Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Madras High Court Establishes Necessity of Including Alienees as Proper Parties in Trust Suit

Madras High Court Establishes Necessity of Including Alienees as Proper Parties in Trust Suit

Date: Sep 21, 1935
Madras High Court Establishes Necessity of Including Alienees as Proper Parties in Trust Suit Introduction The case of Anjaneya Sastri v. Kothandapani Chettiar And Others, adjudicated by the Madras...
Establishing the Right of Auction Purchasers to Refund Under Section 315, Civil Procedure Code

Establishing the Right of Auction Purchasers to Refund Under Section 315, Civil Procedure Code

Date: Aug 2, 1935
Establishing the Right of Auction Purchasers to Refund Under Section 315, Civil Procedure Code Introduction The case of V. Macha Koundan v. V.K Kottora Koundan, adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Kaku Chenchuramana Reddi v. Palapu Arunachalam: Defining Three-Month Criteria as a Condition Precedent Under the Provincial Insolvency Act

Kaku Chenchuramana Reddi v. Palapu Arunachalam: Defining Three-Month Criteria as a Condition Precedent Under the Provincial Insolvency Act

Date: Apr 25, 1935
Kaku Chenchuramana Reddi v. Palapu Arunachalam: Defining Three-Month Criteria as a Condition Precedent Under the Provincial Insolvency Act Introduction The case of Kaku Chenchuramana Reddi v. Palapu...
Application of Article 120 of the Limitation Act in Procession Rights: Ponnu Nadar v. Kumaru Reddiar

Application of Article 120 of the Limitation Act in Procession Rights: Ponnu Nadar v. Kumaru Reddiar

Date: Apr 6, 1935
Application of Article 120 of the Limitation Act in Procession Rights: Ponnu Nadar v. Kumaru Reddiar Introduction Ponnu Nadar v. Kumaru Reddiar is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High...
Adapa Papamma v. Darbha Venkayya: Oral Agreements and Execution of Decrees in Madras High Court Jurisprudence

Adapa Papamma v. Darbha Venkayya: Oral Agreements and Execution of Decrees in Madras High Court Jurisprudence

Date: Mar 30, 1935
Adapa Papamma v. Darbha Venkayya: Oral Agreements and Execution of Decrees in Madras High Court Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Adapa Papamma And Another v. Darbha Venkayya And Others,...
Keesari Santamma v. Kanumathareddi Venkatramireddi: Affirmation of Maintainability in Partition Suits

Keesari Santamma v. Kanumathareddi Venkatramireddi: Affirmation of Maintainability in Partition Suits

Date: Mar 14, 1935
Keesari Santamma v. Kanumathareddi Venkatramireddi: Affirmation of Maintainability in Partition Suits Introduction Keesari Santamma v. Kanumathareddi Venkatramireddi And Others is a pivotal judgment...
Limitation Periods in Trustee-Induced Property Alienations: Insights from S.K Venkatasubramania Ayyar v. S. Sivagurunatha Chettiar

Limitation Periods in Trustee-Induced Property Alienations: Insights from S.K Venkatasubramania Ayyar v. S. Sivagurunatha Chettiar

Date: Feb 28, 1935
Limitation Periods in Trustee-Induced Property Alienations: Insights from S.K Venkatasubramania Ayyar v. S. Sivagurunatha Chettiar Introduction The case of S.K Venkatasubramania Ayyar And Others v....
Abdul Aziz Sahib v. Chokkan Chettiar: Establishing the Applicability of Article 180 in Possession Petitions by Decree-Holders

Abdul Aziz Sahib v. Chokkan Chettiar: Establishing the Applicability of Article 180 in Possession Petitions by Decree-Holders

Date: Feb 9, 1935
Abdul Aziz Sahib v. Chokkan Chettiar: Establishing the Applicability of Article 180 in Possession Petitions by Decree-Holders Introduction The case of Abdul Aziz Sahib And Ors. v. Chokkan Chettiar...
Recognition of Cocoanut Plantations as Fruit Gardens and the Application of Res Judicata in Estates Land Act

Recognition of Cocoanut Plantations as Fruit Gardens and the Application of Res Judicata in Estates Land Act

Date: Feb 9, 1935
Recognition of Cocoanut Plantations as Fruit Gardens and the Application of Res Judicata in Estates Land Act Introduction The case of S.M. Narayana Ayyangar v. S.P.R.M. Subramanian Chettiar And...
Establishment of Article 180 Applicability in Delivery of Possession Cases

Establishment of Article 180 Applicability in Delivery of Possession Cases

Date: Feb 9, 1935
Establishment of Article 180 Applicability in Delivery of Possession Cases Introduction Abdul Azim Sahib v. Chokkan Chettiar is a seminal judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on February 8,...
Continued Administration of Insolvent's Assets Post-Annullment under Section 37 and Section 43: Insights from Moturi Veerayya v. Rao Bahadur P.V Sreenivasa Rao

Continued Administration of Insolvent's Assets Post-Annullment under Section 37 and Section 43: Insights from Moturi Veerayya v. Rao Bahadur P.V Sreenivasa Rao

Date: Jan 30, 1935
Continued Administration of Insolvent's Assets Post-Annullment under Section 37 and Section 43: Insights from Moturi Veerayya v. Rao Bahadur P.V Sreenivasa Rao Introduction The case of Moturi...
Jurisdiction over Religious and Charitable Trusts: Insights from M. Ar. Rm. M. Annamalai Chettiar v. Al. A. C. T. Solaiyappa Chettiar

Jurisdiction over Religious and Charitable Trusts: Insights from M. Ar. Rm. M. Annamalai Chettiar v. Al. A. C. T. Solaiyappa Chettiar

Date: Jan 17, 1935
Jurisdiction over Religious and Charitable Trusts: Insights from M. Ar. Rm. M. Annamalai Chettiar v. Al. A. C. T. Solaiyappa Chettiar Introduction The case of M. Ar. Rm. M. Annamalai Chettiar And...
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts in Election Petitions: Analysis of Y. Mahabaleswabappa v. M. Gopalaswami Mudaliar

Jurisdiction of Civil Courts in Election Petitions: Analysis of Y. Mahabaleswabappa v. M. Gopalaswami Mudaliar

Date: Jan 16, 1935
Jurisdiction of Civil Courts in Election Petitions: Analysis of Y. Mahabaleswabappa v. M. Gopalaswami Mudaliar Introduction The case of Y. Mahabaleswabappa Petitioner v. M. Gopalaswami Mudaliar...
Comprehensive Interpretation of Section 79(iii) of the Madras Local Boards Act in Madras High Court's 1934 Decision

Comprehensive Interpretation of Section 79(iii) of the Madras Local Boards Act in Madras High Court's 1934 Decision

Date: Dec 21, 1934
Comprehensive Interpretation of Section 79(iii) of the Madras Local Boards Act in Madras High Court's 1934 Decision Introduction The case of T.V.K Kamaraja Pandiya Naicker v. The Secretary Of State...
Madras High Court Upholds Illegality of Unauthorized Partnerships in Abkari Business

Madras High Court Upholds Illegality of Unauthorized Partnerships in Abkari Business

Date: Dec 20, 1934
Madras High Court Upholds Illegality of Unauthorized Partnerships in Abkari Business Introduction The case of Chava Ramanayudu v. Suryadevara Seetharamayya adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Set-Off of Capital Losses Against Dividend Income: South Indian Industrials Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Set-Off of Capital Losses Against Dividend Income: South Indian Industrials Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Dec 13, 1934
Set-Off of Capital Losses Against Dividend Income: South Indian Industrials Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The case of The South Indian Industrials, Ltd., Madras, By Its Managing...
Establishing Prescriptive Title in Temple Management: Rajagopala Naidu v. Ramasubramania Ayyar

Establishing Prescriptive Title in Temple Management: Rajagopala Naidu v. Ramasubramania Ayyar

Date: Dec 8, 1934
Establishing Prescriptive Title in Temple Management: Rajagopala Naidu v. Ramasubramania Ayyar Introduction The case of Rajagopala Naidu v. Ramasubramania Ayyar adjudicated by the Madras High Court...
Admissibility of Custodial Statements Under Section 27: King-Emperor v. M. Ramanujam

Admissibility of Custodial Statements Under Section 27: King-Emperor v. M. Ramanujam

Date: Nov 22, 1934
Admissibility of Custodial Statements Under Section 27: King-Emperor v. M. Ramanujam Introduction The case of King-Emperor v. M. Ramanujam is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on...
Admissibility of Confessional Statements under Section 27: Emperor v. Ramanuja Ayyangar (1934)

Admissibility of Confessional Statements under Section 27: Emperor v. Ramanuja Ayyangar (1934)

Date: Nov 22, 1934
Admissibility of Confessional Statements under Section 27: Emperor v. Ramanuja Ayyangar (1934) Introduction The case of Emperor v. Ramanuja Ayyangar (1934) addresses a pivotal issue in the Indian...
Reevaluating Burden of Proof in Promissory Note Cases: Mallavarapu Narasamma v. Boggavarapu Bulli Veerraju

Reevaluating Burden of Proof in Promissory Note Cases: Mallavarapu Narasamma v. Boggavarapu Bulli Veerraju

Date: Oct 19, 1934
Reevaluating Burden of Proof in Promissory Note Cases: Mallavarapu Narasamma v. Boggavarapu Bulli Veerraju Introduction The case of Mallavarapu Narasamma v. Boggavarapu Bulli Veerraju adjudicated by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert