Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Classification of Damages as Capital Receipts in Tax Assessment: Insights from P.L.M Firm v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras [1967]

Classification of Damages as Capital Receipts in Tax Assessment: Insights from P.L.M Firm v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras [1967]

Date: Jan 25, 1967
Classification of Damages as Capital Receipts in Tax Assessment: Insights from P.L.M Firm v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras [1967] Introduction The landmark case of P.L.M Firm v. Commissioner Of...
Strict Enforcement of Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act: Unstamped Agreements Cannot Be Acted Upon

Strict Enforcement of Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act: Unstamped Agreements Cannot Be Acted Upon

Date: Jan 17, 1967
Strict Enforcement of Section 35 of the Indian Stamp Act: Unstamped Agreements Cannot Be Acted Upon Introduction The case of Yasodammal And Another v. Janaki Ammal ([Madras High Court, 1967](#)),...
Prescriptive Easement Rights Confirmed in Palaniswami Naicker v. Chinnaswami Naicker

Prescriptive Easement Rights Confirmed in Palaniswami Naicker v. Chinnaswami Naicker

Date: Jan 13, 1967
Prescriptive Easement Rights Confirmed in Palaniswami Naicker v. Chinnaswami Naicker Introduction The case of Palaniswami Naicker v. Chinnaswami Naicker, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on...
Public Authority and Judicial Review in Employment Termination: Insights from V. Ramiah v. The State Bank of India (1966)

Public Authority and Judicial Review in Employment Termination: Insights from V. Ramiah v. The State Bank of India (1966)

Date: Dec 24, 1966
Public Authority and Judicial Review in Employment Termination: Insights from V. Ramiah v. The State Bank of India (1966) Introduction The case of V. Ramiah v. The State Bank of India decided by the...
High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Parties under Order 1, Rule 10, CPC

High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Parties under Order 1, Rule 10, CPC

Date: Dec 17, 1966
High Court Clarifies Criteria for Impleading Parties under Order 1, Rule 10, CPC Introduction In the landmark case of The Firm Of Mahadeva Rice And Oil Mills By Partners V. Jayaramakrishnan And...
Madras High Court Establishes Precedent on Mortgage Execution Post Estate Abolition under Madras Act XXVI of 1948

Madras High Court Establishes Precedent on Mortgage Execution Post Estate Abolition under Madras Act XXVI of 1948

Date: Dec 6, 1966
Madras High Court Establishes Precedent on Mortgage Execution Post Estate Abolition under Madras Act XXVI of 1948 Introduction In the landmark case of Sk. M. Muhammed Mustafa Marakayar v....
Estoppel by Election in Succession Disputes: K. Shanmugham Pillai v. S. Shanmugham Pillai

Estoppel by Election in Succession Disputes: K. Shanmugham Pillai v. S. Shanmugham Pillai

Date: Nov 11, 1966
Estoppel by Election in Succession Disputes: K. Shanmugham Pillai v. S. Shanmugham Pillai Introduction The case of K. Shanmugham Pillai And Others v. S. Shanmugham Pillai And Others was adjudicated...
Interpreting 'Bona Fide' Claims in Eviction Proceedings: Nathella Sampathu Chetty v. Sha Vajinjeo Bapulal

Interpreting 'Bona Fide' Claims in Eviction Proceedings: Nathella Sampathu Chetty v. Sha Vajinjeo Bapulal

Date: Oct 29, 1966
Interpreting 'Bona Fide' Claims in Eviction Proceedings: Nathella Sampathu Chetty v. Sha Vajinjeo Bapulal Introduction The case of Nathella Sampathu Chetty v. Sha Vajinjeo Bapulal adjudicated by the...
Enforceability of Minimum Charges in Electricity Supply Agreements: M.G. Natesa Chettiar v. Madras State Electricity Board

Enforceability of Minimum Charges in Electricity Supply Agreements: M.G. Natesa Chettiar v. Madras State Electricity Board

Date: Oct 15, 1966
Enforceability of Minimum Charges in Electricity Supply Agreements: M.G. Natesa Chettiar v. Madras State Electricity Board Introduction The case of M.G. Natesa Chettiar v. The Madras State...
Madras High Court Establishes Clear Standards for 'Wilful Default' under the Rent Control Act

Madras High Court Establishes Clear Standards for 'Wilful Default' under the Rent Control Act

Date: Oct 7, 1966
Madras High Court Establishes Clear Standards for 'Wilful Default' under the Rent Control Act Introduction The case of Durairaj Alias Paramasivam And Another v. P.M.S Rathana Bai adjudicated by the...
Restricting Widow's Estate Under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma

Restricting Widow's Estate Under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma

Date: Oct 1, 1966
Restricting Widow's Estate Under Section 14 of the Hindu Succession Act: Insights from Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt. Thatha Navaneethamma Introduction The case of Thatha Gurunadham Chetti v. Smt....
Right to Revision Against Compounding Notices Affirmed: Madras High Court in K.J Lingan & Others v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer

Right to Revision Against Compounding Notices Affirmed: Madras High Court in K.J Lingan & Others v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer

Date: Sep 23, 1966
Right to Revision Against Compounding Notices Affirmed M/S. K.J Lingan & A.V Mahayalam & Others v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer, Mount Road Dn. & Another Madras High Court, September 22, 1966...
Clarifying Adverse Possession Among Co-Owners: Insights from Ameer Bibi v. Chinnammal Alias Nagoorammal And Another

Clarifying Adverse Possession Among Co-Owners: Insights from Ameer Bibi v. Chinnammal Alias Nagoorammal And Another

Date: Sep 21, 1966
Clarifying Adverse Possession Among Co-Owners: Insights from Ameer Bibi v. Chinnammal Alias Nagoorammal And Another Introduction Ameer Bibi v. Chinnammal Alias Nagoorammal And Another is a landmark...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar: Clarifying the Scope of Section 10(5-A) in Income Tax Law

Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar: Clarifying the Scope of Section 10(5-A) in Income Tax Law

Date: Sep 2, 1966
Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar: Clarifying the Scope of Section 10(5-A) in Income Tax Law Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. S. Chenniappa Mudaliar,...
Strict Construction of Time Limits under Section 145(4) Cr PC in Athiappa Gounder v. S.A Athiappa Pandaram

Strict Construction of Time Limits under Section 145(4) Cr PC in Athiappa Gounder v. S.A Athiappa Pandaram

Date: Aug 26, 1966
Strict Construction of Time Limits under Section 145(4) Cr PC in Athiappa Gounder And Others v. S.A Athiappa Pandaram Introduction The case of Athiappa Gounder And Others v. S.A Athiappa Pandaram,...
Reassessment Under Section 34(1)(b): Insights from E.A Venkataramier And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras

Reassessment Under Section 34(1)(b): Insights from E.A Venkataramier And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras

Date: Aug 12, 1966
Reassessment Under Section 34(1)(b): Insights from E.A Venkataramier And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Madras Introduction The case of E.A Venkataramier And Sons v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Admissibility of Customs Officers' Statements in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Collector Of Customs, Madras v. Kotumal Bhirumal Pihlajani

Admissibility of Customs Officers' Statements in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Collector Of Customs, Madras v. Kotumal Bhirumal Pihlajani

Date: Jul 30, 1966
Admissibility of Customs Officers' Statements in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Collector Of Customs, Madras v. Kotumal Bhirumal Pihlajani Introduction The case Collector Of...
Madras High Court Establishes Evidentiary Standards for Bad Debt Deductions in Income Tax Claims

Madras High Court Establishes Evidentiary Standards for Bad Debt Deductions in Income Tax Claims

Date: Jun 25, 1966
Madras High Court Establishes Evidentiary Standards for Bad Debt Deductions in Income Tax Claims Introduction The case of T.S Pl.P Chidambaram Chettiar (By Legal Representatives) v. Commissioner Of...
Haji J.A Kareem Sait v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Mettupalayam: A Landmark Judgment on the Validity of Central Sales-tax Provisions

Haji J.A Kareem Sait v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Mettupalayam: A Landmark Judgment on the Validity of Central Sales-tax Provisions

Date: Jun 25, 1966
Haji J.A Kareem Sait v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer, Mettupalayam: A Landmark Judgment on the Validity of Central Sales-tax Provisions Introduction The case of Haji J.A Kareem Sait v. The...
Deductibility of Pension and Development Rebates: Insights from Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Deductibility of Pension and Development Rebates: Insights from Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jun 22, 1966
Deductibility of Pension and Development Rebates: Insights from Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Indian Overseas Bank Ltd. v. Commissioner Of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert