Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case Commentaries

Narrow Interpretation of 'Fees for Technical Services' under India-Singapore DTAA: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. JD of Income-Tax

Narrow Interpretation of 'Fees for Technical Services' under India-Singapore DTAA: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. JD of Income-Tax

Date: Mar 2, 2007
Narrow Interpretation of 'Fees for Technical Services' under India-Singapore DTAA: Insights from Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd. v. JD of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Bharat Petroleum Corpn. Ltd....
Assessments on Non-Existent Entities: Nullity Confirmed in Pampasar Distillery Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Assessments on Non-Existent Entities: Nullity Confirmed in Pampasar Distillery Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Mar 1, 2007
Assessments on Non-Existent Entities: Nullity Confirmed in Pampasar Distillery Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Pampasar Distillery Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner...
Reimbursement of Pre-Bid Expenses vs. Fees for Technical Services: Modicon Network v. Assistant Commissioner

Reimbursement of Pre-Bid Expenses vs. Fees for Technical Services: Modicon Network v. Assistant Commissioner

Date: Feb 24, 2007
Reimbursement of Pre-Bid Expenses vs. Fees for Technical Services: Modicon Network v. Assistant Commissioner Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Circle 23(2), New Delhi v....
Re-defining Burden of Proof under Section 68: Aravali Trading Co. v. Income-tax Officer

Re-defining Burden of Proof under Section 68: Aravali Trading Co. v. Income-tax Officer

Date: Jan 26, 2007
Re-defining Burden of Proof under Section 68: Aravali Trading Co. v. Income-tax Officer Introduction The case of Aravali Trading Co. v. Income-tax Officer adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
Clarifying Section 14A: Apportionment of Expenses in Mixed Taxable and Exempt Income – Wimco Seedlings Ltd. v. D.C. of Income-tax

Clarifying Section 14A: Apportionment of Expenses in Mixed Taxable and Exempt Income – Wimco Seedlings Ltd. v. D.C. of Income-tax

Date: Dec 22, 2006
Clarifying Section 14A: Apportionment of Expenses in Mixed Taxable and Exempt Income – Wimco Seedlings Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction Wimco Seedlings Ltd. v. Deputy...
M.M. Financiers (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Upholding Transparency in Income Disclosure

M.M. Financiers (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Upholding Transparency in Income Disclosure

Date: Dec 9, 2006
M.M. Financiers (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax: Upholding Transparency in Income Disclosure Introduction The case of M.M. Financiers (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax...
Inclusion of Interest Income in Business Profits for Deductions under Sections 10A and 10B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motorola India Electronics (P.) Ltd.

Inclusion of Interest Income in Business Profits for Deductions under Sections 10A and 10B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motorola India Electronics (P.) Ltd.

Date: Nov 29, 2006
Inclusion of Interest Income in Business Profits for Deductions under Sections 10A and 10B: A Comprehensive Analysis of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. Motorola India Electronics (P.) Ltd....
Interpretation of "Advance Tax" Under Sections 234A and 234B: Mrs. Sheela Jaisingh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Interpretation of "Advance Tax" Under Sections 234A and 234B: Mrs. Sheela Jaisingh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Nov 24, 2006
Interpretation of "Advance Tax" Under Sections 234A and 234B: Mrs. Sheela Jaisingh v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax 1. Introduction The case of Mrs. Sheela Jaisingh v. Assistant Commissioner...
Section 14A: Allocation of Expenditure in Relation to Exempt Income

Section 14A: Allocation of Expenditure in Relation to Exempt Income

Date: Nov 22, 2006
Section 14A: Allocation of Expenditure in Relation to Exempt Income Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax, Range 10(1), Mumbai v. Citicorp Finance (India) Ltd., adjudicated by...
Clarification on Burden of Proof for Cash Credits under Section 68: Income Tax Officer v. Rajendra Kumar Taparia

Clarification on Burden of Proof for Cash Credits under Section 68: Income Tax Officer v. Rajendra Kumar Taparia

Date: Nov 18, 2006
Clarification on Burden of Proof for Cash Credits under Section 68: Income Tax Officer v. Rajendra Kumar Taparia Introduction The case of Income Tax Officer v. Rajendra Kumar Taparia adjudicated by...
Strict Enforcement of Section 14A: Mandate for Proper Allocation of Expenditures Relating to Exempt Income

Strict Enforcement of Section 14A: Mandate for Proper Allocation of Expenditures Relating to Exempt Income

Date: Nov 1, 2006
Strict Enforcement of Section 14A: Mandate for Proper Allocation of Expenditures Relating to Exempt Income Introduction The case of Kalpataru Construction Overseas (P.) Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of...
Taxation of Intra-Branch Transactions for Non-Resident Enterprises in India: The Landmark Decision in Dresdner Bank AG v. ADIT

Taxation of Intra-Branch Transactions for Non-Resident Enterprises in India: The Landmark Decision in Dresdner Bank AG v. ADIT

Date: Oct 21, 2006
Taxation of Intra-Branch Transactions for Non-Resident Enterprises in India: The Landmark Decision in Dresdner Bank AG v. ADIT Introduction The case of Dresdner Bank AG v. Additional Commissioner of...
Sheraton International Inc. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax: Defining the Taxability of Royalties and Fees for Technical Services under India-US DTAA

Sheraton International Inc. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax: Defining the Taxability of Royalties and Fees for Technical Services under India-US DTAA

Date: Oct 5, 2006
Sheraton International Inc. v. Deputy Director of Income-tax: Defining the Taxability of Royalties and Fees for Technical Services under India-US DTAA Introduction The case of Sheraton International...
Non-Admissibility of Survey Material in Block Assessment for Undisclosed Income: Dasari Sri Sailendra Kumar v. D.C.I.T.

Non-Admissibility of Survey Material in Block Assessment for Undisclosed Income: Dasari Sri Sailendra Kumar v. D.C.I.T.

Date: Sep 23, 2006
Non-Admissibility of Survey Material in Block Assessment for Undisclosed Income Dasari Sri Sailendra Kumar v. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction In the case of Dasari Sri Sailendra Kumar...
Doon Valley Motors: Upholding Reasonable Expenditure on Family Employees under Section 40A(2)

Doon Valley Motors: Upholding Reasonable Expenditure on Family Employees under Section 40A(2)

Date: Sep 9, 2006
Doon Valley Motors: Upholding Reasonable Expenditure on Family Employees under Section 40A(2) Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (OSD), Range - 1, Dehradun v. Doon Valley...
Taxation of Turnkey Project Profits: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Roxon OY Judgment Analysis

Taxation of Turnkey Project Profits: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Roxon OY Judgment Analysis

Date: Aug 19, 2006
Taxation of Turnkey Project Profits: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax v. Roxon OY Judgment Analysis Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range-26, Mumbai v. Roxon OY...
Secret Process Requirement for Royalty Classification under DTAA: Panamsat v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Secret Process Requirement for Royalty Classification under DTAA: Panamsat v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Date: Aug 12, 2006
Secret Process Requirement for Royalty Classification under DTAA: Panamsat v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Introduction Case: Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax, NR Circle, New Delhi v. Panamsat...
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd.

Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd.

Date: Aug 12, 2006
Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeals: Insights from Joint Commissioner of Income-tax v. Tractors & Farm Equipments Ltd. Introduction The case of Joint Commissioner of Income-tax, Special Range I,...
PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities

PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities

Date: Aug 2, 2006
PUDA vs CIT: Defining Charitable Status for Development Authorities Introduction The case of Punjab Urban Planning & Development Authority (PUDA) v. Commissioner of Income-Tax-1, Chandigarh serves as...
Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai)

Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai)

Date: Aug 1, 2006
Clarification on Tax Deduction at Source for 'Interest Accrued but not Due': IDBI v. Income-tax Officer, City III (Mumbai) Introduction The case of Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI) v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert