Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

M/S Geethanjali Mills Ltd. v. V. Thiruvenkatanathan: Establishing Accountability for Corporate Offences under Income Tax Act

M/S Geethanjali Mills Ltd. v. V. Thiruvenkatanathan: Establishing Accountability for Corporate Offences under Income Tax Act

Date: Sep 10, 1988
M/S Geethanjali Mills Ltd. v. V. Thiruvenkatanathan: Establishing Accountability for Corporate Offences under Income Tax Act Introduction The case of M/S Geethanjali Mills Ltd. & Six Others v. V....
Scope of Order 11, Rule 21, C.P.C. in Non-Compliance with Court-Directed Document Production: Chinnappan v. Ramachandran

Scope of Order 11, Rule 21, C.P.C. in Non-Compliance with Court-Directed Document Production: Chinnappan v. Ramachandran

Date: Jul 21, 1988
Scope of Order 11, Rule 21, C.P.C. in Non-Compliance with Court-Directed Document Production: Chinnappan v. Ramachandran Introduction The case of Chinnappan v. Ramachandran adjudicated by the Madras...
Discretionary Authority in Granting Stay Orders under S.31(5) Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act

Discretionary Authority in Granting Stay Orders under S.31(5) Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act

Date: Mar 25, 1988
Discretionary Authority in Granting Stay Orders under S.31(5) Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act Introduction The case of Saravana Oil Mills, Tuticorin, Rep. By Its Managing Partner V. Senthurpandian...
Surplus from Currency Devaluation Not Taxable as Capital Gains: E.I.D Parry Limited v. CIT

Surplus from Currency Devaluation Not Taxable as Capital Gains: E.I.D Parry Limited v. CIT

Date: Mar 12, 1988
Surplus from Currency Devaluation Not Taxable as Capital Gains: E.I.D Parry Limited v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of E.I.D Parry Limited v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
M.A Namazie Endowment v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Charitable Trusts under the Income-tax Act

M.A Namazie Endowment v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Charitable Trusts under the Income-tax Act

Date: Mar 12, 1988
M.A Namazie Endowment v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Defining Charitable Trusts under the Income-tax Act Introduction The case of M.A Namazie Endowment v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax adjudicated by...
Extinction of Rights in Capital Assets and Capital Gains Tax: Insights from C. Leo Machodo v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Extinction of Rights in Capital Assets and Capital Gains Tax: Insights from C. Leo Machodo v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 12, 1988
Extinction of Rights in Capital Assets and Capital Gains Tax: Insights from C. Leo Machodo v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of C. Leo Machodo v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Strict Enforcement of Asset Disclosure in Indigency Applications: P.V Chandrasekharan v. Thirumalai Chit Funds

Strict Enforcement of Asset Disclosure in Indigency Applications: P.V Chandrasekharan v. Thirumalai Chit Funds

Date: Mar 5, 1988
Strict Enforcement of Asset Disclosure in Indigency Applications: P.V Chandrasekharan v. Thirumalai Chit Funds Introduction The case of P.V Chandrasekharan And Others v. Thirumalai Chit Funds By...
Comprehensive Analysis of Ekambaram v. Sundaramurthy And State: Establishing Standards for Handling Rival Complaints in Criminal Proceedings

Comprehensive Analysis of Ekambaram v. Sundaramurthy And State: Establishing Standards for Handling Rival Complaints in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Mar 4, 1988
Establishing Standards for Handling Rival Complaints in Criminal Proceedings: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ekambaram v. Sundaramurthy And State Introduction The case of Ekambaram v. Sundaramurthy And...
Inclusion of Interest Claims in Winding-Up Petitions under section 433 of the Companies Act: Rashid Leathers (P.) Ltd. v. Super Fine Skin Traders

Inclusion of Interest Claims in Winding-Up Petitions under section 433 of the Companies Act: Rashid Leathers (P.) Ltd. v. Super Fine Skin Traders

Date: Feb 20, 1988
Inclusion of Interest Claims in Winding-Up Petitions under section 433 of the Companies Act Introduction The case of Rashid Leathers (P.) Ltd. v. Super Fine Skin Traders was adjudicated by the Madras...
Establishing Willful Default and Bona Fide Demolition Requirements in Rent Control Law: Insights from Thayammal v. K. Subramaniam

Establishing Willful Default and Bona Fide Demolition Requirements in Rent Control Law: Insights from Thayammal v. K. Subramaniam

Date: Feb 13, 1988
Establishing Willful Default and Bona Fide Demolition Requirements in Rent Control Law: Insights from Thayammal v. K. Subramaniam Introduction The case of Thayammal v. K. Subramaniam adjudicated by...
Taxation of Honorary Gifts: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Balamuralikrishna

Taxation of Honorary Gifts: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Balamuralikrishna

Date: Feb 11, 1988
Taxation of Honorary Gifts: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Balamuralikrishna Introduction Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M. Balamuralikrishna is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High...
Seizure of Bank Balances as Property under Section 102 CPC: Insights from Bharath Overseas Bank v. Minu Publication

Seizure of Bank Balances as Property under Section 102 CPC: Insights from Bharath Overseas Bank v. Minu Publication

Date: Feb 10, 1988
Seizure of Bank Balances as Property under Section 102 CPC: Insights from Bharath Overseas Bank v. Minu Publication Introduction The case of Bharath Overseas Bank v. Minu Publication adjudicated by...
Madras High Court Rules Ad Valorem Court-Fees Not Applicable in Contentious Probate Proceedings under Section 295 of the Succession Act

Madras High Court Rules Ad Valorem Court-Fees Not Applicable in Contentious Probate Proceedings under Section 295 of the Succession Act

Date: Jan 30, 1988
Madras High Court Rules Ad Valorem Court-Fees Not Applicable in Contentious Probate Proceedings under Section 295 of the Succession Act Introduction The case of Philo Peter & Arputhasamy v....
Exemption Limits on Auxiliary Customs Duty: Insights from Appraiser, Madras Customs v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint Papers Ltd.

Exemption Limits on Auxiliary Customs Duty: Insights from Appraiser, Madras Customs v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint Papers Ltd.

Date: Jan 29, 1988
Exemption Limits on Auxiliary Customs Duty: Insights from Appraiser, Madras Customs v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint Papers Ltd. Introduction The case of Appraiser, Madras Customs v. Tamil Nadu Newsprint...
Mandate to Furnish All Relevant Documentation to Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases: Analysis of K.V Jesudasan v. State Of Tamil Nadu And Another

Mandate to Furnish All Relevant Documentation to Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases: Analysis of K.V Jesudasan v. State Of Tamil Nadu And Another

Date: Jan 28, 1988
Mandate to Furnish All Relevant Documentation to Advisory Board in Preventive Detention Cases: Analysis of K.V Jesudasan v. State Of Tamil Nadu And Another Introduction K.V Jesudasan v. State Of...
M.V Valliappan And Others v. Income-Tax Officer And Others: A Landmark Judgment on Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act

M.V Valliappan And Others v. Income-Tax Officer And Others: A Landmark Judgment on Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act

Date: Jan 14, 1988
M.V Valliappan And Others v. Income-Tax Officer And Others: A Landmark Judgment on Section 171(9) of the Income-tax Act Introduction The case of M.V Valliappan And Others v. Income-Tax Officer And...
Palani Nathan v. Devanai Ammal: Establishing No Limitation Period for Applications Under Order 9, Rule 7, C.P.C.

Palani Nathan v. Devanai Ammal: Establishing No Limitation Period for Applications Under Order 9, Rule 7, C.P.C.

Date: Dec 15, 1987
Palani Nathan v. Devanai Ammal: Establishing No Limitation Period for Applications Under Order 9, Rule 7, C.P.C. Introduction The case of Palani Nathan v. Devanai Ammal adjudicated by the Madras High...
Madras High Court Establishes Precedence on Validity of Industrial Disputes References in Presence of Subsuming Settlements

Madras High Court Establishes Precedence on Validity of Industrial Disputes References in Presence of Subsuming Settlements

Date: Dec 13, 1987
Madras High Court Establishes Precedence on Validity of Industrial Disputes References in Presence of Subsuming Settlements Introduction In the landmark case of Binny, Ltd. (B & C Wills) v....
Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Fraudulent Transfers under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act

Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Fraudulent Transfers under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act

Date: Dec 11, 1987
Madras High Court's Landmark Decision on Fraudulent Transfers under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act Introduction In the case of M. Mohamed Kassim And Ors. v. C. Rajaram And Ors., decided...
Exclusion of Limitation Act 1963 in Order 21 CPC Petitions: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision

Exclusion of Limitation Act 1963 in Order 21 CPC Petitions: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision

Date: Dec 10, 1987
Exclusion of Limitation Act 1963 in Order 21 CPC Petitions: Madras High Court's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of N.M Natarajan v. Deivayanai Ammal And Others, adjudicated by the Madras High...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert