Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Kerala High Court Case Commentaries

Kerala High Court Sets Precedent on Classification of Ungarbled Betel Nuts as Primary Food

Kerala High Court Sets Precedent on Classification of Ungarbled Betel Nuts as Primary Food

Date: Jan 5, 2007
Kerala High Court Sets Precedent on Classification of Ungarbled Betel Nuts as Primary Food Introduction In the case of Al Marwa Traders v. Assistant Commissioner of Imports, decided by the Kerala...
Kerala High Court Ruling on Minority Educational Institutions: Preserving Autonomy and Upholding Constitutional Rights

Kerala High Court Ruling on Minority Educational Institutions: Preserving Autonomy and Upholding Constitutional Rights

Date: Jan 5, 2007
Kerala High Court Ruling on Minority Educational Institutions: Preserving Autonomy and Upholding Constitutional Rights Introduction The case of Lisie Medical & Educational Institutions v. State Of...
Judicial Intervention in Preliminary Labour Court Orders: St. Thomas Missions Hospital v. State Of Kerala

Judicial Intervention in Preliminary Labour Court Orders: St. Thomas Missions Hospital v. State Of Kerala

Date: Dec 20, 2006
Judicial Intervention in Preliminary Labour Court Orders: St. Thomas Missions Hospital v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of St. Thomas Missions Hospital v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the...
Kerala High Court Invalidates Entry Tax: Establishing Limits on State Taxation

Kerala High Court Invalidates Entry Tax: Establishing Limits on State Taxation

Date: Dec 19, 2006
Kerala High Court Invalidates Entry Tax: Establishing Limits on State Taxation Introduction The case of Thressiamma L. Chirayil v. State Of Kerala was adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on December...
Mohanan v. State of Kerala: Clarifying the Scope of Section 55(a) under the Kerala Abkari Act

Mohanan v. State of Kerala: Clarifying the Scope of Section 55(a) under the Kerala Abkari Act

Date: Dec 13, 2006
Mohanan v. State of Kerala: Clarifying the Scope of Section 55(a) under the Kerala Abkari Act Introduction The case of Mohanan v. State of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on December 12,...
Presumption of Possession in Abkari Act Cases: Insights from Paravan v. State of Kerala

Presumption of Possession in Abkari Act Cases: Insights from Paravan v. State of Kerala

Date: Dec 6, 2006
Presumption of Possession in Abkari Act Cases: Insights from Paravan v. State of Kerala Introduction The case of Paravan v. State of Kerala is a significant judgment delivered by the Kerala High...
Validity of Conviction Despite Procedural Challenges: Vikraman Diksoo v. State Of Kerala

Validity of Conviction Despite Procedural Challenges: Vikraman Diksoo v. State Of Kerala

Date: Nov 24, 2006
Validity of Conviction Despite Procedural Challenges: Vikraman Diksoo v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of Vikraman Diksoo v. State Of Kerala was adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on...
Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. v. V.S Krishnan: Clarifying Legitimate Expectation and Oppression in Company Law

Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. v. V.S Krishnan: Clarifying Legitimate Expectation and Oppression in Company Law

Date: Nov 15, 2006
Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. v. V.S Krishnan: Clarifying Legitimate Expectation and Oppression in Company Law Introduction The case of Westfort Hi-Tech Hospital Ltd. And Another v. V.S Krishnan And...
Recognition of Company Law Board as a Court for Limitation Act Purposes: Duroflex Ltd. v. Johnny Mathew

Recognition of Company Law Board as a Court for Limitation Act Purposes: Duroflex Ltd. v. Johnny Mathew

Date: Nov 10, 2006
Recognition of Company Law Board as a Court for Limitation Act Purposes: Duroflex Ltd. v. Johnny Mathew Introduction The case of Duroflex Ltd. v. Johnny Mathew adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on...
Classification of Educational Agencies Post-Mortem: Somanatha Pillai v. State Of Kerala

Classification of Educational Agencies Post-Mortem: Somanatha Pillai v. State Of Kerala

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Classification of Educational Agencies Post-Mortem: Somanatha Pillai v. State Of Kerala Introduction The case of Somanatha Pillai v. State Of Kerala adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on October...
Unified Proceedings in Civil Litigation: Insights from Pampara Philip v. Koorithottiyil Kinhimohammed

Unified Proceedings in Civil Litigation: Insights from Pampara Philip v. Koorithottiyil Kinhimohammed

Date: Oct 20, 2006
Unified Proceedings in Civil Litigation: Insights from Pampara Philip v. Koorithottiyil Kinhimohammed Introduction In the landmark case of Pampara Philip v. Koorithottiyil Kinhimohammed, decided by...
Court Upholds Mobile Base Station Installations in Absence of Scientific Evidence of Health Hazards

Court Upholds Mobile Base Station Installations in Absence of Scientific Evidence of Health Hazards

Date: Oct 13, 2006
Court Upholds Mobile Base Station Installations in Absence of Scientific Evidence of Health Hazards Introduction The case of Reliance Infocom Ltd. v. Chemanchery Grama Panchayat & Ors. was...
Rehabilitation of Sick Companies and the Imposition of Damages under Section 14-B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. P.F Commnr. & Ors.

Rehabilitation of Sick Companies and the Imposition of Damages under Section 14-B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. P.F Commnr. & Ors.

Date: Oct 11, 2006
Rehabilitation of Sick Companies and the Imposition of Damages under Section 14-B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Indian Telephone Industries Ltd. v. Asstt. P.F Commnr. & Ors. Introduction The case of...
Defining the Date of Offence and Personal Liability under Sections 138 & 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Kairali Marketing v. Pullengadi Service Co-Op. Socy.

Defining the Date of Offence and Personal Liability under Sections 138 & 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Kairali Marketing v. Pullengadi Service Co-Op. Socy.

Date: Oct 5, 2006
Defining the Date of Offence and Personal Liability under Sections 138 & 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act – Kairali Marketing v. Pullengadi Service Co-Op. Socy. Introduction The case of Kairali...
Clarifying Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Kerala High Court's Interpretation in P.N Gopinathan v. Sivadasan & Anr.

Clarifying Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Kerala High Court's Interpretation in P.N Gopinathan v. Sivadasan & Anr.

Date: Sep 28, 2006
Clarifying Presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act: Kerala High Court's Interpretation in P.N Gopinathan v. Sivadasan & Anr. Introduction The case of P.N Gopinathan v....
Ensuring Judicial Consistency and Adherence to Precedents: Insights from Peter P.O v. Sara

Ensuring Judicial Consistency and Adherence to Precedents: Insights from Peter P.O v. Sara

Date: Sep 28, 2006
Ensuring Judicial Consistency and Adherence to Precedents: Insights from Peter P.O v. Sara Introduction Peter P.O v. Sara is a pivotal judgment delivered by the Kerala High Court on September 27,...
Lok Ayukta's Jurisdiction Over Suo Motu Investigations: Insights from Ramachandran Master v. Kerala Lok Ayukta

Lok Ayukta's Jurisdiction Over Suo Motu Investigations: Insights from Ramachandran Master v. Kerala Lok Ayukta

Date: Sep 16, 2006
Lok Ayukta's Jurisdiction Over Suo Motu Investigations: Insights from Ramachandran Master v. Kerala Lok Ayukta Introduction The case of Ramachandran Master v. Kerala Lok Ayukta adjudicated by the...
Clarifying the Scope of Order II, Rule 2 of the CPC: Kerala High Court's Stance on Successive Suits for Damages and Injunctions

Clarifying the Scope of Order II, Rule 2 of the CPC: Kerala High Court's Stance on Successive Suits for Damages and Injunctions

Date: Sep 2, 2006
Clarifying the Scope of Order II, Rule 2 of the CPC: Kerala High Court's Stance on Successive Suits for Damages and Injunctions 1. Introduction The case of The Secretary, K.S.E.B & Anr. Etc. v. M.V...
Travancore Cements Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Scope of Section 147 in Reassessment Proceedings

Travancore Cements Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Scope of Section 147 in Reassessment Proceedings

Date: Sep 2, 2006
Travancore Cements Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax: Clarifying the Scope of Section 147 in Reassessment Proceedings Introduction The case of Travancore Cements Ltd. v. Assistant...
Kerala High Court Establishes Guidelines for Income Tax Deduction on Land Acquisition Compensation

Kerala High Court Establishes Guidelines for Income Tax Deduction on Land Acquisition Compensation

Date: Aug 26, 2006
Kerala High Court Establishes Guidelines for Income Tax Deduction on Land Acquisition Compensation Introduction The case of Nalini v. Deputy Collector adjudicated by the Kerala High Court on August...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert