Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Mothers' Custody Rights under the Guardians and Wards Act: Zynab Bi v. Mohammad Ghouse Mohideen

Affirmation of Mothers' Custody Rights under the Guardians and Wards Act: Zynab Bi v. Mohammad Ghouse Mohideen

Date: May 18, 1951
Affirmation of Mothers' Custody Rights under the Guardians and Wards Act: Zynab Bi v. Mohammad Ghouse Mohideen Introduction The case of Zynab Bi Alias Bibijan v. Mohammad Ghouse Mohideen, adjudicated...
Confirmation of Industrial Disputes Act Validity Post-Constitutional Adoption in Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State Of Madras

Confirmation of Industrial Disputes Act Validity Post-Constitutional Adoption in Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State Of Madras

Date: Apr 21, 1951
Confirmation of Industrial Disputes Act Validity Post-Constitutional Adoption in Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State Of Madras Introduction The case of Sree Meenakshi Mills Ltd. v. State Of Madras,...
Enforcement of Contracts in Violation of Public Policy: Chandra Sreenivasa Rao v. Korrapati Raja Rama Mohana Rao

Enforcement of Contracts in Violation of Public Policy: Chandra Sreenivasa Rao v. Korrapati Raja Rama Mohana Rao

Date: Apr 18, 1951
Enforcement of Contracts in Violation of Public Policy: Chandra Sreenivasa Rao v. Korrapati Raja Rama Mohana Rao Introduction The case of Chandra Sreenivasa Rao v. Korrapati Raja Rama Mohana Rao And...
Section 48 C.P.C. Controlled by Section 15 Limitation Act: Insights from Kandaswami Pillai v. Kannappa Chetty

Section 48 C.P.C. Controlled by Section 15 Limitation Act: Insights from Kandaswami Pillai v. Kannappa Chetty

Date: Apr 7, 1951
Section 48 C.P.C. Controlled by Section 15 Limitation Act: Insights from Kandaswami Pillai v. Kannappa Chetty Introduction The case of Kandaswami Pillai v. Kannappa Chetty Alias Arunachala Chetty was...
Defining 'Substantial Question of Law': A Comprehensive Analysis of Rimmalapudi Subba Rao v. Noony Veeraju And Others

Defining 'Substantial Question of Law': A Comprehensive Analysis of Rimmalapudi Subba Rao v. Noony Veeraju And Others

Date: Mar 23, 1951
Defining 'Substantial Question of Law': A Comprehensive Analysis of Rimmalapudi Subba Rao v. Noony Veeraju And Others Introduction The landmark case of Rimmalapudi Subba Rao v. Noony Veeraju And...
Establishment of Equitable Conditions in Alienation of Coparcenary Shares: Insights from K. Peramanayakam Pillai v. S.T Sivaraman And Another

Establishment of Equitable Conditions in Alienation of Coparcenary Shares: Insights from K. Peramanayakam Pillai v. S.T Sivaraman And Another

Date: Mar 23, 1951
Establishment of Equitable Conditions in Alienation of Coparcenary Shares: Insights from K. Peramanayakam Pillai v. S.T Sivaraman And Another Introduction The case of K. Peramanayakam Pillai v. S.T...
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Maddi Venkatasubbayya: Defining the Scope of Agricultural Income

Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Maddi Venkatasubbayya: Defining the Scope of Agricultural Income

Date: Mar 17, 1951
Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Maddi Venkatasubbayya: Defining the Scope of Agricultural Income Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Maddi Venkatasubbayya adjudicated by the Madras...
Taxation of Timber Sales: Profits from Capital Assets are Assessable Income

Taxation of Timber Sales: Profits from Capital Assets are Assessable Income

Date: Mar 14, 1951
Taxation of Timber Sales: Profits from Capital Assets are Assessable Income Introduction In the landmark case of Fringford Estates Limited v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, decided by the Madras High...
Legal Commentary: Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax v. Jivaraj Topun And Sons - Establishing the Importance of Assessing the Correct Assessee in Partitioned Hindu Undivided Families

Legal Commentary: Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax v. Jivaraj Topun And Sons - Establishing the Importance of Assessing the Correct Assessee in Partitioned Hindu Undivided Families

Date: Mar 14, 1951
Commissioner Of Excess Profits Tax v. Jivaraj Topun And Sons: Establishing the Importance of Assessing the Correct Assessee in Partitioned Hindu Undivided Families Introduction The case of...
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: The Raman & Raman Ltd. Precedent

Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: The Raman & Raman Ltd. Precedent

Date: Mar 13, 1951
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: The Raman & Raman Ltd. Precedent Introduction The case of The Commissioner Of Income Tax, Madras v. Raman And Raman Ltd., Kumbakonam is a landmark decision by the...
Madras High Court Upholds Evacuee Property Ordinance: Balancing Public Interest and Fundamental Rights

Madras High Court Upholds Evacuee Property Ordinance: Balancing Public Interest and Fundamental Rights

Date: Feb 17, 1951
Madras High Court Upholds Evacuee Property Ordinance: Balancing Public Interest and Fundamental Rights Introduction The case of M.B Namazi v. Deputy Custodian Of Evacuee Property, Madras And Others...
Narrow Interpretation of 'Appeal' in Article 182 Limitation Act Established in Sivaramachari v. Bayya Anjaneya Chetty

Narrow Interpretation of 'Appeal' in Article 182 Limitation Act Established in Sivaramachari v. Bayya Anjaneya Chetty

Date: Feb 10, 1951
Narrow Interpretation of 'Appeal' in Article 182 Limitation Act: Insights from Sivaramachari v. Bayya Anjaneya Chetty Introduction The case of Sivaramachari v. Bayya Anjaneya Chetty, adjudicated by...
Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Foreign Creditors in Winding-up Proceedings

Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Foreign Creditors in Winding-up Proceedings

Date: Feb 10, 1951
Madras High Court Upholds Rights of Foreign Creditors in Winding-up Proceedings Introduction The case of Rajah Of Vizianagaram v. The Official Liquidator, Vizianagaram Mining Company, Limited,...
Arbitration Awards: Invalidity Due to Non-Signature of Arbitrators and Violation of Court Consent for Minors – Johara Bibi v. Mohammad Sadak Thambi Marakayar

Arbitration Awards: Invalidity Due to Non-Signature of Arbitrators and Violation of Court Consent for Minors – Johara Bibi v. Mohammad Sadak Thambi Marakayar

Date: Feb 4, 1951
Arbitration Awards: Invalidity Due to Non-Signature of Arbitrators and Violation of Court Consent for Minors – Johara Bibi v. Mohammad Sadak Thambi Marakayar Introduction The case of Johara Bibi And...
Judicial Discretion in Partition Suits: Awarding Future Mesne Profits Without Specific Prayer

Judicial Discretion in Partition Suits: Awarding Future Mesne Profits Without Specific Prayer

Date: Feb 3, 1951
Judicial Discretion in Partition Suits: Awarding Future Mesne Profits Without Specific Prayer Introduction The case of Babburu Basavayya And Others v. Babburu Guravayya And Another, adjudicated by...
Disqualification of Unchastity in Widow's Succession: Insights from Minor Ramaiya Konar v. Mottayya Mudaliar

Disqualification of Unchastity in Widow's Succession: Insights from Minor Ramaiya Konar v. Mottayya Mudaliar

Date: Jan 20, 1951
Disqualification of Unchastity in Widow's Succession Minor Ramaiya Konar Alias Ramasami Konar By Father And Guardian Natesa Konar And Another v. Mottayya Mudaliar Alias Manicka Mudaliar Madras High...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Execution Proceedings: Insights from Seshagiri Aiyar v. Valambal Ammal (1951)

Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Execution Proceedings: Insights from Seshagiri Aiyar v. Valambal Ammal (1951)

Date: Jan 19, 1951
Strict Adherence to Procedural Requirements in Execution Proceedings: Insights from Seshagiri Aiyar v. Valambal Ammal (1951) Introduction The case of Seshagiri Aiyar v. Valambal Ammal And Others,...
Continuity of Corporate Identity and Employee Wage Priority in Winding Up: R.G.N. Price v. M. Chandrasekharan

Continuity of Corporate Identity and Employee Wage Priority in Winding Up: R.G.N. Price v. M. Chandrasekharan

Date: Jan 6, 1951
Continuity of Corporate Identity and Employee Wage Priority in Winding Up: R.G.N. Price v. M. Chandrasekharan Introduction The case of R.G.N. Price, The Official Liquidator Of The Andhra Paper Mills...
Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trade Loss for Income Tax Deductions

Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trade Loss for Income Tax Deductions

Date: Jan 3, 1951
Recognition of Employee Embezzlement as Trade Loss for Income Tax Deductions Introduction M.P. Venkatachalapathy Iyer And S.K. Sundaramanier And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax is a seminal...
Restricting Judicial Summoning of Court Witnesses: Madras High Court's Ruling in K.V.R.S. Mani

Restricting Judicial Summoning of Court Witnesses: Madras High Court's Ruling in K.V.R.S. Mani

Date: Dec 19, 1950
Restricting Judicial Summoning of Court Witnesses: Madras High Court's Ruling in K.V.R.S. Mani, In Re. Introduction The case of K.V.R.S. Mani, In Re. adjudicated by the Madras High Court on December...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert