 6, 1933
Taxation of Government Securities Interest in Co-operative Banks: Madras Provincial Co-Operative Bank v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of The Madras Provincial Co-Operative Bank,...
Establishing the Necessity of a Subsisting Decree for Sale Confirmation: Sorimuthu Pillai v. Muthukrishna Pillai

Establishing the Necessity of a Subsisting Decree for Sale Confirmation: Sorimuthu Pillai v. Muthukrishna Pillai

Date: Nov 12, 1932
Establishing the Necessity of a Subsisting Decree for Sale Confirmation: Sorimuthu Pillai v. Muthukrishna Pillai Introduction Case Title: Sorimuthu Pillai v. Muthukrishna Pillai Court: Madras High...
Azhagappa Chetti v. S.A. Ramanathan Chettiar: Reaffirming the Necessity of Proper Service in Execution Proceedings

Azhagappa Chetti v. S.A. Ramanathan Chettiar: Reaffirming the Necessity of Proper Service in Execution Proceedings

Date: Oct 22, 1932
Azhagappa Chetti v. S.A. Ramanathan Chettiar: Reaffirming the Necessity of Proper Service in Execution Proceedings Introduction The case of Azhagappa Chetti v. S.A. Ramanathan Chettiar adjudicated by...
Discharge of Surety via Consent Orders: Precedent from Annadana Jadaya Goundar v. Konammal (1932)

Discharge of Surety via Consent Orders: Precedent from Annadana Jadaya Goundar v. Konammal (1932)

Date: Oct 13, 1932
Discharge of Surety via Consent Orders: Precedent from Annadana Jadaya Goundar v. Konammal (1932) Introduction The case of Annadana Jadaya Goundar v. Konammal, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Determining the Date of Partition in Hindu Joint Family Law: Insights from Muthukumara Sthapathiar v. Sivanarayana Pillai

Determining the Date of Partition in Hindu Joint Family Law: Insights from Muthukumara Sthapathiar v. Sivanarayana Pillai

Date: Sep 21, 1932
Determining the Date of Partition in Hindu Joint Family Law: Insights from Muthukumara Sthapathiar v. Sivanarayana Pillai Introduction The case of Muthukumara Sthapathiar v. Sivanarayana Pillai,...
Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Execution Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Vadlamannati Bala Tripura Sundaramma v. Abdul Khadar

Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Execution Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Vadlamannati Bala Tripura Sundaramma v. Abdul Khadar

Date: Sep 15, 1932
Strict Enforcement of Limitation Periods in Execution Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Vadlamannati Bala Tripura Sundaramma v. Abdul Khadar 1. Introduction The case of Vadlamannati Bala Tripura...
Enforceability of Resale Agreements Involving Minors: Insights from Venkatachalam Pillai v. Sethuram Rao

Enforceability of Resale Agreements Involving Minors: Insights from Venkatachalam Pillai v. Sethuram Rao

Date: Aug 23, 1932
Enforceability of Resale Agreements Involving Minors: Insights from Venkatachalam Pillai v. Sethuram Rao Introduction The case of Venkatachalam Pillai v. Sethuram Rao adjudicated by the Madras High...
Substitution of Legal Representatives in Probate Proceedings: P. Rama Naidu v. Rangayya Naidu

Substitution of Legal Representatives in Probate Proceedings: P. Rama Naidu v. Rangayya Naidu

Date: Aug 20, 1932
Substitution of Legal Representatives in Probate Proceedings: P. Rama Naidu v. Rangayya Naidu Introduction The case of P. Rama Naidu v. Rangayya Naidu, decided by the Madras High Court on August 19,...
Defeasance Clauses in Hindu Property Settlements: Analyzing Govindaraja Pillai v. Mangalam Pillai (1932)

Defeasance Clauses in Hindu Property Settlements: Analyzing Govindaraja Pillai v. Mangalam Pillai (1932)

Date: Aug 3, 1932
Defeasance Clauses in Hindu Property Settlements: Analyzing Govindaraja Pillai v. Mangalam Pillai (1932) Introduction The landmark case Govindaraja Pillai v. Mangalam Pillai adjudicated by the Madras...
Non-Retroactive Application of Section 53-A: Kanji And Moolji Brothers v. T. Shanmugam Pillai

Non-Retroactive Application of Section 53-A: Kanji And Moolji Brothers v. T. Shanmugam Pillai

Date: Apr 29, 1932
Non-Retroactive Application of Section 53-A: Kanji And Moolji Brothers v. T. Shanmugam Pillai Introduction The case of Kanji And Moolji Brothers v. T. Shanmugam Pillai adjudicated by the Madras High...
Inference from Possession of Stolen Property in Murder Cases: Kallam Narayana Judgment

Inference from Possession of Stolen Property in Murder Cases: Kallam Narayana Judgment

Date: Apr 26, 1932
Inference from Possession of Stolen Property in Murder Cases: Kallam Narayana Judgment Introduction The Kallam Narayana case, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on April 25, 1932, addresses...
Defining Cognisance and Revision Limits under Section 436: Insights from Chingurupati V. Naraharisetty, Madras High Court 1932

Defining Cognisance and Revision Limits under Section 436: Insights from Chingurupati V. Naraharisetty, Madras High Court 1932

Date: Apr 7, 1932
Defining Cognisance and Revision Limits under Section 436: Insights from Chingurupati Venkata Subba Rao And Another Petitioners v. Naraharisetty Anjaneyalu, Madras High Court 1932 Introduction The...
Admissibility of Promissory Notes under Section 36 - Alimane Sahiba v. Kolisetti Subbarayudu

Admissibility of Promissory Notes under Section 36 - Alimane Sahiba v. Kolisetti Subbarayudu

Date: Apr 5, 1932
Admissibility of Promissory Notes under Section 36 of the Stamp Act – Alimane Sahiba v. Kolisetti Subbarayudu Introduction The case of Alimane Sahiba v. Kolisetti Subbarayudu adjudicated by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on Mara Ramanarasu v. Matta Venkata Reddi: Expanding the Interpretation of Decree Adjustment under Order 21, Rule 2

Comprehensive Commentary on Mara Ramanarasu v. Matta Venkata Reddi: Expanding the Interpretation of Decree Adjustment under Order 21, Rule 2

Date: Mar 25, 1932
Expanding the Interpretation of Decree Adjustment under Order 21, Rule 2: Insights from Mara Ramanarasu v. Matta Venkata Reddi Introduction The case of Mara Ramanarasu...
Establishing Priority Among Rival Purchasers in Successive Mortgage Suits: Chinnaswami Padayachi v. Darmalinga Padayachi

Establishing Priority Among Rival Purchasers in Successive Mortgage Suits: Chinnaswami Padayachi v. Darmalinga Padayachi

Date: Mar 22, 1932
Establishing Priority Among Rival Purchasers in Successive Mortgage Suits: Chinnaswami Padayachi v. Darmalinga Padayachi Introduction The case of Chinnaswami Padayachi v. Darmalinga Padayachi,...
Clarifying Court Fee Liability in Suits for Cancellation of Decrees: Paluri Venkatasiva Rao v. Bodapati Venkatanarasimha Satyanarayanamurty

Clarifying Court Fee Liability in Suits for Cancellation of Decrees: Paluri Venkatasiva Rao v. Bodapati Venkatanarasimha Satyanarayanamurty

Date: Mar 22, 1932
Clarifying Court Fee Liability in Suits for Cancellation of Decrees Paluri Venkatasiva Rao v. Bodapati Venkatanarasimha Satyanarayanamurty Court: Madras High Court Date: March 21, 1932 Introduction...
Interpretation of Section 162 CPC: Inclusion of Statements by Accused Persons

Interpretation of Section 162 CPC: Inclusion of Statements by Accused Persons

Date: Feb 12, 1932
Interpretation of Section 162 CPC: Inclusion of Statements by Accused Persons Introduction The case of Syamo Maha Patro, In Re. adjudicated by the Madras High Court on February 11, 1932, presents a...
Recognition of Partition Through Testamentary Arrangements: Insights from Appa v. Kachai Bayyan Kutti

Recognition of Partition Through Testamentary Arrangements: Insights from Appa v. Kachai Bayyan Kutti

Date: Jan 28, 1932
Recognition of Partition Through Testamentary Arrangements: Insights from Appa v. Kachai Bayyan Kutti Introduction The Appa v. Kachai Bayyan Kutti case, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Madras High Court Establishes Retention of Jurisdiction in Mortgage Decree Execution Despite Territorial Changes

Madras High Court Establishes Retention of Jurisdiction in Mortgage Decree Execution Despite Territorial Changes

Date: Jan 19, 1932
Madras High Court Establishes Retention of Jurisdiction in Mortgage Decree Execution Despite Territorial Changes Introduction The case of Ramier (3rd) v. Muthukrishna Ayyar And Others S, adjudicated...
Revisional Jurisdiction Over Board of Revenue Decisions: Mandasa Rajah Case Analysis

Revisional Jurisdiction Over Board of Revenue Decisions: Mandasa Rajah Case Analysis

Date: Nov 26, 1931
Revisional Jurisdiction Over Board of Revenue Decisions: Mandasa Rajah Case Analysis Introduction The case of Lieutenant Srinivasa Rajamani Rajah Deo, The Rajah Of Mandasa (Dead) And Another...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert