Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Case Commentaries

Stratagem Portfolio (P) Ltd v. DCIT Circle-24(2): Reinforcing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Income Tax Reassessments

Stratagem Portfolio (P) Ltd v. DCIT Circle-24(2): Reinforcing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Income Tax Reassessments

Date: Sep 16, 2020
Stratagem Portfolio (P) Ltd v. DCIT Circle-24(2): Reinforcing Jurisdictional Boundaries in Income Tax Reassessments Introduction The case of Stratagem Portfolio (P) Ltd, Rohtak v. DCIT Circle-24(2),...
CIT v. Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala): Upholding Natural Justice in Section 153C Assessments

CIT v. Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala): Upholding Natural Justice in Section 153C Assessments

Date: Sep 15, 2020
CIT v. Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala): Upholding Natural Justice in Section 153C Assessments Introduction The case of DCIT, Central Circle-1, Jaipur vs. Shri Jugal Kishore Garg (Derewala) presents a...
Enhanced Criteria for Transfer Pricing Comparables Established in Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd. v. ADDL. CIT, Special Range-6, New Delhi

Enhanced Criteria for Transfer Pricing Comparables Established in Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd. v. ADDL. CIT, Special Range-6, New Delhi

Date: Sep 15, 2020
Enhanced Criteria for Transfer Pricing Comparables Established in Midland Credit Management India Pvt. Ltd. v. ADDL. CIT, Special Range-6, New Delhi Introduction The case of Midland Credit Management...
Clarifying Penalty Notices: Insights from Tejpal Singh Nunia v. DCIT, Jaipur

Clarifying Penalty Notices: Insights from Tejpal Singh Nunia v. DCIT, Jaipur

Date: Sep 12, 2020
Clarifying Penalty Notices: Insights from Tejpal Singh Nunia v. DCIT, Jaipur Introduction The case of Tejpal Singh Nunia v. DCIT, Central Circle-2, Jaipur adjudicated by the Income Tax Appellate...
Determining Agricultural Land Status for Capital Gains Exemption: Insights from G Vijay Padma v. Income Tax Officer, Bangalore

Determining Agricultural Land Status for Capital Gains Exemption: Insights from G Vijay Padma v. Income Tax Officer, Bangalore

Date: Sep 12, 2020
Determining Agricultural Land Status for Capital Gains Exemption: Insights from G Vijay Padma v. Income Tax Officer, Bangalore Introduction The case of G Vijay Padma v. Income Tax Officer...
Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Mamurpur Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. v. Addl. CIT

Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Mamurpur Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. v. Addl. CIT

Date: Sep 11, 2020
Clarification on Penalty Imposition under Sections 271D and 271E: Insights from Mamurpur Co-operative Thrift and Credit Society Ltd. v. Addl. CIT Introduction The case of Mamurpur Co-operative Thrift...
10% Threshold Established for Ignoring Valuation Differences under Section 56(2)(vii)(b): Sri Sandeep Patil vs. Income Tax Officer

10% Threshold Established for Ignoring Valuation Differences under Section 56(2)(vii)(b): Sri Sandeep Patil vs. Income Tax Officer

Date: Sep 10, 2020
10% Threshold Established for Ignoring Valuation Differences under Section 56(2)(vii)(b): Sri Sandeep Patil vs. Income Tax Officer Introduction The case of Sri Sandeep Patil, Bangalore v. The Income...
Shri Pappu Ram Saran v. ITO: Tribunal Upholds Sale Proceeds as Justifiable Source for Unexplained Deposits

Shri Pappu Ram Saran v. ITO: Tribunal Upholds Sale Proceeds as Justifiable Source for Unexplained Deposits

Date: Sep 4, 2020
Shri Pappu Ram Saran v. ITO: Tribunal Upholds Sale Proceeds as Justifiable Source for Unexplained Deposits Introduction The case of Shri Pappu Ram Saran v. Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward-2,...
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof on Assessees in Section 68 Cases: Insights from Ajmera v. ITO Jaipur

Reaffirming the Burden of Proof on Assessees in Section 68 Cases: Insights from Ajmera v. ITO Jaipur

Date: Sep 3, 2020
Reaffirming the Burden of Proof on Assessees in Section 68 Cases: Insights from Ajmera v. ITO Jaipur Introduction The case of Shri Subhash Chand Ajmera, Jaipur v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-2-1, Jaipur...
Rajasthan Nursing Council v. CIT: Affirming Charitable Status Through Predominant Educational Objectives

Rajasthan Nursing Council v. CIT: Affirming Charitable Status Through Predominant Educational Objectives

Date: Sep 2, 2020
Rajasthan Nursing Council v. CIT: Affirming Charitable Status Through Predominant Educational Objectives Introduction The case of Rajasthan Nursing Council, Jaipur v. CIT (Exemption), Jaipur...
Prospective Application of Section 200A Amendment Precludes Liability Under Section 234E for TDS Returns Filed Before 01.06.2015 – Bathline India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Prospective Application of Section 200A Amendment Precludes Liability Under Section 234E for TDS Returns Filed Before 01.06.2015 – Bathline India Pvt. Ltd. v. ACIT

Date: Sep 1, 2020
Prospective Application of Section 200A Amendment Precludes Liability Under Section 234E for TDS Returns Filed Before 01.06.2015 Introduction In the landmark case of Bathline India (Pvt.) Ltd., Delhi...
ITA Del/2019: Section 234E Late Filing Fee Exemption for TDS Returns Prior to 01.06.2015

ITA Del/2019: Section 234E Late Filing Fee Exemption for TDS Returns Prior to 01.06.2015

Date: Sep 1, 2020
ITA Del/2019: Section 234E Late Filing Fee Exemption for TDS Returns Prior to 01.06.2015 Introduction The case of Anjani Technoplast Limited vs. ACIT (ITA Nos.7931 to 7952/Del/2019) was adjudicated...
Reinforcement of TNMM as the Preferred Transfer Pricing Methodology: Sami Labs Limited v. DCIT, Bangalore

Reinforcement of TNMM as the Preferred Transfer Pricing Methodology: Sami Labs Limited v. DCIT, Bangalore

Date: Aug 26, 2020
Reinforcement of TNMM as the Preferred Transfer Pricing Methodology: Sami Labs Limited v. DCIT, Bangalore Introduction The case of Sami Labs Limited, Bangalore v. DCIT, Bangalore adjudicated by the...
Agreement Prior to Registration and Stamp Duty Valuation: ITAT Clarifies Application of Section 56(2)(vii)

Agreement Prior to Registration and Stamp Duty Valuation: ITAT Clarifies Application of Section 56(2)(vii)

Date: Aug 20, 2020
Agreement Prior to Registration and Stamp Duty Valuation: ITAT Clarifies Application of Section 56(2)(vii) Introduction The case of Radha Kishan Kungwani, Ajmer v. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1-2,...
Ensuring Natural Justice in Tax Revisions: Insights from M/s Jaydurga Minerals v. CIT, Cuttack

Ensuring Natural Justice in Tax Revisions: Insights from M/s Jaydurga Minerals v. CIT, Cuttack

Date: Aug 11, 2020
Ensuring Natural Justice in Tax Revisions: Insights from M/s Jaydurga Minerals v. CIT, Cuttack Introduction The case of M/s Jaydurga Minerals, Cuttack v. CIT, Cuttack adjudicated by the Income Tax...
DCIT, Faridabad v. M/s. Knorr Bremse India Pvt. Ltd., Palwal: Establishing TNMM as the Preferred Method for Determining ALP in Absence of Comparable Data

DCIT, Faridabad v. M/s. Knorr Bremse India Pvt. Ltd., Palwal: Establishing TNMM as the Preferred Method for Determining ALP in Absence of Comparable Data

Date: Aug 8, 2020
Establishing TNMM as the Preferred Method for Determining ALP in Absence of Comparable Data Introduction The case of DCIT, Faridabad v. M/s. Knorr Bremse India Pvt. Ltd., Palwal adjudicated by the...
Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Applicable for Adhoc Estimations: Colo Color Pvt. Ltd. Case

Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Applicable for Adhoc Estimations: Colo Color Pvt. Ltd. Case

Date: Aug 1, 2020
Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) Not Applicable for Adhoc Estimations: Colo Color Pvt. Ltd. Case Introduction The case of ACIT - CIRCLE- 6(2)(1), Mumbai v. Colo Color Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai adjudicated by...
Landis+Gyr Ltd. vs DCIT: New Precedents on Revenue Expenditure, Commission Allowances, and Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Income Tax Law

Landis+Gyr Ltd. vs DCIT: New Precedents on Revenue Expenditure, Commission Allowances, and Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Income Tax Law

Date: Jul 29, 2020
Landis+Gyr Ltd. vs DCIT: New Precedents on Revenue Expenditure, Commission Allowances, and Transfer Pricing Adjustments in Income Tax Law Introduction The case of DCIT, Circle-1(1), Kolkata, Kolkata...
Clarity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from SUBHASH SHARMA v. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

Clarity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from SUBHASH SHARMA v. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR

Date: Jul 22, 2020
Clarity in Penalty Notices under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act: Insights from SUBHASH SHARMA v. DCIT, CIRCLE-6, JAIPUR Introduction The case of SUBHASH SHARMA, JAIPUR v. DCIT, CIRCLE-6,...
Surekha Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT-1: Reinforcing the Need for Clear Inquiry in Revenue Recognition under PCM

Surekha Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT-1: Reinforcing the Need for Clear Inquiry in Revenue Recognition under PCM

Date: Jul 21, 2020
Surekha Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v. Pr. CIT-1: Reinforcing the Need for Clear Inquiry in Revenue Recognition under PCM 1. Introduction The case of Surekha Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert