Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Ashish Kumar Chaturvedi v. State Of M.P.: Setting Boundaries for Public Interest Litigation in Employment Matters

Ashish Kumar Chaturvedi v. State Of M.P.: Setting Boundaries for Public Interest Litigation in Employment Matters

Date: Sep 15, 2018
Ashish Kumar Chaturvedi v. State Of M.P.: Setting Boundaries for Public Interest Litigation in Employment Matters Introduction In the case of Ashish Kumar Chaturvedi Petitioner v. State Of Madhya...
BSPL v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Onus Discharge under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act

BSPL v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Onus Discharge under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act

Date: Aug 8, 2018
BSPL v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax: Establishing Onus Discharge under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax (1) Indore v. Chain...
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P.

Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P.

Date: Jul 6, 2018
Establishing Jurisdictional Limits under Section 47-D of the M.P. Excise Act, 1915: Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P. Introduction Anil Dhakad v. State of M.P. is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P.

Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P.

Date: Jun 29, 2018
Reaffirming Locus Standi in Public Interest Litigation: Analysis of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P. Introduction The case of Surendra Pratap Singh v. State Of M.P. And Others adjudicated by...
Strict Adherence to Timeframes in Debt Recovery Tribunal: Crest Steel v. Punjab National Bank

Strict Adherence to Timeframes in Debt Recovery Tribunal: Crest Steel v. Punjab National Bank

Date: May 11, 2018
Strict Adherence to Timeframes in Debt Recovery Tribunal: Crest Steel v. Punjab National Bank Introduction The case of Crest Steel And Power Pvt. Ltd. And Others v. Punjab National Bank And Others...
Madhur v. State of M.P.: Affirming Administrative Discretion and Defining Suitability in Public Service Appointments

Madhur v. State of M.P.: Affirming Administrative Discretion and Defining Suitability in Public Service Appointments

Date: Apr 18, 2018
Madhur v. State of M.P.: Affirming Administrative Discretion and Defining Suitability in Public Service Appointments Introduction The case of Madhur v. State of M.P. adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh...
Stigmatic Termination and Natural Justice: Insights from Malkhan Singh Malviya v. State Of M.P

Stigmatic Termination and Natural Justice: Insights from Malkhan Singh Malviya v. State Of M.P

Date: Mar 9, 2018
Stigmatic Termination and Natural Justice: Insights from Malkhan Singh Malviya v. State Of M.P Introduction The case of Malkhan Singh Malviya v. State Of M.P adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Ashutosh Pawar v. High Court Of M.P.: Redefining Eligibility Standards for Judicial Appointments

Ashutosh Pawar v. High Court Of M.P.: Redefining Eligibility Standards for Judicial Appointments

Date: Jan 13, 2018
Ashutosh Pawar v. High Court Of M.P.: Redefining Eligibility Standards for Judicial Appointments Introduction The case of Ashutosh Pawar v. High Court Of M.P. And Another adjudicated by the Madhya...
Mandatory Regular Enquiry in Minor Penalty Cases: Insights from Union Of India v. Ajay Agrawal

Mandatory Regular Enquiry in Minor Penalty Cases: Insights from Union Of India v. Ajay Agrawal

Date: Jan 3, 2018
Mandatory Regular Enquiry in Minor Penalty Cases: Insights from Union Of India v. Ajay Agrawal Introduction The case of Union Of India v. Ajay Agrawal, adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Guarding Against Arbitrary Suspension: Upholding Article 14 in Employment Law – Smt. Nahid Jahan v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Guarding Against Arbitrary Suspension: Upholding Article 14 in Employment Law – Smt. Nahid Jahan v. The State of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Oct 25, 2017
Guarding Against Arbitrary Suspension: Upholding Article 14 in Employment Law – Smt. Nahid Jahan v. The State of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Smt. Nahid Jahan v. The State of Madhya...
Dharmendra Sonkar v. State Of M.P.: Clarifying Remedies for Non-Registration of FIRs

Dharmendra Sonkar v. State Of M.P.: Clarifying Remedies for Non-Registration of FIRs

Date: Sep 21, 2017
Dharmendra Sonkar v. State Of M.P.: Clarifying Remedies for Non-Registration of FIRs Introduction The case of Dharmendra Sonkar v. State Of M.P. And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Judicial Restraint in Expert Evaluations: Insights from Nitin Pathak v. State Of M.P. & Others

Judicial Restraint in Expert Evaluations: Insights from Nitin Pathak v. State Of M.P. & Others

Date: Sep 5, 2017
Judicial Restraint in Expert Evaluations: Insights from Nitin Pathak v. State Of M.P. & Others Introduction The case of Nitin Pathak v. State Of M.P. & Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
M.P. High Court Upholds Eviction Under Accommodation Control Act: Defining Bona Fide Necessity

M.P. High Court Upholds Eviction Under Accommodation Control Act: Defining Bona Fide Necessity

Date: Jul 26, 2017
M.P. High Court Upholds Eviction Under Accommodation Control Act: Defining Bona Fide Necessity Introduction The case of Kishore Singh v. Satish Kumar Singhvi adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another

Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another

Date: Jul 7, 2017
Maintainability of Intra-Court Appeals Under Articles 226 and 227: Insights from Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional Forest Officer And Another 1. Introduction The case of Shaillendra Kumar v. Divisional...
Admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Prefabricated Structures: Insights from Commissioner of Customs v. ZYG Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

Admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Prefabricated Structures: Insights from Commissioner of Customs v. ZYG Pharma Pvt. Ltd.

Date: Jun 20, 2017
Admissibility of CENVAT Credit on Prefabricated Structures: Insights from Commissioner of Customs v. ZYG Pharma Pvt. Ltd. Introduction The legal landscape surrounding the eligibility of CENVAT...
Re-defining 'Works Contract' and its Implications: Viva Highways Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corp. Ltd.

Re-defining 'Works Contract' and its Implications: Viva Highways Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corp. Ltd.

Date: May 6, 2017
Re-defining 'Works Contract' and its Implications: Viva Highways Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corp. Ltd. Introduction The case of Viva Highways Ltd. v. Madhya Pradesh Road Development...
Establishing the Necessity of Sufficient and Recent Evidence for Externment Orders

Establishing the Necessity of Sufficient and Recent Evidence for Externment Orders

Date: Apr 8, 2017
Establishing the Necessity of Sufficient and Recent Evidence for Externment Orders Introduction The case of Meena Sonkar v. State Of M.P. And Others adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High Court on...
Reaffirming Seniority and Pro-Forma Promotions in Government Employment: Dr. Smt. Ansuya Paraste v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Reaffirming Seniority and Pro-Forma Promotions in Government Employment: Dr. Smt. Ansuya Paraste v. State Of Madhya Pradesh

Date: Jan 4, 2017
Reaffirming Seniority and Pro-Forma Promotions in Government Employment: Dr. Smt. Ansuya Paraste v. State Of Madhya Pradesh Introduction The case of Dr. Smt. Ansuya Paraste v. State Of Madhya Pradesh...
Limitations on Issuance of Writ of Mandamus for FIR Registration Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

Limitations on Issuance of Writ of Mandamus for FIR Registration Under Section 154 Cr.P.C.

Date: Dec 21, 2016
Limitations on Issuance of Writ of Mandamus for FIR Registration Under Section 154 Cr.P.C. Introduction The case of Shweta Bhadauria v. State of Madhya Pradesh adjudicated by the Madhya Pradesh High...
Clarifying the Threshold for Exercise of Section 263 in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Shri Narottam Mishra

Clarifying the Threshold for Exercise of Section 263 in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Shri Narottam Mishra

Date: Nov 4, 2016
Clarifying the Threshold for Exercise of Section 263 in Income Tax Assessments: Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal v. Shri Narottam Mishra Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax, Bhopal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert