Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case Commentaries

Allowability of Business Expenditures: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.P. Morgan India (P.) Ltd.

Allowability of Business Expenditures: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.P. Morgan India (P.) Ltd.

Date: Apr 21, 2011
Allowability of Business Expenditures: Insights from Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax v. J.P. Morgan India (P.) Ltd. Introduction The case of Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax (4(3)) v. J.P....
Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Requirements in Section 43B Deduction: G.D. Metsteel (P.) Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Requirements in Section 43B Deduction: G.D. Metsteel (P.) Ltd. Judgment Analysis

Date: Apr 9, 2011
Substantive Compliance Over Procedural Requirements in Section 43B Deduction: G.D. Metsteel (P.) Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of G.D. Metsteel (P.) Ltd. v....
Interpretation of Built-Up Area under Section 80-IB: Insights from M/S. Modi Builders & Realtors v. Asst. CIT Circle 16(2) Hyderabad

Interpretation of Built-Up Area under Section 80-IB: Insights from M/S. Modi Builders & Realtors v. Asst. CIT Circle 16(2) Hyderabad

Date: Apr 1, 2011
Interpretation of Built-Up Area under Section 80-IB: Insights from M/S. Modi Builders & Realtors v. Asst. CIT Circle 16(2) Hyderabad Introduction The case of M/S. Modi Builders & Realtors (P) Ltd.,...
No Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(i) for Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents

No Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(i) for Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents

Date: Mar 26, 2011
No Disallowance Under Section 40(a)(i) for Commission Payments to Non-Resident Agents Introduction The case of Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax Cir-1(1), Hyderabad v. Divi's Laboratories Ltd....
Capital Gain Implications on Partner Retirement: Sudhakar M. Shetty v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Capital Gain Implications on Partner Retirement: Sudhakar M. Shetty v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Mar 24, 2011
Capital Gain Implications on Partner Retirement: Sudhakar M. Shetty v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Sudhakar M. Shetty v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax...
Modification of Penalty Under Section 272A(2)(k) Based on Financial Difficulties

Modification of Penalty Under Section 272A(2)(k) Based on Financial Difficulties

Date: Mar 19, 2011
Modification of Penalty Under Section 272A(2)(k) Based on Financial Difficulties Introduction The case of Porwal Creative Vision (P.) Ltd. v. Additional Commissioner of Income-tax (TDS), Range-2,...
Interest on NPAs Excluded from Taxable Income: ITAT Vijayawada Decision

Interest on NPAs Excluded from Taxable Income: ITAT Vijayawada Decision

Date: Mar 11, 2011
Interest on NPAs Excluded from Taxable Income: ITAT Vijayawada Decision 1. Introduction The case of Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1) Vijayawada v. The Durga Co-Operative Urban Bank Ltd.,...
Validating Notices under Section 292B and Interpretation of Section 69D Regarding Hundi Transactions in Sh. Kunj Bihari v. ITO, New Delhi

Validating Notices under Section 292B and Interpretation of Section 69D Regarding Hundi Transactions in Sh. Kunj Bihari v. ITO, New Delhi

Date: Feb 26, 2011
Validating Notices under Section 292B and Interpretation of Section 69D Regarding Hundi Transactions in Sh. Kunj Bihari v. ITO, New Delhi Introduction The case of Sh. Kunj Bihari, Delhi v. ITO, New...
Tech Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT: Clarifying Deductible Expenses under Section 10A for Software Exports

Tech Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT: Clarifying Deductible Expenses under Section 10A for Software Exports

Date: Feb 25, 2011
Tech Mahindra Ltd. v. DCIT: Clarifying Deductible Expenses under Section 10A for Software Exports Introduction The case of Tech Mahindra Limited, Bangalore v. DCIT, Bangalore adjudicated by the...
Rebutting Presumptions under Section 132(4A): Gyankumar Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Rebutting Presumptions under Section 132(4A): Gyankumar Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax

Date: Feb 19, 2011
Rebutting Presumptions under Section 132(4A): Gyankumar Agarwal v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax Introduction The case of Gyankumar Agarwal (Ind.) v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax...
Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar-I v. K.D. Bali: Establishing Precedents on Income Attribution and Procedural Fairness in Tax Assessments

Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar-I v. K.D. Bali: Establishing Precedents on Income Attribution and Procedural Fairness in Tax Assessments

Date: Feb 18, 2011
Commissioner of Income-tax, Jalandhar-I v. K.D. Bali: Establishing Precedents on Income Attribution and Procedural Fairness in Tax Assessments Introduction The case of Commissioner of Income-tax,...
Refined Interpretation of 'Scrap' Under Section 206C: Navine Fluorine International Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Refined Interpretation of 'Scrap' Under Section 206C: Navine Fluorine International Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax

Date: Feb 16, 2011
Refined Interpretation of 'Scrap' Under Section 206C Navine Fluorine International Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Introduction The legal landscape surrounding tax collection at source...
Strict Interpretation of Section 153C: Requiring Assessment Year-Specific Incriminating Information

Strict Interpretation of Section 153C: Requiring Assessment Year-Specific Incriminating Information

Date: Jan 29, 2011
Strict Interpretation of Section 153C: Requiring Assessment Year-Specific Incriminating Information Introduction The case of Sinhgad Technical Education Society v. ACIT, Central Circle 2(2)...
Establishment of Strict Time-Limits for Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147 and 148: Insights from Sanjay Kumar Garg v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Establishment of Strict Time-Limits for Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147 and 148: Insights from Sanjay Kumar Garg v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

Date: Jan 29, 2011
Establishment of Strict Time-Limits for Reassessment Proceedings under Section 147 and 148: Insights from Sanjay Kumar Garg v. Asstt. Commissioner Of Income-Tax Introduction The case of Sanjay Kumar...
Hyderabad Chemicals Supplies Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Section 80-IA Deduction Rules

Hyderabad Chemicals Supplies Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Section 80-IA Deduction Rules

Date: Jan 22, 2011
Hyderabad Chemicals Supplies Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-tax: Clarifying Section 80-IA Deduction Rules Introduction The case of Hyderabad Chemicals Supplies Ltd. v. Assistant...
Amaltas Associates v. Income-tax Officer: ITAT Ahmedabad Clarifies Section 80-IB(10) Eligibility

Amaltas Associates v. Income-tax Officer: ITAT Ahmedabad Clarifies Section 80-IB(10) Eligibility

Date: Jan 22, 2011
Amaltas Associates v. Income-tax Officer: ITAT Ahmedabad Clarifies Section 80-IB(10) Eligibility Introduction The case of Amaltas Associates v. Income-tax Officer, Ward-9(2) adjudicated by the Income...
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management v. ACIT, Chennai

Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management v. ACIT, Chennai

Date: Jan 8, 2011
Revenue vs. Capital Expenditure: Insights from Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management Co. Ltd. v. ACIT, Chennai Introduction The case of M/s. Sundaram BNP Paribas Asset Management Company Limited,...
Clarifying the Limitation Period for Penalty Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. Income-Tax Officer

Clarifying the Limitation Period for Penalty Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. Income-Tax Officer

Date: Jan 5, 2011
Clarifying the Limitation Period for Penalty Proceedings under Section 201 of the Income Tax Act: Insights from Bangalore Water Supply & Sewerage Board v. Income-Tax Officer Introduction The case of...
Serdia Pharmaceuticals v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Affirming CUP Method as Most Appropriate for Arm's Length Price Determination in Pharmaceutical API Imports

Serdia Pharmaceuticals v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Affirming CUP Method as Most Appropriate for Arm's Length Price Determination in Pharmaceutical API Imports

Date: Jan 1, 2011
Serdia Pharmaceuticals v. Commissioner of Income Tax: Affirming CUP Method as Most Appropriate for Arm's Length Price Determination in Pharmaceutical API Imports Introduction The case of Serdia...
Income from Front Companies: Tax Liability and Evidence Admissibility in the Shri Hersh W. Chadha v. DDIT Case

Income from Front Companies: Tax Liability and Evidence Admissibility in the Shri Hersh W. Chadha v. DDIT Case

Date: Jan 1, 2011
Income from Front Companies: Tax Liability and Evidence Admissibility in the Shri Hersh W. Chadha v. DDIT Case Introduction The case of Shri Hersh W. Chadha, Legal Heir Of Late Sh. W.N Chadha v. DDIT...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert