Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Kerala High Court Case Commentaries

Judicial Standards for Case Adjournments: Reaffirming Written and Signed Orders under Section 3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958

Judicial Standards for Case Adjournments: Reaffirming Written and Signed Orders under Section 3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958

Date: Aug 31, 2000
Judicial Standards for Case Adjournments: Reaffirming Written and Signed Orders under Section 3 of the Kerala High Court Act, 1958 Introduction The case of Babu Premarajan v. Superintendent Of...
Maintainability of Applications Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Peedikkakumbi Joseph v. Special Tahsildar & Ors.

Maintainability of Applications Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Peedikkakumbi Joseph v. Special Tahsildar & Ors.

Date: Aug 26, 2000
Maintainability of Applications Under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act: Insights from Peedikkakumbi Joseph v. Special Tahsildar (L.A) & Ors. Introduction The case of Peedikkakumbi Joseph v....
Interpretation of Section 115J and 80HHC: Kerala High Court in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.T.N Textiles Ltd.

Interpretation of Section 115J and 80HHC: Kerala High Court in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.T.N Textiles Ltd.

Date: Aug 25, 2000
Interpretation of Section 115J and 80HHC: Kerala High Court in Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.T.N Textiles Ltd. Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. G.T.N Textiles Ltd. was...
Counsel Representation in Warrant Cases: Insights from Noorjahan v. T.T Moideen

Counsel Representation in Warrant Cases: Insights from Noorjahan v. T.T Moideen

Date: Jun 28, 2000
Counsel Representation in Warrant Cases: Insights from Noorjahan v. T.T Moideen Introduction The case of Noorjahan v. T.T Moideen And Others, adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on June 27, 2000,...
Liability of Subsequent Property Purchasers for Previous Electricity Arrears: A. Ramachandran v. Kerala State Electricity Board

Liability of Subsequent Property Purchasers for Previous Electricity Arrears: A. Ramachandran v. Kerala State Electricity Board

Date: Jun 1, 2000
Liability of Subsequent Property Purchasers for Previous Electricity Arrears Introduction The case of A. Ramachandran v. Kerala State Electricity Board And Others adjudicated by the Kerala High Court...
No Right to Summon Opposing Party as Witness: Kerala High Court Sets Precedent

No Right to Summon Opposing Party as Witness: Kerala High Court Sets Precedent

Date: May 26, 2000
No Right to Summon Opposing Party as Witness: Kerala High Court Sets Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Jortin Antony And Others v. Padmanabha Dasa Marthanda Varma And Others, adjudicated...
Restriction on Altering Assessee Status from Firm to Association of Persons under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act

Restriction on Altering Assessee Status from Firm to Association of Persons under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act

Date: Apr 7, 2000
Restriction on Altering Assessee Status from Firm to Association of Persons under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K.V Mankaram And Co....
Justification of Cash Payments Under Rule 6DD(j) in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Muthoot Bankers

Justification of Cash Payments Under Rule 6DD(j) in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Muthoot Bankers

Date: Apr 7, 2000
Justification of Cash Payments Under Rule 6DD(j) in Income Tax Assessments: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Muthoot Bankers Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Muthoot...
Jurisdiction of Arbitration under Telegraph Act Supersedes Consumer Protection Act in Telecommunication Disputes

Jurisdiction of Arbitration under Telegraph Act Supersedes Consumer Protection Act in Telecommunication Disputes

Date: Apr 4, 2000
Jurisdiction of Arbitration under Telegraph Act Supersedes Consumer Protection Act in Telecommunication Disputes Introduction The case of General Manager, Telecom District, Trivandrum v. Consumer...
Depreciation Rights on Passive Assets: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Geo Tech Construction Corporation

Depreciation Rights on Passive Assets: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Geo Tech Construction Corporation

Date: Mar 11, 2000
Depreciation Rights on Passive Assets: Kerala High Court's Ruling in Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Geo Tech Construction Corporation Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Geo Tech...
Tribunal Upholds Cancellation of Penalty for Substantiated Raw Material Consumption in Income-Tax Case

Tribunal Upholds Cancellation of Penalty for Substantiated Raw Material Consumption in Income-Tax Case

Date: Mar 11, 2000
Tribunal Upholds Cancellation of Penalty for Substantiated Raw Material Consumption in Income-Tax Case Introduction In the landmark case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kerala Spinners Ltd., decided...
Preservation of Natural Justice in Imposition of Penalties Under KGST Act: Bismillah Trading Co. v. Intelligence Officer

Preservation of Natural Justice in Imposition of Penalties Under KGST Act: Bismillah Trading Co. v. Intelligence Officer

Date: Mar 4, 2000
Preservation of Natural Justice in Imposition of Penalties Under KGST Act: Bismillah Trading Co. v. Intelligence Officer Introduction The case of Bismillah Trading Co. v. Intelligence Officer, A.I.T...
Clarifying the Scope of Section 172 Assessments for Non-Resident Shipping Entities

Clarifying the Scope of Section 172 Assessments for Non-Resident Shipping Entities

Date: Feb 29, 2000
Clarifying the Scope of Section 172 Assessments for Non-Resident Shipping Entities Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Taiyo Gyogyo Kabushiki Kaisha adjudicated by the Kerala High...
Compromised Investigative Procedures Leading to Acquittal: Naushad v. State Of Kerala

Compromised Investigative Procedures Leading to Acquittal: Naushad v. State Of Kerala

Date: Feb 24, 2000
Compromised Investigative Procedures Leading to Acquittal: Naushad v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of Naushad v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on February 23, 2000,...
Distinguishing Recovery Orders from Punishment in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of K.C Mathew v. Plantation Corporation of Kerala, Ltd.

Distinguishing Recovery Orders from Punishment in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of K.C Mathew v. Plantation Corporation of Kerala, Ltd.

Date: Feb 16, 2000
Distinguishing Recovery Orders from Punishment in Administrative Proceedings: Analysis of K.C Mathew v. Plantation Corporation of Kerala, Ltd. Introduction The case of K.C Mathew v. Plantation...
Reaffirmation of Penalty Liability under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Agreed Income Additions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K.P Madhusudanan

Reaffirmation of Penalty Liability under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Agreed Income Additions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K.P Madhusudanan

Date: Jan 28, 2000
Reaffirmation of Penalty Liability under Section 271(1)(c) Despite Agreed Income Additions: Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K.P Madhusudanan Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. K.P...
Sec. 446 of the Companies Act and Its Applicability to Criminal Proceedings: Insights from Jose Antony Kakkad v. Official Liquidator

Sec. 446 of the Companies Act and Its Applicability to Criminal Proceedings: Insights from Jose Antony Kakkad v. Official Liquidator

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Sec. 446 of the Companies Act and Its Applicability to Criminal Proceedings: Insights from Jose Antony Kakkad v. Official Liquidator Introduction The case of Jose Antony Kakkad v. Official Liquidator...
Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 125(3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act: Govinda Panicker v. Sreedhara Warriar

Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 125(3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act: Govinda Panicker v. Sreedhara Warriar

Date: Jan 14, 2000
Clarification on Jurisdiction Under Section 125(3) of the Kerala Land Reforms Act: Govinda Panicker v. Sreedhara Warriar Introduction In the landmark case of Govinda Panicker v. Sreedhara Warriar,...
Promissory Estoppel in Tax Proceedings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. D.K.B And Co.

Promissory Estoppel in Tax Proceedings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. D.K.B And Co.

Date: Jan 4, 2000
Promissory Estoppel in Tax Proceedings: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. D.K.B And Co. Introduction Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. D.K.B And Co. is a landmark judgment delivered by the...
Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Section 271(1)(c) Penalties: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kishorekumar Shamji

Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Section 271(1)(c) Penalties: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kishorekumar Shamji

Date: Dec 19, 1999
Clarifying the Burden of Proof in Section 271(1)(c) Penalties: Insights from Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kishorekumar Shamji Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. Kishorekumar...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert