Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments
  • Acts

Gujarat High Court Case Commentaries

Ratilal Bhogilal Shah v. State Of Gujarat: Upholding Due Process in Suspension and Cancellation of Arms Licenses under Section 18 of the Indian Arms Act

Ratilal Bhogilal Shah v. State Of Gujarat: Upholding Due Process in Suspension and Cancellation of Arms Licenses under Section 18 of the Indian Arms Act

Date: Feb 13, 1965
Ratilal Bhogilal Shah v. State Of Gujarat: Upholding Due Process in Suspension and Cancellation of Arms Licenses under Section 18 of the Indian Arms Act Introduction The case of Ratilal Bhogilal Shah...
Non-Retrospective Application of New Tax Laws: Induprasad Devshanker Bhatt v. J.P Jani And Another

Non-Retrospective Application of New Tax Laws: Induprasad Devshanker Bhatt v. J.P Jani And Another

Date: Dec 16, 1964
Non-Retrospective Application of New Tax Laws: Induprasad Devshanker Bhatt v. J.P Jani And Another Introduction The case of Induprasad Devshanker Bhatt v. J.P Jani And Another was adjudicated by the...
Non-Applicability of Section 94(1) of Cr.P.C. to Accused Persons: Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi Case

Non-Applicability of Section 94(1) of Cr.P.C. to Accused Persons: Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi Case

Date: Dec 15, 1964
Non-Applicability of Section 94(1) of Cr.P.C. to Accused Persons: Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi Case Introduction The case of Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi And ... v. Shyamlal Mohanlal Choksi And adjudicated...
Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act: Insights from Rasiklal Chimanlal Nagri v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax

Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act: Insights from Rasiklal Chimanlal Nagri v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax

Date: Nov 11, 1964
Defining 'Agricultural Land' under the Wealth Tax Act: Insights from Rasiklal Chimanlal Nagri v. Commissioner Of Wealth-Tax Introduction The case of Rasiklal Chimanlal Nagri v. Commissioner Of...
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. Bai Vina: Interpretation of 'Deemed Profits' and 'Dividend'

Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. Bai Vina: Interpretation of 'Deemed Profits' and 'Dividend'

Date: Oct 23, 1964
Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. Bai Vina: Interpretation of 'Deemed Profits' and 'Dividend' Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. Bai Vina adjudicated by the Gujarat...
Prabhudas Ramji v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Expanding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Authority in Tax Assessment

Prabhudas Ramji v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Expanding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Authority in Tax Assessment

Date: Oct 17, 1964
Prabhudas Ramji v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax: Expanding the Appellate Assistant Commissioner's Authority in Tax Assessment Introduction The case of Prabhudas Ramji v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax...
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof in Penalty Proceedings under Section 28(I)(c): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. L.H Vora

Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof in Penalty Proceedings under Section 28(I)(c): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. L.H Vora

Date: Sep 22, 1964
Reaffirmation of Burden of Proof in Penalty Proceedings under Section 28(I)(c): Insights from Commissioner of Income-Tax, Gujarat v. L.H Vora Introduction The case of Commissioner Of Income-Tax,...
Taxation of Compensation to Religious Office Holders: Insights from Acharya D.V. Pande v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Taxation of Compensation to Religious Office Holders: Insights from Acharya D.V. Pande v. Commissioner Of Income Tax

Date: Sep 18, 1964
Taxation of Compensation to Religious Office Holders: Insights from Acharya D.V. Pande v. Commissioner Of Income Tax Introduction The case of Acharya D.V. Pande v. Commissioner Of Income Tax,...
Expanded Interpretation of "Office or Employment of Profit" under Section 4(3)(vi) in Income-tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay North v. Tejaji Farasram Kharawala Ltd.

Expanded Interpretation of "Office or Employment of Profit" under Section 4(3)(vi) in Income-tax Act: Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay North v. Tejaji Farasram Kharawala Ltd.

Date: Sep 10, 1964
Expanded Interpretation of "Office or Employment of Profit" under Section 4(3)(vi) in Income-tax Act Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Bombay North v. Tejaji Farasram Kharawala Ltd. Comprehensive Legal...
Commission Deductibility Under Section 10(2)(x): Insights from Laxmandas Sejram v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat

Commission Deductibility Under Section 10(2)(x): Insights from Laxmandas Sejram v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat

Date: Sep 5, 1964
Commission Deductibility Under Section 10(2)(x): Insights from Laxmandas Sejram v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat Introduction The case of Laxmandas Sejram v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, Gujarat...
Re-defining 'Manufacturer' under Central Excise Act: Insights from Desai v. Nangra

Re-defining 'Manufacturer' under Central Excise Act: Insights from Desai v. Nangra

Date: Aug 1, 1964
Re-defining 'Manufacturer' under Central Excise Act: Insights from Desai v. Nangra Introduction Jamnadas Chhotalal Desai And Others v. C.L Nangra And Others Opponents is a landmark judgment delivered...
Preservation of Pre-Merger Legislative Exemptions and Period Calculation: Kadi Municipality v. New Chhotalal Mills Co., Ltd.

Preservation of Pre-Merger Legislative Exemptions and Period Calculation: Kadi Municipality v. New Chhotalal Mills Co., Ltd.

Date: Jul 28, 1964
Preservation of Pre-Merger Legislative Exemptions and Period Calculation Introduction The case of Kadi Municipality v. New Chhotalal Mills Co., Ltd., decided by the Gujarat High Court on July 27,...
Sanads as Binding Contracts: Limitation of Section 211 Revisional Powers – Patel Raghav Natha v. G.F. Mankodi

Sanads as Binding Contracts: Limitation of Section 211 Revisional Powers – Patel Raghav Natha v. G.F. Mankodi

Date: Jul 28, 1964
Sanads as Binding Contracts: Limitation of Section 211 Revisional Powers – Patel Raghav Natha v. G.F. Mankodi Introduction The case of Patel Raghav Natha v. G.F. Mankodi, Commissioner, Rajkot...
Defining 'Permanent Structure' under Section 13(1)(b) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act: Insights from Khureshi Ibrahim Ahmed v. Ahmed Hajl Khanmahomad

Defining 'Permanent Structure' under Section 13(1)(b) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act: Insights from Khureshi Ibrahim Ahmed v. Ahmed Hajl Khanmahomad

Date: Jun 20, 1964
Defining 'Permanent Structure' under Section 13(1)(b) of the Saurashtra Rent Control Act: Insights from Khureshi Ibrahim Ahmed v. Ahmed Hajl Khanmahomad Introduction The case of Khureshi Ibrahim...
Legal Commentary on Hiralal Vallabhram v. Sheth Kasturbhai Lalbhai And Ors.: Non-Retrospective Application of Section 14 and Protection of Sub-Tenants Under the Rent Act

Legal Commentary on Hiralal Vallabhram v. Sheth Kasturbhai Lalbhai And Ors.: Non-Retrospective Application of Section 14 and Protection of Sub-Tenants Under the Rent Act

Date: Jun 19, 1964
Non-Retrospective Application of Section 14 and Protection of Sub-Tenants Under the Rent Act Introduction The case of Hiralal Vallabhram v. Sheth Kasturbhai Lalbhai And Ors. adjudicated by the...
Interpretation of Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Application of the Doctrine of Indoor Management: Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. Ltd.

Interpretation of Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Application of the Doctrine of Indoor Management: Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. Ltd.

Date: Feb 19, 1964
Interpretation of Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Application of the Doctrine of Indoor Management Mohanlal Ganpatram v. Shri Sayaji Jubilee Cotton and Jute Mills Co. Ltd. Court:...
Interpretation of Section 34(1)(a) and (1A) of the Income Tax Act: Establishing the Primacy of Special Provisions in Tax Assessments

Interpretation of Section 34(1)(a) and (1A) of the Income Tax Act: Establishing the Primacy of Special Provisions in Tax Assessments

Date: Dec 20, 1963
Interpretation of Section 34(1)(a) and (1A) of the Income Tax Act: Establishing the Primacy of Special Provisions in Tax Assessments Introduction The case of Mathurdas Govinddas v. G.N Gadgil,...
Gujarat High Court Upholds Section 12A(4) of Bombay Sales Tax Act: Balancing Tax Enforcement and Fundamental Rights

Gujarat High Court Upholds Section 12A(4) of Bombay Sales Tax Act: Balancing Tax Enforcement and Fundamental Rights

Date: Dec 3, 1963
Gujarat High Court Upholds Section 12A(4) of Bombay Sales Tax Act: Balancing Tax Enforcement and Fundamental Rights Introduction The case of Kantilal Babulal And Bros. v. H.C Patel, Sales Tax...
Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Adhvaryu: Establishing Standing Orders as Statutory Obligations and Affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction

Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Adhvaryu: Establishing Standing Orders as Statutory Obligations and Affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction

Date: Nov 24, 1963
Tata Chemicals Ltd. v. Adhvaryu: Establishing Standing Orders as Statutory Obligations and Affirming Civil Court Jurisdiction Introduction The case of Tata Chemicals Ltd. And Others v. Kailash C....
Defining Business Activities for Sales Tax: Insights from Ambica Mills Ltd. v. State of Gujarat

Defining Business Activities for Sales Tax: Insights from Ambica Mills Ltd. v. State of Gujarat

Date: Nov 16, 1963
Defining Business Activities for Sales Tax: Insights from Ambica Mills Ltd. v. State of Gujarat Introduction Ambica Mills Ltd. And Others v. The State Of Gujarat And Another is a landmark judgment...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert