Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Karnataka High Court Case Commentaries

Mandatory Compliance with Rule 3A(1) of Order 41 CPC: Insights from State Of Karnataka v. Nagappa

Mandatory Compliance with Rule 3A(1) of Order 41 CPC: Insights from State Of Karnataka v. Nagappa

Date: Jun 29, 1985
Mandatory Compliance with Rule 3A(1) of Order 41 CPC: Insights from State Of Karnataka v. Nagappa Introduction The case of State Of Karnataka v. Nagappa adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on...
Palthur Honnur Saheb v. Bopanna Annapurnamma: Strengthening Mandatory Pleading Requirements under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act

Palthur Honnur Saheb v. Bopanna Annapurnamma: Strengthening Mandatory Pleading Requirements under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act

Date: Jun 27, 1985
Palthur Honnur Saheb v. Bopanna Annapurnamma: Strengthening Mandatory Pleading Requirements under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act Introduction The case of Palthur Honnur Saheb v. Bopanna...
Partition of Joint Family Properties and the Partibility of Sanadi Watan Land: Insights from Fakirappa Bailappa Kambar v. Kristappa Bailappa Kambar

Partition of Joint Family Properties and the Partibility of Sanadi Watan Land: Insights from Fakirappa Bailappa Kambar v. Kristappa Bailappa Kambar

Date: Jun 26, 1985
Partition of Joint Family Properties and the Partibility of Sanadi Watan Land: Insights from Fakirappa Bailappa Kambar v. Kristappa Bailappa Kambar Introduction The case of Fakirappa Bailappa Kambar...
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Refund Mechanism for Excise Duty and Upholds Petition Under Article 226

Karnataka High Court Clarifies Refund Mechanism for Excise Duty and Upholds Petition Under Article 226

Date: Jun 8, 1985
Karnataka High Court Clarifies Refund Mechanism for Excise Duty and Upholds Petition Under Article 226 Introduction The case of Union Of India And Others v. I.T.C Limited And Another adjudicated by...
Tara Bai v. Krishnaswamy Rao: Upholding Judicial Restraint in Compromise Decrees Amid Alleged Fraud

Tara Bai v. Krishnaswamy Rao: Upholding Judicial Restraint in Compromise Decrees Amid Alleged Fraud

Date: Jun 5, 1985
Tara Bai v. Krishnaswamy Rao: Upholding Judicial Restraint in Compromise Decrees Amid Alleged Fraud Introduction Tara Bai v. Krishnaswamy Rao is a significant judgment delivered by the Karnataka High...
State Government's Authority Over Tenanted Lands and Tenant Rights under Karnataka Land Reforms Act: Sakrappa v. State Of Karnataka

State Government's Authority Over Tenanted Lands and Tenant Rights under Karnataka Land Reforms Act: Sakrappa v. State Of Karnataka

Date: Apr 16, 1985
State Government's Authority Over Tenanted Lands and Tenant Rights under Karnataka Land Reforms Act: Sakrappa v. State Of Karnataka Introduction The case of Sakrappa v. State Of Karnataka heard by...
Enforcement of Power of Attorney in Auction Sales: Insights from Doddarajappa v. Venkoba Rao

Enforcement of Power of Attorney in Auction Sales: Insights from Doddarajappa v. Venkoba Rao

Date: Apr 3, 1985
Enforcement of Power of Attorney in Auction Sales: Insights from Doddarajappa v. Venkoba Rao Introduction The case of Doddarajappa v. Venkoba Rao adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on April 2,...
S.G Thimmappa v. T. Anantha: Clarifying the Scope of Order 23 Rule 3A, C.P.C in Challenges to Compromise Decrees

S.G Thimmappa v. T. Anantha: Clarifying the Scope of Order 23 Rule 3A, C.P.C in Challenges to Compromise Decrees

Date: Mar 20, 1985
S.G Thimmappa v. T. Anantha: Clarifying the Scope of Order 23 Rule 3A, C.P.C in Challenges to Compromise Decrees Introduction The case of S.G Thimmappa v. T. Anantha, adjudicated by the Karnataka...
Determining the Appropriate Multiplier in Fatal Accident Compensation: Insights from H.T Bhandary v. Muniyamma

Determining the Appropriate Multiplier in Fatal Accident Compensation: Insights from H.T Bhandary v. Muniyamma

Date: Mar 13, 1985
Determining the Appropriate Multiplier in Fatal Accident Compensation: Insights from H.T Bhandary v. Muniyamma Introduction The case of H.T Bhandary v. Muniyamma adjudicated by the Karnataka High...
Capitalization and Apportionment of Compensation in Compulsory Business Acquisition

Capitalization and Apportionment of Compensation in Compulsory Business Acquisition

Date: Mar 2, 1985
Capitalization and Apportionment of Compensation in Compulsory Business Acquisition Introduction The case of Syndicate Bank Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner Of Income-Tax, adjudicated by the Karnataka...
Interest Calculation and Banking Practices: Analysis of Krishna Reddy v. Canara Bank

Interest Calculation and Banking Practices: Analysis of Krishna Reddy v. Canara Bank

Date: Mar 1, 1985
Interest Calculation and Banking Practices: Analysis of Krishna Reddy v. Canara Bank Introduction Krishna Reddy v. Canara Bank is a landmark judgment delivered by the Karnataka High Court on February...
Jurisdictional Validity of Notice Procedures and Proper Valuation Methodology in Income Tax Acquisition: Premchand v. IAC

Jurisdictional Validity of Notice Procedures and Proper Valuation Methodology in Income Tax Acquisition: Premchand v. IAC

Date: Feb 28, 1985
Jurisdictional Validity of Notice Procedures and Proper Valuation Methodology in Income Tax Acquisition: Premchand v. IAC Introduction The case of Premchand And Others v. IAC Of Income Tax...
Legal Principles on Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property by De Facto Guardians Established in Ganapati Santaram Bhosale v. Kulkarni

Legal Principles on Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property by De Facto Guardians Established in Ganapati Santaram Bhosale v. Kulkarni

Date: Feb 13, 1985
Legal Principles on Alienation of Joint Hindu Family Property by De Facto Guardians Established in Ganapati Santaram Bhosale v. Ramachandra Subbarao Kulkarni Introduction The case of Ganapati...
Comprehensive Analysis of M/S. Aspinwal & Co. Ltd. v. State Of Karnataka: Reforms in Minimum Wages and Dearness Allowance

Comprehensive Analysis of M/S. Aspinwal & Co. Ltd. v. State Of Karnataka: Reforms in Minimum Wages and Dearness Allowance

Date: Jan 25, 1985
M/S. Aspinwal & Co. Ltd. v. State Of Karnataka: Reforms in Minimum Wages and Dearness Allowance Introduction The case of M/S. Aspinwal & Co. Ltd., And Others v. State Of Karnataka And Others was...
Recognition of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals as Subordinate Courts under CPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mrs. Noreen R. Srikantaiah v. Dasarath Ramaiah

Recognition of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals as Subordinate Courts under CPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mrs. Noreen R. Srikantaiah v. Dasarath Ramaiah

Date: Dec 22, 1984
Recognition of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunals as Subordinate Courts under CPC: A Comprehensive Analysis of Mrs. Noreen R. Srikantaiah v. Dasarath Ramaiah Introduction The case Mrs. Noreen R....
Merger Doctrine and Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.

Merger Doctrine and Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd.

Date: Oct 27, 1984
Merger Doctrine and Revisional Jurisdiction under Section 264 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Hindustan Aeronautics Ltd. Introduction In the landmark case of...
Comprehensive Commentary on C. Arunachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Interpretation of Section 64(1) in HUF Context

Comprehensive Commentary on C. Arunachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Interpretation of Section 64(1) in HUF Context

Date: Oct 27, 1984
Comprehensive Commentary on C. Arunachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax: Interpretation of Section 64(1) in HUF Context Introduction The case of C. Arunachalam v. Commissioner Of Income Tax...
Limitation Period in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mysore Iron & Steel Ltd.

Limitation Period in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mysore Iron & Steel Ltd.

Date: Oct 27, 1984
Limitation Period in Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147: Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mysore Iron & Steel Ltd. 1. Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-Tax v. Mysore...
Expansion of Liability Under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insurer's Accountability Affirmed

Expansion of Liability Under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insurer's Accountability Affirmed

Date: Oct 16, 1984
Expansion of Liability Under Section 92-A of the Motor Vehicles Act: Insurer's Accountability Affirmed Introduction The case of Mohammed Iqbal v. Bhimaiah And Others adjudicated by the Karnataka High...
Reaffirmation of Tenant Status Post-Lease Expiry under Karnataka Rent Control Act

Reaffirmation of Tenant Status Post-Lease Expiry under Karnataka Rent Control Act

Date: Sep 7, 1984
Reaffirmation of Tenant Status Post-Lease Expiry under Karnataka Rent Control Act Introduction The case of B.S Giridhar v. P.V Shetty adjudicated by the Karnataka High Court on September 6, 1984,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert