Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Madhya Pradesh High Court Case Commentaries

Narrow Interpretation of Sedition: High Court Sets Limits on Seditious Libel under Press Emergency Powers Act in Bhagwati Charan Shukla v. Provincial Government

Narrow Interpretation of Sedition: High Court Sets Limits on Seditious Libel under Press Emergency Powers Act in Bhagwati Charan Shukla v. Provincial Government

Date: Apr 12, 1946
Narrow Interpretation of Sedition: High Court Sets Limits on Seditious Libel under Press Emergency Powers Act in Bhagwati Charan Shukla v. Provincial Government Introduction The case of Bhagwati...
Protection of Accused's Rights to Witness Statements: Insights from Baliram Tikaram Marathe And Others Accused v. Emperor

Protection of Accused's Rights to Witness Statements: Insights from Baliram Tikaram Marathe And Others Accused v. Emperor

Date: Nov 3, 1944
Protection of Accused's Rights to Witness Statements: Insights from Baliram Tikaram Marathe And Others Accused v. Emperor Introduction The case of Baliram Tikaram Marathe And Others Accused v....
Clarifying Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of the Central Provinces Moneylenders Act, 1934: Decree Courts vs. Executing Courts – D.D Bilimoria v. Central Bank Of India Ltd., Bombay Decree-Holder

Clarifying Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of the Central Provinces Moneylenders Act, 1934: Decree Courts vs. Executing Courts – D.D Bilimoria v. Central Bank Of India Ltd., Bombay Decree-Holder

Date: Sep 28, 1943
Clarifying Jurisdiction Under Section 11 of the Central Provinces Moneylenders Act, 1934: Decree Courts vs. Executing Courts D.D Bilimoria v. Central Bank Of India Ltd., Bombay Decree-Holder...
Proper Exercise of Tribunal Discretion in Allowing Additional Grounds of Appeal: B.P. Byramji And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Proper Exercise of Tribunal Discretion in Allowing Additional Grounds of Appeal: B.P. Byramji And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 30, 1943
Proper Exercise of Tribunal Discretion in Allowing Additional Grounds of Appeal: B.P. Byramji And Co. v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of B.P. Byramji And Co. v. Commissioner Of...
Commissioner of Income-Tax Central and United Provinces v. Laxminarain Badridas Agarwal: A Landmark Judgment on Ex Parte Assessments

Commissioner of Income-Tax Central and United Provinces v. Laxminarain Badridas Agarwal: A Landmark Judgment on Ex Parte Assessments

Date: Apr 13, 1934
Commissioner of Income-Tax Central and United Provinces v. Laxminarain Badridas Agarwal: A Landmark Judgment on Ex Parte Assessments Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax Central and...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert