Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madras High Court Case Commentaries

Prosecution of Firms under Income Tax Act: Jurisprudence on Imprisonment and Fines

Prosecution of Firms under Income Tax Act: Jurisprudence on Imprisonment and Fines

Date: Oct 6, 1990
Manian Transports And Others v. S. Krishna Moorthy: Judicial Interpretation on Prosecuting Firms for Income Tax Offences Incorporating Mandatory Imprisonment Introduction In the landmark case of...
J. Velan v. G. Muthu & 3 Others: Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Hindu Minority Law

J. Velan v. G. Muthu & 3 Others: Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Hindu Minority Law

Date: Sep 5, 1990
J. Velan v. G. Muthu & 3 Others: Upholding Paternal Guardianship in Hindu Minority Law Introduction J. Velan v. G. Muthu & 3 Others is a seminal judgment rendered by the Madras High Court on...
Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Amrutanjan Ltd. v. Ashwin Fine Chem. & Pharm.

Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Amrutanjan Ltd. v. Ashwin Fine Chem. & Pharm.

Date: Aug 28, 1990
Jurisdiction in Trademark Infringement: Insights from Amrutanjan Limited v. Ashwin Fine Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals 1. Introduction The case of Amrutanjan Limited v. Ashwin Fine Chemicals and...
Establishing Partner Liability under Sections 276-B and 278-B of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Shital N. Shah & 5 Ors. v. Income Tax Officer

Establishing Partner Liability under Sections 276-B and 278-B of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Shital N. Shah & 5 Ors. v. Income Tax Officer

Date: Aug 28, 1990
Establishing Partner Liability under Sections 276-B and 278-B of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Shital N. Shah & 5 Ors. v. Income Tax Officer Introduction The case of Shital N. Shah & 5 Ors. v....
Limits on Appeals in Contempt Proceedings Under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act: Shantha V. Pai v. Vasanth Builders

Limits on Appeals in Contempt Proceedings Under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act: Shantha V. Pai v. Vasanth Builders

Date: Aug 24, 1990
Limits on Appeals in Contempt Proceedings Under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act Shantha V. Pai v. Vasanth Builders, Madras (1990) Introduction The case of Shantha V. Pai v. Vasanth...
Establishing the Applicability of Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suits: P. Lakshmi Ammal v. S. Lakshmi Ammal And Others

Establishing the Applicability of Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suits: P. Lakshmi Ammal v. S. Lakshmi Ammal And Others

Date: Jul 28, 1990
Establishing the Applicability of Lis Pendens in Specific Performance Suits Introduction The case of P. Lakshmi Ammal v. S. Lakshmi Ammal And Others adjudicated by the Madras High Court on July 27,...
Clarifying 'Good Faith' in Defamation: Madras High Court in P. Swaminathan v. Lakshmanan Establishes Precedent

Clarifying 'Good Faith' in Defamation: Madras High Court in P. Swaminathan v. Lakshmanan Establishes Precedent

Date: Jul 28, 1990
Clarifying 'Good Faith' in Defamation: Madras High Court in P. Swaminathan v. Lakshmanan Establishes Precedent 1. Introduction The case of P. Swaminathan and Others v. Lakshmanan adjudicated by the...
Madras High Court Upholds Management Control in Kasturi & Sons Ltd: A Landmark Judgment on Oppression and Company Law

Madras High Court Upholds Management Control in Kasturi & Sons Ltd: A Landmark Judgment on Oppression and Company Law

Date: Jul 18, 1990
Madras High Court Upholds Management Control in Kasturi & Sons Ltd: A Landmark Judgment on Oppression and Company Law Introduction The case of G. Kasturi v. Kasturi & Sons Limited was adjudicated by...
Strict Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 32 CPC in Arjuna Gounder v. Govindaraju Reddiar

Strict Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 32 CPC in Arjuna Gounder v. Govindaraju Reddiar

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Strict Interpretation of Order 21 Rule 32 CPC in Arjuna Gounder v. Govindaraju Reddiar Introduction Arjuna Gounder v. Govindaraju Reddiar is a landmark judgment delivered by the Madras High Court on...
Thangamuthu Nattar v. Susilammal: Establishing Robust Criteria for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreements

Thangamuthu Nattar v. Susilammal: Establishing Robust Criteria for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreements

Date: Jul 14, 1990
Thangamuthu Nattar v. Susilammal: Establishing Robust Criteria for Specific Performance in Property Sale Agreements Introduction The case of Thangamuthu Nattar v. Susilammal adjudicated by the Madras...
Invalid Transfer of Company Assets: M. Moorthy v. Drivers And Conductors Bus Service Private Ltd. And 6 Others

Invalid Transfer of Company Assets: M. Moorthy v. Drivers And Conductors Bus Service Private Ltd. And 6 Others

Date: Jul 12, 1990
Invalid Transfer of Company Assets: M. Moorthy v. Drivers And Conductors Bus Service Private Ltd. And 6 Others Introduction The case of M. Moorthy v. Drivers And Conductors Bus Service Private Ltd....
Exemption of Rental Income for Charitable Societies under Section 11(1)(a) and Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Thyaga Brahma Gana Sabha (Regd.)

Exemption of Rental Income for Charitable Societies under Section 11(1)(a) and Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Thyaga Brahma Gana Sabha (Regd.)

Date: Jun 15, 1990
Exemption of Rental Income for Charitable Societies under Section 11(1)(a) and Section 2(15) of the Income-tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Sri Thyaga Brahma Gana Sabha (Regd.) Introduction The...
Clarifying the Scope of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. C.R Niranjan

Clarifying the Scope of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. C.R Niranjan

Date: Jun 15, 1990
Clarifying the Scope of Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. C.R Niranjan Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. C.R Niranjan was...
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Insurance Liability: Licensing and Privity of Contract in Motor Accident Claims

Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Insurance Liability: Licensing and Privity of Contract in Motor Accident Claims

Date: Jun 14, 1990
Madras High Court Establishes Strict Criteria for Insurance Liability: Licensing and Privity of Contract in Motor Accident Claims Introduction The case of United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. K....
S. Krishnaswami, In Re: Interpretation of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963

S. Krishnaswami, In Re: Interpretation of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963

Date: May 4, 1990
Interpretation of Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963 in S. Krishnaswami, In Re Introduction The case of S. Krishnaswami, In Re adjudicated by the Madras High Court on May 3, 1990, delves into...
High Court Clarifies High Court's Bail Powers under NDPS Act

High Court Clarifies High Court's Bail Powers under NDPS Act

Date: May 4, 1990
High Court Clarifies High Court's Bail Powers under NDPS Act Introduction The case of P.T. Oliver Fernando v. Asst. Collector Of Madras adjudicated by the Madras High Court on May 3, 1990, marks a...
Jurisdictional Bar on Late Pleas: Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Bank v. R.S. Thiruvengadam

Jurisdictional Bar on Late Pleas: Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Bank v. R.S. Thiruvengadam

Date: May 3, 1990
Jurisdictional Bar on Late Pleas: Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Bank v. R.S. Thiruvengadam Introduction Indian Bank v. R.S. Thiruvengadam, adjudicated by the Madras High Court on May 2, 1990,...
Vimala Ammal v. C. Suseela And Others: Upholding Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine and Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Specific Performance Actions

Vimala Ammal v. C. Suseela And Others: Upholding Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine and Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Specific Performance Actions

Date: May 3, 1990
Vimala Ammal v. C. Suseela And Others: Upholding Bona Fide Purchaser Doctrine and Necessity of Proper Party Inclusion in Specific Performance Actions Introduction The case of Vimala Ammal v. C....
Enforcing Statutory Notice Requirements in Land Encroachment Cases: Hamsavalli v. Tahsildar

Enforcing Statutory Notice Requirements in Land Encroachment Cases: Hamsavalli v. Tahsildar

Date: Apr 25, 1990
Enforcing Statutory Notice Requirements in Land Encroachment Cases: Hamsavalli v. Tahsildar Introduction The case of Hamsavalli v. Tahsildar was adjudicated in the Madras High Court on April 24,...
Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Enforcement of Equitable Mortgages

Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Enforcement of Equitable Mortgages

Date: Apr 24, 1990
Madras High Court Clarifies Jurisdiction in Enforcement of Equitable Mortgages Introduction The case of Southern Petrochemical Industries Corporation Ltd. v. Durga Iron Works, And 3 Others...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert